top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

A Communiqué from the UCSC Occupation of Humanities 2

by Occupy our education
The University of California was once a tuition-free and public institution. Now the students are facing yet another tuition hike. The most recent attempt to raise tuition in 2009 was successfully frozen by the courageous and necessary action of students, yet this week, the UC Regents have approved a 5% tuition increase each year for the next five years. This is in addition to the numerous increases that have occurred since the new millennium which amount to what will now be a 500% increase by 2020.
800_humanities-ucsc.jpg
The University of California was once a tuition-free and public institution. Now the students are facing yet another tuition hike. The most recent attempt to raise tuition in 2009 was successfully frozen by the courageous and necessary action of students, yet this week, the UC Regents have approved a 5% tuition increase each year for the next five years. This is in addition to the numerous increases that have occurred since the new millennium which amount to what will now be a 500% increase by 2020. Governors and legislatures have come and gone, and have continually spouted rhetoric without taking any action.

In addition to tuition increases, students face larger class sizes, fewer classes, cuts to student services, and ultimately, are paying more for less education. Of course, these measures disproportionately affects those already marginalized--women, students of color, queer students, and many more. A private business parades in the mask of a public university.

All of these issues and more are a direct result of the failed leadership of the UC Regents, a ruling junta appointed by the governor—yet rebuked in this move even by him!

Privatization threatens the promise of education for all. With this most recent tuition hike, UC students are being crushed; this is just one symptom of a global effort to privatize everything. Our water, lands and studies are being held hostage to further benefit those at the top of a horrifying capitalist economy of accumulation. It extends far beyond the university, from the extraction of natural resources, to the oppression and exploitation of laborers. We are saddled with obligations to work and incur debts at the expense of our humanity and the habitat we depend on. As students, our future labor is put on lien for the privilege of attending a once free, now mediocre, university.

The hypocrisy we face is astounding: the Regents gave 20% raises to a few campus Chancellors just weeks before hoisting more debt onto vulnerable students. Regent Bonnie Ress said they were correcting an “injustice” by bumping people up from $360,000 to $383,000. This would be laughable if it weren’t so disgusting. Never mind that the chancellors are already in the top half percent of income earners in the United States. But with ten CEOs, four corporate lawyers, two investment bankers and merely one student on the board of Regents, it is not surprising that the priorities of this institution are skewed towards the interests of those at the top.

For all these reasons, we are occupying the Humanities 2 building at UC Santa Cruz. We are using the space to do many things: to think, to strategize, to finally meet the fellow students we sit next to every day. Most of all, however, we are simply inhabiting a space that is ours in a world where nothing seems to be for us.

The students here are fed up, but we have not given up hope on one another, and we have not given up hope on you. This message is intended for our fellow students here at UCSC, but it is also for everyone else: we want to hear from alumni; from parents; from the people in our communities; from our fellow students at other UCs; from our young comrades in elementary, middle and high schools; from the workers and teachers who make this university run. We may only be in this building temporarily, but we want to build something bigger, something lasting, and we want all of you to be a part of it.

The Regents have passed their tuition hike, but this is far from over. We are calling on our allies to help us grow: more occupations will surely follow (we don’t know who plans them!), and more strikes, more disrupted meetings, more barricades, more students and allies in the street. All of this not to return to the past, but to build a new future.

We will be unmanageable until such time as there are no managers—until the Regents, tuition, and privatization are washed away in a wave of democracy.

#occupyoureducation
§Why Humanities 2? or: End the Administration
by Education Should Be Free!
800_slug-monster.jpg
The UC administration wraps its tentacles around all of our lives. And it has established many nodes from which to strangle us; Kerr Hall is only one hub of a much larger amorphous beast. Given this fact, students had a lot of options when we began considering an occupation. How, then, did we choose this particular administrative base of operations, Humanities 2, for our action?

In fact, it is not a difficult question, and everyone here is clear on the answer: this building houses the office of a particularly smarmy figure, one Dean Sheldon Kamieniecki—a perversely enthusiastic agent of austerity. This person was responsible for slashing whole departments as soon as he got the chance, Community Studies being one notable example. Most recently, he tried to sack five or six Social Science staffers last year, most of whom make roughly $40,000, and who, as any student can tell you, are absolutely indispensable to the day-to-day functioning of the university and central to the academic lives of students. Kamieniecki himself made $206,000 last year, and nobody knows what he does.

Last fall, a group of students saw Kamieniecki entering this building and confronted him about the proposed layoffs: “How do you justify firing six workers who we all depend on?”

“It’s simple math. We have to make cuts. What else could you cut?”

“Well, we saw that you make over $200,000 a year.”

“So what? I should just quit my job then, I guess.”

