Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Summer Heat Against The Sleeping Ban--Protest at Bunny's Shoes
Import event into your personal calendar
Date:
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Time:
12:00 PM
-
3:00 PM
Event Type:
Protest
Organizer/Author:
Robert Norse
Email:
rnorse3@hotmail. com
Phone:
831-423-4833
Address:
309 Cedar PMB #14B
Location Details:
On the sidewalk near Bunny's Shoes in downtown Santa Cruz at 1350 Pacific Ave.and its sister store across the street
PROTEST RESUMES
Back to the blacktop in front of Bunny's Shoes to urge stores
to post and support the Pledge for Human Rights and Harmony. THIS PROTEST IS SCHEDULED REGULARLY EVERY SATURDAY.
The pledge reads: "This business does not discriminate. We support Human Rights for the homeless community. In particular, the right to sleep at night--not anywhere and everywhere--but somewhere." [See http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/12/18601539.php ]
HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) and HRO (Human Rights Organization) in concert with independent activists continue our picketing and protest, which we began a month ago.
POLICE CRACKDOWN INTENSIFIES
The police crackdown against the poor was stepped up last week. Two musicians reported a violent incident by Officer Winston in front of Union Grove Music on Wednesday night.
The new out-of-town Proxy-Police Ambassadors group replaces the Downtown Hosts on July 1st. [See http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_12669248?IADID=Search-www.santacruzsentinel.com-www.santacruzsentinel.com]
More benches are disappearing from downtown and Parks and Recreation boss Dannettee Shoemaker stonewalls Public Records Act requests to specify why benches are being removed and under pressure from whom.
STORES THAT STAND UP FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Some of the stores that have posted the Pledge, which we urge the community to spend at:
Tacqueria Vallarta 1101A Pacific
Streetlight Records 939 Pacific
Santa Cruz City Soccer 717 Pacific
Starbucks 1335 Pacific
The Perfumer's Apprentice 1319A-B Pacific
SLEEPING BAN HARASSMENT ONGOING
Police continue to harass sleepers outside without shelter under the City's medieval MC 6.36.010a (the homeless Sleeping Ban) even though there is no legal shelter for them.
Please report such incidents to 423-4833; ask the officer who demands you move if he has a legal place for you to go specifically then and there.
WHY BUNNY'S?
Bunny's Shoes, Property managers at Borders and the Palomar, and Manthri Srinath, owner of Lulu Carpenters) all contributed to a discriminatory court Injunction, granted last month by Judge Paul Burdick against two homeless musicians, Anna Richardson and Miguel deLeon
This injunction bans Richardson and deLeon from sleeping anywhere in a park or on the sidewalk in the downtown area on pain of jail. City law additionally bans them from sleeping anywhere on public property in Santa Cruz after 11 PM.
It has nothing to do with any kind of real criminal conduct or nuisance behavior like littering, trespassing, disturbing the peace, urinating, defecating, etc. Simply sleeping outside downtown has become an immediate jailing offense for these two. So far police have not arrested them.
The impact of the decision expands far beyond these two performers, since there are 1500-2000 homeless in Santa Cruz of whom less than 10% have shelter throughout the summer.
Homeless people face $97 citations, police harassment, theft and destruction of their property, and discrimination.
It is piling absurdity upon cruelty to ban sleeping downtown on pain of jail, yet allow no legal place for homeless people to sleep. MC 6.36.010 makes all nighttime sleeping illegal outside on public property already; the Injunction adds a jail penalty to the downtown area for this homeless couple.
Activists will continue presenting their Pledge on Human Rights and Harmony for merchants to display in their windows or in their stores in soldarity if they choose. So far about about 1/2 of the businesses downtown have been approached.
Mediators have approached Bunny's asking them to post the Pledge and support a policy of non-discrimination. Bunny's is one of four stores signing Declarations used by the City Attorney to secure the Injunction against Richardson and deLeon.
