Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Ukraine: A war for the disintegrating world order
The situation surrounding Russia's invasion cannot be explained by Putin's wickedness as an autocratic ruler, nor by the wickedness of the actions of Western actors. What is decisive is the structural context in which the actors' actions are embedded. It is the context of the collapse of the dominant world order1 and its empires2
Ukraine: A war for the disintegrating world order
by Herbert Böttcher
[This article published in March 2022 is translated from the German on the Internet, EXIT! Krise und Kritik der Warengesellschaft.]
First published in a slightly modified form on: https://www.oekumenisches-netz.de.
Russia's cynical attack on Ukraine is to be condemned without ifs and buts and cannot be justified by anything. It leaves dead and wounded, drives people into flight and destroys vital infrastructure. With this war, the 'world order wars' find a new and dangerous level of escalation. Since the battles over Iraq and former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, they have been waged primarily in and around failing states, primarily in the global South. For countless people, they have destroyed livelihoods. To this day, they continue to drive more and more people into flight and death.
The situation surrounding Russia's invasion cannot be explained by Putin's wickedness as an autocratic ruler, nor by the wickedness of the actions of Western actors. What is decisive is the structural context in which the actors' actions are embedded. It is the context of the collapse of the dominant world order1 and its empires2 in the crisis of capitalism. It can no longer be confined to 'disintegrating states' on the periphery, but as a process of disintegration is also 'closing in' on the European states. In 1989, the capitalist West considered itself the victor over the collapsed East. It was not recognized that not a system competitor, but the 'twin brother' of the capitalist West had met its end: the statist variant of commodity production, also called state capitalism. The collapse of this variant of commodity production, however, was already an expression of the fact that capitalist commodity production is heading for its final crisis, because it is forced to replace value and value-added labor by technology and thus to cut off its own water. The locational competition that accompanies modern commodity production led the Eastern bloc to ruin because of its etatistically limited capitalist options for action, to the second great "collapse of modernization" (Robert Kurz) after the debt crisis of the global South.
Wars born out of the crises of the capitalist world system
It is logically consistent that the victorious West also got more and more into crisis. It acts itself out in the generally known but misunderstood crisis phenomena: social division processes, indebtedness, destruction of ecological livelihoods, disintegration of states, increasing (civil) wars, migration and flight, ideological and violent 'processing strategies'... Also affected by these disintegration processes are the formerly bipolar Eastern and Western empires, which moreover had to deal with the competitor China. Countries in the Western centers were able to cushion the crisis processes by shifting them outward: the U.S. via deficit cycles in which - mediated by the dollar as world money - exorbitant debt could be maintained for decades within the framework of a veritable financial bubble economy. The status of the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency was guaranteed not least by the military power of the United States. In the context of the disintegration processes, there were again and again Western interventions and wars, often contrary to international law and legitimized with lies - among others in former Yugoslavia, in Iraq or in Afghanistan with a massacre ordered by Bundeswehr Colonel Klein in 2009. Behind the defense of Germany at the Hindu Kush and the so-called humanitarian interventions nothing else was hidden than the attempt to create order in a disintegrating global world in the Western sense - a clearly failed endeavor3. Nevertheless, it was no longer possible for the U.S. and its NATO allies to maintain their role as world police and thus as guarantor of the capitalist order - the Syrian conflict at the latest made this all too clear. Germany, with its 'success model' Hartz IV and the associated reduction in labor costs, was able to rise to become the export (vice) world champion, financing its export surpluses through the indebtedness of importing countries in the European and global periphery, while the processes of disintegration progressed, especially on the peripheries of Western and Eastern Europe.
The Crisis in Ukraine and the Crisis in Russia
While the crisis processes also intensified in the Western countries, the related internal contradictions were compensated for economically and politically by expansion to the East - contrary to assurances given in 1989/90 - above all via NATO's eastward enlargement. The 'defeated' Russia became a negligible factor in the calculation of power - degraded to a supplier of raw materials on a 'third world' level. These processes were accompanied militarily by activities that extended beyond the alliance area. Security guarantees demanded by Russia were denied and, at the same time, under President Trump, important arms control agreements were abandoned and the alliance's own armaments were further advanced.
