From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Santa Cruz Indymedia
Government & Elections
Health, Housing & Public Services
Police State & Prisons
Project Homeless Connect Leading the Initiative To Establish Homeless Court in Santa Cruz
Time for a New Model of Social Justice
Historically, “homeless courts” or “community courts” have met with a very cautious reception among homeless advocates. One of the first such programs was created in 2007 by then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom who pushed for the court after a visit to Manhattan's Midtown Community Court. Offenders in that court, including minor misdemeanants and subway fare evaders, were offered the chance to have their crimes wiped from their records in exchange for participating in social services or performing community service. The model was first applied in the Tenderloin as a place to tackle quality-of-life crimes such as camping on sidewalks and public urination and initially drew scorn from homeless advocates who said it would criminalize homeless people.
Although that criticism has softened somewhat over the years, a measured approach to the concept is still warranted. Project Homeless Connect, which has organized and hosted the one-day homeless services fair in Santa Cruz for the past five years, believes that the time is right for consideration of such a court in Santa Cruz and Santa Cruz County. There are many reasons why this social justice model would provide substantial benefits to our local homeless community. Here are just a few:
For many members of the Santa Cruz homeless community, the challenges of a chronic physical or mental disability are not the only obstacles to getting their lives back together. Some have accumulated hundreds or even thousands of dollars in fines they cannot afford to pay. These fines are the result of citations for infractions, most often for violation of vehicle codes or city ordinances. Others are the chronically homeless who have received numerous illegal camping tickets from years of sleeping in public spaces in violation of the local ban on this activity.
A smaller number of people experiencing homelessness have outstanding fines or open cases related to lower level misdemeanors such as vagrancy, disorderly conduct or public intoxication. As a practical matter, these unpaid fines and unresolved dispositions create insurmountable obstacles to finding gainful employment, securing financial aid, qualifying for permanent housing or getting medical and/or behavioral health care. The program proposed by Project Homeless Connect is designed to address these challenges.
The Project Connect Homeless Court Program is modeled after Project Clean Slate offered by the County of Santa Cruz some years ago and would be a court of “good dispositions” for our homeless participants. The current working model provides for a sitting Judge or Commissioner designated by the Presiding Judge of the Santa Cruz County Superior Court to hear and dispose of cases that come before him or her. The Judge would be assisted by a Clerk of the Court designated by the Chief Executive Officer of the Santa Cruz County Superior Court. A Deputy District Attorney with full authority to dispose of “low level” misdemeanor cases would represent the District Attorney’s Office. The deputy would also be authorized to set aside unpaid fines on closed cases and make recommendations related to community service options. A Public Defender or an Advocate from the Homeless Persons Legal Assistance Project would provide Pro Bono legal assistance to participants.
This program is now in the conceptual stage and PHC hopes to gather together representatives from the Santa Cruz County Superior Court, the District Attorney and Public Defender Offices, the Clerk of the Court, Homeless Legal Advocates and the Homeless Services Center to work together to develop the framework for a successful program. It is the hope of Project Homeless Connect and its community partners that this program will encourage participants to make good choices in the future and provide them with more options for “positive outcomes”.
But the program participants are not the only potential beneficiaries of this program. Local courts and court administration will also benefit in terms of reduced court calendaring as well as the personnel and resource expenditures that can be saved by giving our participants an opportunity to return to lives lived “outside” of the criminal justice system. And, in a perfect world, the monies saved could be applied to much needed but severely underfunded services for our homeless community; adequate shelter space being foremost among them.
Although the first session of any functioning homeless court is still several months away, PHC and its collaborative partners believe that the benefits accruing to the homeless community, the court system and the community at large are well worth the effort. The time is right for a new holistic approach to justice that helps homeless people realize their potential and enables them to lead fulfilling lives as active contributors to their community. Whether it is in the name of social justice or criminal justice or restorative justice, the Project Connect Homeless Court Program will advance human justice for those in our community experiencing homelessness.
That is the goal.
