Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Witnesses Report Excessive Use of Force by SCPD during Arrest near Court House
Witnesses to the recent tasing and arrest of a man in Santa Cruz describe the incident differently from the account communicated by police through the reporting of the Santa Cruz Sentinel. Individuals on the scene report excessive force was used when officers with the SCPD arrested Oliver Howard near the Court House on Water Street on the afternoon of October 13. They say officers struck Howard with a baton, tased his bare body, piled on top of him, wrenched and twisted his limbs, and grinded his face and body into the ground, all unnecessarily. [Photo: Ryan Kiar of the SCPD was the first police officer to initiate contact with Oliver Howard.]
Debra Ellis was driving on Water Street that afternoon on her way to a medical appointment when she observed what she called an "aggressive police officer" pursuing a man near the Court House who was backing up with his hands raised above his head. She immediately exited her car because she wanted to be a witness to what she thought could be an "escalation of violence" by the police officer.
The officer's body language and facial expressions were "tense and angry," Ellis recalled. "I did not feel the man he was pursuing was dangerous or a threat to the officer or me."
"The man being pursued appeared scared and confused," she said.
Ellis said Howard was asking to be "left alone" as he walked backwards and away from the officer. It was at this time the officer took a swing at Howard with his baton, making contact with the man's leg below his knee.
"I could hear a loud sound from the impact," Ellis said. Howard's face showed the pain felt from the hit, and his body buckled. "I feared for the man's safety," she said.
As the situation continued to escalate, Ellis said a small group of observers began to form. "Each one that spoke to me expressed concern with what they were witnessing."
Photographer Shmuel Thaler of the Santa Cruz Sentinel also happened to be on the scene, and he was taking photographs constantly, Ellis said.
Moments later another officer arrived and Howard, who had no shirt on, was shot on his bare back with a taser gun. His back buckled, Ellis said, and he was brought forcibly to the ground by the officers. Additional officers arrived on the scene and joined in holding his body.
"During this time I saw an officer bend the man’s left leg in what seemed to be a painful angle for no apparent reason. I felt I was witnessing torture," she said.
"Not only was the force used by the officers excessive, the response was also excessive," Ellis said. She noted that numerous police cars arrived with what she estimated to be a dozen or more officers, plus medical responders and an ambulance. Ellis later placed a phone call to Dominican. She said they confirmed that Howard had been admitted to the hospital.
"The man did not have a weapon, did not seem threatening, and what I witnessed was excessive, unnecessary force," she said.
Ellis has lived in the Santa Cruz area for over 20 years, and besides being a mother and a recently retired UCSC administrator, she is active with the Resource Center for Nonviolence (RCNV). She took it upon herself to exchange contact information with the other witnesses in an effort to find out what exactly had occurred for the police to have responded so aggressively.
Two of the witnesses told Ellis their vehicle had been pulled over on Water Street by the first officer on the scene that afternoon (later identified as Ryan Kiar of the SCPD). When the officer was talking to them from outside of their car, Oliver Howard pulled up behind them in his vehicle. She said Howard exited his car and approached the officer, asking him about dead bodies and dead body parts in Santa Cruz and why weren't police doing something about it. She said Howard then walked away and was pursued by the police officer.
Another woman told Ellis that she saw Howard push away from the officer after the officer grabbed him by his hair and was shaking him violently. She told Ellis it appeared Howard was trying to pull away from this action.
Another one of the witnesses, Justin Mittie, felt the use of force by Santa Cruz police officers was excessive.
Mittie, a 23-year-old from Lodi, was visiting Santa Cruz that day and he is considering moving to the area. He was in his truck on Water Street when the incident caught his attention.
He said he saw a police officer pointing his finger at Oliver Howard as the man was walking away from him backwards, and with his hands up.
"He [Howard] was saying he wanted to go home," Mittie recalled.
Mittie said he saw the officer trying to grab at Howard and it appeared that the officer was "trying to antagonize" him.
Mittie noted that after hitting Howard with a baton and tasing him, multiple officers then piled on top of the man, even though, "the guy was clearly not fighting," he said.
"They were grinding his face into the ground, and his whole body," Mittie said. "It was not necessary. He was one man and not fighting back."
