top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Jewish terrorist caught planning to slaughter Muslims

by Prophet
Robert Goldstein case amazes police Poor Dr. Goldstein has been under way too much stress lately, so we have to take good care of him. If he were any other ethnic group, his ass would be at Guantanamo right http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2220039.stm
jew_terrorist_goldsteinap150.jpg
Lethal weapons of mass destruction were found at Goldstein's townhouse

Little is known about Robert Goldstein, the doctor on trial in the United States accused of planning to attack Islamic centres in Florida.
One fellow doctor told the Associated Press news agency that the 37-year-old foot specialist did not mingle with other doctors.

Mr Goldstein was arrested on Friday at his home in Seminole, near Tampa.

Police went there after Mr Goldstein's wife, Kristi, complained that he was threatening to kill her.


The FBI are unsure whether Dr Goldstein was part of a group or acting alone (Lunitics of zion)

It took detectives 30 minutes to coax Mr Goldstein out of his townhouse, which they say was rigged with trip wires and surveillance cameras.

When police searched the house, they found a cache of up to 40 weapons, including sniper rifles and AK-47 guns, according to prosecutors.

Police say they also uncovered more than 30 explosive devices, as well as a list of approximately 50 Islamic places of worship across Florida.

Most crucially, detectives say they found an 11-point "mission template", covering everything from what Mr Goldstein would wear to getting rid of fingerprints and dealing with hand-to-hand combat if necessary.

"Set timers for approximately 15-20 minutes to allow for enough time to get out of area, but to confirm explosions has (sic) been successful," the template reads.

"The amount of explosives should be ample to take down the building(s)."

Mr Goldstein was placed in custody under a state law that allows commitment for psychiatric evaluation.
by pro-guillotine

"zionists control the media" is now a fully operating proverb.

tabs on the copyright
by Also not a Jew
Hi,

I'm not a Jew, but I dislike bigots of any stripe.

Your submission was full of anti-Jewish bigotry, and although I'm not a Zionist, the more I read this new-Age KKK propaganda, the more prone I (and other Christians) are to support the Jewish State.

For the record: Goldstein was BORN a Jew, but he converted to Christianity (Jews for Jesus) YEARS AGO! In our Church, like most of the civilized world, when a Jew converts he stops being a member of the Jewish religion (i.e. no longer a Jew), is reborn in Christ, and must be considered a Christian.

Goldstein's Christianity seems to be a taboo subject.

Why?

Perhaps because the author wants to present a RACIAL paradigm. He considers Jews to be members of a depraved race, just as the KKK presents African-Americans as morally and ethically inferior by nature.

Well, bigotry is an anethema to the Revolution. I'm appalled by the anti-Jewish bigotry the appears to dominate Indymedia (this article is a typical example).

What next? Lynch the Jews before they support Israel? Lynch the Jews because they live in Israel? Or just lynch the Jews because they just want to LIVE?????

Listen, get this racist nonsense off Indymedia. Perhaps David Duke needs some new material. He appears to be your spiritual brother.

Christ will judge you both.
by X2
To be honest, most of the article is factual and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. However you are all probably right about the author; I think he copied and pasted this and added this to a sentence: "(Lunitics of zion)"

Which is the only thing I see wrong with the article. Obivously the author hopes for us to accept that because this one man is misguided, it is proof that all Jews are misguided. Or, if a green haired man steals my bike, well, all green haired men must be bike thieves. Absurd.

This doesn't change the fact that this *individual* is likely a terrorist.
by kapital
notice the somewhat inverted - perhaps involuntary - prejudice amongst yourselves. X noted that this individual may "LIKELY" be a terrorist, notice the term "likely". an individual, irrespective of his faith and origin is caught with weapons of mass destruction with explicit reason to use them on civilians is LIKELY a terrorist, while had it been an arab or muslim, the mere suggestion that he was SUSPECTED of anything remotely near terrorism, would land him an indefinate stay at concentration camp gunatanamo.

note to the fundie, your xtian objectivism - or lack there of - is somewhat humerous, a bible thumping lunatic preaching the finer points of humanism .. how convenient.

the word jew - perhaps overused in the original article - was used in reference to signify this invididual's ethnicity. in the media, his ethnicity - faith is rarely used, while had the invididual been a muslim, ethnicity and faith would be used extensively.
by X2
bible-thumping lunatic? I'm atheist!!!! You must have me confused with someone else. Also I would always say "likely" no matter who it was; because until I see it with my own eyes it's only a pretty good chance, at best. I always say likely when dealing with any news. I question it, even if it seems to me to be reasonable and true. You should *always* question.
You seem to have me confused with some right wing fellow which I'm not. You don't sound very objective yourself, looking for holes to poke where there are none. just because you perceive something against your particular bias ....
All I was trying to say is that the guy who posted the article was likely antisemitic judging from the tone, but that doesn't change the facts of the situation. Despite the writer's probable antisemitism, the individual is still likely a terrorist.
I have to ask: do you believe utterly everything you read on IMC, or do you assign it a chance of probability until you can confirm with other sources? Shouldn't you say 'likely' until you did?
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network