top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

We have the numbers, can we turn those numbers into action?

by Regime Change in the USA
Here is a picture from the protest in LA that was posted to http://nyc.indymedia.org

While protests have not yet had a huge effect, they could. The numbers are high enough and the US population is pissed off enough at Bush.
la.jpgf59286.jpg
With tens of thousands in the streets in LA, NYC and SF, it is evident that we have the numbers. But the media wont cover peaceful demonstrations and the impact of these protests is questionable. In England hundreds of thousands marched and just days later the Labor conference backed Blair with many of the MPs backing him comming from solidly antiwar districts. Pressure on MPs in England probably could stop British support, but pressure on the US Congress seems like it can at most delay the "inevitable".

But, "the inevitable" is only inevitable if the actions of the Left are as predictable as they usually are. If protests can be turned into direct actions and the results of protests can be the top news item for days on end, public opinion would have a chance of swaying (even if the coverage is bad, the news that many Americans oppose the war will have a productive effect in many areas where those who oppose the war feel isolated)

What can we do?

Well, if you think more should happen at demonstrations, then DO DOMETHING AT THEM. Its not like ANSWER or NION really would stop a contingent trying to perform a more radical form of protest. And if you dont think actions at protests are the way to go, organize actions outside of them. Protests take hundreds but direct action is a tactic that can be effective even if it is just by a single person.

There are millions in the US opposed to the war. There are hundreds of thousands willing to spend a whole day going to a protest and marching in the street. How many of that number will be willing to risk arrest by taking this strugle to the next level? Do we have enough people who though small coordinated or individual actions are willing to risk their personal security to help make this war too costly for those in Washington?
by bov
One thing we need to do is promote Indymedia at these events - hand out small handbills that say, "To see many pictures and articles on this protest, take a look at - ..." Have warnings about what to expect - belligerent trolls jealous of success - and a few tips about the format, and the philosopy.

BUT, right now the middle class that came to the event will look in the paper and see almost nothing, so it sort of radicalizes people, let's them know for themselves how things are misrepresented, and that's a lesson best learned that way.

I spent all my time handing out Green Party stuff, but maybe I should also start handing out the Indymedia url along with everything else.
by .
How do you define 'success'? By the numbers of the small crowds that have attended these protests? Wouldn't 'success' actually be defined as having prevented a war? So when war does come, you will have failed. Oh yeah, there's nothing I'm more 'jealous' of than a bunch of failures.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network