When Mittie was trying to find out from the other witnesses what may have triggered the incident, the woman who was initially pulled over in her car by the first officer on the scene told him that Howard had yelled at the officer.
"I think having peace officers is a good thing, they are here to protect us, not to abuse power," Mittie said.
After Howard was arrested, Mittie said the first officer on the scene approached him to apologize, saying, "sorry for the inconvenience."
However, Mittie said he was angry about what he had just witnessed and he told the officer that, "You are a sorry excuse for a man."
"Your use of force was unnecessary," Mittie told him.
"He wouldn't even look at me," Mittie recalled. "He wouldn't look me in the eye."
Mittie said the officer then walked away and returned the taser to its place in the patrol vehicle.
"I know there's good cops out there," he said. "He abused his power."
"I don't think he should be an officer for that," Mittie concluded.
Debra Ellis said she still felt "shaken and confused" about what she had witnessed, and she wanted an explanation from police.
"Why, if the officer had called in back up did he not remain calm or attempt some form of communication to de-escalate the situation rather than insight it?" Ellis wondered.
Because so many officers had arrived on the scene so quickly, Ellis felt that Howard could have been contained without the use of weapons.
Later that afternoon Ellis visited the police station to speak with the supervisor of the two officers she saw, in her words, "beating and tasing" Howard. She was given a number to call, and she eventually spoke with Lieutenant Flippo and Sergeant Croft on the phone.
She described Flippo as being "all jacked up" during the call, and that he was acting defensive. Flippo told her that he becomes "concerned" when the public asks the police to do their job, and then doesn't let them "protect their guys."
Ellis asked them the question, “under what circumstances is it acceptable to use a taser?” She was told by Flippo the use of the taser is considered a "mid-level" response, but she felt the question was never answered clearly.
Flippo and Croft told Ellis that Howard had charged at the first officer on the scene, ripped the badge off of him, was under the influence, and had resisted arrest.
Additionally, Flippo informed her that Howard was tased once by the first officer who made contact with him.
Ellis expressed concerns about the number of officers who responded to the incident. Flippo explained it was necessary because the man had been tased, but that the weapon had not affected him, explaining, "when these guys are on something they don’t feel pain.”
Flippo said a call had come into the station from officers that one of their own had been beaten and that his guys were responding with the thought in their head that an officer had been hurt.
Ellis believes that is partly why officers had responded with such an agitated orientation, and why so many of them were sent to the scene.
However, she said she was also informed that after the first few cars arrived on the scene a separate message was relayed to the station that the crowd was growing, and empathetic with the victim, which is why so many more officers swarmed in.
It was for crowd control.
Smiitie agreed that the response was an overreaction, and that assigning officers for crowd control in this case was not necessary.
"The crowd was staying back," he said.
Ellis was concerned about this because, "it was clear they tried to divide us all up, some more aggressively than others, and you couldn't have had a more gentle group of folks."
Ellis described what she witnessed as "pack behavior" on the part of the police, and that officers were exhibiting an "entitled use of power and violence" that day when they thought one of their own had been threatened.
"I even think they will cover for one another, and apparently the Sentinel does the same for them," Ellis said.
She was referring to the fact that the report published later that day in the Santa Cruz Sentinel made no mention that witnesses on the scene believed there was an excessive use of force by police. There was no mention of the witnesses at all in the article, which was written by local reporter Jessica A. York.
Ellis said the Sentinel article was, "certainly written pro-police."
Shmuel Thaler was using a "long lens" and "snapping away," she said.
"I approached him and he said he worked with the Sentinel, which did not take sides and that his photos couldn't be used in court," she said.
Ellis had hoped Thaler's photographs would show that police had used excessive force against Howard.
Though Deputy Chief of Police Steve Clark is quoted in the Sentinel article as stating that Howard was arrested for "battery on a police officer," the charge was not listed in the press log released by SCPD on October 15.
The arrest is listed as Case # 14S-08499 in the SCPD press logs, and Howard is listed as having been arrested for violating 148(A) Obstruction/Resisting Public Officer and 23152(E) DUI Drug. The Sentinel lists the SCPD officer who was first to initiate contact with Howard as being officer Ryan Kiar. According to Santa Cruz County Jail records, Howard was never booked into jail after he was released from the hospital.
