top
Central Valley
Central Valley
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Feds fund captive breeding program for Delta smelt

by Dan Bacher
"If Delta smelt, once the most numerous species in the estuary, and winter Chinook and other species lingering on the brink of extinction go extinct, the state water board and the state and federal fishery agencies will be the responsible policies," said Bill Jennings, Executive Director of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA).
800px-delta_smelt_fish_in_hand.jpg
Feds fund captive breeding program for Delta smelt

by Dan Bacher

Delta smelt, once the most abundant fish in the Bay Delta Estuary, are now on the precipice of extinction in the wild. Sadly, there’s only one place where the fish can be found by the thousands — the Fish Conservation and Culture Laboratory (FCCL) of the University of California, Davis.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation recently awarded the UC Davis lab’s captive breeding program, located in Byron near Discovery Bay, a total of $10 million over a four-year period to continue and improve its work preserving the imperiled species.

This is a critical time for the survival of the smelt. The latest trawl survey by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) found just six smelt. That survey follows the fall midwater trawl survey, when biologists recorded the lowest number of smelt ever documented, 8, at a total of 100 sites sampled from September through December.

The 2.0 to 2.8 inch long fish is an indicator species that demonstrates the health of the Bay Delta Estuary. The species, found only in the estuary, was federally listed as “threatened” in 1993 and as “endangered” under the California Endangered Species Act in 2009.

For the past seven years, the laboratory, in collaboration with the UC Davis Genomic Variation Lab, has been raising a refuge population of Delta smelt, “preserving their genetic diversity and providing a supply of the fish for scientific research,” according to a UC Davis news release.

“The refuge population provides a level of protection against species extinction,” said Tien-Chieh Hung, director of the FCCL at UC Davis. “Our laboratory is, so far, the only place in the country that regularly reproduces and raises the Delta smelt throughout their whole life cycle, creating a supply for further studies.”

In announcing the funding, the Bureau said there “an urgent need for a genetically managed refugial population of Delta smelt to serve as a critical safeguard against species extinction in the event that the natural population continues its decline.”

The Bureau said maintaining a genetically diverse population of Delta smelt in captivity would provide a seed population for future rehabilitation - should the smelt’s habitat ever recover from decades of Delta export pumping, water diversions, pollution and other factors.

Aa safeguard against extinction, the lab starts its spawning season by producing about 200,000 Delta smelt eggs and cultures approximately 20,000 fish each year.

The goals of the project are to:
• Continue to develop the Delta smelt refuge population as a safeguard against species extinction;
•Create a genetically sound population of captive fish for research purposes; and
• Conduct experiments on smelt physiology, health, condition and behavior.

Delta smelt habitat is currently under assault after decades of the state and federal governments exporting water south from the Delta to corporate agribusiness interests, Southern California water agencies and oil companies conducting fracking and steam injection operations.

The situation of the smelt is so critical that Peter Moyle, a professor and fish biologist with the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, this March told the Delta Stewardship Council to “prepare for the extinction of the Delta smelt in the wild."

Moyle said the latest state trawl survey found only six smelt — two males and four females — where there normally would have been several hundred. He also said there is no reliable estimate of the past and present numbers of Delta smelt.

“When it comes to past and present numbers of smelt, we don't have real estimates, only the indices,” said Moyle. “Folks have tried but the efforts stretch credulity. In a sense exact numbers don't matter.”

Moyle emphasized, “The real question is have densities gotten so low, the population is below a threshold of maintaining itself? Can males and females even find one another?"

Moyle said the reasons behind the collapse of the Delta smelt are complex, starting with the change in the estuary caused by the removal of freshwater.

“I wish there was a single smoking gun for the crash of delta smelt but there are many, starting with the change to the estuarine hydrodynamics created by removal of freshwater by upstream diverters, in-delta diverters, and the pumps in the south delta," he said.

“Some others (not an exclusive list) include predation on larvae by silversides, reduction in food supply by clams and ammonium discharges, increases in water clarity and diverse micro-contaminants. I think drought has exacerbated the effects of all these conditions,” said Moyle.

“In the short run, there is not much we can do. The long run is more complicated,” said Moyle.

Bill Jennings, Executive Director of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, responded to the announcement of the federal funding for the project by stating, “It’s laudable – but if we can’t establish the natural conditions that will support the fish in the estuary, it does little good to have a few fish in a tank in the UC Davis program.”

“If Delta smelt go extinct in the wild, the same thing will happen again if UC Davis fish are dumped into the estuary. You have to change the hydrology of the estuary,” said Jennings.

As for the causes of the Delta smelt’s decline, Jennings said all of the factors are either caused or exacerbated by the lack of freshwater flows.

“The fact that our regulatory agencies are unable to protect the public trust resources to slow the increase in pollutant discharges into the estuary is an indictment of regulators that have been captured by special political interests,” said Jennings. “If Delta smelt, once the most numerous species, and winter Chinook and other species lingering on the brink of extinction go extinct, the state water board and the state and federal fishery agencies will be the responsible policies."

The collapse of Delta smelt occurs as part of a larger ecosystem decline since the State Water Project started pumping massive quantities of water south of the Delta in 1967. The fall midwater trawl surveys conducted annually by the California Department of Wildlife show that population indices of Delta smelt, striped bass, longfin smelt, threadfin shad, American shad and Sacramento splittail have declined 97.80%, 99.70%, 99.98%, 97.80%, 91.90%, and 98.50%, respectively, between 1967 and 2014, according to Jennings.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Beeline
It seems we are destined to counter problems with one technology with another form of technology rather than just changing the cause.

We know that water diversion is the major cause of fisheries decline but instead smelt will be grown in an artificial environment. We know that fossil fuel use causes major environmental problems but the technology of solar radiation management uses a form of pollution in the upper atmosphere so that fossil fuel pollution can continue. We know that solar radiation management causes a negative shift in rainfall patterns but large corporations can make more money on water futures.

The government/corporate complex has taken another step toward economic, social and biosphere collapse.
by Tom A.
I have been discussing this article with a colleague and we both noted the emphasis on causation but lack of effects. It is laudable in the extreme that you all have described the problem, but to what end? To be blunt, what happens if the smelt go extinct, or the other fish species for that matter? Are there models that forecast a Bay Delta with no smelt?
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$205.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network