While we respect the right of Bunny's to manage its own property, when it supports police action on public property against those that have no choice, it needs to hear from the community--as does every business that supports this kind of "get-out-of-town" bigotry.
SUPPORT HUMAN RIGHTS LOCALLY WITH YOUR DOLLARS
In essence we ask downtown businesses to advise the community and their customers that they no longer favor--whatever position they may have taken in the past--turning homeless people into criminals for sleeping--something over which they have no control.
Businesses that have the clarity and courage to do this should be rewarded and those that don't should be questioned.
FLYERS
Flyers are downloadable at:
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/12/18601539.php
More info on this situation at
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/15/18601786.php
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/09/18601111.php
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/02/18599901.php
and
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/05/28/18598906.php
Back to the blacktop in front of Bunny's Shoes to urge stores
to post and support the Pledge for Human Rights and Harmony. THIS PROTEST IS SCHEDULED REGULARLY EVERY SATURDAY.
The pledge reads: "This business does not discriminate. We support Human Rights for the homeless community. In particular, the right to sleep at night--not anywhere and everywhere--but somewhere." [See http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/12/18601539.php ]
HUFF (Homeless United for Friendship & Freedom) and HRO (Human Rights Organization) in concert with independent activists continue our picketing and protest, which we began a month ago.
POLICE CRACKDOWN INTENSIFIES
The police crackdown against the poor was stepped up last week. Two musicians reported a violent incident by Officer Winston in front of Union Grove Music on Wednesday night.
The new out-of-town Proxy-Police Ambassadors group replaces the Downtown Hosts on July 1st. [See http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ci_12669248?IADID=Search-www.santacruzsentinel.com-www.santacruzsentinel.com]
More benches are disappearing from downtown and Parks and Recreation boss Dannettee Shoemaker stonewalls Public Records Act requests to specify why benches are being removed and under pressure from whom.
STORES THAT STAND UP FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Some of the stores that have posted the Pledge, which we urge the community to spend at:
Tacqueria Vallarta 1101A Pacific
Streetlight Records 939 Pacific
Santa Cruz City Soccer 717 Pacific
Starbucks 1335 Pacific
The Perfumer's Apprentice 1319A-B Pacific
SLEEPING BAN HARASSMENT ONGOING
Police continue to harass sleepers outside without shelter under the City's medieval MC 6.36.010a (the homeless Sleeping Ban) even though there is no legal shelter for them.
Please report such incidents to 423-4833; ask the officer who demands you move if he has a legal place for you to go specifically then and there.
WHY BUNNY'S?
Bunny's Shoes, Property managers at Borders and the Palomar, and Manthri Srinath, owner of Lulu Carpenters) all contributed to a discriminatory court Injunction, granted last month by Judge Paul Burdick against two homeless musicians, Anna Richardson and Miguel deLeon
This injunction bans Richardson and deLeon from sleeping anywhere in a park or on the sidewalk in the downtown area on pain of jail. City law additionally bans them from sleeping anywhere on public property in Santa Cruz after 11 PM.
It has nothing to do with any kind of real criminal conduct or nuisance behavior like littering, trespassing, disturbing the peace, urinating, defecating, etc. Simply sleeping outside downtown has become an immediate jailing offense for these two. So far police have not arrested them.
The impact of the decision expands far beyond these two performers, since there are 1500-2000 homeless in Santa Cruz of whom less than 10% have shelter throughout the summer.
Homeless people face $97 citations, police harassment, theft and destruction of their property, and discrimination.
It is piling absurdity upon cruelty to ban sleeping downtown on pain of jail, yet allow no legal place for homeless people to sleep. MC 6.36.010 makes all nighttime sleeping illegal outside on public property already; the Injunction adds a jail penalty to the downtown area for this homeless couple.
Activists will continue presenting their Pledge on Human Rights and Harmony for merchants to display in their windows or in their stores in soldarity if they choose. So far about about 1/2 of the businesses downtown have been approached.