The scare now is that Russia wants to assert itself as a great power and secure its spheres of influence similar to the U.S. and Europe. After the disastrous 'power games' over Syria, Ukraine, which - with the support of Europe and the USA - has been set on a pro-Western course, is now the place of execution. Its pro-Western orientation is not simply an expression of free self-determination, but integrated into the global crisis. As an eroding state, Ukraine had become a service store for oligarchs of various stripes. Some of the oligarchs, and with them the so-called democracy movement, saw a way out of the "oligarch and disintegration struggle" in a liaison with the West. This path promised democracy and human rights and subjected Ukraine to a structural adjustment regime in the usual manner, which further impoverished the impoverished population and at the same time tried to keep job-seeking Ukrainians out of the European labor markets - cheap labor being an exception. Due to Western economic and political penetration in the wake of EU and NATO enlargements, Eastern Europe - much like Southern Europe - has become an extended cheap production site and indebted consumer for Western goods. In the contradictory nature of the situation, it should not be misunderstood that the Western desire for enlargement was and is accompanied by the understandable and justified need of Eastern Europe to finally and forever leave Soviet and now Russian domination behind.
While the West increasingly limited Russia's sphere of influence, Russia was pushed more and more into the role of an energy and raw materials supplier within the framework of economic cooperation. Russia wants to set a limit to this with the war against Ukraine (as well as earlier with foreign deployments in Syria or Libya). On the one hand, this unjustifiable war is associated with suffering and death of the population. Moreover, it is particularly dangerous because it is accompanied by Russian dreams of great power, which are historically or ideologically linked to delusional dreams of a great Russian empire, which are legitimized in religious fundamentalist terms. Putin already justified the conquest of Crimea with the sacral and religious significance of the island for Russia, since it was in Crimea that the Kiev Grand Prince Vladimir had accepted Christianity in 988. Among the reactionary philosophers favored by Putin is Ivan Ilyin (1883-1954), whose body, buried in Switzerland, Putin had 'brought home' in 2005 with an appropriate staging. According to him, the state is, entirely in the fascist understanding, an organic community, which - analogous to the Foucaultian 'pastoral power' - is governed and held together by an understanding and caring monarch. On the cutting edge of postmodern times is also Aleksander Dugin, one of Putin's court philosophers. He claims that truth is a matter of faith and that there is a special Russian truth. Such thinking moves in the vicinity of ethnic ideas of identity, which, for example, went hand in hand with genocide in the world order wars waged in the Balkans in the 1990s.
Within the framework of these ideas, the confrontation with the West is culturally and religiously charged in a fundamentalist-identitarian way. The East defends its own religious and cultural identity against the religious and moral decline of the West. Against liberal Western democracy, the idea of autocracy, the rule of one person, is represented here. Ukraine, which in Putin's view belongs to Russia, must be brought back to the realm to which it 'originally' belonged. All countries that could be counted among the haze of a Greater Russian Empire have cause for concern. This is especially true for Poland, which has been the victim of (Great) Russian and German interests several times in its history.
War for freedom, democracy and human rights
Compared to such fantasies of Putin and Co., the Western 'narratives' of freedom, democracy and human rights are by no means rational, but also have a mythological character. On the one hand, they are refuted by the realities of the crisis - from repressions against refugees to social cuts and the dismantling of freedom rights to the well-known wars of world order including gigantic militarization thrusts. In the process, they are inextricably linked to capitalist relations of domination. The more the crisis progresses, the more capitalist liberalism will again decompose more and more into authoritarian and repressive structures and ideologies, analogous to the history of the enforcement of capitalism. They are not the opposite of liberalism, but its indispensable flip side. Similar to the post-1989 hallucinations of the West's victory over communism, it is now part of the West's 'life lies' to defend an out-of-control dictator and a Russian-dominated authoritarian East against a West acting prudently on the basis of democratic values. The commodity-producing system, which has come up against its internal logical and external ecological limits and to which the supposed socialist alternatives also belonged, is getting more and more out of control. This is reflected in the actions of the actors who, in the current situation, overplay the real powerlessness in a megalomaniacal way - not unlike their out-of-control counterparts in such megalomania.
