From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
An Open Letter about Student Protests at UCSC
While there have been vociferous expressions of support and solidarity for the recent UC student protests, a number of students, parents, faculty, administrators, and members of the greater Santa Cruz community have expressed frustration, what borders on vitriolic hatred, and ad hominem attacks against those who took to the highways and most recently to the campus entrances. As longterm members of the UC community, we know firsthand that these students are fighting so that all students might afford the quality public education we have been promised, fighting so that students of color, low income students, queer students, gender nonconforming students, trans* students, and other marginalized and underrepresented students can obtain an education without fear of reprisal in the form of legal, verbal, or physical harassment.
An Open Letter about Student Protests at UCSC:
In the last week, it seems that everyone has something to say about the polarizing spate of UCSC student protests. While there have been vociferous expressions of support and solidarity for the protests, a number of students, parents, faculty, administrators, and members of the greater Santa Cruz community have expressed frustration, disappointment, and what borders on vitriolic hatred and ad hominem attacks against those who took to the highways, to the streets, and most recently to the campus entrances. In the face of so many instances of structural inequalities at the university, these student-activists have been taking a stand against ballooning tuition hikes, engorged salaries for the top tiers of university administration, and targeted police violence. As a former UC undergraduate, and current UC graduate students, it has been troubling to see so much anger directed at these students, who are desperately fighting for their livelihoods, and so little anger focused on the root of the problem. As longterm members of the UC community, we know firsthand that these students are fighting so that all students might afford the quality public education we have been promised, fighting so that students of color, queer students, gender nonconforming students, trans* students, and other marginalized and underrepresented students can obtain an education without fear of reprisal in the form of legal, verbal, or physical harassment.
The palpable outrage lobbied at the students is in part because we are not used to inconvenience and discomfort in this sleepy beach town of ours. Still, common comforts and expectations of convenience must never take precedence over things like empathy and a recognition of the historical conditions that have enabled the students to view freedom of speech and freedom of protest as viable outlets of voicing concern and affecting change for a more inclusive and equitable system of education and liberation. Ironically, the history of resistance, defiance, and free-thinking is one that the university’s top administrators are currently capitalising on. In this, the 50th anniversary of UC Santa Cruz, the banners and flyers bearing the university’s tagline is, “UCSC: The original authority on questioning authority.” The marketing has been everywhere: banners about questioning authority, being innovative, creative, and dedicated to community and education. Instead of recognizing that these students are building off of this legacy-turned-marketing ploy, the banners flap in the wind as students routinely lay in handcuffs and face academic sanctions.
Many have not paused to ask themselves why students are taking such extreme measures and instead dismiss these acts as disrespectful or embarrassing. This sense of embarrassment is misplaced. We should be embarrassed that we have failed to keep the promise of free, quality public education. The University continues to marginalize students based on color, class, creed, gender and sexual identity. These problems have been brought to the attention of the administration on a nearly daily basis, yet the administration shrugs their shoulder and turn their backs. The students blocking the highway, inconveniencing your day, have been pushed to put their bodies on the line by university and government policies. Until we listen to what they have to say, civil disobedience is their only option. We should not be ashamed of them, but ashamed of the University that fails them.
In solidarity,
SA Smythe
Solidarity Officer of the Grad Student Association
History of Consciousness PhD Student,
Literature and Feminist Studies, D.E., UCSC
Jennifer K. Teschler
Co-President of the Grad Student Association
Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology (METX), PhD Student, UCSC
UCSC/ Thimann Receiving
In the last week, it seems that everyone has something to say about the polarizing spate of UCSC student protests. While there have been vociferous expressions of support and solidarity for the protests, a number of students, parents, faculty, administrators, and members of the greater Santa Cruz community have expressed frustration, disappointment, and what borders on vitriolic hatred and ad hominem attacks against those who took to the highways, to the streets, and most recently to the campus entrances. In the face of so many instances of structural inequalities at the university, these student-activists have been taking a stand against ballooning tuition hikes, engorged salaries for the top tiers of university administration, and targeted police violence. As a former UC undergraduate, and current UC graduate students, it has been troubling to see so much anger directed at these students, who are desperately fighting for their livelihoods, and so little anger focused on the root of the problem. As longterm members of the UC community, we know firsthand that these students are fighting so that all students might afford the quality public education we have been promised, fighting so that students of color, queer students, gender nonconforming students, trans* students, and other marginalized and underrepresented students can obtain an education without fear of reprisal in the form of legal, verbal, or physical harassment.
The palpable outrage lobbied at the students is in part because we are not used to inconvenience and discomfort in this sleepy beach town of ours. Still, common comforts and expectations of convenience must never take precedence over things like empathy and a recognition of the historical conditions that have enabled the students to view freedom of speech and freedom of protest as viable outlets of voicing concern and affecting change for a more inclusive and equitable system of education and liberation. Ironically, the history of resistance, defiance, and free-thinking is one that the university’s top administrators are currently capitalising on. In this, the 50th anniversary of UC Santa Cruz, the banners and flyers bearing the university’s tagline is, “UCSC: The original authority on questioning authority.” The marketing has been everywhere: banners about questioning authority, being innovative, creative, and dedicated to community and education. Instead of recognizing that these students are building off of this legacy-turned-marketing ploy, the banners flap in the wind as students routinely lay in handcuffs and face academic sanctions.
