Spontaneous Strike Shuts Down Cable Car System
Cable Cars pulled into the Mason Street service barn around 10am and remained there until about 12:30 pm. Union members gathered and met at the cable-car barn while the strike was going on.
Union chief William Sisk and other union officials negotiated with Muni officials as well as Gavin Newsom who (of course) asked them to put the cars back on the street.
The strike occurred over the firing of two union employees who had been accused of stealing. Union members meeting at the service barn said it was about whether Muni had followed a labor contract in the firing of the two men. Muni's comment: "It's a personnel matter."
Various corporate news articles about the event:
San Francisco Chronicle, CA: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/03/03/BAGSKBJLGK1.DTL
KGO, CA:
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/news/030205_nw_cable_car_shutdown.html
FoxReno.com, NV:
http://www.foxreno.com/news/4248037/detail.html
The possibility of further strikes happening as the week continues has been suggested, but in no way confirmed.
This is the way workers should be standing up for each other and fighting capital. Don't wait for the bureaucrats to "approve" of workers collective actions. Do it (strategically of course)!
The union is the rank & file. Let's hope this starts some bigger stones rolling.
-Steve (a fewllow transit worker).
"Steve"
What you describe is slavery, pure and simple. The only reason why unions sign such contracts is because they are forced to because of the dictates of capitalism (and because of the inhernetly flawed structures of business unionism).
You say:
Public workers work for the people, and they have an obligation to perform their duties to the public as long as the contract is in place.
Public workers work for the "people" in a theoretical sense, yes, but are their direct supervisors and managers also accountable to the people? Who supervises the suporvisors? What recourse have workers, even those that work for "the public", when their immediate bosses violate their rights?
As far as "the law" goes, just because something is "lawful" doesn't make it right or just. Slavery was legal in this country until law-breaking abolitionists made an issue out of it.
Since labor creates all wealth and provides all services, the right of workers to strike should be absolute with no exceptions. Workers shouldn't be coerced into signing no-strike pledges and they should be illegal.
The American Labor Movement has let itself be subservient to the needs of capital for far too long, and the bureaucrats controlling it have pulled punch after punch in an effort to not be tarred as anti-capitalist (a huge mistake and a horrible setback for the cause of freedom). It will be a great day, a GREAT DAY, when labor breaks the back of capitalism once and for all. Any movement in that direction should be hailed as a grand achievement.
So what if some tourists are inconvenienced? People have got to get off their arrogant asses and wake up to the fact that those that pick up our shit and haul the trash we throw away are our equals--our sisters and brothers--and they deserve the same amount of respect as you and me. You wouldn't tolerate somebody suspending you for a wrongful act that you didn't commit or a minor infraction that results in a punishment that doesn't fit the crime, and I'll be DAMNED if I would. Why should these workers expect any less?
Finally, in case you didn't realize it, this site is unabashedly anti-capitalist. If that ruffles your feathers, then tough darts pal!
-Steve Ongerth
Unapoligetically anti-boss and anti-capitalist!
All of the good Democrats sitting on the Board of Supervisors need to demand their fellow Democrats in Sacramento and Washington restore the corporate profits tax to the 90% it was in the 1950s. That would eliminate all deficits.
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.