top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Direct Action to Stop the War :: Press Conference

by liberation radio news with dasw media
Tuesday 04 March 2003, San Francisco :: a broad coalition calls on the world to "break the rules" in the event of war :: mass direct action, civil disobedience and non-cooperation to shutdown San Francisco's financial district
Copy the code below to embed this movie into a web page:
Standing in front of the Pacific Stock Exchange at Pine and Sansome, anti-poverty organizer Jason Negrón-Gonzáles (People Organized to Win Employment Rights), labor organizer Howard Wallace (SF Labor Council), Grey Panther Margot Smith, Veteran for Peace George Johnson, Kate Raphael (Out Against the War), Friar Louie Vitale, Arab-American anti-capitalist Rayan El-Amine, organizer Renee Saucedo (SF Day Laborers Program), and establishmentarian R. Warren Langley (fmr. President, Pacific Stock Exchange; ret. Lt. Col., U.S. Air Force) hold a press conference calling for "direct action to stop the war."

download player [part 2 and audio-only follow]
§transcript :: R. Warren Langley
by liberation radio news with dasw media

Statement of R. Warren Langley Opposing the US preemptive invasion of Iraq in March 2003

My name is Warren Langley and I would like to tell you why I am opposed to the preemptive invasion of Iraq by US-led forces.

There are many ways to reduce the threat that Iraq and Saddam Hussein pose to the US and to the world. Intrusive inspections, constant pressure, and continuous over-flights coupled with the joint rather than the unilateral threat of consequences is the obvious first option. We should work with the rest of the world through the UN to minimize the threat of Saddam Hussein rather then start a war that will cause death, destruction, and harm to the people of Iraq and the allied military forces. Disarmament is a valid goal and a critical outcome; regional destabilization and regime change are not. Democracy will never follow unilateral conquest. Beyond the direct human cost of an Iraq invasion, the economic and political consequences are monumental. The increased risk of terrorist attacks and anti-American sentiment worldwide as well as the tremendous sum of money and resources that will be diverted from vitally needed health, education, and other domestic needs will be felt for years

There may come a time when there is no alternative but to invade Iraq but that time is not now. If enough of us can make our voices heard, Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfield and Mr. Powell will have to consider other alternatives instead of continuing along the single-minded path toward war that they have been on for the past 18 months.

If you looked at my background, you would ask why I take such a public stand against the war. I grew up in the South, my Dad was a WW II POW, I graduated from the US Air Force Academy, spent 15 years in the active Air Force and am now a Retired Lt. Colonel in the Air Force Reserves. I have and still do strongly support our military forces and believe that it is necessary to maintain a strong military both for our own defense and to make the world a safer and better place to live. I have also spent a long career in business including time in the defense and airline industries culminating with 12 years in the financial services industry, the last three being as President and COO of the Pacific Stock Exchange.

I have always worked from within the Establishment and I have always been a rule-follower rather than a rule-breaker thinking that if a rule was wrong, change it, don't break it first.

So I am surprised to be here today telling you that, to stop the war, I am willing to "break the rules" and asking you to join me in "breaking the rules" so loudly that we are heard by the President and his administration to convince them to find a way to peace not war. We have to be heard like the people were heard about civil rights in the 60's and the Vietnam War in the 60's and 70's. People like you and me do matter and we can be heard. If we all believe that and do something about it -- something more than talk, march, and discuss--- then we can help find peace and security for the US, Iraq, and the world.
§transcript :: Kate Raphael
by liberation radio news with dasw media

Statement of Kate Raphael, Queer Cluster

I'm proud to stand here today to honor a long tradition of queer anti-war activism. Most of you probably don't know that during the Vietnam War, two gay men got jobs as extras in the San Francisco Opera so they could unfurl a banner onstage that read, 'Fags Say Stop the War.' There are thousands of queers here today (right?) to join with every other community to say NO TO GENOCIDE. Because that is what our government has already committed in Iraq and we will not allow any more of it.

