From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
DPR Recommends Interim Restrictions on Use of Chlorpyrifos
In an ongoing effort to protect human health and the environment, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation has recommended new interim restrictions on the use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos.
SACRAMENTO – In an ongoing effort to protect human health and the environment, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation has recommended new interim restrictions on the use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos.
The new measures will provide increased protections from potential exposure to the pesticide while DPR completes a formal regulatory process to list chlorpyrifos as a “toxic air contaminant” and develops permanent restrictions on its use. The department is recommending that county agricultural commissioners (CAC’s) begin implementing the interim measures on Jan. 1, 2019.
“DPR has been working with growers for years to find alternatives to this pesticide while also taking action to curtail its use through the regulatory process,” said DPR Director Brian Leahy. “These interim measures represent a significant step in our ongoing effort to protect human health and the environment.”
The interim measures include:
• Banning all aerial applications of chlorpyrifos.
• Discontinuing its use on most crops. Chlorpyrifos will be restricted to “critical uses” on crops for which there are few if any alternative pesticides, as determined by the University of California Cooperative Extension. These critical uses are listed here on DPR website
• Requiring a quarter-mile buffer zone during all allowed applications of the pesticide and for 24 hours afterwards.
• Requiring a 150-foot setback from houses, businesses, schools and other sensitive sites at all times, regardless of whether the site is occupied at the time of application.
Chlorpyrifos – which is used to control pests that threaten a variety of crops, including grapes, almonds and oranges – has declined in use over the past decade as growers have chosen safer alternatives. Use of the pesticide has dropped by more than 50 percent from two million pounds in 2005 to just over 900,000 pounds in 2016.
In 2015, DPR designated chlorpyrifos a California restricted material, meaning that only trained, licensed professionals with a permit from a local county agricultural commissioner may use products containing the pesticide. In 2017, it was added to California’s Proposition 65 list of chemicals known to cause reproductive harm.
In September 2018, following extensive scientific review and public comment, DPR proposed designating chlorpyrifos as a “toxic air contaminant,” which California law defines as an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to increases in serious illness or death, or that may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. A 45-day public comment period on the proposed designation closed on Nov. 9.
Following designation of chlorpyrifos as a toxic air contaminant, DPR is required to consult with other state and local agencies – including the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the California Air Resources Board, CAC’s and local air districts – to determine what permanent mitigation measures are needed. This regulatory process could take up to two years to complete.
More information on chlorpyrifos can be found here and a complete list of recommended restrictions can be found here.
The new measures will provide increased protections from potential exposure to the pesticide while DPR completes a formal regulatory process to list chlorpyrifos as a “toxic air contaminant” and develops permanent restrictions on its use. The department is recommending that county agricultural commissioners (CAC’s) begin implementing the interim measures on Jan. 1, 2019.
“DPR has been working with growers for years to find alternatives to this pesticide while also taking action to curtail its use through the regulatory process,” said DPR Director Brian Leahy. “These interim measures represent a significant step in our ongoing effort to protect human health and the environment.”
The interim measures include:
• Banning all aerial applications of chlorpyrifos.
• Discontinuing its use on most crops. Chlorpyrifos will be restricted to “critical uses” on crops for which there are few if any alternative pesticides, as determined by the University of California Cooperative Extension. These critical uses are listed here on DPR website
• Requiring a quarter-mile buffer zone during all allowed applications of the pesticide and for 24 hours afterwards.
• Requiring a 150-foot setback from houses, businesses, schools and other sensitive sites at all times, regardless of whether the site is occupied at the time of application.
Chlorpyrifos – which is used to control pests that threaten a variety of crops, including grapes, almonds and oranges – has declined in use over the past decade as growers have chosen safer alternatives. Use of the pesticide has dropped by more than 50 percent from two million pounds in 2005 to just over 900,000 pounds in 2016.
In 2015, DPR designated chlorpyrifos a California restricted material, meaning that only trained, licensed professionals with a permit from a local county agricultural commissioner may use products containing the pesticide. In 2017, it was added to California’s Proposition 65 list of chemicals known to cause reproductive harm.
In September 2018, following extensive scientific review and public comment, DPR proposed designating chlorpyrifos as a “toxic air contaminant,” which California law defines as an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to increases in serious illness or death, or that may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. A 45-day public comment period on the proposed designation closed on Nov. 9.
Following designation of chlorpyrifos as a toxic air contaminant, DPR is required to consult with other state and local agencies – including the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, the California Air Resources Board, CAC’s and local air districts – to determine what permanent mitigation measures are needed. This regulatory process could take up to two years to complete.
More information on chlorpyrifos can be found here and a complete list of recommended restrictions can be found here.
For more information:
https://www.cdpr.ca.gov
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network