Although that criticism has softened somewhat over the years, a measured approach to the concept is still warranted. Project Homeless Connect, which has organized and hosted the one-day homeless services fair in Santa Cruz for the past five years, believes that the time is right for consideration of such a court in Santa Cruz and Santa Cruz County. There are many reasons why this social justice model would provide substantial benefits to our local homeless community. Here are just a few:
For many members of the Santa Cruz homeless community, the challenges of a chronic physical or mental disability are not the only obstacles to getting their lives back together. Some have accumulated hundreds or even thousands of dollars in fines they cannot afford to pay. These fines are the result of citations for infractions, most often for violation of vehicle codes or city ordinances. Others are the chronically homeless who have received numerous illegal camping tickets from years of sleeping in public spaces in violation of the local ban on this activity.
A smaller number of people experiencing homelessness have outstanding fines or open cases related to lower level misdemeanors such as vagrancy, disorderly conduct or public intoxication. As a practical matter, these unpaid fines and unresolved dispositions create insurmountable obstacles to finding gainful employment, securing financial aid, qualifying for permanent housing or getting medical and/or behavioral health care. The program proposed by Project Homeless Connect is designed to address these challenges.
The Project Connect Homeless Court Program is modeled after Project Clean Slate offered by the County of Santa Cruz some years ago and would be a court of “good dispositions” for our homeless participants. The current working model provides for a sitting Judge or Commissioner designated by the Presiding Judge of the Santa Cruz County Superior Court to hear and dispose of cases that come before him or her. The Judge would be assisted by a Clerk of the Court designated by the Chief Executive Officer of the Santa Cruz County Superior Court. A Deputy District Attorney with full authority to dispose of “low level” misdemeanor cases would represent the District Attorney’s Office. The deputy would also be authorized to set aside unpaid fines on closed cases and make recommendations related to community service options. A Public Defender or an Advocate from the Homeless Persons Legal Assistance Project would provide Pro Bono legal assistance to participants.
This program is now in the conceptual stage and PHC hopes to gather together representatives from the Santa Cruz County Superior Court, the District Attorney and Public Defender Offices, the Clerk of the Court, Homeless Legal Advocates and the Homeless Services Center to work together to develop the framework for a successful program. It is the hope of Project Homeless Connect and its community partners that this program will encourage participants to make good choices in the future and provide them with more options for “positive outcomes”.
But the program participants are not the only potential beneficiaries of this program. Local courts and court administration will also benefit in terms of reduced court calendaring as well as the personnel and resource expenditures that can be saved by giving our participants an opportunity to return to lives lived “outside” of the criminal justice system. And, in a perfect world, the monies saved could be applied to much needed but severely underfunded services for our homeless community; adequate shelter space being foremost among them.
Although the first session of any functioning homeless court is still several months away, PHC and its collaborative partners believe that the benefits accruing to the homeless community, the court system and the community at large are well worth the effort. The time is right for a new holistic approach to justice that helps homeless people realize their potential and enables them to lead fulfilling lives as active contributors to their community. Whether it is in the name of social justice or criminal justice or restorative justice, the Project Connect Homeless Court Program will advance human justice for those in our community experiencing homelessness.
That is the goal.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Instead of straw man 'solutions', why not do something meaningful, like decriminalizing existence? Then the court costs 'problem' disappears!
Oh, right, framing the victims is the priority.
So instead of investigating, prosecuting, and incarcerating those that create, promote, and enforce ""cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment", the idea is to spin a kinder and gentler tyranny? Gee, how benevolent of you!
Oh, right, framing the victims is the priority.
So instead of investigating, prosecuting, and incarcerating those that create, promote, and enforce ""cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment", the idea is to spin a kinder and gentler tyranny? Gee, how benevolent of you!
For more information:
http://peacecamp2010insider.blogspot.com/2...
Sounds like kangaroo courts to me.
OMFG! That's all. OMFG!
I can't believe I'm reading this...
Keep your hands off our (preexistent and fucking well invisible to you and your housed friends) ideations and actualizations of justice. We don't do "Just-Us" Steve. Butt out.
That resistance thing at the top. That means I don't comply with their illegitimate "laws" if possible and illegitimate shitstems of just-us that lord over flies. That IS active resistance.
I can't believe I'm reading this...
Keep your hands off our (preexistent and fucking well invisible to you and your housed friends) ideations and actualizations of justice. We don't do "Just-Us" Steve. Butt out.
That resistance thing at the top. That means I don't comply with their illegitimate "laws" if possible and illegitimate shitstems of just-us that lord over flies. That IS active resistance.
