From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Court of Appeals panel Overturns Nazi Salute Ban Ruling--City Council May Face Trial Again
An panel of 10+ judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a 2-1 decision. The new decision requires a new 3-judge panel to rehear the mock-Nazi salute case at City Council, for which I was falsely arrested in March 2002. The case has never gone to trial--being stymied repeatedly by Judge Robert Whyte in San Jose, who gave summary dismissal both times to the the defendant City of Santa Cruz, Councilmembers, and arresting police officers. A new panel may now rule that the trial go forward, holding the guilty politicians and police accountable for their false arrest and repressive behavior.
The panel will rule on Judge Whyte's second summary dismissal motion of my lawsuit against the City. Facing possible financial penalties are Mayors Tim Fitzmaurice & Chris Krohn as well as all other members of the City Council who sat by in March 2002 and let me be arrested (Sugar, Primack, Reilly, Porter, and Kennedy) as well as arresting officer SCPD Sgt. Loran "Butchie" Baker.
If the new 3-judge panel overturns Judge Whyte's refusal to let the case go to trial (as they are now likely to do), these politicians will have to appear before the Court to defend themselves.
REPRESSSIVE CITY COUNCIL BEHAVIOR TOWARDS THE PUBLIC
City Council has been passing increasingly repressive rules as well as shortening public comment time, holding fewer and fewer evening sessions, and creating a closed process in which staff recommendations are pretty much assured of being rubberstamped.
The City has spent over $100,000 on this case, rather than change its rules of "decorum" and apologize for the false arrest.
I am a advocate seeking to restore basic civil liberties for homeless people and much of City Council's repressive behavior was part of its policy of keeping issues like the homeless Sleeping Ban, police abuse against the poor, and misappropriation of funds out of the public eye.
PAST MUZZLING MOVES BY MAYORS ROTKIN AND COONERTY
To cut back any discussion of these issues, the Council, Vice-Mayor Coonerty and Mayor Rotkin have successfully lobbyed for new rules. In 2005, Rotkin's new rules essentially eliminated all public comment on Consent and Administrative Agenda items that went past addressing two or three of the items (when the Brown Act provides that citizens should be able to speak on every item) ("Rotkin's Council To Cut Back Public Comment" at http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17159/index.php ). In 2007, Coonerty cut public comment time back further on the majority of agenda items in a procedure more resrictive than that of virtually any other city council in California ( "Coonerty Uses New Consent Agenda Gag Rule" at http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03)/26/18488814.php ).
Attempts to get these Mayors and subsequent Mayors to correct these abuses through Brown Act complaints have failed:
("Brown Act Correction Letter" at http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/26/18488814.php?show_comments=1#18488816
A more general article on the Rotkin abusive rules and other City Council devices to silence speakers:
"Having Your Say At City Council Meetings Is a Right, Not A Privilege" at http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/18359/index.php
PREVIOUS STORIES
Previous indymedia stories on the mock-Nazi salute case can be found at
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/11/21/18629792.php ("Mock-Nazi Salute Case Appeal")
For details on the history of this case and earlier City Council repression go to
Assaulted and Arrested at City Council Tuesday Afternoon for Trying to Make a Two Minute Pro-Union Speech
http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17930/index.php
Having Your Say At City Council Meetings Is a Right, Not A Privilege
http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/18359/index.php
More on the "Fascist Salute at City Council" Case
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/04/12/18396906.php
Santa Cruz City Council Will Face Trial in mock-Nazi salute case
http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/13163/index.php
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Some critical analyses of the decision just overturned can be found at:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20070427_brownstein.html ("Disorder in the Council Room: Does It Violate the First Amendment to Remove a Citizen from a City Council Meeting for Making a Nazi Salute Gesture?
http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/amar/20091120.html ("The Ninth Circuit Errs in Santa Cruz City Council Protester Case")
VIDEO
A partial video of the event can be found at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOssHWB6WBI (courtesy of homeless advocate and journalist Becky Johnson)
COMMENTARY
My commentary in the Santa Cruz Sentinel is at:
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_13844857?IADID=Search-www.santacruzsentinel.com-www.santacruzsentinel.com
("Robert Norse: City Council silencing dissenting voices")
If the new 3-judge panel overturns Judge Whyte's refusal to let the case go to trial (as they are now likely to do), these politicians will have to appear before the Court to defend themselves.