Many have not paused to ask themselves why students are taking such extreme measures and instead dismiss these acts as disrespectful or embarrassing. This sense of embarrassment is misplaced. We should be embarrassed that we have failed to keep the promise of free, quality public education. The University continues to marginalize students based on color, class, creed, gender and sexual identity. These problems have been brought to the attention of the administration on a nearly daily basis, yet the administration shrugs their shoulder and turn their backs. The students blocking the highway, inconveniencing your day, have been pushed to put their bodies on the line by university and government policies. Until we listen to what they have to say, civil disobedience is their only option. We should not be ashamed of them, but ashamed of the University that fails them.
In solidarity,
SA Smythe
Solidarity Officer of the Grad Student Association
History of Consciousness PhD Student,
Literature and Feminist Studies, D.E., UCSC
Jennifer K. Teschler
Co-President of the Grad Student Association
Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology (METX), PhD Student, UCSC
UCSC/ Thimann Receiving
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
We have seen all kinds of protests over the student debt, yet it continues to grow. That is because students continue to take out loans instead of just refusing to go to school if they cannot afford it and instead go to work at a fulltime job. The post office is hiring in all kinds of positions, as is FedEx. With any job comes the most important thing you will have: A PAYCHECK. With the paycheck comes not only a steady income but also you pay into Social Security (good for both disability and retirement), Medicare, state disability coverage and unemployment insurance. Your employer usually provides medical coverage as well. Some provide a pension plan. If you make enough, you can save for retirement. And most importantly, you have no debt and you can sleep well each night.
The more students refuse to go to school if they cannot afford it, the sooner the debt racket will end as soon these schools will have no students, administrators will have no jobs, etc. Meanwhile, on the job, if you feel the need, you can do labor organizing as that is the only way anything will change in this society.
Colleges were opened to women and people of color, men and women, in the 1960s, based on the prosperity made possible by labor organizing in the 1930s and 1940s. It is that labor organizing that made possible the various civil rights movements.
If you do go into debt, make sure you are in a field where you can get a job that requires a college degree that pays enough to pay off the debt in a year. Otherwise, your college education is a waste. The greatest need is in the medical fields, including but not limited to medical doctor and registered nurse. All other science and mathematical fields are worth considering. UC Santa Cruz has a science department and an engineering department. The humanities are only good for becoming a lawyer or a teacher, and only a corporate lawyer makes any money.
While UC Santa Cruz charges $13,000 a year tuition, San Jose State University charges $7,000 a year for the same thing, and more. San Jose State has a radio-TV-film department, another field with lots of career opportunities.
My history degree from a state university (I never had the money for UC and I lived at home while going to school as I had no money to pay for room and board) is not worth much. My paycheck as a secretary is worth far more, both for the pay and the benefits described above. The history department in my youth was regurgitation of the same anti-communist drivel as we heard in high school. I am so glad I have no debt; I sleep better at night and I have discretionary income to save for my retirement.
The struggle is not on the campuses; the struggle is on the job because this is a class society.
The more students refuse to go to school if they cannot afford it, the sooner the debt racket will end as soon these schools will have no students, administrators will have no jobs, etc. Meanwhile, on the job, if you feel the need, you can do labor organizing as that is the only way anything will change in this society.
Colleges were opened to women and people of color, men and women, in the 1960s, based on the prosperity made possible by labor organizing in the 1930s and 1940s. It is that labor organizing that made possible the various civil rights movements.
If you do go into debt, make sure you are in a field where you can get a job that requires a college degree that pays enough to pay off the debt in a year. Otherwise, your college education is a waste. The greatest need is in the medical fields, including but not limited to medical doctor and registered nurse. All other science and mathematical fields are worth considering. UC Santa Cruz has a science department and an engineering department. The humanities are only good for becoming a lawyer or a teacher, and only a corporate lawyer makes any money.
While UC Santa Cruz charges $13,000 a year tuition, San Jose State University charges $7,000 a year for the same thing, and more. San Jose State has a radio-TV-film department, another field with lots of career opportunities.
My history degree from a state university (I never had the money for UC and I lived at home while going to school as I had no money to pay for room and board) is not worth much. My paycheck as a secretary is worth far more, both for the pay and the benefits described above. The history department in my youth was regurgitation of the same anti-communist drivel as we heard in high school. I am so glad I have no debt; I sleep better at night and I have discretionary income to save for my retirement.
The struggle is not on the campuses; the struggle is on the job because this is a class society.
