They want to raise tuition again
The Regents' strategy is fairly evident. In announcing the new tuition policy only two weeks before their meeting, they are hoping to establish the policy before mass student and worker opposition can materialize. And in making the decision to hike tuition contingent upon state inaction, they are trying to redirect students' focus to Sacramento, and to create some ambiguity about when a tuition hike ultimately would happen, so as to prevent students from establishing a clear calendar of protest.
More broadly, the Regents are trying to set themselves up for a win-win situation. Either students, workers, and our allies, through our collective actions and power, will be able to compel the state to increase UC's budget and to stave off hikes; or we won't, and the Regents will get their money anyway in the form of higher undergrad tuitions.
We know from recent experience what higher tuitions would mean:
* More debt, which falls especially heavily on women and people of color.
* Fewer working class students and students of color enrolling at the UCs.
* More students exhausted from second, third, and fourth jobs.
* Fewer low-income students finishing college.
* A ripple effect throughout the higher education system, pushing more working class students and students of color into fraudulent for-profit colleges.
These are the stakes. This is why it is critical that each of us does what we can to prevent these tuition hikes from happening. And while the Regents are trying to surprise and disorient us, their plans to hike tuition will not succeed if students, workers, and our allies take sufficiently powerful collective actions in the coming weeks and months. We have the necessary capacities, political experience, and social bonds. We just have to use them.
It starts with us showing up at the Regents' meeting in San Francisco on November 19th and 20th and calling against tuition hikes. Regardless of what happens at the meeting, and whether we are able to prevent the Regents from voting, a strong turnout, combined with actions and mass education on the campuses, will set the tone for the coming months and will give us confidence.
A potential tuition hike is something that all students deserve to know about. Graduate student instructors and professors have a responsibility to discuss the potential hike in our classes, to give students time to talk together about how they would be affected by tuition hikes, to assure students that their participation in any actions will be seen favorably, and to provide students with relevant information and resources, including potentially the UC Student Association's petition against fee hikes or some of the documents linked above [embedded links not included in this reprint]. Students, for their part, can organize teach-ins in dorms, co-ops, and meetings, and can ask professors to make time for announcements about upcoming political actions at the beginning of classes.
This kind of mass education is critically important. But it isn't enough. Only by acting collectively to interrupt business as usual on our campuses and throughout the state will we have the power to block tuition hikes. In taking collective action, students and workers can draw from past experiences. We might plan mass assemblies for the days surrounding the Regents' vote, as well as cascading building take-overs in the days after. We might take the opportunity at these assemblies to call for a student strike against tuition hikes for the winter quarter / spring semester.
UCSA has already taken a strong position demanding tuition rollbacks; will they endorse and help build for the kinds of collective actions that will be required to realize this demand? Will our unions, co-ops, dorms, cultural organizations, student government parties, and other groups rise to the challenge to stop another round of proposed tuition hikes? It is up to each of us to push our organizations beyond where they've gone in the past, and to build bonds of struggle that are broad, powerful, and enduring enough to win.
See you at the Regents' meeting.
http://reclaimuc.blogspot.com/2014/11/they-want-to-raise-tuition-again.html
reclaim UC
http://reclaimuc.blogspot.com/
I'll go with 'UC needs to fund a new(er) logo'. Or maybe, 'need to build up a legal war chest, in case people like Yoo are ever brought up on war crimes charges'...
The mainstream media is used to covering college protesters, framing college protests (well, that pepper spray cop thing got kinda out of hand), it's almost automated. They aren't (yet) used to covering kindergarteners getting firehosed, and given current trends, the kindergarteners might need the practice.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-boy-on-the-bicycle
I was fortunate to attend UCSC just before tuition began to skyrocket. Worse, they're extracting more money from you while they're cutting programs, majors and making class sizes larger, as well as mistreating graduate teaching assistants and laborers worse, worse, worse.
Follow the example of the Quebec student strikes which toppled a provincial Canadian government. Relevant links:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jun/01/quebec-protests-student-activists
http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/jul/09/international-fees
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/24/canada-student-fee-protest-arrests
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/may/24/quebec-truncheon-law-rebounds-student-strike
In the USA, even funded and free education is under attack by 'developers' and irresponsibly overpriced and wasteful management (Cooper Union was fine for more than a century, until management and developers killed it, by blowing wads of cash on a building)...
Inspired in 1830 when Peter Cooper learned about the government-supported École Polytechnique, Cooper Union was established in 1859. The school was built on a radical new model of American higher education based on founder Peter Cooper's fundamental belief that an education "equal to the best technology schools [then] established" should be accessible to those who qualify, independent of their race, religion, sex, wealth or social status, and should be "open and free to all". The Cooper Union previously granted each admitted student a full-tuition scholarship; as of April 23, 2013, due to financial concerns, that policy has been eliminated beginning with the class entering in the Fall of 2014, although every incoming student receives at the very least a fifty-percent merit scholarship.
[...]
The president of the school, Jamshed Bharucha, indicated that depletion of the school's endowment required additional sources of funding. A possible tuition levy and more pointed solicitation of alumni donations and research grants were being considered to offset recent financial practices such as liquidating assets and spending heavily on 41 Cooper Square, a controversial new academic building.
[...]
On April 23, 2013, the New York Times reported that the college had announced that it would end its free tuition policy for undergraduates, beginning in fall 2014.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_Union
Build it and they will sabotage it. See also: The Shock Doctrine: The Rise Of Disaster Capitalism by Naomi Klein.
i would be surprised if you stopped them using the tactics you propose though.
merely interrupting their business doesn't cost them enough, they already have the students money upfront from tuition. shutting down the university also alienates other students who might otherwise support your cause. in a way, your strategy is lose - lose.
as you point out the regents are destroying the quality of your lives with these hikes.
so why should their lives be so plush?
PICKET THE REGENTS AT THEIR HOMES.
well, not actually a single home, that's not legal, but you can march around their block. which is even better because it will tend to turn their neighbors against them.
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.