Silence and a stare made clear our agreement with that plan. A scoff was all we got back.

But the point is not merely rhetorical: Imagine a university where the workers and students who make the place run also get to run the place. And where people whose primary job is to make cuts and give “mathematical” defenses of those cuts didn’t have to exist.

That is a university we could live with.

In this sense, this story is not only about Kamieniecki. UC President Janet Napolitano (salary $578,000) was recently quoted citing “arithmetic” in defense of the need “to look at a whole range of things” to resolve the school’s financial situation. Predictably, in the course of a month, the task went from “looking at” to actually imposing a 27% tuition increase. How quickly a look turns into an act! The Regents’ discerning eyesight is matched only by their own efficiency.

These administration figures hide behind the veneer of mathematics in order to carry out their jobs. It makes things seem very complicated. In reality, it’s very simple: they raise tuition, attack workers, cut student services. In concert with the Regents, they make choices about how this university functions and where its resources go, and they make the wrong choices. Unsurprisingly, a lot of those resources go to admins and Regents themselves via high salaries, debt-vehicles and real-estate deals.

Unfortunately for the administrators, even if we take them at their word, the discussion of math here reveals their own redundancy. I propose, therefore, that as a test we replace all administrators with a very mathematical computer. If everything is dictated by numbers, then this computer can probably do their jobs for a lot less money.

But this will also make our job easier! For then, we can spend less time tracking these people down and denouncing them, and simply smash the computer.

For the time being however, this occupation will serve as a similar sort of test. We will keep Kamieniecki away from the levers that he pulls, and what will become clear is that no one is worse off for his absence. Either the arithmetic of austerity will simply run its course without him, or, if we’re lucky, it will falter, and our lives will surely improve. In short, like all UC administrators, he’s either superfluous or pernicious. Either way, we don’t want him.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by G
Lax enforcement of Glass-Steagall, and its eventual elimination, has led to yet more financial crises (see also: http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine). There is also the endorsement of illegal wars, such as Vietnam (see also: Nixon's Vietnam treason), leading to financial crises. A financial crisis is the excuse being used for raising tuition, yet again, at UCSC (see also: Cooper Union 'bust out').

In the 1960's and 1970's, students were fed up with being drafted into an illegal war (and assasinations of civil rights leaders, as well as a sitting President), and exercised their right to redress (obviously people like 'Observed' have an active dislike for such patriotic, Constitutionally 'protected' activities). In 1971, the result was a Constitutional Amendment, lowering the voting age to the draft age (empowering draftees, giving some influence over their futures). The draft also fell out of favor; in November of this year, the last draftee left the military.

The 1% and friends hated that denouncement of servile attitude, and have been conspiring to reapply the leashes.

Some say the recent financial crises have, in addition to allowing trillions of dollars in unprosecuted theft, served as a draft proxy, due to lack of opportunity and financial burdens, especially among the 99%. Perhaps this time students will create the political will for aggressively protecting the education system, for aggressively pursuing financial and political corruption within and outside of the education system (watch out TBSC!), and perhaps even aggressively curbing the lust for illegal wars?

If only people like Observed made a habit of standing against tyranny (instead of endorsing it), perhaps it wouldn't be necessary to repeatedly seek redress for things like collective punishment and financial extortion. Even Observed must understand how preferable such things are to the alternatives (see also: Declaration Of Independence).
by bloom
I am an alum, UCSC 1984 (there was no tuition then). I applaud your efforts, if I can help, let me know.
by Robert Norse
Any suggestions?
by John Colby (john.roncohen.colby [at] gmail.com)
I suggest that UC students use the power of information connected to collective resistance — like occupation — by leveraging computer science, investigative journalism, Freedom of Information laws and social media. It's working for me. You must expose as much UC fraud and public corruption as possible to make the UC embarrass the federal government — agencies that fund UC and are responsible for investigating fraud and corruption like the USDOJ — President Obama and the U.S. Senate.

Information + Media + Passion + Compassion + Courage + Community Resistance = Powerful and Effective Action.
by 75 river
this is just business as usual for the university, sit-ins or occupations don't put all that much pressure on the system.
universities have faced this tactic for decades and are experts at defeating it.
the reason the pressure you ate exerting is weak, is beause, as far as i know, you are not COSTING them any money. is there any way universities get day to day money, like the bookshop or cafeteria?
pickets at these locations would truly interrupt business as usual.
it is best to change tactics often, to prevent the regents from making easy targets out of you.
aim at the regents directly. and their lives. the regents don't have their own off campus pig force like they do on campus. picket the golf courses they frequent. that may cause other members to pressure the regents for you.
and if you want the "liberal" students to join in, try winning something.
winning wins people to your cause.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$75.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network