top
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

TOWNHALL: Speaker Nancy Pelosi Meets With Her Constituents!

by Ben Terrall & Bill Carpenter (wcarpent [at] ccsf.edu)
Persistence pays off! Four-minute QuickTime movie.63MB.
Copy the code below to embed this movie into a web page:
On Thursday, August 30, San Francisco anti-war activists held a “Peoples Town Hall Meeting” at the San Francisco Federal Building, site of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s home office.

Given the Democratic Party leadership’s tepid follow-through on opposing the Bush Administration and the Iraq War, peace activists CODEPINK have been pressuring Pelosi for months to meet publicly with her constituents about the war. Since her staffers consistently refused to cooperate, CODEPINK members camped and fasted outside Pelosi’s San Francisco home for two weeks in August. The mock town meeting was a culmination of that campaigning, and featured a San Francisco resident, coincidentally also named Nancy, wearing a cut-out of Pelosi’s face but tied to a chair to ensure that at least the Congresswoman’s stand-in had to listen to critics.

CODEPINK co-founder Medea Benjamin opened the proceedings as office workers on their way home began filing out of the building. Benjamin explained to the forty or so assembled San Franciscans that the last time Pelosi had a town hall meeting was well over a year ago, and though “this is the time of year when many Congresspeople have meetings in home districts [but] … we couldn’t get a meeting.” Benjamin said, “while Nancy Pelosi didn’t have time to meet with her constituents in August, we did our homework and found that she’s gone to seven different states going from fundraiser to fundraiser, so she had plenty of time for that.”

Antonia Juhasz, activist, policy analyst, and author of The Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time, spoke next. She described Pelosi as “the most powerful Democrat in Washington, DC,” and said, “if I had the ultimate joy and privilege of being able to talk to her in her esteemed majesty … I would tell her … that Iraq’s oil is not ours.” Juhasz noted that Pelosi has said the oil law under consideration in Iraq, which was drafted and written in English by U.S. contractor BearingPoint and reviewed by the Bush Administration and the International Monetary Fund months before Iraqi legislators saw it [http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?article_class=16&no=367478&rel_no=1], “is about revenue sharing.” But Juhasz argued, “what we want them to do is to share the 2 cents they have left after we take the $200 billion away,” since the law puts as a “benchmark” for the Iraqi government “that it must privatize its oil and turn its oil over to US oil corporations.”

As an analyst with U.S. military consultants the RAND Corporation, Daniel Ellsberg leaked documents to the New York Times in 1971 known as “the Pentagon Papers,” which contributed to mass disaffection with the Vietnam War. The veteran activist drew applause from the dissidents on August 30 by suggesting that they “recall to Nancy Pelosi and others that they were not elected for the single purpose of getting reelected.” Referring to Pelosi and other leading Democrats, Ellsberg argued, “their failure to act better than they have has amounted to complicity not only in bad policy, or policies they don’t agree with but haven’t stopped, it involves them in complicity with grave unconstitutional behavior, destruction of our constitution, grave illegality, obviously the deaths day by day and hour by hour of many, many people … ten to one non-American.” Ellsberg stated he thought it “more likely than not” that Bush would attack Iran before leaving office, and noted that “Nancy Pelosi actually withdrew … part of a bill in March of this year which did no more than say that he must come to Congress, as the constitution demands, before he attacks a new country … For Congress to say that is kind of the minimal thing that could be done, and Nancy Pelosi removed that from a vote. That was noted at the time in this country and in Iran, surely, as a total green light to the President using a free hand to do what he wants to do.” Ellsberg also stressed that Bush’s moves toward a police state “with the excuse of 9/11” encountered “no effective opposition from the Democratic Party when they were in the minority or in the majority.”

Norman Solomon, author of War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death (recently adapted into a documentary film narrated by Sean Penn), echoed Ellsberg’s critique of the Democrats: “When we look at Congress today we see the distinction between the leadership and leadership. And when we look at the Speaker of the House and her own district, we’re really seeing the refraction of several decades of the gap between the grassroots and the power elite in Washington.” Solomon encouraged opponents of the status quo to “develop challenges, including at the electoral level,” as “it’s a travesty and a tragedy for San Francisco to be represented in Congress by someone who doesn’t represent the views of the people in San Francisco.”

