From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Reichstag Fire TV show, Hitlers 9/11 Fake terror to grab control!
This ia a history channel video Clip about the Reichstag Fire and the proof that the fire was set by the NAZIs, blamed it on the communist to gain power.
This ia a history channel video Clip about the Reichstag Fire and the proof that the fire was set by the NAZIs, blamed it on the communist to gain power.
http://education.yahoo.com/search/be?lb=t&p=url%3Ar/reichstag_fire
Burning of the German parliament building (Reichstag) in Berlin. Allegedly set by a Dutch communist, the fire was used by A. Hitler to turn public opinion against his opponents, especially the communists. He enacted a decree suspending constitutional protection of personal rights, which effectively began the Nazi Party dictatorship. The fire was widely believed to have been set by the Nazis themselves, while others have argued there was no proof of Nazi complicity; it remains the subject of debate and research
Reichstag Fire - Encyclopedia Britannica - Reichstag fire, burning of the Reichstag (parliament) building in Berlin, on the night of Feb. 27, 1933, a key event in the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship and widely believed to have been contrived by the newly formed Nazi government itself to turn public opinion against its opponents and to assume emergency powers...his propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, is supposed to have devised the scheme... On Feb. 28, 1933, the day after the fire, Hitler's dictatorship began with the enactment of a decree "for the Protection of the People and the State," which dispensed with all constitutional protection of political, personal, and property rights.
The Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm (The Hegelian Dialectic)
1) The government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others
2) The people react by asking the government for help willing to give up their rights
3) The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis
http://education.yahoo.com/search/be?lb=t&p=url%3Ar/reichstag_fire
Burning of the German parliament building (Reichstag) in Berlin. Allegedly set by a Dutch communist, the fire was used by A. Hitler to turn public opinion against his opponents, especially the communists. He enacted a decree suspending constitutional protection of personal rights, which effectively began the Nazi Party dictatorship. The fire was widely believed to have been set by the Nazis themselves, while others have argued there was no proof of Nazi complicity; it remains the subject of debate and research
Reichstag Fire - Encyclopedia Britannica - Reichstag fire, burning of the Reichstag (parliament) building in Berlin, on the night of Feb. 27, 1933, a key event in the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship and widely believed to have been contrived by the newly formed Nazi government itself to turn public opinion against its opponents and to assume emergency powers...his propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, is supposed to have devised the scheme... On Feb. 28, 1933, the day after the fire, Hitler's dictatorship began with the enactment of a decree "for the Protection of the People and the State," which dispensed with all constitutional protection of political, personal, and property rights.
The Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm (The Hegelian Dialectic)
1) The government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others
2) The people react by asking the government for help willing to give up their rights
3) The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
I posted a link on main indymedia site to video here, did not repost.
You need to see somebody about this conspiracy paranoia crap. 9/11 can't have just happened - it couldn't be a bunch of sicko, mad-dog terrorists out to do some bad. It couldn't just be a bunch of guys who hate us. No, they couldn't hate the US enough. No, they needed to be part of a bigger plan. No. It had to be some deep, ulterior hidden agenda. I suppose that if it snows in North Dakota this winter, there will have been some conspiracy, some secret plot to drop the temperature. Give it a rest, moron. Get a life, or end the one you have. You are sick and frickin' twisted. The real terrorists would be laughing their asses off if they heard about this crap.
In fact, tis hardly none that none other than Fidel Castro astutely studied Mein Kampf as a nascent student revolutionary, not because he was a NAZI sympathizer, but because of the information contained in it for building a mass movement. Reading out the stultifying prose it is chock full of tactics and strategy, then again so is Mao's Little Red Book, Sun Tzu's The Art of War and Der Kommunist Manifesto.
As regards being NAZI like, as opposed to being a NAZI, the ideology and tactics of Sharon and Bush,
are every bit as NAZI like as Hitler's.
When it comes to turning reality on it's head, and saying that black is white and vice versa, what comes out of Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. is every bit as
heinous, lying, obfuscating and distorting as what came out of Goebbels Ministry of Propaganda.
What has been proven to work, will always be adapted and adopted by the Plutocracy, regardless of it's source and origin.
Violence, terror and oppression create fear and victims.
Victimology is a science, the science of identity politics and propaganda (myths).
Israeli's believe they are victims.
Palestinians believe they are victims.
Americans, now, believe they are victims.
Iraq's believe they are victims.
Koreans (North and South) believe they are victims.
etc, etc, ad nauseum, ad finitum.
