From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
What's wrong with wave power?
Now Green Wave is trying for a new permit for a wave energy system off the coast of Mendocino. This attempt will not be stopped by the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) "Initiative" to create so-called "marine protected areas." We Mendocino Coast citizens must stop this dangerous and inefficient technology which will forever deface our beautiful coastline and destroy the economic potential that the natural beauty of our coast affords us.
Photo: a 450-foot long Pelamis 2 Wave Energy Machine
Photo: a 450-foot long Pelamis 2 Wave Energy Machine
What's wrong with wave power?
by Judith Vidaver and Ed Oberweiser
The Ocean Protection Coalition opposes plans to industrialize the ocean by energy extraction. The ocean is the most important component in the earth’s life support system. We have already compromised its ability to function with pollution, overfishing, habitat destruction and, now, global warming. We agree that we urgently need to develop carbon free energy sources.
However, the ocean, stressed as it is, isn’t the place to get them. A panel of scientists, convened by the state of Oregon, concluded that wave power projects may affect water circulation and currents. They may also reduce wave action and disrupt sediment transport, affecting beaches. Cables could entangle marine species, such as turtles and whales, and emit electromagnetic radiation.
Migration paths of whales and other marine mammals would be disrupted. Noise produced by these devices could be harmful to marine animals and annoying to humans. These gigantic machines, nearly 500 feet long and weighing nearly 800 tons, would be painted bright orange and lighted at night, degrading wild and scenic ocean vistas. Our Mendocino coast is recognized as one of the four most productive marine ecosystems in the world and is a major visitor destination. Lost tourist dollars would far exceed any income generated by the projects being proposed for our coast.
Installations of these machines are proposed directly over the San Andreas fault anchored in our crumbly substrate. There would be no quick and easy way to retrieve them If they break loose in an earthquake or during one of our fierce storms. The global warming emergency demands immediate actions if we are to avoid the worst effects. This threat is so extreme that we can’t afford to waste time or money on a technology that already has already failed in Portugal.
There the Pelamis P-1 device is likely to be written off by Pelamis due to design faults after a chaotic period that saw it towed in for repairs after just a few weeks in the water in contradiction to company claims at the time. A trio of devices is currently sitting forlornly in a dock near Porto.
The tow-in of the prototype, which coincided with the bankruptcy of Australian-owned renewables giant B&B, caused considerable embarrassment to Portuguese politicians who had declared the project the key component of the country’s future energy plans. It also angered local companies developing their own marine-energy projects.
However Pelamis is trying to bring the technology back. Scottish wave-energy pioneer Pelamis Wave Power has been given a lifeline in Portugal despite its first commercial prototype, the much-vaunted P-1, now looking set to be scrapped after a series of technical failures and the collapse of its majority shareholder, Babcock & Brown (B&B).
Portuguese energy giant EDP and compatriot engineering firm Efacechave decided to take over the majority stake in the project in Portugal, opening the way for a second prototype to be tested in the country’s offshore waters using the infrastructure built for the P-1.
Now Green Wave is trying for a new permit for a wave energy system off the coast of Mendocino. This attempt will not be stopped by the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) "Initiative" to create so-called "marine protected areas." We Mendocino Coast citizens must stop this dangerous and inefficient technology which will forever deface our beautiful coastline and destroy the economic potential that the natural beauty of our coast affords us.
This is the wrong approach. We need to reduce our use of fossil fuels and focus all our efforts on proven sources of non-carbon energy, such as land-based solar, wind and geothermal. The effort to deploy wave power will stretch far into the future because any ocean industrialization is highly controversial. Controversy delays projects and adds to the cost.
Also, so far it’s proving to be unfeasible because the ocean is such a challenging environment to work in. The ocean is the most critical element in the amelioration of global warming. It is already stressed to the maximum with marine ecosystems collapsing all over the planet. We can’t afford any more experiments that might result in unintended consequences. We can’t reverse destruction of the productivity of our local ocean. Arrays of energy extracting machines could disrupt the natural processes upon which much of the western Pacific depends.
by Judith Vidaver and Ed Oberweiser
The Ocean Protection Coalition opposes plans to industrialize the ocean by energy extraction. The ocean is the most important component in the earth’s life support system. We have already compromised its ability to function with pollution, overfishing, habitat destruction and, now, global warming. We agree that we urgently need to develop carbon free energy sources.