Ellis said police took reports from all of the witnesses, and she said Flippo told her the police cars have cameras. Two witnesses also video recorded the incident.
"I told the department that in my 24 years in Santa Cruz I have never witnessed something like this from our police," Ellis said. "I hope to never do so again."
"Watching a man tased on the naked back at close range, who was already on his knees, was disturbing, upsetting and gravely disappointing."
Alex Darocy
http://alexdarocy.blogspot.com/
The officer's body language and facial expressions were "tense and angry," Ellis recalled. "I did not feel the man he was pursuing was dangerous or a threat to the officer or me."
"The man being pursued appeared scared and confused," she said.
Ellis said Howard was asking to be "left alone" as he walked backwards and away from the officer. It was at this time the officer took a swing at Howard with his baton, making contact with the man's leg below his knee.
"I could hear a loud sound from the impact," Ellis said. Howard's face showed the pain felt from the hit, and his body buckled. "I feared for the man's safety," she said.
As the situation continued to escalate, Ellis said a small group of observers began to form. "Each one that spoke to me expressed concern with what they were witnessing."
Photographer Shmuel Thaler of the Santa Cruz Sentinel also happened to be on the scene, and he was taking photographs constantly, Ellis said.
Moments later another officer arrived and Howard, who had no shirt on, was shot on his bare back with a taser gun. His back buckled, Ellis said, and he was brought forcibly to the ground by the officers. Additional officers arrived on the scene and joined in holding his body.
"During this time I saw an officer bend the man’s left leg in what seemed to be a painful angle for no apparent reason. I felt I was witnessing torture," she said.
"Not only was the force used by the officers excessive, the response was also excessive," Ellis said. She noted that numerous police cars arrived with what she estimated to be a dozen or more officers, plus medical responders and an ambulance. Ellis later placed a phone call to Dominican. She said they confirmed that Howard had been admitted to the hospital.
"The man did not have a weapon, did not seem threatening, and what I witnessed was excessive, unnecessary force," she said.
Ellis has lived in the Santa Cruz area for over 20 years, and besides being a mother and a recently retired UCSC administrator, she is active with the Resource Center for Nonviolence (RCNV). She took it upon herself to exchange contact information with the other witnesses in an effort to find out what exactly had occurred for the police to have responded so aggressively.
Two of the witnesses told Ellis their vehicle had been pulled over on Water Street by the first officer on the scene that afternoon (later identified as Ryan Kiar of the SCPD). When the officer was talking to them from outside of their car, Oliver Howard pulled up behind them in his vehicle. She said Howard exited his car and approached the officer, asking him about dead bodies and dead body parts in Santa Cruz and why weren't police doing something about it. She said Howard then walked away and was pursued by the police officer.
Another woman told Ellis that she saw Howard push away from the officer after the officer grabbed him by his hair and was shaking him violently. She told Ellis it appeared Howard was trying to pull away from this action.
Another one of the witnesses, Justin Mittie, felt the use of force by Santa Cruz police officers was excessive.
Mittie, a 23-year-old from Lodi, was visiting Santa Cruz that day and he is considering moving to the area. He was in his truck on Water Street when the incident caught his attention.
He said he saw a police officer pointing his finger at Oliver Howard as the man was walking away from him backwards, and with his hands up.
"He [Howard] was saying he wanted to go home," Mittie recalled.
Mittie said he saw the officer trying to grab at Howard and it appeared that the officer was "trying to antagonize" him.
Mittie noted that after hitting Howard with a baton and tasing him, multiple officers then piled on top of the man, even though, "the guy was clearly not fighting," he said.
"They were grinding his face into the ground, and his whole body," Mittie said. "It was not necessary. He was one man and not fighting back."
When Mittie was trying to find out from the other witnesses what may have triggered the incident, the woman who was initially pulled over in her car by the first officer on the scene told him that Howard had yelled at the officer.
"I think having peace officers is a good thing, they are here to protect us, not to abuse power," Mittie said.
After Howard was arrested, Mittie said the first officer on the scene approached him to apologize, saying, "sorry for the inconvenience."
However, Mittie said he was angry about what he had just witnessed and he told the officer that, "You are a sorry excuse for a man."