The dangerous aspect of the current situation lies not least in the fact that it is not understood as an expression of the global crisis of world capital, in which the globe is being sacrificed to the irrational end in itself of the multiplication of money or capital - if the decision-makers go completely mad, even in a nuclear strike 4. Harald Kujat, former Inspector General of the German Armed Forces and Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, for example, has warned of the risk of miscalculations and human and technical failure. In the escalating crisis of capitalist commodity production, it is by no means good and evil, rationality and irrationality that confront each other, but agents and subjects who are caught up in structures of fetishized relations and their normative and symbolic charges. Without recognizing their deadly and irrational character, they imagine themselves to be on the good and rational side, while the opposite side is assigned to the realm of evil and irrationality. Both poles of one and the same crisis capitalism have to be overcome - and not one of them has to be taken at face value and the arsenal of weapons has to be further increased. Thinking in terms of such polarities is an expression of an immanent view in which nation states and their interests are always presupposed. The immanent difficulties in resolving the conflicts, if not in resolving them, then at least in preventing them from escalating into wars that can ultimately no longer be controlled, makes it clear once again that the nation-states are part of the commodity-producing fetish system, within the framework of which there can be no peaceful coexistence of people - all the less so the more the crises intensify at all levels. Anyone who analyzes the situation soberly will realize that the only illusionless and realistic perspective that remains is a critique of this fetish system aimed at overcoming it.
Full-bodied, naive, under-complex - and many questions
The speeches and actions of the German government prove to be full-bodied, naive and under-complex. When the chancellor speaks of a "turning point in time," he means a clear edge in the struggle between good and evil, between Russian dictatorship and the free West. His Green foreign minister even talks about "ruining Russia. The instruments for this are arms deliveries to Ukraine, economic sanctions and a 100 billion euro armament buildup. All this lies in the blind logic of what has contributed to the current escalation: intensified competition between the blocs in the disintegrating world system accompanied by economic cooperation that is now being terminated. It is absurd: a policy that has failed is now being piously imposed, sold and hailed as a solution on a higher and more dangerous rung of the problem ladder. The bloodiest part of the battle against an overpowering opponent is to be fought out by the Ukrainians, who are praised as heroic. It is to be feared that the longer the fighting continues, the more people - soldiers and civilians - will be sacrificed and given heroic status in gratitude or to legitimize their sacrifice.
The consequences of rearmament and economic sanctions are foreseeable: among other things, the aggravation of crises through higher economic burdens. They can already be seen in the form of price increases for heating oil, fuel and gas. Natural gas is needed not only for heating, but also for numerous processes in industry. The high gas prices will therefore also affect the economy, possibly even leading to company closures due to fuel shortages. As the economic situation worsens, so do the prospects for implementing the measures that are essential in view of the worsening climate crisis. And what will become of the libertarian subject, who cannot endure even limited restrictions on 'a liberty' in fighting the Corona pandemic, and who fears climate protection more than severe weather, when there could be even more severe restrictions on capitalist normality? All the problems surrounding conspiracy mania, racism and anti-Semitism are likely to be further aggravated if the financing of armaments and economic sanctions in the crisis of capitalism increasingly reaches its limits along with corresponding austerity measures, there are economic collapses, increasing inflation and the bursting of financial bubbles. In the U.S., Trump and his band of supporters could gain even more momentum, betting on 'America first' without regard for what is happening in the rest of the world. In Germany, it is to be feared that the AfD will benefit, which - along with the Left - is pretty much the only party to point out the social consequences of economic sanctions and rearmament.
