Legalizing Marijuana - A New Republican Strategy?
Legalizing Marijuana - A New Republican Strategy?
By Mike Rhodes
The attractive young woman says to me, "would you sign our petition to legalize marijuana?" I don’t have to think twice and say "sure, where do I sign?" That is when it got interesting. She says, "Do you have your ID with you?" "Well, yes I do, but what does that have to do with..." I say as she responds with "oh, we just have to verify your ID." Thinking that this has something to do with making sure they have valid names for a ballot initiative I comply.
As I’m filling out my name and address on the petition I notice that the young lady is filling out a very official looking form. Probably just the ballot initiative form, I think to myself. Then, she says "is it OK if I register you as a Republican?" "What?!?" I say "yes, I do mind! What are you doing?" She says that if I register Republican she will get an extra 10 cents. But, I complain, "I don’t want to re-register." She explains that this is just to update the records for the County Clerks office. I repeat that "I do not want or need to update my records." I am repeatedly told that it is OK and that they just want to update my voter registration records. She also tells me that she is working for the Republican party, being paid hourly, and that the ploy about the "10 cent bonus" was not accurate.
This Republican party employee goes on to tell me that she is there to attract people to the table that is set up in Fresno’s Courthouse Park, and that the legalize marijuana petition is just a prop. She confirmed that there is no ballot initiative to legalize marijuana. She said that the petition will be given to an elected official in Sacramento. I have my doubts about that.
At this point in the conversation, she called over her "boss" who was talking with someone a short distance away. I introduced myself as the editor of the Community Alliance newspaper and said I was interested in writing a story about the petition campaign and their registering people with the Republican party. I guess that wasn’t the right approach to get him to open up to me. The "boss" gave me no information. He even refused to give me a copy of the marijuana legalization petition I had just signed.
Later that day I called Victor Salazar, the Fresno County Clerk. Salazar said that the process sounded deceptive and that I might want to call the Secretary of State fraud investigation unit. I called the number for the fraud investigation unit repeatedly today. Apparently, nobody was in the office today and all I got was an answering machine. I will continue to call.
I also went back to Courthouse Park today to see the Republican Party project was again in full operation. They seemed to have different approaches to different groups. To white men that looked like they might be attorneys, they asked if they were registered to vote. When Latinos walked by they would throw out the legalize marijuana angle.
###
NOT that their decision to cease opposing mrijuanna is self serving, designed to get them more votes, etc. IF (a big if) it is true that they really are ceasing to support criminalization of marijuanna use.
Like DUH -- that's how most changes occur in society. One side or the other quits.
Those of us who oppose the Republicans (maybe we oppose the Democrats too) have no "right" that the Republicans refrain from supporting things that we want. It isn't unfair. We have a gripe if they are running a FAKE campaign but if you want to make that sort of charge you need to provide evidence. Like all of us, the people who are Republicans are getting older. Damn few left in charge who grew up before the 60's. So you can assume that MOST of the movers and shakers in the CA Republican party lit up in their day and may not consider it any big deal.
I received a call from an investigator from the Secretary of State Fraud Investigation Unit at 4 PM on Friday. He told me that it sounds like this group is in violation of an infraction of the law, related to signing people up to vote without telling them what you are doing. He said that he would get on the trail of these desperado’s first thing Monday morning.
As far as the question (see comment above) that maybe the Republican Party has “seen the light” and now supports legalizing marijuana - not a chance. The Republican Party does not support the legalization of marijuana.
I have also had several people ask me for phone numbers for the SOS Fraud Investigation Unit. If you are in Fresno, you should call Tom Quiroz at (559) 445-6884. I was also given two numbers in Sacramento. Those numbers are: (916) 657-2177, Paul Rutledge or (916) 654-1845, Mark Loren.
First off, thank you for the article. As a former Fresno State Student I have seen luring techniques by Republicans and even people who were not Republican but simply doing this as a job for the Republican Party.
Who is going to protect the voting rights of our citizens if its not the State's Attorney?