We are all VICTIMS. Then again the I.Rate one says, there are no victims only volunteers. When we give over our identity as self sovereign humans, manipulated by none and governable by none, we cease to become victims.
I have no truck (dealings, exchange, barter) with anyone who wears or adopts the mantle of "identity" politics, be it based on religion, ethnicity, race, politics
or even such curious and scurilous epithets as "liberal" or "conservative" - two words incidentally which are more code words than words with any meaning.
BTW, a type in the first sentence second paragraph.
Should read "It is hardly KNOWN" not hardly none.
Again my apologies.
Lebanon's ambassador to Canada is under fire for comments he made last week in an Arabic-language newspaper in response to the government's decision to ban Hizbullah.
In an interview with the newspaper Sada al Mashriq, Raymond Baaklini said Canada outlawed the Lebanese resistance group last month because of pressure from a "Zionist party" that he said "controls 90% of the Canadian media."
He also advised that Canadians travelling in the Arab world should not wear Canada T-shirts anymore, and said he had been told that "Canadian police always suspect every man with a beard and every woman with a veil."
Baaklini told later The National Post his remarks were meant for an Arabic audience and he might have phrased them differently if he were addressing English readers.
Do you REALLY want to know what happened? Quit reading speculative posts from amatuer novelists and start reading hard science from the field.
It's one thing to fight the government with rhetoric, quite another to challenge science with an actual theory.
Comparing Bush to Hitler is quite a fair, and accurate comparison, the both have so much in common, starting with being sociopaths.
You may think that, like Germany c.1930's, our country is headed for hell on a jet, but it just isn't there, yet, so don't rush it.
Let's look at another similar scenario: The OK City bombing has ex-military experts testifying an ANFO couldn't do more than scuff the outer wall, the FBI changes their story about the crater size 3 times, people in the building who survived the horror remember the ANFO truck bomb go off as a shudder and then the walls disintegrating a few seconds later as another blast ripped the building apart, and everyone and their mother is saying the support pillars crumbled from the inside. There is as much consistency in the WTC attacks as there is in the Murrah bombing. Why the disinfo if we are the victims? What comfort do we get from being mislead? None, it only breeds FEAR of the terrorist boogeymen.
Now I can buy that terrorists act on their own and create havoc on their own, but who is allowing them to do this and to what end? We have the largest military and intelligence force in the world and we can't stop a plane coming in over the nation's capital and hitting this country's military HQ? Come on... this was all done completely from a cave in a back waters country? We aren't watching for this sort of behaviour from people who have been threatening the WTC towers regularly since 1993?
Yeah Bin Laden has money and contacts and everything you need to wage a guerilla war, but we have those resources times 1,000 and we can't stop him. Not to mention the CIA has spoken with him at least twice between the embassy bombings and 9-11-01 and the second time was purportedly in France in July 2001. It's not so much that information taken in small blips as it comes out of the media looks suspicious, it's that when you weave them all together and look at all the discrepencies and information gaps that you really start to see it as something bigger than a small group of disgruntled terrorists. Pile historical context onto this blanket and you really start to wonder what it's all covering.
Why the deceit and disinformation if you have nothing to hide? It's certainly arguable as to the governments involvement in the actual event, but they sure have capitalized on it anyway. It's our fear that the media trades on for ratings and the current war-hawk administration trades on for support of beating the war drum (and just throw vast oil reserves in on it too).
"Where they blow smoke, they've surely built fires."
And while I am aware that the government has lied, and they could do it again, when events like 9/11 take place, I gather the information I have before me and what I can dig up (including the various links that have been provided at sfimc over the past year) and form my beliefs based upon that which I am convinced. To this point, that al-Qaeda planned and carried out this attack has the most merit.
You have some likelies you watch, but there are ten million of these morons, and you can't know the details of their stupid little plans.
These agencies cannot second-guess, with the level of precision being demanded of them, where and when the next act of terrorism will occur. Neither you, nor I, can second-guess a traffic accident we may encounter on the way home today. Or tomorrow. The possibilities are limitless. I am not saying they do a great job at anything, and they deserve a lot of criticism for 57 other reasons, but not this one.
Creationists and Conspiracy theorists on the other hand start off with a foregone conclusion and then try to find evidence to support their claims and disregard facts that don't. Instead of submitting their "scholarly" work for peer review in professional journals, they sell mass-marketed books to the layman -- "proof" to the true believers.
