From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Misstatements Regarding the "Pacifica Lawsuit"
Pacifica did file a complaint against New Day; however there has not been any court judgment on the complaint.
Recently there was an article posted on Indybay (10/17/21): ‘The Lies & Falsification Of Pacifica's "New Day" Exposed By Lawsuit Judgement’
The article claimed that “the Pacifica Foundation sued [New Day] and won a court judgment on all counts.”
Pacifica did file a complaint against New Day, which asked for the the election result to be upheld and tried to enjoin New Day from contesting the result of the election, and also asking for damages, however, beyond that, the reporting in the article was essentially fact free.
Pacifica members voted for the New Day Bylaws by a solid and democratic majority (6820 to 5471), and the members have the right to ascertain that their vote were counted according to the Bylaws, which they are naturally pursuing in court.
There has been no hearing on the complaint, so there are no judgements on the complaint.
On October 15th, The court only heard and denied a routine motion to transfer the matter to Alameda County.
A major victory occurred on that same day, however, Pacifica has not murmured a word about it. Three of the people who would/will become officers when/if the New Day Bylaws are validated by the court were dismissed by Pacifica from the law suit. This was a significant triumph, skillfully achieved without even going to court, because Pacifica was convinced by their lawyers that these people were wrongfully sued and could recover major damages from Pacifica if they were not immediately dismissed from the case.
The article claimed that “the Pacifica Foundation sued [New Day] and won a court judgment on all counts.”
Pacifica did file a complaint against New Day, which asked for the the election result to be upheld and tried to enjoin New Day from contesting the result of the election, and also asking for damages, however, beyond that, the reporting in the article was essentially fact free.
Pacifica members voted for the New Day Bylaws by a solid and democratic majority (6820 to 5471), and the members have the right to ascertain that their vote were counted according to the Bylaws, which they are naturally pursuing in court.
There has been no hearing on the complaint, so there are no judgements on the complaint.
On October 15th, The court only heard and denied a routine motion to transfer the matter to Alameda County.
A major victory occurred on that same day, however, Pacifica has not murmured a word about it. Three of the people who would/will become officers when/if the New Day Bylaws are validated by the court were dismissed by Pacifica from the law suit. This was a significant triumph, skillfully achieved without even going to court, because Pacifica was convinced by their lawyers that these people were wrongfully sued and could recover major damages from Pacifica if they were not immediately dismissed from the case.
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network