"Your use of force was unnecessary," Mittie told him.
"He wouldn't even look at me," Mittie recalled. "He wouldn't look me in the eye."
Mittie said the officer then walked away and returned the taser to its place in the patrol vehicle.
"I know there's good cops out there," he said. "He abused his power."
"I don't think he should be an officer for that," Mittie concluded.
Debra Ellis said she still felt "shaken and confused" about what she had witnessed, and she wanted an explanation from police.
"Why, if the officer had called in back up did he not remain calm or attempt some form of communication to de-escalate the situation rather than insight it?" Ellis wondered.
Because so many officers had arrived on the scene so quickly, Ellis felt that Howard could have been contained without the use of weapons.
Later that afternoon Ellis visited the police station to speak with the supervisor of the two officers she saw, in her words, "beating and tasing" Howard. She was given a number to call, and she eventually spoke with Lieutenant Flippo and Sergeant Croft on the phone.
She described Flippo as being "all jacked up" during the call, and that he was acting defensive. Flippo told her that he becomes "concerned" when the public asks the police to do their job, and then doesn't let them "protect their guys."
Ellis asked them the question, “under what circumstances is it acceptable to use a taser?” She was told by Flippo the use of the taser is considered a "mid-level" response, but she felt the question was never answered clearly.
Flippo and Croft told Ellis that Howard had charged at the first officer on the scene, ripped the badge off of him, was under the influence, and had resisted arrest.
Additionally, Flippo informed her that Howard was tased once by the first officer who made contact with him.
Ellis expressed concerns about the number of officers who responded to the incident. Flippo explained it was necessary because the man had been tased, but that the weapon had not affected him, explaining, "when these guys are on something they don’t feel pain.”
Flippo said a call had come into the station from officers that one of their own had been beaten and that his guys were responding with the thought in their head that an officer had been hurt.
Ellis believes that is partly why officers had responded with such an agitated orientation, and why so many of them were sent to the scene.
However, she said she was also informed that after the first few cars arrived on the scene a separate message was relayed to the station that the crowd was growing, and empathetic with the victim, which is why so many more officers swarmed in.
It was for crowd control.
Smiitie agreed that the response was an overreaction, and that assigning officers for crowd control in this case was not necessary.
"The crowd was staying back," he said.
Ellis was concerned about this because, "it was clear they tried to divide us all up, some more aggressively than others, and you couldn't have had a more gentle group of folks."
Ellis described what she witnessed as "pack behavior" on the part of the police, and that officers were exhibiting an "entitled use of power and violence" that day when they thought one of their own had been threatened.
"I even think they will cover for one another, and apparently the Sentinel does the same for them," Ellis said.
She was referring to the fact that the report published later that day in the Santa Cruz Sentinel made no mention that witnesses on the scene believed there was an excessive use of force by police. There was no mention of the witnesses at all in the article, which was written by local reporter Jessica A. York.
Ellis said the Sentinel article was, "certainly written pro-police."
Shmuel Thaler was using a "long lens" and "snapping away," she said.
"I approached him and he said he worked with the Sentinel, which did not take sides and that his photos couldn't be used in court," she said.
Ellis had hoped Thaler's photographs would show that police had used excessive force against Howard.
Though Deputy Chief of Police Steve Clark is quoted in the Sentinel article as stating that Howard was arrested for "battery on a police officer," the charge was not listed in the press log released by SCPD on October 15.
The arrest is listed as Case # 14S-08499 in the SCPD press logs, and Howard is listed as having been arrested for violating 148(A) Obstruction/Resisting Public Officer and 23152(E) DUI Drug. The Sentinel lists the SCPD officer who was first to initiate contact with Howard as being officer Ryan Kiar. According to Santa Cruz County Jail records, Howard was never booked into jail after he was released from the hospital.
Ellis said police took reports from all of the witnesses, and she said Flippo told her the police cars have cameras. Two witnesses also video recorded the incident.
"I told the department that in my 24 years in Santa Cruz I have never witnessed something like this from our police," Ellis said. "I hope to never do so again."
"Watching a man tased on the naked back at close range, who was already on his knees, was disturbing, upsetting and gravely disappointing."