It is already clear that people with low incomes will not be able to cope with the already looming cost increases in heating costs and food. Russia and Ukraine, among others, are major wheat producers. Especially in countries of the two-thirds world, food crises will intensify, if they are not already there - as in Madagascar, among others - due to climate change. This applies both to the lack of imports from Russia and to rising energy prices, which are highly relevant for transport and agriculture. And what will then become of the fleeing and refugees? The 'welcome culture' that flared up in 2015 was not only quickly over, but turned into hatred and aggression towards non-Western people. At present, the politically 'right' refugees are still coming from Ukraine. But what happens when more and more people feel forced to flee? And what will happen to the refugees who are forced to flee as a result of economic sanctions and increasing political repression from Russia, but who are not seen in a direct connection with the war in Ukraine, or who are not granted asylum because of their origin? It is to be feared that refugees will be massively played off against each other and that repression against those fleeing from the global crisis countries will be intensified. While white refugees from Ukraine are rightly accepted as a matter of course, non-white refugees are prevented from crossing the border from Ukraine, Poland's highly militarized border with Belarus, where an unknown number of asylum seekers camp hungrily in the cold, remains closed. A foretaste of future disputes is offered by the legitimations of such actions. Slovakia's communications office let slip in a since-deleted tweet, "Ukrainian refugees come from an environment that in a cultural religious and historical sense is something different than that from which refugees from Afghanistan come." Similarly, Bulgaria's Prime Minister Petkov speaks of refugees coming from Ukraine "to whom we are accustomed. These people are Europeans. These people are intelligent. They are educated...not people with unclear pasts who may even have been terrorists."
If perspectives for ways out of the increasingly worsening crises of capitalist socialization are to emerge, it is indispensable to look at the whole5 of conditions and their complex entanglements. It is necessary to break with the myths and life lies of the 'free West' as well as with those of a mission for a Russian empire or any other autocratic fundamentalism. They must be replaced by an unvarnished and self-critical reflection on the entanglements and entanglements of the current crisis constellations. The most dangerous seems to be an identitarian amalgamation into a bulwark of good against evil, of freedom against dictatorship, which ignores the victims of Western freedom as well as its authoritarian-dictatorial and racist flip side.
https://exit-online.org/textanz1.php?tabelle=aktuelles&index=23&posnr=765. ^
https://exit-online.org/textanz1.php?tabelle=aktuelles&index=2&posnr=805. ^
https://exit-online.org/textanz1.php?tabelle=autoren&index=45&posnr=640&backtext1=text1.php. ^
https://www.oekumenisches-netz.de/2021/09/der-atomare-todestrieb-impuls-zur-pax-christi-dioezesanversammlung-2021/. ^
https://www.oekumenisches-netz.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Ganze_final.pdf. ^
by Herbert Böttcher
[This article published in March 2022 is translated from the German on the Internet, EXIT! Krise und Kritik der Warengesellschaft.]
First published in a slightly modified form on: https://www.oekumenisches-netz.de.
Russia's cynical attack on Ukraine is to be condemned without ifs and buts and cannot be justified by anything. It leaves dead and wounded, drives people into flight and destroys vital infrastructure. With this war, the 'world order wars' find a new and dangerous level of escalation. Since the battles over Iraq and former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, they have been waged primarily in and around failing states, primarily in the global South. For countless people, they have destroyed livelihoods. To this day, they continue to drive more and more people into flight and death.
The situation surrounding Russia's invasion cannot be explained by Putin's wickedness as an autocratic ruler, nor by the wickedness of the actions of Western actors. What is decisive is the structural context in which the actors' actions are embedded. It is the context of the collapse of the dominant world order1 and its empires2 in the crisis of capitalism. It can no longer be confined to 'disintegrating states' on the periphery, but as a process of disintegration is also 'closing in' on the European states. In 1989, the capitalist West considered itself the victor over the collapsed East. It was not recognized that not a system competitor, but the 'twin brother' of the capitalist West had met its end: the statist variant of commodity production, also called state capitalism. The collapse of this variant of commodity production, however, was already an expression of the fact that capitalist commodity production is heading for its final crisis, because it is forced to replace value and value-added labor by technology and thus to cut off its own water. The locational competition that accompanies modern commodity production led the Eastern bloc to ruin because of its etatistically limited capitalist options for action, to the second great "collapse of modernization" (Robert Kurz) after the debt crisis of the global South.
