top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

ISO and Phillip Morris

by Walter Nef's bastard son
The ISO, operates as a recipient of grants from the Center for Economic Research and Social Change. The latter's assets comprised largely of Wall Steet stock...until they sold it to pay themselves.
The ISO, operates as a recipient of grants from the Center for Economic Research and Social Change. The latter's assets comprised largely of Wall Steet stock...until they sold it to pay themselves.

We've seen the ISO at community meetings, on campus, and in rare exceptions, in the workplace. With their authoritarian tendencies, attacks on anarchism and anarchists, historical revisionism on radical labor politics, cult-like recruiting tactics, and bizarre social manipulations of groups, many anarchists have asked the $60,000 question: are these folks paid, and who pays them?

The Center for Economic Research and Social Change is the paper organization for the ISO and their activities. They are a 501c3 organization (also in Chicago) that files 990s with the IRS every year. It is a common practice amongst activists to have a non-profit act as a steward for managing funds of other groups. Activist organizations often umbrella under non-profits, in order to save the administrative and bureaucratic hassle of getting a tax exemption-even anarchists.

In the last few years, the ISO has gotten pretty consistent with their presence in various places; the International Socialist Review is a slick, professional looking left magazine, and the ISO conventions run in the tens of thousands to organize. You can set your watch to when they will show up at various spots to sell the SW. If you think it is hard to believe that the ISO can pay for all of this with dues money and Socialist Worker sales, especially when publications with no advertising do not turn a profit, then you're on to something.

According to the 990 IRS forms filed in 2001, the Center received a large donation--perhaps a good chunk of the startup funds, from a man named Kevin Neel, who donated over 1.2 million in stock. The stock acquired by the Center is in Oracle and Phillip Morris. The Center has been selling off portions of this stock every year in excess of several hundred thousand a year, to fund a huge payroll, including $45,000 a year plus benefits to the Center's president Ahmed Sehrawy. For the year 2000-01, the total payroll in wages and benefits was $185,000 (presumably disbursed to several party organizers and staff-only $27,000 went to pay two officers of the Center.); in 2001-02, over $400,000, and in 2002-03: nearly $500,000. In 2002-03, Sehrawy made nearly $60,000 in wages and benefits.

For the past three years, the Center has also derived its funding from a handful of activists, much of it in cash. What this tells us is that the workers do not support the Center and the ISO-a few men with disposable income do. And given that fact that the Center's bottom line continues to chow a net loss, these funds will soon dwindle, and magazine and paper sales will be as crucial as ever. This is in spite of a net increase of literature sales and monies raised at their yearly socialist conference in Chicago.

In the left, all one has to do is follow the money, to see who controls the politics. More research will reveal specifics on the relationship between the ISO and the Center's stock "trust fund". These "trustifarians" simply wear a blue collar. Thing is, who's on the rest of their payroll is not a matter of public record. And it would be too much to expect an organization for the workers to actually tell the workers who on the payroll.

§?
by ?
Sounds like a great little conspiracy theory if the ISO were powerful and spending a lot of money. In SF one sees ANSWER and NION paying for large protests with permits etc.. (and where the money for that comes from is somewhat transparent since they have held events to honor a few major donors) but rarely if ever does on see the ISO do this. I went to one meeting on the Berkeley campus and while its likely they dont make much selling those papers I didnt see them doing anything that required money (as a student group they get rooms on campus free, some money to print flyers etc..) It does cost money to print papers but one would figure the papers cose would pay for that...
by stupid acronyms and abbreviations (SA+A)
For reference for those who don't know the left vocabulary, the ISO that this story talks about without ever spelling out what the intials mean, is the International Socialist Organization, one of the major Trotskyist organziations in the U.S, today. The generally can be found on most major college campuses, where they attempt to recruit members.
by they havent taken to running ads
like this site does. whether they're "free" is merely a quibble about pricing, and dodges questions like editorial control and privilege.

objections to ads here have been met with protests that it's okay to generate money from a capitalist system to pay for revolution-- i am specifically referencing ak press here.

people in glass houses... tsk tsk...
by problem with acronyms
ISO also stands for the Independent System Operator. The CALISO was in the news a lot during the California blackouts of 2001.

IAC also stands for the Israel Action Committee which organizes proIsrael events on the Berkeley campus.
by destory activism through sectarianism
Is this the same guy who wrote:

California death penalty
on http://www.socialistworker.org/2001/366/366_18_NewsReports.shtml

Looking up that name on Usenet shows a bunch of posts related to a software developer who works at a large investment firm. Since the donation was in 2001 it could have just been a college kid who joiend the ISO and made a huge amount during the dot com boom?

As a comment on infoshop states:

Did Ann Coulter write this?

No one should give this article any credibility.

Sadly, this is like an anarchist version of right-wing Frontpage Magazine (http://www.frontpagemag.org) who recently accused the ISO of being the "parent organization" of ANSWER (http://www.internationalanswer.org).

This article deserves to be in the class of "journalism" that Fox News belongs in.

How is paying dues a version of tithing? Tithing is a biblical mandate. Members are not required to pay 10%, they choose to pay whatever they can. Some members pay as little as $5 a month. The ISO is not awash in money contrary to what this article claims.

( http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=04/12/18/3006900 )



by frank c.
In addition to working full time, I've been an active ISO member for a couple of years now. I sell SW at community meetings, on campus, and in my union and workplace. Look, SW costs more to produce than we sell it for. the paper is a tool we use to engage with people who are radicalizing under the current assaults by the bosses and state, to generalize local rank and file struggles, and hopefully draw more people into organized class struggle. If you have political disagreements with the paper, say so. Your implication that the ISO is somehow a capitalist tool, because a few of our staffers earn a decent wage for the 16 hour days they put in is contemptable. Just like you, we don't own the fucking means of production so in order to operate, we have to engage with the existing system. I wish revolutionaries had tons of money to gather materials to organize with. As a rank and file member, I've never been denied an accounting of our funds or expenditures by our democratically elected leadership. More importantly, ALL MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO LEAD, OPENLY ORGANIZE, AND CHALLENGE WHAT WE DISAGREE WITH. And yes, we do have internal disagreements and debates about prioritizing our resources. a major influence on my decision to join, after years of skepticism bred by lifestyle b.s. and pointless sectarian jargony sniping was simply witnessing the high political calibre and commitment of ISO members and staff. they remain the most dedicated revolutionaries i've ever met in my life, the vast majority of our work is donated time and many of us do political work until forced to sleep. i'm sure you agree, there are so many important struggles people must win, along with trying to rally what remains of the left AND train a generation of revolutionary fighters.
As far as "cult-like recruiting tactics, and bizarre social manipulations of groups" give some examples, cause i think it's bullshit. If you're referring to the fact that some members become close friends or lovers, so what? Its always true when people work in important ways closely together for long periods of time. We also have members who personally despise one another but are united politically. Apparently, you have political disagreements ("authoritarian tendencies, attacks on anarchism and anarchists, historical revisionism on radical labor politics"). Fine. make a political argument. I hope you're successfull in your work organizing a revolutionary left. I have every confidence in what working people decide to do when they start feeling their class' inherent power. You're article is wrong about the ISO. What's your motivation for such flimsy innuendo? Is it political? Then address it politically. Otherwise lets both just get back to smashing the capitalist class once and for all.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network