Steve writes: For many members of the Santa Cruz homeless community, the challenges of a chronic physical or mental disability are not the only obstacles to getting their lives back together. Some have accumulated hundreds or even thousands of dollars in fines they cannot afford to pay. These fines are the result of citations for infractions, most often for violation of vehicle codes or city ordinances. Others are the chronically homeless who have received numerous illegal camping tickets from years of sleeping in public spaces in violation of the local ban on this activity.
yes Steve. some chronically homeless and even temporarily homeless have received illegal camping tickets in spite of a local ban. You know why Steve? It's b/c despite the fact the city has a sleeping ban law, humans still need to sleep. A law doesn't mean that all of a sudden a homeless person loses their need to sleep. SOMEWHERE. You sleep some WHERE and get caught and the cop doesn't like you, you get a ticket vs a move on order.
Vehicle violations and other "harass the homeless and poor "infractions are typically incurred by POOR people and not just homeless or even chronically homeless. It happens b/c you don't have enough $$ to pay some tax on time and can't catch up once the city/state starts trying to pick the meat off of your bones for being late in paying, ie, poor.
Steve continues: This program is now in the conceptual stage and PHC hopes to gather together representatives from the Santa Cruz County Superior Court, the District Attorney and Public Defender Offices, the Clerk of the Court, Homeless Legal Advocates and the Homeless Services Center to work together to develop the framework for a successful program. It is the hope of Project Homeless Connect and its community partners that this program will encourage participants to make good choices in the future and provide them with more options for “positive outcomes”.
WTF steve. encourage participants to make good choices in the future? You mean like next life try to be born into Mitt Romney's family or the Rittenhouse or Coonerty clans, make the right choice to be born into a family where having to make a choice between paying for medical care vs. paying your rent isn't a dilemma? Where the choice between keeping your tags current or getting a couple nights in a dry hotel room isn't a choice? Does "encourage participants to make good choices in the future" mean being sure one isn't born into a body that isn't disabled or that suffers a debilitating disease or anxiety disorders or depression or any number of physical and mental manifestations that affect one's ability to work and thus put people on the street?
The language you are using seems to be intentionally crafted to appeal to a in vogue crowd in Santa Cruz that believes that poverty is a nuisance and thus a crime. If that's the case, why are you posting this on indymedia and not promoting this directly to the Law and Order groups for their buy-in?
An speaking of law and order types, honestly, isn't this proposal really just a DAP mini-me? DAP's ugly little cousin? Son of DAP? Maybe the plan is to have the two share the same DT quarters?
Here's an alternative idea. Have every single person on the PHC bd of advisors http://www.phc-santacruz.org/board-of-advisors/ as well as the steering committee http://www.phc-santacruz.org/steering-committee/ work and actualize a reversal of the laws in SC which criminalize being poor. Have members show up at CC meetings every session. Have them lobby SC CC in private. Have local speakouts and PR campaigns by folks such as Kathy Beirs and "downtown chip" to mobilize the community and CC to reverse course on making being homeless be a crime. Have them work to enact local rent control so people don't have to pay $1200 for a 10x15 "studio" on Broadway that's really just a firetrap. Have them establish a workable vehicle ordinance and get some low tech sanctuary village concepts established as well. etc.
Once PHC and other people of influence get some skin in the game, risk losing a small amount of political capital in the interest of economic justice; once PHC and other people of local influence can get these local laws that are often more about making SC pretty and palatable to the beautiful and rich vs addressing the actual quality of life and safety for ALL citizens no matter their circumstance, then and only then should poor people be lectured about being "encouraged to make good choices in the future."
yes Steve. some chronically homeless and even temporarily homeless have received illegal camping tickets in spite of a local ban. You know why Steve? It's b/c despite the fact the city has a sleeping ban law, humans still need to sleep. A law doesn't mean that all of a sudden a homeless person loses their need to sleep. SOMEWHERE. You sleep some WHERE and get caught and the cop doesn't like you, you get a ticket vs a move on order.
Vehicle violations and other "harass the homeless and poor "infractions are typically incurred by POOR people and not just homeless or even chronically homeless. It happens b/c you don't have enough $$ to pay some tax on time and can't catch up once the city/state starts trying to pick the meat off of your bones for being late in paying, ie, poor.
Steve continues: This program is now in the conceptual stage and PHC hopes to gather together representatives from the Santa Cruz County Superior Court, the District Attorney and Public Defender Offices, the Clerk of the Court, Homeless Legal Advocates and the Homeless Services Center to work together to develop the framework for a successful program. It is the hope of Project Homeless Connect and its community partners that this program will encourage participants to make good choices in the future and provide them with more options for “positive outcomes”.
