top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

SFUSD gets an 'A' in gentrification

by Ebony Colbert, Bay View (reposted)
On the eve of Martin Luther King Day and two weeks before Black History Month begins, the School Board of the city known as "America's most progressive" is likely to vote against Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, June Jordan, Enola Maxwell, Gloria R. Davis and even Willie Brown - closing nearly all the schools in San Francisco named for Black luminaries and several other schools located in Black neighborhoods. Martin Luther King Middle School is spared for the moment, perhaps because the school closure showdown comes in his birthday week.
One would think that this disappointing - yet predictable - move is based solely on statistics and budget, but it goes far beyond that and much deeper than the San Francisco Unified School District is willing to say.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the district loses 800 to 1,000 students of all races every year as families leave in search of cheaper housing or better schools, among other reasons. In addition to that revelation, low academic performance and low enrollment have been cited as reasons for closure. All this may very well be true, but in accepting this rationale, one must also believe that sending children who are in under-enrolled schools to schools across town that are already over capacity will somehow raise their test scores and help to alleviate the school district's budget pitfalls.

If it doesn't sound right to you, you are not alone. Obviously, denying our children an appropriate curriculum, educational materials and resources is not enough. The school district has to outright deny our children an education in their own communities.

Consider this: If you go to the SFUSD website (http://www.sfusd.edu), you'll see that most of these schools have actually raised their test scores in the past few years, which to me would be reason enough to keep them open, provide more resources and watch them flourish. But the school district says this is not enough.

In my opinion, the closing down of these schools is just another piece of the gentrification puzzle that is plaguing Black people and other poor people of color all over this city. According to Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, many students affected by last years' closures are now in schools that are targeted for closure this year. The proposed closures and mergers disproportionately affect San Francisco's African American, Latino and working class communities and threaten to devastate programs established with community support that have begun to show promising results city-wide, especially in Supervisor Districts 5 and 10, home to most Black San Franciscans.

Schools slated for closure are not only named for Black people but have the highest number of Black students in the city. The historically Black Fillmore, which had its only middle school, Benjamin Franklin, closed last year, has five more schools on the chopping block this year. How can we honestly say we believe that this school system is fair and just when even the Supervisors themselves doubt it?

Read More
http://www.sfbayview.com/011106/sfusdgetsana011106.shtml
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Jeff G
Thanks for this good article. Absolutely true, as someone who works for the district, I can attest.

Note, though, that the SFUSD is over 90% students of color. (That's right, even though SF is 49% white people white families send their children to private schools.) The white kids that are part of SFUSD nearly all go to West side schools that are not slated for closure. I would doubt there are even a dozen white students in all of the schools slated for closure COMBINED. In other words, the closures are even more racially skewed in terms of whom they effect.
by anon
SFUSD is one of the worst places to work. And yes, they want to "keep the white students". So, they didn't close New Traditions (majority white). They should have merged it with Grattan. But those parents are white, and they got their wish.

Talk about "plantation mentality"! SFUSD is a terrible terrible horrible place for anyone to work, let alone send their precious darlings to.

Administrators (like the one at New Traditions btw - Maria Agudelo) is one of the worst in the entire SFUSD, and she's chased away a LOT of parents there. She's not the only one though, there are so many fucked up admins in that district, completely unqualified.

The reason they didn't close Webster was because the Potrero Hill whites said they would move or send their kids to private school rather than to Starr King. Again, the two schools should have been merged, but the Pot. Hill parents said they wanted to whitify Daniel Webster. We'll see next year if it really happens.

Liberals suck. I would rather vote republican than vote for any of these scum, including any sf politico, state, or fed. Liberals all suck. They are the most racist people around, worse than any repubs in the 60's or today.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$140.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network