Fresno State needs to get off their butts too. They only randomly check to see if people are in accordence with the School Rules, or if someone complains. But that too would not stop these criminals from going elseware to break the law.
Winning elections for the GOP is a process of weaning the vote from people they don't want to vote, on a regular basis, day-by-day. Most people are just not motivated enough to overcome the barriers they find on the day they want to vote, and the ones that are - are usually frustrated anyway - no matter what they think.
This is how Democrats "lose". This is one of a thousand techniques the better funded GOP and it's various private entities that are "non-partisan" and well funded by corporate interests, make sure that on election day, they can explain their victory.
In 2004, in the runup to the election, all reports were that Democrats were outregistering Republicans by huge numbers, after Kerry "lost" - due to a variety of complex techniques of reducing the vote and perhaps even switching the votes (see, on exit polls - http://uscountvotes.org/ ) ( learn one of many techniqus for hacking your own vote on video - amusing http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/how-to-hack-a-diebold-vot_b_26301.html ), declaring a national security emergency during the vote count in Ohio, and also preventing bona fide recounts - Republicans and the media also began to claim the the GOP had engaged in "the most successful stealth registration campaign in history". They went on to say that "values voters" won the day, even though later, polls showed that this was just fiction. But the story about Republican stealth registration campaign helped make it pretty muddy and seemingly (though not rationally) hard to argue about the extremely improbable exit polls.
Good luck. Be persistent on the fraud investigation. That is a real story. It's very ikely nothing will effectively done unless you keep the pressure on. These things are extremely political, and Democrats are not that good on the issue either, which probably means that either they are extremely naive or possibly somewhat complicit.
Democracy is hard, and powerful interests prefer to manipulate public opinion and manipulate perceptions of what public opinion is rather than to know what it might actually be, if people knew what was actually going on in their names.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04297/400512.stm
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/102404Y.shtml
It looks like the Republicans are desperately using every trick in the book to make people register as Republicans so that their electoral ploys this November will look more plausible. I'll keep an eye for any of these fake campaigns in my neck of the woods.
At least the Republicans know how popular their drug policy is; which is to say, not at all! Both parties remain committed to the continuation of the failed War on Drugs, despite its unpopularity with voters. Gee, sounds a bit like Iraq, doesn't it?
These ideological wars aren't waged because they're popular -- though they may be at the start -- they are waged to serve as a distraction and a power amplification conduit. The distraction part is obvious, but the power conduit part is less recognized. These wars transfer massive amounts of political, financial and military power to certain people within the government; that is the point of these wars. Bush/Cheney's wartime expansion of executive power is the prototypical example for this type of power amplification, and it is repeated down the chain of command, at least where it's relevant. The Dept. of Education hasn't gained much power from the War in Iraq. But the Drug Czar, the FBI, DEA and the CIA have all benefitted hugely from the War on Drugs.
Of course, the fact that the War on Drugs and the War in Iraq don't make sense from a rational point of view also constitutes an unanncounced War on Logic. Many of the neocons' statements seem to portend an upcoming War on Reality. We can only guess at what comes after that. Perhaps a War on Everybody is in the works?
Before that war, we've got a series of additional wars that need waging. The War on Syria and the long-awaited War on Iran are coming down the pipeline shortly. What other wars will we need after that? Well, perhaps a War on Every Other Islamic Nation will be needed because I suspect they will assume they're next even if they aren't. And who can blame them? We've been invading Islamic nations for awhile now. If we go into Iran and Syria that will make 4 that we've taken out in the last half-decade.
War, war, war!! It's a dirty business, but it hasn't to be waged, doesn't it?
Well, what about the power amplification conduit I mentioned earlier? What about the incredible amount of power we've transferred to the Pentagon, the White House, NSA, CIA and all the corporations helping them wage the war? Doesn't it seem clear that they are addicted to power? They constantly need more of it. They feed, but they're still hungry. More power!
When does it end?
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. It ends with the War on Everybody.
from: http://weblog.timoregan.com/2006/08/power-wars-republicans-using-fake.html
This should be illegal!