At the protest’s close, Dick Becker of the anti-war coalition ANSWER coalition stressed the importance of upcoming protests. On September 15, Congress will begin debating $195 billion in funding which Bush has requested for the Iraq war. Becker commented on the September 15 march on Washington, “it’s not just going to be a march but a mass act of civil disobedience. On Monday the 17th CODEPINK has called for a march inside Congress, and the Iraq Veterans Against the War have called for shutting down the recruitment stations in Washington DC.” Further demonstrations will take place throughout the U.S. on October 27. In San Francisco, Becker listed “the five Bay Area labor councils, United for Peace and Justice/Bay Area, the ANSWER coalition, the Stop Funding the War Coalition, the Episcopal Diocese” and other organizations as all focusing on that date for organizing, which meant “we have the possibility to see more people in the streets than at any time since the run up to the war.”

§Our Representative
by Ben Terrall & Bill Carpenter
070830pelosifrontispiece.jpg
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
Looking at these films and listening to these strong impassioned speeches which thoroughly describe the disconnect between the representatives and the represented-- especially between Nancy Pelosi and San Franciscans--

it dawned on me why so little has changed, and is unlikely to change unless the protesters take one bold extra step:

Norman Solomon identified that step when he encouraged opponents of the status quo to:

“develop challenges, including at the electoral level,” as “it’s a travesty and a tragedy for San Francisco to be represented in Congress by someone who doesn’t represent the views of the people in San Francisco.”

When will we progressives who are anti-war and pro-peace decide once and for all that we have wasted too much of our time throwing so much good after bad? When will we tangibly develop the challenge Solomon spoke about?

When will we recognize that Pelosi is unlikely to ever listen to us? What is she to really gain? Save to one day be able to "answer to an almighty God?" (As Robert Byrd put it describing the ultimate justice for cruel persons who pit creature against creature.)

The real challenge to Nancy Pelosi is not a nebulous one to found in an enduring struggle.

The real challenge to Pelosi is immediate and available to be supported TODAY.

We all know her name: Cindy Sheehan.

So long as Cindy's name is not pronounced... so long as she is derided as inconsequential (as she was in a posting August 11 by Kathy Pollitt at the Nation website) or damned with faint praise (as she was by the Nation's John Nichols this week http://tinyurl.com/33p285)... Nancy Pelosi will likely continue to ignore her constituents and the majority of Americans who want to bring the troops home now. Impeachment will stay "off the table." "Troop redeployment" will be just another euphemism for expanding U.S. aggression.

This morning after listening to Norman Solomon and Danny Schechter, the "news dissector", on KALW Your Call Radio, I was struck by how neither Nancy Pelosi's continuing intransigence nor the name of Cindy Sheehan ever came up in the hour devoted largely to promoting books, films and KALW. And we wonder why the mainstream media ignores our pleas?

While we know (as Schechter mentioned on the program) that there is a Washington Consensus that operates as a gatekeeper to what news is allowed to pass to the American people... isn't it high time to ask if we aren't ourselves gatekeepers by censoring ourselves from voicing the obvious?

If the antiwar and peace movement really wants to put its "money where its mouth is" and put real pressure on the War Machine then we have to break this curious taboo which makes-believe that Cindy Sheehan does not exist-- or cannot win an election against Pelosi.

Further, we should support Sheehan for all the reasons that we cannot support Pelosi.

Otherwise all this activism (useful only at showing us all what type of creature Pelosi is) is henceforth only so much smoke.

Let's leave 456 Golden Gate, and Camp Pelosi behind-- we might as well be sermonizing to cows in a pasture.

(Cindy was smart enough to know that there is a limit to what can be achieved by that sort of activism.)

If we are serious about change, then we need to be working for Sheehan in her quest to represent California's District 8 in the U.S. House of Representatives.

We should be working for her each and every day until we have a Representative who will listen.
by Robert B. Livingston (gruaudemais [at] yahoo.com)
When will we recognize that Pelosi is unlikely to ever listen to us? What is she to really gain?

What reason can we have to expect Pelosi to do what is right--

except to hope that she will realize that she will have to "answer to an almighty God?" (As Robert Byrd put it describing the ultimate justice for cruel persons who pit creature against creature.)
by Robert B. Livingston (gruaudemais [at] yahoo.com)
TOWNHALL: Speaker Nancy Pelosi Meets With Her Constituents! Pt. 6: Renée Saucedo
by Bill Carpenter
On Thursday, August 30, San Francisco anti-war activists held a “Peoples Town Hall Meeting” at the San Francisco Federal Building, site of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s home office.



Link to film:
by Pamela Bennett (octohorse [at] comcast.net)
It's really fun to see what we all would like to say to Nancy. Poor San Francisco. It is unbelievable
to me that Nancy Pelosi got in by touting herself as anti-war and this is what we get. Shameful.
I can't believe all the luminaries that attended this town-hall meeting. Normon Solomon, Medea
Benjamin, and Antonia Juhasz. Wow!. You should launch these on YouTube.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$425.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network