REPRESSSIVE CITY COUNCIL BEHAVIOR TOWARDS THE PUBLIC
City Council has been passing increasingly repressive rules as well as shortening public comment time, holding fewer and fewer evening sessions, and creating a closed process in which staff recommendations are pretty much assured of being rubberstamped.
The City has spent over $100,000 on this case, rather than change its rules of "decorum" and apologize for the false arrest.
I am a advocate seeking to restore basic civil liberties for homeless people and much of City Council's repressive behavior was part of its policy of keeping issues like the homeless Sleeping Ban, police abuse against the poor, and misappropriation of funds out of the public eye.
PAST MUZZLING MOVES BY MAYORS ROTKIN AND COONERTY
To cut back any discussion of these issues, the Council, Vice-Mayor Coonerty and Mayor Rotkin have successfully lobbyed for new rules. In 2005, Rotkin's new rules essentially eliminated all public comment on Consent and Administrative Agenda items that went past addressing two or three of the items (when the Brown Act provides that citizens should be able to speak on every item) ("Rotkin's Council To Cut Back Public Comment" at http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17159/index.php ). In 2007, Coonerty cut public comment time back further on the majority of agenda items in a procedure more resrictive than that of virtually any other city council in California ( "Coonerty Uses New Consent Agenda Gag Rule" at http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03)/26/18488814.php ).
Attempts to get these Mayors and subsequent Mayors to correct these abuses through Brown Act complaints have failed:
("Brown Act Correction Letter" at http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/26/18488814.php?show_comments=1#18488816
A more general article on the Rotkin abusive rules and other City Council devices to silence speakers:
"Having Your Say At City Council Meetings Is a Right, Not A Privilege" at http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/18359/index.php
PREVIOUS STORIES
Previous indymedia stories on the mock-Nazi salute case can be found at
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/11/21/18629792.php ("Mock-Nazi Salute Case Appeal")
For details on the history of this case and earlier City Council repression go to
Assaulted and Arrested at City Council Tuesday Afternoon for Trying to Make a Two Minute Pro-Union Speech
http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/17930/index.php
Having Your Say At City Council Meetings Is a Right, Not A Privilege
http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/18359/index.php
More on the "Fascist Salute at City Council" Case
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/04/12/18396906.php
Santa Cruz City Council Will Face Trial in mock-Nazi salute case
http://santacruz.indymedia.org/newswire/display/13163/index.php
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Some critical analyses of the decision just overturned can be found at:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20070427_brownstein.html ("Disorder in the Council Room: Does It Violate the First Amendment to Remove a Citizen from a City Council Meeting for Making a Nazi Salute Gesture?
http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/amar/20091120.html ("The Ninth Circuit Errs in Santa Cruz City Council Protester Case")
VIDEO
A partial video of the event can be found at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOssHWB6WBI (courtesy of homeless advocate and journalist Becky Johnson)
COMMENTARY
My commentary in the Santa Cruz Sentinel is at:
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_13844857?IADID=Search-www.santacruzsentinel.com-www.santacruzsentinel.com
("Robert Norse: City Council silencing dissenting voices")
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
I think you mean Ronald Whyte
Sat, Mar 27, 2010 6:44PM
You're both playing into his game
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 8:04PM
RE:Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmmmm...
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 2:17PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmmmm...
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 10:53AM
Re: Re: Re: Hmmmmm...
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 9:33AM
Re: Re: Hmmmmm...
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 7:58AM
Re: Hmmmmm...
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 9:31PM
Hmmmmmmm
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 5:48PM
Re: the attorneys may be paid if they win
Mon, Mar 15, 2010 3:41PM
Some Corrections and Clarifications from a Legal Worker
Sun, Mar 14, 2010 1:21PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network