top
North Coast
North Coast
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Maxxam Begins Final Liquidation of Once-Proud Pacific Lumber Company

by Humboldt Watershed Council
Business plan right on target, say observers
The Humboldt Watershed Council announced today that it has confirmed a secretive move by Maxxam corporation to begin the long-predicted process of dividing and selling-off the remaining assets of once-proud Pacific Lumber Company. Some 75,000 acres have been quietly put on the market in recent weeks, comprising over a third of the company’s lands.

Maxxam Corporation is the parent company of Pacific Lumber (Palco), which in turn is the parent of Scotia Pacific (ScoPac.) Palco owns approximately 220,000 acres of once-might redwood forests in Humboldt County. Of that, 211,000 acres are held by its ScoPac subdivision as collateral for $867 million in bonds the company sold in 1998.

The Humboldt Watershed Council (HWC) was able to confirm late last week that Palco was offering 16 properties for sale, totaling 14,631 acres. The properties are mostly non-contiguous to the bulk of Palco’s lands, and range in size from 26 acres up to 3,795 acres. The properties are located all over Palco’s holdings, including Jacoby Creek, the Mattole, Kneeland, and Avenue of the Giants.

The Watershed Council has also received credible word that Palco is putting an additional 60,000 acres up for auction to other timber companies, though maps of these properties have yet been obtained.

The sale of these lands comes just as the company’s business plan approaches a long-predicted ‘jumping-off point’ for Maxxam. As far back as 2003, the Humboldt Watershed has publicly predicted a liquidation and sale of the company and its assets would occur by 2007-2008. HWC’s analysis was based on a review of the company’s own documents and records.

Mark Lovelace, President of the Humboldt Watershed Council, said that Palco’s harvest levels over the last 6 years have been within 2% of the company’s business plan (see below.) Lovelace also pointed out that ScoPac’s log sales to Palco this year have been higher than in any of the past 4 years.

“Clearly, if there is any problem with the company’s finances, it cannot be blamed on a reduced rate of harvest, because they are right on target,” said Lovelace.

The majority of the lands being offered are held by ScoPac, though a few small pieces are held by Palco. Scopac owns the timber rights on all of the lands. Because of this, virtually all of the profits from any sale will have to go to the ScoPac bondholders, to pay off the company’s massive debt. The bondholders were not consulted with or contacted in any way by ScoPac, Palco, or Maxxam before putting these lands on the market.

“This is certainly in keeping with this company’s standard operating procedure,” said Lovelace. “Doing the right thing for their neighbors has never been a concern. Why should they care about their creditors? Anyone who seeks to do business with this company on these lands should proceed with extreme caution.”

Lovelace noted that the company’s lands are extremely cut over, with very little merchantable timber. A disclosure released by ScoPac late last year showed that 84% of the company’s lands contained an average of just 12,750 board-feet of timber per acre, less than 1/6 of what a healthy second-growth redwood forest should hold.

Lovelace also cautioned any prospective buyers that Palco’s Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) goes with the land, and prevents any conversion. The lands must be managed according to the HCP for the life of the agreement.

“There are lots of restrictions, there’s not much timber, and they can’t be converted,” said Lovelace. “Let the buyer beware.”

###

Palco harvest levels, 2000 through 2006

Actual Log Sales in mmbf:
2000 153.40
2001 167.90
2002 178.60
2003 166.30
2004 144.10
2005 145.00 (ScoPac est)

Actual average harvest level, 2000 through 2005
159.20 mmbf

Target average harvest level through 2007
(from ScoPac 1998 Bond Memo)
162.27 mmbf (Palco equivalent)

Amount below plan:
-1.9%
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by big
but liars figure. As stated,

"Lovelace noted that the company’s lands are extremely cut over, with very little merchantable timber. A disclosure released by ScoPac late last year showed that 84% of the company’s lands contained an average of just 12,750 board-feet of timber per acre, less than 1/6 of what a healthy second-growth redwood forest should hold.