Wars born out of the crises of the capitalist world system
It is logically consistent that the victorious West also got more and more into crisis. It acts itself out in the generally known but misunderstood crisis phenomena: social division processes, indebtedness, destruction of ecological livelihoods, disintegration of states, increasing (civil) wars, migration and flight, ideological and violent 'processing strategies'... Also affected by these disintegration processes are the formerly bipolar Eastern and Western empires, which moreover had to deal with the competitor China. Countries in the Western centers were able to cushion the crisis processes by shifting them outward: the U.S. via deficit cycles in which - mediated by the dollar as world money - exorbitant debt could be maintained for decades within the framework of a veritable financial bubble economy. The status of the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency was guaranteed not least by the military power of the United States. In the context of the disintegration processes, there were again and again Western interventions and wars, often contrary to international law and legitimized with lies - among others in former Yugoslavia, in Iraq or in Afghanistan with a massacre ordered by Bundeswehr Colonel Klein in 2009. Behind the defense of Germany at the Hindu Kush and the so-called humanitarian interventions nothing else was hidden than the attempt to create order in a disintegrating global world in the Western sense - a clearly failed endeavor3. Nevertheless, it was no longer possible for the U.S. and its NATO allies to maintain their role as world police and thus as guarantor of the capitalist order - the Syrian conflict at the latest made this all too clear. Germany, with its 'success model' Hartz IV and the associated reduction in labor costs, was able to rise to become the export (vice) world champion, financing its export surpluses through the indebtedness of importing countries in the European and global periphery, while the processes of disintegration progressed, especially on the peripheries of Western and Eastern Europe.
The Crisis in Ukraine and the Crisis in Russia
While the crisis processes also intensified in the Western countries, the related internal contradictions were compensated for economically and politically by expansion to the East - contrary to assurances given in 1989/90 - above all via NATO's eastward enlargement. The 'defeated' Russia became a negligible factor in the calculation of power - degraded to a supplier of raw materials on a 'third world' level. These processes were accompanied militarily by activities that extended beyond the alliance area. Security guarantees demanded by Russia were denied and, at the same time, under President Trump, important arms control agreements were abandoned and the alliance's own armaments were further advanced.
The scare now is that Russia wants to assert itself as a great power and secure its spheres of influence similar to the U.S. and Europe. After the disastrous 'power games' over Syria, Ukraine, which - with the support of Europe and the USA - has been set on a pro-Western course, is now the place of execution. Its pro-Western orientation is not simply an expression of free self-determination, but integrated into the global crisis. As an eroding state, Ukraine had become a service store for oligarchs of various stripes. Some of the oligarchs, and with them the so-called democracy movement, saw a way out of the "oligarch and disintegration struggle" in a liaison with the West. This path promised democracy and human rights and subjected Ukraine to a structural adjustment regime in the usual manner, which further impoverished the impoverished population and at the same time tried to keep job-seeking Ukrainians out of the European labor markets - cheap labor being an exception. Due to Western economic and political penetration in the wake of EU and NATO enlargements, Eastern Europe - much like Southern Europe - has become an extended cheap production site and indebted consumer for Western goods. In the contradictory nature of the situation, it should not be misunderstood that the Western desire for enlargement was and is accompanied by the understandable and justified need of Eastern Europe to finally and forever leave Soviet and now Russian domination behind.
While the West increasingly limited Russia's sphere of influence, Russia was pushed more and more into the role of an energy and raw materials supplier within the framework of economic cooperation. Russia wants to set a limit to this with the war against Ukraine (as well as earlier with foreign deployments in Syria or Libya). On the one hand, this unjustifiable war is associated with suffering and death of the population. Moreover, it is particularly dangerous because it is accompanied by Russian dreams of great power, which are historically or ideologically linked to delusional dreams of a great Russian empire, which are legitimized in religious fundamentalist terms. Putin already justified the conquest of Crimea with the sacral and religious significance of the island for Russia, since it was in Crimea that the Kiev Grand Prince Vladimir had accepted Christianity in 988. Among the reactionary philosophers favored by Putin is Ivan Ilyin (1883-1954), whose body, buried in Switzerland, Putin had 'brought home' in 2005 with an appropriate staging. According to him, the state is, entirely in the fascist understanding, an organic community, which - analogous to the Foucaultian 'pastoral power' - is governed and held together by an understanding and caring monarch. On the cutting edge of postmodern times is also Aleksander Dugin, one of Putin's court philosophers. He claims that truth is a matter of faith and that there is a special Russian truth. Such thinking moves in the vicinity of ethnic ideas of identity, which, for example, went hand in hand with genocide in the world order wars waged in the Balkans in the 1990s.