WTF steve. encourage participants to make good choices in the future? You mean like next life try to be born into Mitt Romney's family or the Rittenhouse or Coonerty clans, make the right choice to be born into a family where having to make a choice between paying for medical care vs. paying your rent isn't a dilemma? Where the choice between keeping your tags current or getting a couple nights in a dry hotel room isn't a choice? Does "encourage participants to make good choices in the future" mean being sure one isn't born into a body that isn't disabled or that suffers a debilitating disease or anxiety disorders or depression or any number of physical and mental manifestations that affect one's ability to work and thus put people on the street?
The language you are using seems to be intentionally crafted to appeal to a in vogue crowd in Santa Cruz that believes that poverty is a nuisance and thus a crime. If that's the case, why are you posting this on indymedia and not promoting this directly to the Law and Order groups for their buy-in?
An speaking of law and order types, honestly, isn't this proposal really just a DAP mini-me? DAP's ugly little cousin? Son of DAP? Maybe the plan is to have the two share the same DT quarters?
Here's an alternative idea. Have every single person on the PHC bd of advisors http://www.phc-santacruz.org/board-of-advisors/ as well as the steering committee http://www.phc-santacruz.org/steering-committee/ work and actualize a reversal of the laws in SC which criminalize being poor. Have members show up at CC meetings every session. Have them lobby SC CC in private. Have local speakouts and PR campaigns by folks such as Kathy Beirs and "downtown chip" to mobilize the community and CC to reverse course on making being homeless be a crime. Have them work to enact local rent control so people don't have to pay $1200 for a 10x15 "studio" on Broadway that's really just a firetrap. Have them establish a workable vehicle ordinance and get some low tech sanctuary village concepts established as well. etc.
Once PHC and other people of influence get some skin in the game, risk losing a small amount of political capital in the interest of economic justice; once PHC and other people of local influence can get these local laws that are often more about making SC pretty and palatable to the beautiful and rich vs addressing the actual quality of life and safety for ALL citizens no matter their circumstance, then and only then should poor people be lectured about being "encouraged to make good choices in the future."
"The Goal" is a cheaper tyranny.
Revocation of consent is the likely result.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html
Revocation of consent is the likely result.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html
For more information:
http://PeaceCamp2010insider.blogspot.com/
Specialty courts were recommended by the City Safety Task Force. There's now a DAP court, Thursdays, Judge Guy, and a behavioral health court at the jail Fridays, we used to have a drug court, I think we still have a family court. I haven't observed, not sure of the hours, days, details.
On the one hand, specialty courts seem to me to deprive those charged of full basic rights. On the other hand, they move things along, cut through red tape, ... They do seem to me to interfere with the actions of people using the law to make statements about rights.
I hope the drafters of any recommendation would include lots of input from people with lived experience of being unhoused, having lots of citations, ... I don't see them included in the group to be consulted.
On the one hand, specialty courts seem to me to deprive those charged of full basic rights. On the other hand, they move things along, cut through red tape, ... They do seem to me to interfere with the actions of people using the law to make statements about rights.
I hope the drafters of any recommendation would include lots of input from people with lived experience of being unhoused, having lots of citations, ... I don't see them included in the group to be consulted.
Every year, a veterans stand down is held in Fresno. One of the components is a court session where minor offenses can be disposed of. The outcomes are usually (99.9%) to the benefit of the defendants. Misdemeanor/infraction warrants are recalled, outstanding fines are either cancelled or reduced, and usually community service can be done instead of paying. Those taking advantage of the court aren't forced to. They can opt out and pursue legal matters through the normal process. This is merely a service provided to those who want to resolve outstanding issues quickly.
Asserting that the imposition of unjust laws on oppressed groups is OK, if the 'processing' is cheap and easy?
What will you say when your groups are the victims, I wonder.
What will you say when your groups are the victims, I wonder.
For more information:
http://PeaceCamp2010insider.blogspot.com/
(cont.) "Although that criticism has softened somewhat over the years," it's still true.
So how can people concerned with the well-being of the houseless rationalize supporting this 'separate-but-not-quite-equal' Kangaroo Court Just-Us shitstem?
People do.