Alex Darocy
http://alexdarocy.blogspot.com/
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
When SCPD acts like a lawless gang, who has jurisdiction?
Internal Affairs departments are notoriously lax in their duties, when it comes to police misconduct. Sheriffs, District Attorneys, and Attorney Generals too. Even the 'mainstream media'. The chronic problem of police misconduct is not unique to this time nor place.
Perhaps it is time to begin work on a lasting, comprehensive solution.
Internal Affairs departments are notoriously lax in their duties, when it comes to police misconduct. Sheriffs, District Attorneys, and Attorney Generals too. Even the 'mainstream media'. The chronic problem of police misconduct is not unique to this time nor place.
Perhaps it is time to begin work on a lasting, comprehensive solution.
For more information:
http://PeaceCamp2010insider.blogspot.com/
There is enough credible witness testimony in this article to file an effective color of law complaint with the FBI. I just filed one yesterday — it's easy if you have your accounts straight. I suggest that all the witnesses type up their accounts of what happened, then have them signed and notarized. Also audio record extra details which you can't describe in writing. Be sure to draw maps showing the spatial nature of the incident. Have an objective 3rd party summarize this into a complaint referencing parts of the witness statements and the maps.
Email, fax, and send it all via postal mail to the San Francisco FBI Duty Agent and be sure to carbon copy it to the (nonlocal) media like the San Jose Mercury, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Sacramento Bee, the Los Angeles Times, the California Office for the Associated Press, the California Office for the New York Times, the Center for Investigative Reporting in Berkeley, ProPublica in New York City, The Real News Network in Cleveland and Democracy Now! in New York City.
Relevant links:
http://www.fbi.gov/sanfrancisco/contact-us/contact
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/color_of_law
Also fax and mail it via post to the Northern California ACLU and the Lawyer's Committtee for Civil Rights in San Francisco. Call their hotlines to follow up.
https://www.aclunc.org/contact-us
http://www.lccr.com/who-we-are/contact-us/
Email, fax, and send it all via postal mail to the San Francisco FBI Duty Agent and be sure to carbon copy it to the (nonlocal) media like the San Jose Mercury, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Sacramento Bee, the Los Angeles Times, the California Office for the Associated Press, the California Office for the New York Times, the Center for Investigative Reporting in Berkeley, ProPublica in New York City, The Real News Network in Cleveland and Democracy Now! in New York City.
Relevant links:
http://www.fbi.gov/sanfrancisco/contact-us/contact
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/color_of_law
Also fax and mail it via post to the Northern California ACLU and the Lawyer's Committtee for Civil Rights in San Francisco. Call their hotlines to follow up.
https://www.aclunc.org/contact-us
http://www.lccr.com/who-we-are/contact-us/
...who will book the assaulting officers?
The October 22nd Coalition to Stop Police Brutality, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation has been mobilizing every year since 1996 for a National Day of Protest on October 22nd, bringing together those under the gun and those not under the gun as a powerful voice to expose the epidemic of police brutality.
Across the U.S., Black, Latino, and poor neighborhoods are treated like occupied territory by increasingly militarized armies of law enforcement. People are criminalized and brutalized for their perceived status – socioeconomic, immigration, mental health, and/or racial, gender, or sexual identity. People living in our communities, especially youth, are routinely stopped, harassed, beaten, and even killed.
In the United States, this year has seen a litany of state violence, with increasing documentation and coverage making these ongoing atrocities more difficult to deny. Over 800 people have been killed by law enforcement nationwide, at least 200 since Mike Brown, and at least 23 people in one week. Although police criminalization of and violence against women and transgender people is nothing new, they have become more newsworthy of late. There seems to be no level too low for law enforcement to stoop in their violence, whether it is against children and young teens, the elderly, the deaf, or those who are emotionally or mentally distressed.