Within the framework of these ideas, the confrontation with the West is culturally and religiously charged in a fundamentalist-identitarian way. The East defends its own religious and cultural identity against the religious and moral decline of the West. Against liberal Western democracy, the idea of autocracy, the rule of one person, is represented here. Ukraine, which in Putin's view belongs to Russia, must be brought back to the realm to which it 'originally' belonged. All countries that could be counted among the haze of a Greater Russian Empire have cause for concern. This is especially true for Poland, which has been the victim of (Great) Russian and German interests several times in its history.
War for freedom, democracy and human rights
Compared to such fantasies of Putin and Co., the Western 'narratives' of freedom, democracy and human rights are by no means rational, but also have a mythological character. On the one hand, they are refuted by the realities of the crisis - from repressions against refugees to social cuts and the dismantling of freedom rights to the well-known wars of world order including gigantic militarization thrusts. In the process, they are inextricably linked to capitalist relations of domination. The more the crisis progresses, the more capitalist liberalism will again decompose more and more into authoritarian and repressive structures and ideologies, analogous to the history of the enforcement of capitalism. They are not the opposite of liberalism, but its indispensable flip side. Similar to the post-1989 hallucinations of the West's victory over communism, it is now part of the West's 'life lies' to defend an out-of-control dictator and a Russian-dominated authoritarian East against a West acting prudently on the basis of democratic values. The commodity-producing system, which has come up against its internal logical and external ecological limits and to which the supposed socialist alternatives also belonged, is getting more and more out of control. This is reflected in the actions of the actors who, in the current situation, overplay the real powerlessness in a megalomaniacal way - not unlike their out-of-control counterparts in such megalomania.
The dangerous aspect of the current situation lies not least in the fact that it is not understood as an expression of the global crisis of world capital, in which the globe is being sacrificed to the irrational end in itself of the multiplication of money or capital - if the decision-makers go completely mad, even in a nuclear strike 4. Harald Kujat, former Inspector General of the German Armed Forces and Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, for example, has warned of the risk of miscalculations and human and technical failure. In the escalating crisis of capitalist commodity production, it is by no means good and evil, rationality and irrationality that confront each other, but agents and subjects who are caught up in structures of fetishized relations and their normative and symbolic charges. Without recognizing their deadly and irrational character, they imagine themselves to be on the good and rational side, while the opposite side is assigned to the realm of evil and irrationality. Both poles of one and the same crisis capitalism have to be overcome - and not one of them has to be taken at face value and the arsenal of weapons has to be further increased. Thinking in terms of such polarities is an expression of an immanent view in which nation states and their interests are always presupposed. The immanent difficulties in resolving the conflicts, if not in resolving them, then at least in preventing them from escalating into wars that can ultimately no longer be controlled, makes it clear once again that the nation-states are part of the commodity-producing fetish system, within the framework of which there can be no peaceful coexistence of people - all the less so the more the crises intensify at all levels. Anyone who analyzes the situation soberly will realize that the only illusionless and realistic perspective that remains is a critique of this fetish system aimed at overcoming it.
Full-bodied, naive, under-complex - and many questions
The speeches and actions of the German government prove to be full-bodied, naive and under-complex. When the chancellor speaks of a "turning point in time," he means a clear edge in the struggle between good and evil, between Russian dictatorship and the free West. His Green foreign minister even talks about "ruining Russia. The instruments for this are arms deliveries to Ukraine, economic sanctions and a 100 billion euro armament buildup. All this lies in the blind logic of what has contributed to the current escalation: intensified competition between the blocs in the disintegrating world system accompanied by economic cooperation that is now being terminated. It is absurd: a policy that has failed is now being piously imposed, sold and hailed as a solution on a higher and more dangerous rung of the problem ladder. The bloodiest part of the battle against an overpowering opponent is to be fought out by the Ukrainians, who are praised as heroic. It is to be feared that the longer the fighting continues, the more people - soldiers and civilians - will be sacrificed and given heroic status in gratitude or to legitimize their sacrifice.