We are here, unfortunately, for the same reasons we were here in 1990: because our government, which claims to care about American lives, refuses to provide life-saving AIDS prevention information and materials to kids, and cares little about the lives of girls and women, who die every day from lack of access to safe abortions or contraceptives. We're here because a government that claims to care about our security does not intervene in the most dangerous place in this country: the nuclear family, where three women are killed every day by husbands or partners, where one in four girls and one in five boys is molested or raped. We're here because Don't Ask, Don't Tell Don't Cut It. It's a discriminatory policy that is used disproportionately against lesbians and queer people of color. We demand options for queer youth that don't involve learning to kill. We say, Don't Join, Don't Go, Don't Fight. Ban the Military, not the Queers.

We're here to demand money for jobs, AIDS care, welfare, hormone treatments, schools, abortions, queer youth programs, dental dams. But if there were all the money we need for all of those things, we still would say, scrap the military budget. No War. Fund human needs.

We're here because the government of Israel is already using the preparation for war to intensify its campaign of terror to drive the Palestinian people from their land. I know this well, because I just returned from three months in the occupied West Bank. I can tell you that my neighbors were terrified about a coming transfer, which means ethnic cleansing. They know what they're talking about. Some of them already lost their homes in 1948, again in 1967 and yet again during settlement expansion in the Oslo period. I, personally, will not allow this issue to be set aside or buried.

We are here, as we all must be, in a spirit of unity. We need to stand behind the organizations which have brought out over a million people to protest a war that has not begun -- and that must not begin. That doesn't mean we ignore our differences. Our diversity is our strength. It means that queers need to come out in force against the 'special registration' of immigrants and the imprisonment of Arab Americans like Farouk Abdel-Muhti.

It also means those of you who are not queer, and even those of you who don't like queers, need to lift up your voices to condemn the Egyptian government's imprisonment of gay men for the crime of dancing together, and the Saudi government execution of crossdressers. Both of these assaults on human rights by repressive governments supported by our government have increased in the last year. It means you must join us in demanding that charges be dropped against the members of Gay Shame who were attacked by San Francisco police and then arrested in front of the LGBT Community Center last week.

It means you can join us now in saying, WE'RE HERE, WE'RE QUEER, WE'RE OUT AGAINST THE WAR.
§transcript :: Rayan El-Amine
by liberation radio news with dasw media

Press Statement by Rayan El-Amine (Arab American community and Anti-Capitalist Cluster member)

As a member of the Arab-American community, I want to fully support the "day after" actions against the war in Iraq. Arab Americans have been targeted by an administration that has used racism, fear and the events of September 11th, to attack our community abroad and at home. We feel that we share a historical role with other immigrant communities like Asian Americans, Latinos and African Americans who came before us in fighting racism at home and unjust wars abroad.

We intend to show that despite the attacks on our civil liberties and a government that refuses to represent us in the halls of Congress or in the White House - our opposition to this war will be heard. Arab-Americans, South Asians, and other targeted community members will join thousands of others who are against the war and we will represent ourselves in the streets.

The US war on Iraq is not a war to liberate anyone in the Middle East, but in fact it is a war about profits, oil and empire. The only people that will benefit from such imperial escapades are the corporations, weapons peddlers, and self-serving politicians who hope to take advantage of people
§audio only :: Renee Saucedo & Warren Langley
by liberation radio news
Listen now:
Copy the code below to embed this audio into a web page:
§part 2 :: question & answer
by ibidem
Copy the code below to embed this movie into a web page:
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by skye
hey, any posibility of uploading another version of the DASW press video? lots of players don't support mp4.

best,
-skye
by John Simmons (john [at] cityofmind.com)
I just caught Langley on The O'Reilly Factor. O'Reilly started the segment by warning that once the bombs start dropping all dissenters should shut up. He then interviewed Langley about his contemplated civil disobedience. By the end, it looked like Langley had succeeded in shutting up O'Reilly when he told him he didn't care what O'Reilly thought of him and that he was ready to face the consequences for his actions. A little breakthrough moment there.
by Judith Claassen
I worked closely with Warren Langley at one time when we were involved with the test and development of missile guidance systems for the Dept. of Defense, and I considered him a good and admired friend. We continued to exchange Christmas cards for a number of years after he moved on, but we finally lost contact.

