top
Environment
Environment
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Radioactive Waste: The San Onofre File

by Michael Steinberg
A report on the routine radioactive releases from the San Onofre nukes into the environment, as well as their transportation to sites far away.
Though a meltdown at a nuclear plant may be its worst case scenario, the dangers and risks by no means end there. In fact they go on every day.


Radioactive releases into the air and water are routine at nukes. As is the transportation of radioactive wastes offsite by road, rail and water. These activities are the seldom discussed everyday threats to people, other living beings, and the environment as a whole.


This report delves into what goes on at the San Onofre Generating Station in these respects.


San Onofre’s liquid radwastes flow out of the plants through “outflows” pipes and empty into the Pacific. They are highly diluted but nevertheless still there.

According to the plant’s 2007 Radioactive Effluent Release Report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, there were 202 liquid effluent “batch” releases that year.

These releases lasted a total of 489 hours, or over 20 days. The longest was 7.6 hours in duration. The releases averaged 2.4 hours.

The releases contained many dangerous radioactive chemicals, including cesium 137, cobalt 60, iodine 131 and strontium 90.

Cesium 137 has a radioactive life of over 300 years, cobalt 60’s over 50 years, and strontium 90’s almost 300.

Iodine 131’s radioactive life is only a few months, but during that time it is intensely radioactive. I-131 mimics regular iodine, and concentrates in the thyroid gland if it enters our bodies.

I-131 caused high rates of thyroid cancer after Chernobyl exploded and burned its nuclear core, releasing virtually all its radioactivity.

San Onofre’s airborne radioactive releases included all of the radioactive chemicals cited above.

The 2007 report informs us “waste gas decay tank releases are considered to be ‘batch’ releases. Containment purges and plant stack releases are considered to be ‘continuous’ releases.”

Though San Onofre Unit 1 permanently shut down in 1992, the 2007 report states that its liquid and gaseous radioactive releases did not cease until 2006.

And in 2007, though Unit 1 had been shut down for nearly 15 years, a radioactive accident happened in April, the report states.

During the transfer of the contents of a large liquid container there, “a worker noticed a steady flow of water exiting a pipe onto the sand in an area that had been recently excavated.”

Turns out that a pipe had been “inadvertently severed…As a result, nearly all of the contents…about 2000 gallons, spilled through the severed pipe onto the sand.”

The spill contained “trace amounts” of cesium 137, according to the report.

Out of Sight, Out of Their Minds

Also in 2007, the report states, “solid [radioactive] waste” from all three units was “shipped offside for burial or disposal.”

In fact, the report states, there were 599 such shipments.

This waste contained, among other radioactive chemicals, plutoniums 238, 239, 240, 241 and 242. Plutoniums 239 and 242 have radioactive lives in the millions of years.

San Onofre’s shipped-out radwastes end up in Utah, Tennessee and South Carolina. The public is not notified of these shipments. If it were, it would have to hear of them just about every day.

Playing a prominent role in spiriting San Onofre’s radwastes away is EnergySolutions, headquartered in Salt Lake City. The company’s motto is “Energy Solutions, we’re part of the solution.” Among its operations is operating privatized radioactive waste dumps.

If you’re a basketball fan, you may recognize the company’s name. It adorns the home court of the Utah Jazz.

EnergySolutions operates a low level radwaste dump in Clive, Utah, about 75 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, near the Nevada Test Site. The latter site is where the US blew up atomic bombs above and below ground.

The company also operates a high level radwaste site at the defunct Big Rock nuke plant in Michigan. High level radioactive waste includes spent fuel, nuclear fuel that has outlasted its commercial life but remains lethally dangerous thousands of years after it is removed from nuclear reactors.

According to the 2007 report, in 2004 all of Unit 1’s spent fuel was transferred to this site, dubbed the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.

The federal government’s plan to transport all the spent fuel from commercial US nuke plants to Yucca Mountain, a sacred site on the land of the Western Shoshone tribe, is, like most of this radwaste, going nowhere. This site is also near the Nevada Test Site.

