From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
School Beat:Re-Examining School Closures
In the face of fiscal pressures, any smart business plan addresses both the bottom line (costs) and the top line (revenue). The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) school closure process has only discussed costs--why haven’t we discussed the revenue side at all? Cutting costs through closures is short sighted and amounts to an incomplete solution. Attracting families into the public school district is a better strategy.
According to a 2002 study, private schools have a significant share of the San Francisco student enrollment (http://portal.sfusd.edu/apps/departments/school_operations/docs/fmpIV.pdf). Tuitions at these schools are typically over $20,000. For a family with two school age children, attending public rather than private, represents a $40,000 cost savings. That’s more than most mortgages! I can’t imagine a better affordable housing plan.
What keeps families from partaking in this incentive plan is the perception that the schools are low quality, overcrowded, difficult to enroll in, mismanaged, and unstable. That the public receives only bad press about the schools only solidifies these impressions. This is particularly true for white families whose public kindergarten to birth enrollment ratio is less than 20% (compared to a city average over 50%).
There is an opportunity to grow enrollment and consequently revenue if we can change perceptions.
All of the hard work and time spent in this closure process by the District, the Board, the parents, community organizations, and the City could have been directed toward a positive campaign to fill our schools. Instead, we all have been fighting the wrong fight, fighting one another. Consequently, all of us will be wounded when this battle is done.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=2830#more
What keeps families from partaking in this incentive plan is the perception that the schools are low quality, overcrowded, difficult to enroll in, mismanaged, and unstable. That the public receives only bad press about the schools only solidifies these impressions. This is particularly true for white families whose public kindergarten to birth enrollment ratio is less than 20% (compared to a city average over 50%).
There is an opportunity to grow enrollment and consequently revenue if we can change perceptions.
All of the hard work and time spent in this closure process by the District, the Board, the parents, community organizations, and the City could have been directed toward a positive campaign to fill our schools. Instead, we all have been fighting the wrong fight, fighting one another. Consequently, all of us will be wounded when this battle is done.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=2830#more
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Dear concerned parent
Mon, Jan 16, 2006 7:31PM
san francisco schools
Fri, Jan 13, 2006 9:03PM
Neighborhood Schools NOW!
Thu, Jan 12, 2006 1:24PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network