The consequences of rearmament and economic sanctions are foreseeable: among other things, the aggravation of crises through higher economic burdens. They can already be seen in the form of price increases for heating oil, fuel and gas. Natural gas is needed not only for heating, but also for numerous processes in industry. The high gas prices will therefore also affect the economy, possibly even leading to company closures due to fuel shortages. As the economic situation worsens, so do the prospects for implementing the measures that are essential in view of the worsening climate crisis. And what will become of the libertarian subject, who cannot endure even limited restrictions on 'a liberty' in fighting the Corona pandemic, and who fears climate protection more than severe weather, when there could be even more severe restrictions on capitalist normality? All the problems surrounding conspiracy mania, racism and anti-Semitism are likely to be further aggravated if the financing of armaments and economic sanctions in the crisis of capitalism increasingly reaches its limits along with corresponding austerity measures, there are economic collapses, increasing inflation and the bursting of financial bubbles. In the U.S., Trump and his band of supporters could gain even more momentum, betting on 'America first' without regard for what is happening in the rest of the world. In Germany, it is to be feared that the AfD will benefit, which - along with the Left - is pretty much the only party to point out the social consequences of economic sanctions and rearmament.
It is already clear that people with low incomes will not be able to cope with the already looming cost increases in heating costs and food. Russia and Ukraine, among others, are major wheat producers. Especially in countries of the two-thirds world, food crises will intensify, if they are not already there - as in Madagascar, among others - due to climate change. This applies both to the lack of imports from Russia and to rising energy prices, which are highly relevant for transport and agriculture. And what will then become of the fleeing and refugees? The 'welcome culture' that flared up in 2015 was not only quickly over, but turned into hatred and aggression towards non-Western people. At present, the politically 'right' refugees are still coming from Ukraine. But what happens when more and more people feel forced to flee? And what will happen to the refugees who are forced to flee as a result of economic sanctions and increasing political repression from Russia, but who are not seen in a direct connection with the war in Ukraine, or who are not granted asylum because of their origin? It is to be feared that refugees will be massively played off against each other and that repression against those fleeing from the global crisis countries will be intensified. While white refugees from Ukraine are rightly accepted as a matter of course, non-white refugees are prevented from crossing the border from Ukraine, Poland's highly militarized border with Belarus, where an unknown number of asylum seekers camp hungrily in the cold, remains closed. A foretaste of future disputes is offered by the legitimations of such actions. Slovakia's communications office let slip in a since-deleted tweet, "Ukrainian refugees come from an environment that in a cultural religious and historical sense is something different than that from which refugees from Afghanistan come." Similarly, Bulgaria's Prime Minister Petkov speaks of refugees coming from Ukraine "to whom we are accustomed. These people are Europeans. These people are intelligent. They are educated...not people with unclear pasts who may even have been terrorists."
If perspectives for ways out of the increasingly worsening crises of capitalist socialization are to emerge, it is indispensable to look at the whole5 of conditions and their complex entanglements. It is necessary to break with the myths and life lies of the 'free West' as well as with those of a mission for a Russian empire or any other autocratic fundamentalism. They must be replaced by an unvarnished and self-critical reflection on the entanglements and entanglements of the current crisis constellations. The most dangerous seems to be an identitarian amalgamation into a bulwark of good against evil, of freedom against dictatorship, which ignores the victims of Western freedom as well as its authoritarian-dictatorial and racist flip side.
https://exit-online.org/textanz1.php?tabelle=aktuelles&index=23&posnr=765. ^
https://exit-online.org/textanz1.php?tabelle=aktuelles&index=2&posnr=805. ^
https://exit-online.org/textanz1.php?tabelle=autoren&index=45&posnr=640&backtext1=text1.php. ^
https://www.oekumenisches-netz.de/2021/09/der-atomare-todestrieb-impuls-zur-pax-christi-dioezesanversammlung-2021/. ^
https://www.oekumenisches-netz.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Ganze_final.pdf. ^
For more information:
https://marcbatko.academia.edu
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$205.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network