Mediators have approached Bunny's asking them to post the Pledge and support a policy of non-discrimination. Bunny's is one of four stores signing Declarations used by the City Attorney to secure the Injunction against Richardson and deLeon.
While we respect the right of Bunny's to manage its own property, when it supports police action on public property against those that have no choice, it needs to hear from the community--as does every business that supports this kind of "get-out-of-town" bigotry.
SUPPORT HUMAN RIGHTS LOCALLY WITH YOUR DOLLARS
In essence we ask downtown businesses to advise the community and their customers that they no longer favor--whatever position they may have taken in the past--turning homeless people into criminals for sleeping--something over which they have no control.
Businesses that have the clarity and courage to do this should be rewarded and those that don't should be questioned.
FLYERS
Flyers are downloadable at:
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/12/18601539.php
More info on this situation at
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/15/18601786.php
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/09/18601111.php
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/06/02/18599901.php
and
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/05/28/18598906.php
For more information:
http://www.huffsantacruz.org
Added to the calendar on Sat, Jun 27, 2009 11:07AM
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
I was gonna boycott them if it were there, but it wasn't so I had 2 tacos.
That's sort of the deal, right? We draw up sides, support those who agree with us and boycott those who don't. So I'll keep shopping there until I see your poster go up, then I'll stop going and tell them why I'm boycotting them.
That's sort of the deal, right? We draw up sides, support those who agree with us and boycott those who don't. So I'll keep shopping there until I see your poster go up, then I'll stop going and tell them why I'm boycotting them.
I didn't see one this morning at Starbucks either. I made a point of looking for it.
I was just over at Starbucks and I looked all over for the sign. Didn't see anything. And I looked everywhere.
So I asked the girl behind the counter about it when I got my coffee and she just laughed. Didn't answer the question, just laughed.
So I asked the girl behind the counter about it when I got my coffee and she just laughed. Didn't answer the question, just laughed.
Robert says "While we respect the right of Bunny's to manage its own property, when it supports police action on public property against those that have no choice, it needs to hear from the community".
Could Robert please clarify if Bunny's contacted police about activity that was happening on public or private property. And since he is targeting Bunny's could he please enlighten everyone where exactly these incidents took place?
Could Robert please clarify if Bunny's contacted police about activity that was happening on public or private property. And since he is targeting Bunny's could he please enlighten everyone where exactly these incidents took place?
Yeah, I couldn't find them at Streetlight or the Perfumed place either? Robert, are you sure these groups were sincere? They may have just said "yes" and tossed them in the recycling.
Believe me, business owners downtown see this for what it is. This "pledge" is nothing more then extortion and a bullying tactic. Norse can't find any headway with the city so he has decided to go after the business owners and hit their revenue. The only thing is it's not working. No one is going to give in to these practices of fear and intimidation.
What is truly amazing is that there is a lot more back story in the details of the incident that sparked this protest. Norse and his friends at the HRO have not been entirely forthcoming when telling the complete story about Anna and Miguel. While the couple was cited for sleeping infractions, there were surrounding incidents of vandalism, breaking and entry, urination, defecation, trespassing, and refusal to leave private property. Norse, Johnson, et al have only told one side of this story. The other side of the story is well documented and could be enlightening if only they would ask.
What is truly amazing is that there is a lot more back story in the details of the incident that sparked this protest. Norse and his friends at the HRO have not been entirely forthcoming when telling the complete story about Anna and Miguel. While the couple was cited for sleeping infractions, there were surrounding incidents of vandalism, breaking and entry, urination, defecation, trespassing, and refusal to leave private property. Norse, Johnson, et al have only told one side of this story. The other side of the story is well documented and could be enlightening if only they would ask.
The issue is the downtown businesses' move to intensify criminalization of homelessness downtown under the cover of dealing with "bad behavior."
