From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Massive Subsidies to Big Oil are Ongoing
Welfare to fossil fuel industry costs taxpayers $20 billion a year and is a major contributor to global warming.
As the environmental movement targets the financing Wells Fargo, Chase, Citybank, and other large banks do that
enables the fossil fuel industry, the US government continues its massive subsidies of the fossil fuel extractive industry.
Flying under the radar of the perception of most people are a web of arcane tax regulations that effectively propagate a class
of ultra wealthy government welfare recipients who are also major contributors to the earth's climate disaster.
Here are the four main kinds of subsidies that are costing U.S. taxpayers $20 billion a year.
Tax Expenditures:
H.R.2184 has been introduced in the House, the End Oil and Gas Tax Subsidies Act of 2021. It provides for:
Active support for the pasage of this bill should be added to the demands made on President Biden
during this week of environmental protest. It would be a start.
Source: https://www.fuelfreedom.org/oil-company-subsidies/
Here are the four main kinds of subsidies that are costing U.S. taxpayers $20 billion a year.
Tax Expenditures:
There are tax expenditures in which the federal government allows oil companies to deduct taxes during the oil-well
development process. A prime example of this is the $2.3 billion Intangible
Drilling Oil & Gas Cost Deduction that allows producers to deduct 100 percent of expenses
that aren’t directly linked to the final operation of an oil well in the year they are incurred.
Another notable example is the Last-In, First Out Accounting for Fossil Fuel Companies subsidy that allows oil companies to undervalue their inventory, reducing their amount of taxable income on the books and taking $1.5 billion out of federal coffers each year. This accounting trick that allows companies to reduce their tax bills by selling off the most expensive fossil fuel reserves first, artificially reduces the inventory on which they pay taxes by an estimated $1.7 billion per year.
Fossil fuel companies get a tax credit for taxes paid to foreign countries. Called the "Dual Capacity Tax Preference", U.S. taxpayers subsidize Big Oil’s production of foreign oil. These companies reduce their taxes by disguising royalty payments to foreign governments as taxes. Also, one can just imagine the private "arragements" possible in which oil companies could divert local expenditures (equipment, labor, etc.) through local governments as "taxes".
Direct spending subsidies: Another notable example is the Last-In, First Out Accounting for Fossil Fuel Companies subsidy that allows oil companies to undervalue their inventory, reducing their amount of taxable income on the books and taking $1.5 billion out of federal coffers each year. This accounting trick that allows companies to reduce their tax bills by selling off the most expensive fossil fuel reserves first, artificially reduces the inventory on which they pay taxes by an estimated $1.7 billion per year.
Fossil fuel companies get a tax credit for taxes paid to foreign countries. Called the "Dual Capacity Tax Preference", U.S. taxpayers subsidize Big Oil’s production of foreign oil. These companies reduce their taxes by disguising royalty payments to foreign governments as taxes. Also, one can just imagine the private "arragements" possible in which oil companies could divert local expenditures (equipment, labor, etc.) through local governments as "taxes".
These are the direct spending subsidies, such as the $229 million Inland Waters
Transport for Petroleum sbsidy. Usually, the federal government taxes shipping company using waterways
a fee proportionate to the tonnage of what they ship. Not so with oil companies.
Similar to this is the $107 million "Inadequate Administrative Fees for Onshore Drilling Management subsidy" that leaves taxpayers holding the bag for Bureau of Land Management costs associated with drilling that would otherwise be covered by the industry.
Royalty Relief subsidies: Similar to this is the $107 million "Inadequate Administrative Fees for Onshore Drilling Management subsidy" that leaves taxpayers holding the bag for Bureau of Land Management costs associated with drilling that would otherwise be covered by the industry.
These are subsidies, where oil companies carve out exemptions for themselves—
usually with the help of lawmakers
to pay significantly lower royalties
rates on the oil and gas they extract. Note who the top recipient is, none other than our favorite Senator of current fame Joe Manchin who tops the
list of fossil fuel company largess recipients at $179,450.
For example, the Lost Royalties on Offshore Drilling for Leases Issued from 1996 through 2000 subsidy came as a result of the 1995 “Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act,” something that to this day deprives taxpayers of $1.1 billion each year.
Regulatory subsidies:For example, the Lost Royalties on Offshore Drilling for Leases Issued from 1996 through 2000 subsidy came as a result of the 1995 “Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act,” something that to this day deprives taxpayers of $1.1 billion each year.
H.R.2184 has been introduced in the House, the End Oil and Gas Tax Subsidies Act of 2021. It provides for:
- increases to seven years the amortization period for geological and geophysical expenditures;
- repeals the tax credits for producing oil and gas from marginal wells and for enhanced oil recovery;
- repeals the tax deduction for the intangible drilling and development costs of oil and gas wells;
- repeals percentage depletion
- repeals the tax deduction for tertiary injectant expenses;
- repeals the passive loss exception for working interests in oil and gas property;
- denies the tax deduction for income attributable to domestic production activities for oil and gas activities;
- prohibits the use of the last-in, first-out (LIFO) accounting method by major integrated oil companies;
- limits the foreign tax credit for dual capacity taxpayers (i.e., taxpayers who are subject to a levy of a foreign country or U.S. possession and receive specific economic benefits from such country or possession); and
- expands the definition of crude oil for purposes of the excise tax on petroleum and petroleum products to include any oil derived from a bitumen or bituminous mixture (tar sands), and any oil derived from kerogen-bearing sources (oil shale).
Source: https://www.fuelfreedom.org/oil-company-subsidies/
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network