First, there is no connection between registering people officially as republicans and the petition to legalize marijuana. Second, this is not an issue of fraud. Here's why:
At any given point there are groups that want to get an issue to the ballot, and these groups often pay signature gatherers to get the numbers they need. This is paid for by the political parties and by interest groups. Also, it's not always bad-- when I was involved I was taking signatures to protect wildlife areas in San Diego county from further development. Part of the money I was paid was collected at the local unitarian church by members of the community who did not have time to get the signatures themselves.
While I was doing that, I was part of a group of 10-12 people that were gathering signatures. There were petitions that were republican-funded and democrat-funded. Apart from me, all the other signature gatherers were collecting signatures for every single initiative we had. Which is to say they had zero party affiliation-- they did not care about the issues, only the quantity of signatures gathered.
One signature with vaild address confirmed by the office of the registrar of voters paid $1-2.
Now, the republican party was paying at the time $1-4 for registering someone to vote as a republican. It was more in districts that had a democrat majority. They have an interest in growing the number of official republicans in the various districts and are willing to pay for it.
SO-- the reality of most of the signature gatherers you meet is that this is how they put food on the table. They are not concerned with the issues they put in front of you. Furthermore, they have a vested interest (sometimes) in registering people republican... but this is always apart from the petitions. It is very likely that some nothern california group is funding the marijuana issue, and has absolutely nothing to do with the republicans. Furthermore, the paid registration of republicans has existed and been going on for much more time than this particular mj petition.
Lastly, the democrats have also paid to have people register with their party. This was prior to the Bush/Kerry election, however they paid hourly. As far as I know, the republicans have never paid hourly, only per person registered.
If you have any more questions about this process, post them, and will try to answer.
First, it is only fraud if someone checks the republican box without telling you. If you understand that you are being registered as republican, it is legal. They can sell it to you however thay want, but if you decide it is okay, then it is legal.
Second, you cannot kick them off a campus, or basically anywhere. This is why: Technically, they are engaging in a ¨peaceful poitical activity¨ in an ¨area open to the public¨, which therefore protects it under first amendment law. Think like this-- if you can raise a picket sign, you can also gather signatures/register people to vote.
Again, any questions, post them.
Josh
No. If there were a group that were funding a marijuana initiative, it would have actually said something and had a real goal. Look at the photo of this petition. All it says is that "Restrictions should not be placed." It doesn't demand that the state remove restrictions, for example. Several initiatives will be on ballots around the state this fall: in Santa Barbara, Santa Monica, and Santa Cruz. Look at taxandregulate.org for more info about them.
I have done signature gathering where I've been paid by the signature. I do registrations as a way to get more people who can sign the petitions. That tends to not produce good signatures in some places, because a lot of times it seems to be that if someone is not registered to vote, there is a reason (ie, they might be on parole or probation, or they might not understand that you have to be a US citizen in order to be able to vote).
If it's not NORML, it's not a legitimate petition. NORML is the only organization involved in this issue with a meaningful infrastructure that will look into serious abuses of their name.
The scum have got Halliburton concentration camps for 20 million people waiting to be filled up. If you don't want to see this height of Nazi expression as extending down to a phony setup in "Courthouse Park", then by all means, don't support your local Democrat because he or she is against gun control. Vote Nader in protest, or vote otherwise because the Democrat is only left of center rather than fully progressive. Vote normally in the face of the camps, if you wish. After the next election or two, it won't matter what you vote or how you wished you did.
Pretty sleazy.
FIRST, I ~have~ done completely voluntary, unpaid, petitioning for "decriminalization" of marijuana (it goes over better than legalization with voters and does sorta make more sense). First of all, it is common practice to try to get people to sign by registering them to vote if they are not already and they qualify. However, the voter registration cards are ALWAYS filled out by the person registering (YOU), not the person collecting the sigs. Also you do NOT have to show your ID. We do often offer to pay the postage and mail them in (or hand-deliver), and there is potential of checking the affiliation box if the person forgot to, but we don't, cuz we're honest. If I ask you if you're registered, I believe you when you say yes, and assume not if the answer is "I don't know". And since the goal is to get as many sigs as possible, we try not to "waste" our time on ppl who won't produce valid sigs - such as those who are not registered and are iffy about registering at that time. If I confirm they're not registered, I ask if they'd like to, but point out it's a completely separate process than signing the petition. If they're still iffy, I just send them on their way with a blank registration card.