In January merchants showed up en masse to support making three "unattended" Sleeping Ban infractions a criminal misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and $1000 fine. (Actually any three infractions--even if only one or two of them involve Sleeping).
Merchants and the Coonerty-Robinson-Mathews coalition at City Council, are all too willing to blame the depression on the presence of poor people hanging out downtown (having been driven out of the parks, off the beaches, and out of the Pogonip).
The "forbidden zones" for innocent behavior such as sitting, sparechanging, political tabling, and street performing now cover more than 90% of the Pacific Ave. sidewalks and 100% of sidewalks where there are businesses within 14' everywhere else in town.
It's illegal to sit down next to a closed or vacant storefront any time of the day or night. Do it three times, ignore the absurd tickets, and you get a jail sentence? I think tourists should be advised that this is the kind of crap merchants are letting their Downtown Association push through City Council.
The May Injunction against Anna Richardson and Miguel de Leon only covers sleeping and has nothing to do with "bad behavior." Lulu Carpenter's, Bunny's, the Palomar, and Borders--who all contributed declarations to support it--should repudiate it.
A new more militant set of Hosts (the "Ambassadors") appeared on the streets yesterday. We have yet to see how abusive they are, but folks should report what they see at 423-4833.
Portland, OR courts recently threw out a much more limited Sitting Ban (see http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2009/06/392371.shtml ). Instead of piling on more repressive laws and wannabe cops, local merchants need to turn to better solutions like those proposed by the reconstituted Street Performers Guild.
The Sleeping Ban went down in L.A., San Diego, Fresno, Richmond, and Laguna Beach. It's only a matter of time (and money) before it happens here.
As mentioned above, if it's behavior on private property that worries businesses (a legitimate concern), then let them clearly state they support non-discrimination and an end to the Sleeping Ban, somewhere, not everywhere, in Santa Cruz. If not, then potential customers should know where their dollars are going.
Buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks. Their pledge is clearly visible.
In January merchants showed up en masse to support making three "unattended" Sleeping Ban infractions a criminal misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and $1000 fine. (Actually any three infractions--even if only one or two of them involve Sleeping).
Merchants and the Coonerty-Robinson-Mathews coalition at City Council, are all too willing to blame the depression on the presence of poor people hanging out downtown (having been driven out of the parks, off the beaches, and out of the Pogonip).
The "forbidden zones" for innocent behavior such as sitting, sparechanging, political tabling, and street performing now cover more than 90% of the Pacific Ave. sidewalks and 100% of sidewalks where there are businesses within 14' everywhere else in town.
It's illegal to sit down next to a closed or vacant storefront any time of the day or night. Do it three times, ignore the absurd tickets, and you get a jail sentence? I think tourists should be advised that this is the kind of crap merchants are letting their Downtown Association push through City Council.
The May Injunction against Anna Richardson and Miguel de Leon only covers sleeping and has nothing to do with "bad behavior." Lulu Carpenter's, Bunny's, the Palomar, and Borders--who all contributed declarations to support it--should repudiate it.
A new more militant set of Hosts (the "Ambassadors") appeared on the streets yesterday. We have yet to see how abusive they are, but folks should report what they see at 423-4833.
Portland, OR courts recently threw out a much more limited Sitting Ban (see http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2009/06/392371.shtml ). Instead of piling on more repressive laws and wannabe cops, local merchants need to turn to better solutions like those proposed by the reconstituted Street Performers Guild.
The Sleeping Ban went down in L.A., San Diego, Fresno, Richmond, and Laguna Beach. It's only a matter of time (and money) before it happens here.
As mentioned above, if it's behavior on private property that worries businesses (a legitimate concern), then let them clearly state they support non-discrimination and an end to the Sleeping Ban, somewhere, not everywhere, in Santa Cruz. If not, then potential customers should know where their dollars are going.
Buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks. Their pledge is clearly visible.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$75.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network