From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
If Daly Doesn’t File Today, Convention Paved Way for Gonzalez
The Progressive Convention on June 2nd ended with no serious candidate declaring that they will run against Gavin Newsom. Much to the chagrin of many attendees, Ross Mirkarimi adamantly stated that this year is “not my time,” and he will focus on the Board of Supervisors. But Chris Daly never said that he was not running, as he told me right after his speech: “I promised a candidate from this Convention.” Daly added that he can't take out papers until 9:00 a.m. today, and that he will discuss it with his family over the weekend. But with his wife expecting a baby one week before the Election, is it likely to happen?
If Daly doesn’t file today, the Convention paved the way for Matt Gonzalez to run. “My whole idea of emerging as a candidate,” said Gonzalez, “was if no candidate emerged from the Convention.” Gonzalez did not attend Saturday’s Convention and had said that he did not want to be considered at the time. Many activists are upset with Gonzalez for not showing up, but practically everyone I talked to said they would support him anyway. Gonzalez is still non-committal about running, but if he runs it will be a serious effort to win. And a winning campaign, said Gonzalez, requires a much bigger tent than the 300-odd people who showed up at the Convention.
“I’m not impressed with the Mayor,” said Gonzalez in a phone interview yesterday, “and I feel that he should be beat. But it takes a lot of work to run for Mayor. Newsom has made a lot of inroads in the progressive community, so you can’t just run a candidate and expect to get 70% of the vote in the Mission. A winning campaign would have to meet with voters on the West Side and pick up support over there.” While the Convention brought a lot of energy from activists who cut their teeth in progressive campaigns, the whole structure of it and how it was framed – “Chris Daly’s Convention” – was not a winning formula.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=4578#more
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
He wasn't able to pull it off last time and he's a much weaker candidate now than he was then (while Newsom is a much stronger candidate).
I think Gonzalez had the votes and probably won the last election. It is well known that he got more votes on election day. Newsom won by a small margin-- with absentee votes. There was much pressure on the Election Department that year because it was notorious for its foul-ups. Think it was totally cleaned up? Think again.
After the election, it was shown that city workers were canvassing for Newsom-- but as usual, the establishment media paid only a cursory attention and did not have the heart, courage, or integrity to dig deeper to see if worse corruption was involved. Vested interests-- the same interests that allowed Newsom to outspend Gonzalez ten to one-- had every interest in making believe that "the system" worked.
Newsom's popularity is also an illusion fostered by those who have a vested interest in holding on to the city's current status quo which favors the most financially well-off.
After 4 years, Newsom has shown his mettle: rather than immediately resigning as a more decent man would have, he allowed Alex Tourk to resign. In San Francisco, it is unlikely that a politician can resurrect a career by becoming "born again"-- but Newsom did the next best thing-- he checked into a sobriety program.
Despite rumblings from the vox populi that Newsom is as nasty a person among his closest aquaintances as a reasonable person could surmise from his worst public actions-- it would be wiser to assume that he is just human like all the rest of us-- no different except perhaps for all the bags of money that help prop him up.
Rather than prognosticate who should be mayor-- those who really care about Newsom, the human being and not the image, should better spend their time explaining why Gavin's own life could take a better turn if he were NOT mayor.
As for making any private or public amends by keeping his office-- forget it-- he cannot catch up to his own best public reputation on behalf of marriage-- when once he, with his private actions, attacked the sanctity of a marriage.
That is the tragic crux of why Newsom deserves a decent challenger and should lose-- saying nothing of the actual state of the city which is becoming less charming and more botoxed (betoxed?) by ever more competitive and clueless marketers and consultants with each passing day.
After the election, it was shown that city workers were canvassing for Newsom-- but as usual, the establishment media paid only a cursory attention and did not have the heart, courage, or integrity to dig deeper to see if worse corruption was involved. Vested interests-- the same interests that allowed Newsom to outspend Gonzalez ten to one-- had every interest in making believe that "the system" worked.
Newsom's popularity is also an illusion fostered by those who have a vested interest in holding on to the city's current status quo which favors the most financially well-off.
After 4 years, Newsom has shown his mettle: rather than immediately resigning as a more decent man would have, he allowed Alex Tourk to resign. In San Francisco, it is unlikely that a politician can resurrect a career by becoming "born again"-- but Newsom did the next best thing-- he checked into a sobriety program.
Despite rumblings from the vox populi that Newsom is as nasty a person among his closest aquaintances as a reasonable person could surmise from his worst public actions-- it would be wiser to assume that he is just human like all the rest of us-- no different except perhaps for all the bags of money that help prop him up.
Rather than prognosticate who should be mayor-- those who really care about Newsom, the human being and not the image, should better spend their time explaining why Gavin's own life could take a better turn if he were NOT mayor.
As for making any private or public amends by keeping his office-- forget it-- he cannot catch up to his own best public reputation on behalf of marriage-- when once he, with his private actions, attacked the sanctity of a marriage.
That is the tragic crux of why Newsom deserves a decent challenger and should lose-- saying nothing of the actual state of the city which is becoming less charming and more botoxed (betoxed?) by ever more competitive and clueless marketers and consultants with each passing day.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network