Because it works for "Druggies" who want to 'buy back into' the equally addicted mainstream of US society. Do you know that a HUGE percentage of the US population takes Mood Meds, tranx, and pain pills?
Because 'it works' for Vets who are 'standing down' when they REALLY NEED TO BE STANDING UP TO THE SHITSTEM THAT FUCKED THEM UP AND OVER...
Because Poverty Pimps WILL pander their wares...
So how can people concerned with the well-being of the houseless rationalize supporting this 'separate-but-not-quite-equal' Kangaroo Court Just-Us shitstem?
People do.
Because it works for "Druggies" who want to 'buy back into' the equally addicted mainstream of US society. Do you know that a HUGE percentage of the US population takes Mood Meds, tranx, and pain pills?
Because 'it works' for Vets who are 'standing down' when they REALLY NEED TO BE STANDING UP TO THE SHITSTEM THAT FUCKED THEM UP AND OVER...
Because Poverty Pimps WILL pander their wares...
You hit the nail on the head RR: "Separate but equal" all over again.
Date: January 28, 2003
To: Veterans Crisis Programs of Central CA
From: Coalition on Homelessness, San Francisco
Re: Position on homeless courts
This letter is our response to the homeless courts conference.
We believe that homeless courts are not the solution to homelessness in our cities.
Homeless courts do not address the causes of homelessness, It does not benefit homeless people or reflect their best interests. Because in order to get considered into the court program they must essentially waive all their due process rights. Most homeless people get caught up into the criminal justice system simply because they are homeless.
Homeless courts do not represent homeless people fairly. Despite claims that it will reduce recidivism it does not offer any guarantees like permanent housing or treatment. It is just a means to make it more convenient for the criminal justice system to streamline its operations. Homeless courts would still be a revolving door but instead it would place homeless people in the position to accept the terms of this program or be incarcerated.
Homeless courts are not justice, It takes advantage of them and their circumstances because they are poor and without a roof over their heads.
Instead of creating another expensive bureaucracy, let us repeal the laws that cause homeless people to get arrested, laws that make life sustaining activities for homeless people such as sleeping/camping, panhandling a crime.
Instead of enforcing these "quality of life" laws let's improve the quality of life for those who are without a home by working towards real solutions - permanent solutions.
First, we must stop more from becoming homeless, by helping people retain housing they already have through rental assistance programs and providing treatment on demand. Homeless courts will not do this. Homeless courts promise no real way out of homelessness.
In conclusion, We believe homeless courts discriminate and alienate and offer no long term solutions for homeless people.
Speaking on behalf of the homeless residents here in San Francisco, we hereby Oppose the creation of a Homeless Court System.
Sincerely, Coalition on Homelessness, San Francisco
To: Veterans Crisis Programs of Central CA
From: Coalition on Homelessness, San Francisco
Re: Position on homeless courts
This letter is our response to the homeless courts conference.
We believe that homeless courts are not the solution to homelessness in our cities.
Homeless courts do not address the causes of homelessness, It does not benefit homeless people or reflect their best interests. Because in order to get considered into the court program they must essentially waive all their due process rights. Most homeless people get caught up into the criminal justice system simply because they are homeless.
Homeless courts do not represent homeless people fairly. Despite claims that it will reduce recidivism it does not offer any guarantees like permanent housing or treatment. It is just a means to make it more convenient for the criminal justice system to streamline its operations. Homeless courts would still be a revolving door but instead it would place homeless people in the position to accept the terms of this program or be incarcerated.
Homeless courts are not justice, It takes advantage of them and their circumstances because they are poor and without a roof over their heads.
Instead of creating another expensive bureaucracy, let us repeal the laws that cause homeless people to get arrested, laws that make life sustaining activities for homeless people such as sleeping/camping, panhandling a crime.
Instead of enforcing these "quality of life" laws let's improve the quality of life for those who are without a home by working towards real solutions - permanent solutions.
First, we must stop more from becoming homeless, by helping people retain housing they already have through rental assistance programs and providing treatment on demand. Homeless courts will not do this. Homeless courts promise no real way out of homelessness.
In conclusion, We believe homeless courts discriminate and alienate and offer no long term solutions for homeless people.
Speaking on behalf of the homeless residents here in San Francisco, we hereby Oppose the creation of a Homeless Court System.
Sincerely, Coalition on Homelessness, San Francisco
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network