Lacking any real solution to the spent fuel problem, enter EnterySolutions, part of the problem. Because most nuclear safety advocates believe that until a real solution to this problem is created, the waste should stay on the sites of the nuke plants.

Nuclear authorities tell us that all of the above activities are perfectly safe, and that there is no threat to the public. That all the releases are below acceptable levels, and all the buried and “disposed” waste will never escape into the environment to harm us or succeeding generations.

However, numerous studies have found higher rates of cancers around nuclear power plants, such as the one reported recently in the OB Rag that found high mortality rates for childhood leukemia in counties adjacent to San Onofre. And virtually all nuke dumps, such as the massive one in Barnwell, South Carolina, have already leaked.

In addition, in 2005 the National Academy of Sciences committee to study the effects of radiation on our health concluded that there is no exposure to radiation without risk.

The committee’s chairman, Richard Monson of the Harvard School of Public Health, stated “The health risks—particularly the development of solid cancers in organs—rises proportionally with exposure. At low doses of radiation, the risk of inducing solid cancers is very small. As the overall lifetime exposure increases, so does the risk.”

And since San Onofre has been operating since 1970, there are all too many lifetime exposures already.

And you will note that EnergySolutions low level waste dump isn’t anywhere near its HQ of Salt Lake City, but instead embedded in a restricted and defiled region riddled with the remains of atomic explosions, whose memory will forever shame mankind.

San Onofre’s owners would like to operate their two remaining active reactors for an extra 20 years, until 2042, to continue their legacy of contamination for an extra generation, and its consequences for many more generations.

With true green energy looming on the horizon as real energy solutions for our future, why let the insanity that is San Onofre waste it?

by Rinky
...
Since then, he has obtained wood-ash radioactivity assays from 16 other scientists across the nation. These 47 data sets, representing trees in 14 states, suggest that fallout in wood ash "is a major source of radioactivity released into the environment," Farber says. With the exception of some very low California readings, all measurements of ash with fallout-cesium exceeded - some by 100 times or more - the levels of radioactive cesium that may be released from nuclear plants (about 100 picocuries per kilogram of sludge). Ash-cesium levels were especially high in the Northeast - probably because naturally high levels of nonradioactive cesium in the soil discourage trees from releasing fallout-derived cesium through their roots, he says.
...
by Dan (daniel.p.madson [at] gmail.com)
You make a lot of claims. How about putting the title/link to these studies so that they can be evaluated. Any yahoo can publish anything but unless it has been peer-reviewed it should be viewed as untested.
by Bjorn Cedervall, Stockholm (bjorn_cedervall [at] yahoo.com)
The article contains no information about the released amounts of radioactivity and more important, realistic dose calculations to those most exposed. Without such information the text cannot be understood as no one then can put the risks (insignificant-small-large?) into a reasonable perspective. The global average annual effective dose to humans from natural sources is in the order of 2.4 millisievert (mSv) which may serve as a reference - see http://www.unscear.org for further information.
Rad supplement is GOOD!
Extra four rad, (0.4Sv),10x usual background radiation,
100x possible exposure from above SO discharges, iis associated with much LESS cancer, deformity and death. See http://www.aapsonline.org , then Departments, Journal APS, V9 #1 p6-10, Spring 2004, Chen, Luan et al, Is Chronic Radiation an Effective Prophylaxis Against Cancer?.

My rad meter 100' from the Palo Verdes AZ reactor waste read 16mR/hr, vs 24 mR/hr in Phoenix hotel (granite sink).

So I sit on thoriated welding rods to bring my SF area rads (0.015 mR/h) up to the healthier Denver level (0.045 mR/h)
by Dan
You state "EnergySolutions operates a low level radwaste dump in Clive, Utah, about 75 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, near the Nevada Test Site." My map shows that the Nevada Test Site is in, of all places, Nevada. Clive, Utah, is nowhere near NTS. Again, attention to detail.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$75.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network