Secondly, a petition of any sort will usually have an official seal by the state, city or other govt body that has approved the petition for sig. gathering, and will usually read something like "I instruct my [state representative] to introduce legislation..." ALWAYS READ WHAT YOU SIGN. Another ploy is to have a perfectly legit petition, but they tell you it's for something it's not, counting on you not to read it.
Thirdly, NORML is usually the main sponsor of such petitions, but don't exclude other, potentially valid organizations, such as DRC (Drug Reform Coalition), and MPP (Marijuana Policy Project). MPP, by the way is doing a LOT of good, productive work in this area.
Finally, I'd like to respond to the question "What does it matter if I'm registered Republican?" For general elections - it doesn't. When you vote for mayor, governor, president, etc, you can belong to any party (or none) and vote for anyone from any party. It only matters during primaries, which can also make a big difference. I like to remain unaffiliated (no party), but one year I felt strongly about voting in the Republican primary. You cannot vote in both during the same primary season. This automatically registered me as a Rep, which I did not realize. The next time I wanted to vote in a primary, I wanted to vote in the Democratic primary, and was told I could not because I was registered Rep. They explained that I could re-register as no party immediately after voting, and ALL polling stations will have such forms on hand. So I took one of the forms and started to walk out. The lady there was surprised and said "well aren't you going to at least vote in the Rep. primary?" I said "no - I don't want any of them to win", and left them gasping. Oh well - lesson learned. Now after every primary, I immediately re-register as independent and it works like a charm.
Thanks for your attention. Hope this helps. :)
-VG-
Also, because signing a petition is exercising your right to vote, it is mostly anonymous. I say mostly, because people will see your name, but they should only be the signature gatherers and the govt officials who confirm you are registered while "counting" your "vote". These people are not allowed to use your name for any purpose other than counting your vote. That's not to say there aren't some shady govt workers who might, but if it's a cause you believe in, don't think about the possibility of such shady characters. It is against the law for the govt to acknowledge that they know you signed a petition about a specific issue, or use this information against you (or for you). I know it's hard sometimes, but you have to trust the govt to follow its own laws. Often this is the hardest thing to convince a potential signer of.
This sounds far more suspicious. Since party membership doesn't have anything to do with votes on the real election day, and since they are actually putting a lot of money into paying these signature gatherers, they must have a good motivation that isn't clear right now for doing so. It almost sounds like they want to gather a list of names of people supporting a liberal proposition. I hope someone figures this out soon.
The only reason a party really would want more members is if they are a minority party like Peace&Freedomsocialist party that almost is under 1% where they will fall off the ballot listing. Other than that, it sounds ineffective for them to be able to claim that republicans are becoming more popular lately or something.
Also, for consolation, a lot of the signature gatherers are marijuana smokers themselves, and any money they're getting is going back into one of the most non-corporate economies around.
Also, I disagree about registering providing bad signatures. The reason they have the registration cards is because the signature is invalid without a corroborating registered address. In my experience, if someone can't vote because of a felony or citizenship they tell you immediately...
I have never had the experience of registering somone providing a bad signature, only the opposite.
Or the Greens: "Would you sign our Democratic petition to pave ANWR?"
Or the Libertarians: "Would you sign our petition to name the Drug Czar as Supreme Leader?"
Or AARP: "Would you sign our petition to euthanize useless old people?"
Or NAACP: "Would you sign our petition to put n@$#!@s back in their place?"
Or NRA: "Would you sign our petition to shoot Charlton Heston?"
And so it goes...
I would be inclined not to think that this ploy was about attracting people to register, but rather, the government making a list of pro-marijuana people who, most likely won't be voting for them.
