top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Google Hands 12 Terabytes of Data to Viacom; How Much is About You?

by bright strangely
Earlier this month Viacom demanded that Google hand over identifying information on Youtube users.
Why? Because 4.1 billion videos are there, about 38% of all videos online.
And some of them, are copyrighted. That means there is money to be made. Lots of it.
As, Mark Getty, founder of Getty Images, once said, "Intellectual Property is the oil of the 21st century."

PHOTO: Members of the Raging Grannies and Veterans for Peace campaign for Internet Freedom
640_fcc2_statuevfp.jpg
*The Right to Anonymity*

Think for a moment, about how speech works in public. If you hear someone in a restaurant sing part of a commercial jingle, you might recognize the content. But would you recognize the person?

It's an interesting thing to think about online. Because suddenly, that's exactly what a few people can do online. On July 1st, Viacom demanded that Google hand over identifying information on Youtube users. Why? Because 4.1 billion videos are there, about 38% of all videos online.

And some of them, are copyrighted.

I'll leave you a moment to gasp in horror.

Then I'll ask you if that should matter. And why should it matter? After all, I see hundreds of thousands of images and words each day. Most of them are probably copyrighted. It would be almost impossible for any stranger to guess what I looked at on any given day. And then came the internet. And now it's possible for any number of companies to track my viewing habits, without my permission or knowledge.

The closest analogy I can think of, is if the Nielsens were entitled to peer into my windows, to see what I was watching and when I changed the channel on my TV. And that creeps me out. I do not belong to the market. If Viacom wants to know what I like watching, they can ask the Nielsen people, because that's what they're there for. I do not need the internet to become a window into my home and my habits retroactively.

There are many companies that would leap at the chance to know all our political ideas. Or how many socks I purchase a year. The fact is, I simply don't want to be followed like this. The expectation of privacy and anonymity in our day to day affairs is not something we should sacrifice without due consideration.

But its becoming resoundingly clear that it is not my choice to make. For an excellent examination of the legal details and implications of this decision, please see this article from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/07/court-ruling-will-expose-viewing-habits-youtube-us

And then consider joining the Youtube Revolution. At least if we name every video "Viacom Sucks" or "Colbert Report", they will have a harder time finding their own material.
http://www.media-alliance.org/article.php?story=20080708174812680




Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
indybay ed
Wed, Jul 16, 2008 1:16AM
bright strangely
Tue, Jul 15, 2008 4:25PM
Raging Grannies
Tue, Jul 15, 2008 12:11PM
more
Tue, Jul 15, 2008 7:57AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network