But the portion that PL is intending to sell off is fir, hardwoods and ranch (grassland). So that acreage is not redwood ground. And the point that Mark is trying to make is a misrepersentation of the truth. PL's redwood ground is growing trees just fine.
by fig
Whats your point big? All that paragraph says to me is that PL has mismanaged its lands (originally stolen from indiginous people) and now they are selling off a large portion of their lands in order to extract the maximum amount of profit in a relativly short time, just like clearcutting. They can simply make more money from the land by selling it than logging it at this point.
Where is the misstatement?
by b
The lie is in the fact that Mark states that by using his numbers, Scopac land is understocked by 5/6th. Not all of Scopacs land is Redwood ground. He takes the position that it is, to make his figures "work".
by to indigenous people's stewardship
Again, most of the land in question was originally tended and cared for by the diverse indigenous tribes of the California coast and coast range foothills. Euro-american settlers and squatters later took the land from indigenous peoples by force. Following the forced relocation of these indigenous peoples to reservations like Round Valley in Covelo, timber corporations then claimed legal property ownership of this land taken by the squatters. The US government approved of the timber corporation's claim of land ownership, one reason that many people are opposed to corporate personhood. No single individual besides possible Ted Turner owns this much land..

For a detailed history of the land grants given to timebr corporation's, visit endgame website;

http://www.landgrant.org/history.html

http://www.endgame.org/

Also recommend Derick Jenson's book, "Strangely Like War"..

So now the CEO of Maxxam, Charles Hurwitz, claims that he owns this land via Maxxam/PL/ScoPac/etc..

All people of Humbolt are effected by Maxxam's high rate of timber harvest, from flooding to erosion, endangered species habitat loss to stolen pensions and lost jobs after decades of mismanagement by Maxxam. Workers are contracted by thugs like Steve Wills and exploited (no healthcare, no job security) by Maxxam while eco-activists are scapegoated for lost jobs. We need to rekindle the spirit of Judi Bari to network both labor and environmental concerns..

Short term financial gain is the ONLY interest Maxxam has in Humboldt county. What happens after Maxxam leaves town in ecological devastation and record unemployment as sustainable jobs are lost..

My belief is that corporate personhood needs to be abolished throughout the US, and Humboldt is a great place to begin. Maxxam CEO Hurwitz and other shareholders need to return the money stolen from the Humboldt bioregion..

Any logging would be better off controlled by the workers of the local community, not a holding corporation based in Houston. The means of production belong only in the hands of the people. The IWW has a great historical perspective on how logging benefits can be returned to the people..

Lumber Workers 120;

http://www.iww.org/unions/iu120/

We the people will take the land back from Maxxam..

love, peace and justice,

luna moth


by fig
For one thing, Lovelace is using figures disclosed by Scopac last year that say that "84% of the company’s lands contained an average of just 12,750 board-feet of timber per acre". Do you dispute this figure? How much of that is not redwood land? Or do you even know?

So far you have not proven your own accuracy. You stated, "But the portion that PL is intending to sell off is fir, hardwoods and ranch (grassland). So that acreage is not redwood ground."

As far as I am aware there are multiple areas containing redwood lands that pl/scopac has put up for sale. I am looking at a parcel table right now. It includes the following parcels ; Jacoby crk. , Schmidbauer, Moore ranch, and Grunert cabin. These lands alone total 1,397 acres of redwood all projected by scopac to be harvestable by 2011.
Of the 16 areas on the table of parcels for sale, 3,486 acres of redwood are said to be harvestable by 2015.

One should keep in mind that the location of only 14,631 acres out of approx. 70,000 acres of land for sale is now known to the public. Who knows but PL where the additional 60,000 acres is located and what kind of forest grows there.
Shall we take some anonymous PL big-wigs' word for it?

Is there something I'm still not getting or are PLs land assets being sold off starting with the land that is least controversial within the lower levels of the company and the greater logging community?