There's a very good reason why the vast majority of the C&Cers never directly challenge science with science of their own -- they know their evidence will not measure up to scrutiny of scientists. And that's why C&Cers are often called crazy or nuts, because we know what they refuse to see -- what they hold onto because of belief.
do you?
The possiblity of a passport surviving a plane crash and building collapse is akin to the Warren Commission finding a perfectly intact bullet on a stretcher. It is convienent beyond plausibility (just disregard physics kiddies, nothing to observe here), but we stretch our minds to it anyway.
This is a very tough subject and very sensitive on both sides. We should question what we're sold wholesale. Who watches the watchmen? Conspiracy theorists don't harm the status quo, shutting them up because you don't like where the arguments going doesn't give you the right to say all conspiracy believers belong in the same group, there is plenty of carefully followed alternative journalism that colors outside the lines and winds up at the same place conspiracy theorists land. Just because a few people say UFOs and Secret "Black Ops" Government forces are behind all ills of our country with nothing other than sci-fi conjecture, doesn't mean you can just label and dismiss anyone who would question the truth as presented.
Why is it so hard to believe we knew (as a government) before hand when FBI field agents are called off the trial of two hijackers a week before the crash, after a hijacker in a Minnesota flight school asks how to steer a 747 in air and claims he's not interested in take off or landing, after a Bronx mosque was warned to stay out of Manhattan during that fateful week, a school student of Middle Eastern descent in Brooklyn told his entire class that the buildings wouldn't be there in a week (kids just can't keep their mouths shut can they?), on and on and on... People on the street knew and our at home intelligence services were clueless. All I'm trying to say is that there are a lot of discrepancies being reported (or not being reported as the case may be) and if you think scientific thought and reasoning is the only way forward, why would you wholesale swallow what the government offically releases and ignore all other compelling evidence? Does it not fit with the sanitized version you're handed? Or is it more of an ad hominem attack? it doesn't come from smiling, good looking talking heads so we can ignore it... Chances are good if the mainstream media picks it up and then drops it quickly, it's for a good reason and you will usually find it doesn't fit the "acceptable" version of events. We're asked to look quickly and then move on.
Did our government know? We have no one stepping out to say they did, but have an awful lot of people stepping out to say we didn't and to quickly kick out of sight anything contrary to that statement.
If you can accept the mainstream media line of fact recitation, all the better for you. After all, I live in your world, the burden of proof is on me, not on you.
If, indeed, a Boeing's product is shown in that footage it would most likely be one of their fine and highly accurate CRUSE MISSILES. (My guess is that the object seen in the video, flying very, very fast and only a couple of feet off the ground, is more likely some sort of combat aircraft drone.) If you chose to take the time to search for this video or you chose to look at the few photos available from that event look for the aircraft’s debris, which should be plentiful at a crash site where a 137 ton aircraft is said to have slammed into a building at several hundred miles per hour yet it only punched a 2 meter diameter hole into its target! Where in God’s name are all the parts, parts of either the plane or of its passengers and crew?
Tell me Mr. or Ms. "[O]utrageous", generally speaking whenever a crime is of such a nature that it has a huge and everlasting impact on the citizen and the direction of this country, why is it that acceptance of the “official” explanation of the event requires the suspension of one’s logic and understanding of the basic laws of physic? To me the crimes of September 11 could only have been committed by the likes of Lee Harvey Oswald himself…if you catch my drift.
But, I wonder why did the plane that hit the Pentagon, struck the building at it's most hardened and protected area [the building was being renovated and the area was strengthened {This info was gathered from a National Geographic's TV documentary}]?
I think that the plane really hit the Pentagon, but what actually transpires {rather than the plane hitting the Pentagon}, is the bigger mystery.
But, I wonder why did the plane that hit the Pentagon, struck the building at it's most hardened and protected area [the building was being renovated and the area was strengthened {This info was gathered from a National Geographic's TV documentary}]?
I think that the plane really hit the Pentagon, but what actually transpires {rather than the plane hitting the Pentagon}, is the bigger mystery.
But, I wonder why did the plane that hit the Pentagon, struck the building at it's most hardened and protected area [the building was being renovated and the area was strengthened {This info was gathered from a National Geographic's TV documentary}]?
I think that the plane really hit the Pentagon, but what actually transpires {rather than the plane hitting the Pentagon}, is the bigger mystery.
God be with you. VUMSDOR
(snip)
On Halloween Night 1938, Orson Welles produced a radio play based on H.G. Wells's War of the Worlds. Many Americans, either tuning in late or possessing what by modern standards is an almost quaint level of naïveté, believed that it was not fiction, that invaders from Mars had actually landed in New Jersey and were laying waste to all before them. Panic ensued. Many people fled for their lives. Others got Old Betsy down from her place over the mantelpiece and rushed out into the yard to have at 'em. Casualties were reported.