Its just astounding to me that America thinks it can export 'democracy' to the rest of the world, when it can't even get it right here.
I'm sorry but this country is majorly " up shit creek"
Dale Drew
p.s. great article
Mike Rhodes
P0 Box 5077
Fresno, CA 93755
Dear Mr. Rhodes:
I am responding to your recent complaint about certain actions and practices by petition circulators you recently encountered at the Fresno Courthouse Park. One of our investigators followed up on your complaint and subsequently made contact with these same circulators. Of special interest to our office was their tactic of asking for ID, ostensibly to verify a person's eligibility to sign the ballot initiative. While this practice appears to be intentionally misleading, the Elections Code is silent on the practice of circulators asking for ID to sign a petition. By the same token, even though there is no law against asking for ID, there clearly is no requirement that a potential signer have ID or comply with a request to show ID as a condition of signing a
statewide ballot initiative.
The issue becomes even more blurred because, as we discussed, the medical marijuana petition they were circulating was not a state-sanctioned initiative but a so- called plebiscite petition. These types of petitions are purportedly used to measure support for an issue, but are legally non-binding. Even the rules concerning petition circulator conduct in the Elections Code only refer to city, county or state petitions; plebiscite petitions are not addressed
anywhere in the Code.
Another area of concern was the female circulator's attempt to begin registering you as a voter using the information from your ID. Elections Code § 2 162(c) states:
The affidavit portion of a voter registration card shall not be marked, stamped, or partially or fully completed by any person other than an elector attempting to register to vote or by a person assisting the elector in completing the affidavit at the request of the elector.
It's not clear if her asking you, "Is it OK if I register you as a Republican?" constitutes a request or an implied request of the elector, but even if there was a violation, Elections Code § 2162(c), unfortunately, contains no sanctions for the conduct it prohibits.
In our visit with these circulators, our investigator reminded them that, although they were being paid to register Republicans, it was ultimately up to the individual citizen to select what party, if any, with which they wish to register. The investigator also put the so-called circulators on notice that someone from our office would be monitoring future activity by their group to ensure compliance with state laws and regulations.
Based on your report and the observations of our investigator, there is insufficient evidence of a criminal violation of the Elections Code to launch an investigation at this time. Even so, I believe that the warning this group received from our office did serve to deter them from cutting corners in their voter registration efforts.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.
Sincerely,
Election Fraud Investigation Unit
I register voters all of the time - and so do several people that I know - no one gets paid for these (that I know of) - however, I did talk to a coordinator of petition gatherer's - the pay kind and he said that the best way to get people to register to vote is to make up a bogus petition. His suggestion was cheap gas - legalizing pot would be another popular one, but pushing people to republican - I would think that they would think of something more appealing to republicans to actually attract republicans - since currently I believe that they are paying up to 6.00 or more vote -
if not illegal - it certainly is unethical - and it is these kinds of things that destroys our freedoms.
If pot is regulated, similar to the way alcohol is sold, tax it and maybe the federal deficit would diminish greatly. Hemp could be used instead of cotton and other hemp products will be used that are less expensive to manufacture. Maybe even hemp can be used as an alternate fuel!
-Alyssa Heimrich
chatham high school
Want to stop the Republican and Democrats Voter Registration Scams,? LEGALIZE MARIJUANA!!!
Legalize marijuana!! Buying alcohol is legal which will harm you much greater than pot smoking. Why is alcohol legal? You know what I am saying? Big Money Donating Lobbyist!! Why were the laws change regarding Liquor ads on TV again? Lobbyist!! With Millions or Billions of Dollars going into politicians pockets!!
You have most likely been drunk at some time in your life, and you have most likely been stoned. Which is worse? I dam sure can not drive drunk, but I can get by drive after a couple of hits. I have never gotten sick after Smoking a joint, but I have been so sick after a night of drinking. I have never missed a day of work after smoking a joint on the weekend, but I have after a night of drinking. I know you know what I am saying.