Note: not all the land that mxm/pl/scopac calls a "ranch" is open prarie. For example, the 3,795 "Hartman Ranch" is primarily forested in douglas fir with some prarieland on ridges, you can look on google earth if you aren't already privy to scopacs gis programs. This land is next to the mattole river and contains areas of mcguiness crk. and burgess ridge.
by fig
In all fairness, the 3,486 acres of redwood said to be harvestable by 2015 are only a fourth of the 14,631 acres that have been disclosed.

This however contradicts bigs' previous statement- "... the portion that PL is intending to sell off is fir, hardwoods and ranch (grassland). So that acreage is not redwood ground."

I think it was robert manne, the new PL president, who said that the company wasn't selling off the "core" redwood lands. I wonder what his definition of "core" is. Hes the man charged with the task of finishing the job that began so long ago... the liquidation of PLs' assets for the profit of charles hurwitz, ceo of Maxxam.

Why is it that PL/ScoPac (or whatever th' hell they're called) won't release the location of the other 60,000 acres up for auction to other timber companies?

Maxxam Out of Humboldt!
by stand alone with the truth
when will shunka cop to the dirty deals he, andy and the rest of the NCEF leadership have been pulling. selling us out to the timber creeps. to sell out forest for money is just the lowest thing in the world to do.
by Shunka
What in the world are you talking about?
Selling out the land to timber creeps?
You just like to throw my name in there every once in awhile, eh? Good to know you're still thinkin' of me.
I've TRIED to get Maxxam/PL to negotiate with us to allow good people to BUY groves from them, so that they get their money and the people get their trees.
But NOOOOO, Maxxam/PL couldn't do anything so reasonable and good-natured as that, could they?
Not even when one of the groves was right up the ridge from where they killed an Earth First!er, David "Gypsy" Chain, in 1998.
Gypsy's mother even came ALL THE WAY from Texas, to have a special meeting with Robert Manne, the president of Pacific Lumber Co., to respectfully ask that they not use the ultra-hazardous and illegal extraction climbers near where her son was killed, and to work with us to save the grove in her son's honor.
Yet could Maxxam/PL do that? NOOOOOOOOOOO
Of course not, because that would be like "giving in" to people who just want to save some beautiful trees.
Can't have that in a corporate fascist society, you know...
So, hey, keep throwing my name around so that I'll have an excuse to keep exposing you, crooks.
You won't get too much of my time, though, so sorry....

Forever wild,
Shunka Wakan
http://www.northcoastearthfirst.org
by fig
The two posts before Shunkas are obviously meant to provoke, discredit and divide forest activists. I guess their "factual argument" is just fluff. Most forest activists here know that we need to bridge the social gaps between many timber workers and and those who want to see the last of the old-growth protected. This belief is taught in non-violent direct action trainings. Tactics like those used by the ELF alienate these workers who themselves are being victimized by the corporations and government.
Also the potshots at Shunka by " stand alone with the truth" are a little silly and I seem to remember nearly identical posts left on indybay over the years.
It seems like when their arguments fizzle they resort to petty and unsubstantiated attacks. They know that if you repeat a lie over and over again (just like Bush) some people might believe it.
Don't be fooled by these fools.
by Love
The issue here is WAR - bigger than the destruction of Humboldt's forestlands, and the sick business/government systems that perpetrate acts of violence against life. This culture enables killing and fails to hold people responsible for atrocious war crimes against nature. People who fight peacemakers are clear examples of War.
Haven't we as a community had enough of the WAR? The forest needs us to restore this land and the companies need to step up and do their part to make things right. Perhaps the first step toward peace is to be honest about the War, awknowledging the extents of damage so that healing may begin. If humans don't change warring ways soon, it will be the entire planet's ruin. This applies on all levels. Transform negative into positive. Nature wills the forest to regrow as long as we agree it should be so. Blessings.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network