This was not lost on the psychological warriors of the world. Ten months later, Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels spoke on the radio. He told the German people an only slightly less outlandish tale, that not Martians, but Poles had invaded. Unlike Welles, the Nazis had actually prepared some faux evidence. They were emboldened by the success of the Reichstag Fire, a ruse that had swept German civil rights and the last of the Nazi's internal opposition away with one blow. The Nazis dressed up some prisoners in Polish uniforms, broadcast a violently provocative diatribe from a radio transmitter a few miles from the Polish border, shot the place up, and left it strewn with corpses.
This stunt ultimately proved to be the single most deadly psy op in all of human history (we hope). It was called Operation Canned Meat. The German people, who are apparently dumb as Yanks any day, fell for it hook, line, and sinker. They counterattacked clear to the gates of Moscow. Casualties were reported.
(snip)
Bush is on his way to becoming the most feared person in the world. He now gave himself the power to use first-strike nuclear weapons. He is also slowly turning the U.S into a dictatorship. if you were to fallow how Hitler became so empowered, you will see that Bush is doing the exact same thing.
I hope one day that sick twisted SOB gets what he deserves; a surface to air missile right up his ass.
Airplanes are made of aluminum, aluminum melts and burns in air accidents. The fuel was the bulk of the weight and did the most impact damage.
The stupidity expressed here should be grounds for castration. Spare the gene pool..Slit you throat on occam's razor...
Have you no decency at all?
http://www.slashsgoodies.com/picview.php?pic=darwin.jpg
I don't think you're a moron, but I think you're REALLY reading way too much into things. The way I see it (and I'm not going to go into detail because I'm only here cause this is an assigned research paper) is that the US government is designed so that conspiracies cannot exist, or for that, last. Bush will be gone in a few years. No president gets reelected after declaring a war.
AND! I sure don't feel like my civil liberties have been taken away from me. In fact, I just got out of the navy where I didn't have any. While in my 6th month of my enlistment, I asked to get out and they let me. And that's something that a lot of people don't know you can do. The war on drugs might be against the constitution, but I don't see anything else.
When it comes right down to it...I look at this war in a utilitarian point of view, so it's easy for me to justify our actions. But all in all... Saddam Hussein is a RACIST and a PURSECUTIONIST. Not "evil" because I’m atheist evil isn't even in my Vocab.... but he abuses his people and the world would be better off without him.
So I'm not going to cut you down, but I know there is not any fun in being a radical. I'm a liberal myself, but support my shipmates and those other service men and women. Saying to myself* FUCKING HIPPIES!*
In this article, placed on a D O D website, RUMSFELD ADMITS A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON.
DO ANY OF YOU SHEEP EVER GET A CLUE?
I'll be honest folks. I didn't buy into the whole 9/11 conspiracy thing until 10 months ago. I never even realized just how easy it would be for me (an intellectual who takes nothing for granted) to be easily duped, until one day, a muslim coworker told me that he believed in this conspiracy and challenged me to check it out myself. So I did, with the intent to prove him wrong, only to find out that maybe I was the one who was wrong. The pentagon thing is clearly an issue, but honestly, I'm more concerned with the physics behind the WTC. I have an engineering background (2 bachelor's degrees) and while I couldn't care less about people nitpicking the President's words as to where and what he saw on TV, but I do care about published reports saying that refined Kerosene (which burns at about 1500 F) could cause steel supports to melt (which melts at 2900 F) uniformly across every structure (not possible) and cause the buildings to collapse from the ground (not from the impact site). That's what makes me sick.
I don't take sick pleasure out of being right on this issue. I WANT TO BE WRONG, and in some perverse sort of way, I wouldn't mind being ignorant again either. My challenge to those who claim that there is no conspiracy, is simple: PROVE IT, and do it so that I can believe you too.
Oh yeah, to the idiot said that "creationists and conspiracy theorirsts start off with forgone conclusions and then find the facts to fit their theory." I'd like to know if you used the scientific method to prove there is no conspiracy, or do you rigorously test those whom you would like to believe (such as the government or media members) so that you ensure that they use this method? I doubt it... You just assume that they did. Personally, if you actually used your precious scientific method, you'd probably find that your evolutionist friends are just as guilty as the creationists whom you derride.
Your ignorance is only surpassed by your arrogance.