In New York City, the era of mass criminalization of Black and brown communities through "stop and frisk" was supposed to be over thanks to the election of a supposedly progressive mayor. What de Blasio brought instead though, was the return of William Bratton, the architect of Stop and Frisk! Bratton's highly oppressive "broken windows" style of policing, in which the smallest "crimes" are aggressively policed, has already led to an increase in police brutality and public mistrust. In this year, NYPD's use of "Broken Windows" has led to the highly publicized chokehold death of beloved community member Eric Garner, the beating of an 84-year-old immigrant man for allegedly jaywalking, a chokehold on a 7-month pregnant woman for barbecuing in front of her home, a young man kicked in the head while lying on the ground handcuffed, numerous people beaten for falling asleep on the subway, a raid of Harlem housing projects, and numerous other atrocities. Even some of the most well-known cultural aspects of New York are under attack, as subway performers are being arrested at astonishing rates simply for trying to earn a living as they have been doing for decades. Meanwhile, the same City Council that voted so strongly for police reforms earlier this year has remained silent in the midst of a new "progressive" administration, lifting their voices only to cry out for 1,000 more cops!
For more info go to http://www.october22.org/ .
The October 22nd Coalition to Stop Police Brutality, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation has been mobilizing every year since 1996 for a National Day of Protest on October 22nd, bringing together those under the gun and those not under the gun as a powerful voice to expose the epidemic of police brutality.
Across the U.S., Black, Latino, and poor neighborhoods are treated like occupied territory by increasingly militarized armies of law enforcement. People are criminalized and brutalized for their perceived status – socioeconomic, immigration, mental health, and/or racial, gender, or sexual identity. People living in our communities, especially youth, are routinely stopped, harassed, beaten, and even killed.
In the United States, this year has seen a litany of state violence, with increasing documentation and coverage making these ongoing atrocities more difficult to deny. Over 800 people have been killed by law enforcement nationwide, at least 200 since Mike Brown, and at least 23 people in one week. Although police criminalization of and violence against women and transgender people is nothing new, they have become more newsworthy of late. There seems to be no level too low for law enforcement to stoop in their violence, whether it is against children and young teens, the elderly, the deaf, or those who are emotionally or mentally distressed.
In New York City, the era of mass criminalization of Black and brown communities through "stop and frisk" was supposed to be over thanks to the election of a supposedly progressive mayor. What de Blasio brought instead though, was the return of William Bratton, the architect of Stop and Frisk! Bratton's highly oppressive "broken windows" style of policing, in which the smallest "crimes" are aggressively policed, has already led to an increase in police brutality and public mistrust. In this year, NYPD's use of "Broken Windows" has led to the highly publicized chokehold death of beloved community member Eric Garner, the beating of an 84-year-old immigrant man for allegedly jaywalking, a chokehold on a 7-month pregnant woman for barbecuing in front of her home, a young man kicked in the head while lying on the ground handcuffed, numerous people beaten for falling asleep on the subway, a raid of Harlem housing projects, and numerous other atrocities. Even some of the most well-known cultural aspects of New York are under attack, as subway performers are being arrested at astonishing rates simply for trying to earn a living as they have been doing for decades. Meanwhile, the same City Council that voted so strongly for police reforms earlier this year has remained silent in the midst of a new "progressive" administration, lifting their voices only to cry out for 1,000 more cops!
For more info go to http://www.october22.org/ .
I am so happy that someone has written about this! There was a similar Case in September regarding Michael Paquette (Google it) The Santa Cruz police department obviously has no proper training with mental health cases and uses horrible excessive force and then gives false reports to cover their asses. Their blog wrote about Paquette, an attempted suicide case. Paquette's father had called the Santa Cruz PD after his son started threatening suicide, he hid in some bushes, and started inflicting self harm. The santa cruz PD shows up, did not announce themselves and aggressively attacked Paquettte. They knew he had a knife, they knew he was threatening suicide and they still aggressively handled the case with resulted in one office getting a quarter in nick on his leg. Paquette also showed signs of just wanting to go home. They raised him. On the Santa Cruz police blog they say that one officer was stabbed and Paquette tried to stab another in the face. Guess what? It's not in any police report that he attempted to stab another officer in the face. They also say that the officer that was "stabbed" was at home and resting, what they don't say is that it's a quarter inch knick on his leg from mishandling a mental health case. This is all so disheartening. When you look at this case and dig for others, on top of the newest smear campaign against Leonie Sherman, it makes you really wonder if the Santa Cruz PD has any of out best interests at heart. Open your eyes Santa Cruz.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$75.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network