top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Alameda County District Attorney violates Public Records Act

by Steve White (boatbrain [at] aol.com)
A short article about the Alameda DA refusing to release records which show a pattern of nepotism in hiring by his office
About six months back, I discovered a pattern of nepotism in hiring at the DA's office in Alameda. I saw an old article in the local legal paper, (would give credit, but not sure which one it was) and followed up on the lead.

It turned out the nepotism had gotten far worse after the first criticisms.

Alameda District Attorney Thomas Orloff routinely hires the children of the judges on the criminal courts. In this way, he ensures the judges are friendly to his side in cases.

This nepotism is much greater in Alameda than in all the other five Bay Area counties, plus Sacramento, COMBINED.

I did my research using Bar records, so I was only finding laywers in that office, but there are about as many non-lawyer staff as there are lawyers, (secretaries, paralegals, and investigators) so I asked Alameda County Human Resources Director Doris Eaton-May for a list of all the non-lawyer staff in the office.

She gave the case over to the DA, who refused to give up the information.

This refusal is not legal. These are the types of records the Public Records Act makes public.

They claim I might misuse the information -- yeah, Orloff, to show how much nepotism you are involved in --

But the truth is, the Public Records Act says if you give information to one person, you must give it to all, and conversely, if you do not give it to one, you must not give it to all. -- So, from a legal standpoint, they are claiming, beause one person might misuse this information, no one is ever entitled to see it.

This is clearly not in the public interest, and they do not say it outright, but that is the inescapable logic of their arguement.

I just wanted everyone to know what is going on in that office.

My web page is http://www.alamedacountyda.com

and the sup page on nepotism

http://www.alamedacountyda.com/Nepotism.html
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Steve White
Thu, Feb 22, 2007 6:49PM
Steve White
Thu, Feb 22, 2007 6:46PM
Steve White
Wed, Jun 1, 2005 7:28PM
Steve White
Wed, Jun 1, 2005 7:28PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network