If the government would legalize marijuana, the jail populations would be greatly reduced and therefore lot money saved; the police could focus on more Violent Criminals! There would be about 40 million happier people in the US who wouldn't have to worry about drug testing for smoking a joint before going on a job interview, or drug testing while employed!!!
If pot is regulated, similar to the way alcohol is sold, tax it and maybe the federal deficit would diminish greatly. Hemp could be used instead of cotton and other hemp products will be used that are less expensive to manufacture. Maybe even hemp can be used as an alternate fuel!
It's a way to cope with your stresses in every day life. Alcohol has more danger signs then weed. When you smoke a joint, u just sit back and chill. Alcohol leads to car accidents and other problems. I would stick to my green a little every day.
I would like more info such as ,did you ever get a hold of the Atty Gen fraud division?If so,what was the result?
http://politics.netscape.com/story/2007/09/02/legalizing-marijuanaa-new-republican-strategy/
in the Netherlands what they call "drugs" is taxed and they live an wonderfull life
in the rest of the world the drugs are consumed but the quality is shiet!!!
if illegal substances were taxed it would be health control and we would know if it was a good thing for us to consume
and also it would destroy the profiters of this situation!!! or is the actual situation like this because those people are getting wealthier and the rest of the world pourer's???
,HEROIN,COKE,EXTACY,METH,SPEED,LSD,ALL HAVE ALOT OF HORIBLE SIDE
EFFECTS... CAN ANYBODY GIVE ME (5)BAD SIDE EFECTS OF SMOKING OR
EATING WEED THAT ARE 100% PROVEN? ...NO...NOBODY CAN BECAUSE THERE
ARE NONE. WEED HAS BEEN USED AS A MEDICEN FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS,
ITS A NATURAL HERB.THERE ARE NO OTHER NATURAL ILLIGAL DRUGS THAT EXIST.
WEED IS A PLANT NOT A DRUG.IT IS USED AS MEDICEN.THERE ARENT ANY ADED
CHEMICALS TO THE PLANT.IT IS SIMPLY GROWN,DRIED AND SMOKED.CIGERETS KILL
HOUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE A YEAR.PEOPLE DIE FROM SMOKING CIGERETS
TO MUCH.THATS PRETY MUCH THE SAME THING AS OVERDOSING.NO BODY HAS EVER DIED
FROM OVERDOSING ON WEED.YOU KNOW WHY? ITS BECAUSE YOU CANT OVERDOSE ON WEED.
SO WHAT WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE SOLD IN GAS STATIONS AND GROCERY STORES...CIGERETS
THAT KILL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE EACH YEAR, OR A NATURAL PLANT
THAT HASNT KILLED ANYBODY?..and the government are actualy responsible for thousands
of deaths by making tabaco legal and weed not so there prety much stupid murderers puting
the blame on themselves for thousands of deaths and they dont realise it yet...and these people
are running countrys!!!!????
I VOTE YES LEGALIZE IT.
(to make it legal)
Of course there are going to be restrictions on legalizing it.
1. Age limit. 18 is still a bit young because everyone will be getting high before school and school's would re-vote it and through this all into a tangle. 21 is the drinking age and most people are more responsible.
2. Driving/ Same as drinking and driving/ Smoking and driving might be revoked. But who cares!!!! If I'm high i love to adventure and not rely on driving. But if you get caught with weed in your car, they can give you simple tests to see if you are high or not, if you pass the test they let you go, if not they take it away and take you to jail/or home.
3. If they are underage and are caught smoking the charge should be like getting caught with tabacco/ get a ticket and go to court. If probation is required then it must be. Probation will never really go away.
4. Locations and jobs. Jobs should be able to restrict you coming to work high. Some may not care but if it is a really high safty program and you come to work high. they can choose to let you leave for the day, or if you keep coming to work high, just to fire you.
4.2 They may restrict areas to smoke at, such as parks and local residents or business areas. If you can get high while smoking in your yard I'm sure no one will complain about it.
This took about 30 min. to type. Tell me what you think
CoHenderson [at] gaggle.net or CodyHenderson7 [at] hotmail.com (Subject the message "DO NOT DELETE"
That simple
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.