I would like to send him a somewhat personal message regarding his intention to "stop the war." I read with great interest his article and found his reasons to be noble, as expected. However, I would like to point out a contradiction in his argument.

Mr. Langley says that he supports disarming the Iraqi government and feels that, among other things, "constant pressure" is an important tool toward that goal. This is where the contradiction comes in. Constant pressure is exactly what is being applied and has been for some months. But every display of public disapproval such as demonstrations against the war only serve to reduce the pressure and to convince Saddam that the American people are opposed to war and that our president surely won't dare to proceed in making good his threat. Unless the pressure game can be continued with intensity, it will fail.

So far the pressure has succeeded in the destruction of a few missiles. Not nearly good enough. It has provoked discussions and debates in the United Nations which have brought the issue to the attention of the entire world. As a result, most Americans are becoming aware that indeed Hussein is a threat to our safety, a brutal despot, and a liar. This realization is progress at least.

A disruption of business will certainly serve to hurt our economy and result in a financial hardship to millions of Americans, but is this really what you hope to achieve? It will not bring the troops home; to believe so is naive. It will undoubtedly reassure Saddam that there is no real resolve in America to disarm him, and so the bluff will be called, and the game will be over one way or the other.

Each person must do what his conscience dictates. Thankfully doing so is still possible in this country. The good and innocent people of Iraq deserve the same freedom.
by a
> Hussein is a threat to our safety

Please explain exactly how he is a threat to the US. With his missiles that can fly 100 miles?

> The good and innocent people of Iraq deserve the same freedom.

And they will gain it for themselves, from the bottom up. As they did in Indonesia, against a far more murderous dictator armed by the US.
by Chris
The bellicose nature of the Bush administratration has accomplished much more than just destroying a few absolete missiles in Iraq. It has also provoked nations all around the world that have found themselves on Bush's sixty-plus long hit-list of countries to attack to attempt to develop their own WMD programs to defend themselves from history's largest and most sophisticated army every.
What lesson will Iran learn from the double standard applied to N. Korea compared to Iraq (i.e. secretly assemble a small nuclear stockpile and be able to threaten U.S. allies in the region). Furthermore, what would we say to a country like Russia or China if they were to invade a country on their border under the banner of the war on terrorism.
Even more likely would be the implementation of the so-called 'transfer' plan in Palestine. Under the fog of war, Israel has openly admitted its intentions not only to retaliate against Iraq, but also to target thousand and thousands of Palestinean organizers and community leaders, as well as those live in areas designated for future settlements.
Even if you think that bombing Iraq (with more bombs on the first day than were dropped during the entire Gulf War) is what's best for Iraq, you must also deal with the direct effects of that action. Do we really think that taking out Saddam (along with hundreths of thousands of Iraqi civilians) will make us any safer from international terrorists, upset with U.S foreign policy, who can go plenty of other places other than Iraq to buy their weapons. If we are ever to make ourselves safe again, it will have to come through the mobilization of our vast resources to help ameliorate the acute social problems that breed and promote exactly what Bush says he's fighting.
by ad verecundiam
Your qualifications are irrelevant unless you're talking physics, Jude - in which case you still have to provide evidence supporting your argument - not just your faith-based opinion. Science doesn't work on faith.


"The good and innocent people of Iraq deserve the same freedom. "


Zionist Project for the New American Century - p14
=======================================
"The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification,
the
need
for
a
substantial
American
force
presence
in
the
Gulf
transcends <--
the <--
issue <--
of
the
regime
of
Saddam
Hussein."
===================================


So.....why are you lying to us, Jude?

What is your motive?
Judith Claussen/Warren Langley
i have interpretated the role of UNMOVIC in Iraq to include inspection, verification and continued monitoring to disarm Iraq of prohibited weapons of mass destruction. UNMOVIC, composed of scientific experts and financed by the "oil for food" program, is the group to safely and economically disarm Iraq. Their mandate for the continued monitoring would prevent Iraq re-acquiring prohibited weapons.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network