The students who shut down the freeway attacked the weakest and most vulnerable in our society. The sick and elderly stuck in cars had no other option than to suffer at the hands of the fishhook 6. We need to stand up for the diabetic who could not get food because of these protestors, and the cancer patient who missed an appointment for chemotheraphy. Attacking the weak will never help any cause, it is just an act of cowardice. In fact this act has tuned many progressive members of the Santa Cruz community against the students who they may normally support. There is no greater act of white privilege than shutting down a road used by the minority community to return from night shifts in San Jose.
Aside from the huge salaries and perks the 'executives of the firm' (vamping Mario Savio) receive ...
Because it keeps you in economic slavery to the sociocultural system that educates you and (they think) you won't rebel against that cult\ure (of illusory affluence) and system of economics that supports it.
Because it keeps you in economic slavery to the sociocultural system that educates you and (they think) you won't rebel against that cult\ure (of illusory affluence) and system of economics that supports it.
Thanks for posting this "Open Letter." It was right after the Highway 17 protest that I saw firsthand how the local corporate media instead of just reporting events works as an ad man for not only corporate interests but to raise opposition and oppression of these students. On the recent local TV News broadcast they stated how there was a petition going on to punish the students and it stated how many signatures were needed. This so-called news broadcast said nothing about how to support the students, just how to oppose and punish them. Perhaps we should get a petition supporting them, if this hasn't already been done (and if so, where can I sign?).
I respectfully disagree with your claims, in several instances.
1) Your statement that the outrage shown by the community is because this community "is not used to inconvenience and discomfort in this sleepy beach town of ours" is patronizing and biased. It's just as valid for me to say, and I believe this is what those who are angry are saying, that we're outraged because the "action" taken by the 6 students was misguided, self-aggrandizing, and placed members of the community at risk. By shutting the highway, they limited the movement of emergency response vehicles. They made a decision for hundreds as to whether they could freely proceed on public property or not. (I was particularly amused by the post of one supporter who complained that the police were denying the 6 protesters access to water, while ignoring at the same time that the protesters were doing the same to hundreds trapped in their cars.)
2) You claim that "expectations of convenience must never take precedence over things like empathy". Yet where was the empathy of thoose 6 students to those they imposed their will upon?
3) You appear to be confusing "Questioning Authority" with "Doing whatever the hell we want". Questioning authority can be done without forcibly imposing ones will upon a community. I can only imagine the vitriolic outrage that you'd be posting if say, the police had done to you what these students did to the community and shut down the roads for a half day to demand higher wages. You'd have the same support of expressing ones viewpoint? I think not.
The students took an action. They must now deal with the repercussions of that action. You support them. I don't. That's difference of opinion.
But I'm only holding them accountable, and not you as their supporter. I'm not trying to color any who agree with them as insensitive, out of touch, ignorant, or selfish, as you appear to be.
I don't see the community coloring as guilty by association anyone who supported those protesters, but I see you doing that. I think it's a cheap and transparent tactic.
1) Your statement that the outrage shown by the community is because this community "is not used to inconvenience and discomfort in this sleepy beach town of ours" is patronizing and biased. It's just as valid for me to say, and I believe this is what those who are angry are saying, that we're outraged because the "action" taken by the 6 students was misguided, self-aggrandizing, and placed members of the community at risk. By shutting the highway, they limited the movement of emergency response vehicles. They made a decision for hundreds as to whether they could freely proceed on public property or not. (I was particularly amused by the post of one supporter who complained that the police were denying the 6 protesters access to water, while ignoring at the same time that the protesters were doing the same to hundreds trapped in their cars.)
2) You claim that "expectations of convenience must never take precedence over things like empathy". Yet where was the empathy of thoose 6 students to those they imposed their will upon?
3) You appear to be confusing "Questioning Authority" with "Doing whatever the hell we want". Questioning authority can be done without forcibly imposing ones will upon a community. I can only imagine the vitriolic outrage that you'd be posting if say, the police had done to you what these students did to the community and shut down the roads for a half day to demand higher wages. You'd have the same support of expressing ones viewpoint? I think not.
The students took an action. They must now deal with the repercussions of that action. You support them. I don't. That's difference of opinion.
But I'm only holding them accountable, and not you as their supporter. I'm not trying to color any who agree with them as insensitive, out of touch, ignorant, or selfish, as you appear to be.
I don't see the community coloring as guilty by association anyone who supported those protesters, but I see you doing that. I think it's a cheap and transparent tactic.
As of now there is no petition, though I expect the union to start something soon. City on a Hill Press does have a poll you can vote on in the hopes that public pressure can help these students gain access to their university again:http://www.cityonahillpress.com/.
This text is being circulated, "Whether or not you are a student, please go to the website below and vote against the UCSC highway 6 being suspended or expelled and mark on the poll that the action is inappropriate. It appears that these particular suspensions are illegal and unconstitutional according to ACLU and NLG lawyers."
This text is being circulated, "Whether or not you are a student, please go to the website below and vote against the UCSC highway 6 being suspended or expelled and mark on the poll that the action is inappropriate. It appears that these particular suspensions are illegal and unconstitutional according to ACLU and NLG lawyers."
For more information:
http://www.cityonahillpress.com/
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network