However, the ocean, stressed as it is, isn’t the place to get them. A panel of scientists, convened by the state of Oregon, concluded that wave power projects may affect water circulation and currents. They may also reduce wave action and disrupt sediment transport, affecting beaches. Cables could entangle marine species, such as turtles and whales, and emit electromagnetic radiation.
Migration paths of whales and other marine mammals would be disrupted. Noise produced by these devices could be harmful to marine animals and annoying to humans. These gigantic machines, nearly 500 feet long and weighing nearly 800 tons, would be painted bright orange and lighted at night, degrading wild and scenic ocean vistas. Our Mendocino coast is recognized as one of the four most productive marine ecosystems in the world and is a major visitor destination. Lost tourist dollars would far exceed any income generated by the projects being proposed for our coast.
Installations of these machines are proposed directly over the San Andreas fault anchored in our crumbly substrate. There would be no quick and easy way to retrieve them If they break loose in an earthquake or during one of our fierce storms. The global warming emergency demands immediate actions if we are to avoid the worst effects. This threat is so extreme that we can’t afford to waste time or money on a technology that already has already failed in Portugal.
There the Pelamis P-1 device is likely to be written off by Pelamis due to design faults after a chaotic period that saw it towed in for repairs after just a few weeks in the water in contradiction to company claims at the time. A trio of devices is currently sitting forlornly in a dock near Porto.
The tow-in of the prototype, which coincided with the bankruptcy of Australian-owned renewables giant B&B, caused considerable embarrassment to Portuguese politicians who had declared the project the key component of the country’s future energy plans. It also angered local companies developing their own marine-energy projects.
However Pelamis is trying to bring the technology back. Scottish wave-energy pioneer Pelamis Wave Power has been given a lifeline in Portugal despite its first commercial prototype, the much-vaunted P-1, now looking set to be scrapped after a series of technical failures and the collapse of its majority shareholder, Babcock & Brown (B&B).
Portuguese energy giant EDP and compatriot engineering firm Efacechave decided to take over the majority stake in the project in Portugal, opening the way for a second prototype to be tested in the country’s offshore waters using the infrastructure built for the P-1.
Now Green Wave is trying for a new permit for a wave energy system off the coast of Mendocino. This attempt will not be stopped by the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) "Initiative" to create so-called "marine protected areas." We Mendocino Coast citizens must stop this dangerous and inefficient technology which will forever deface our beautiful coastline and destroy the economic potential that the natural beauty of our coast affords us.
This is the wrong approach. We need to reduce our use of fossil fuels and focus all our efforts on proven sources of non-carbon energy, such as land-based solar, wind and geothermal. The effort to deploy wave power will stretch far into the future because any ocean industrialization is highly controversial. Controversy delays projects and adds to the cost.
Also, so far it’s proving to be unfeasible because the ocean is such a challenging environment to work in. The ocean is the most critical element in the amelioration of global warming. It is already stressed to the maximum with marine ecosystems collapsing all over the planet. We can’t afford any more experiments that might result in unintended consequences. We can’t reverse destruction of the productivity of our local ocean. Arrays of energy extracting machines could disrupt the natural processes upon which much of the western Pacific depends.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Right, I'm afraid that I'm going to be very objectionable here.
Very objectionable.
I object to the semi-facts. If you are going to express an opinion then at least get it right.
1. Wave power may affect water circulation and currents. It's hard to see how a device working on the surface could affect currents. It's a _wave_ power device. It interacts with surface waves, not currents, or circulation.
2. They reduce wave action and sediment transport. They do take energy from the waves but the power produced by these devices compared to the power in the wavefront is infitesimal. Do the maths yourself, or think of the effect of a fleet of ships moored way offshore; imperceptible. As for sediment transport- this is not a breakwater!
3. Regarding cables and marine species; there's not a big problem with other offshore cables is there? Ships moorings, buoy lines?
4. As for noise; I think you are confusing this form of energy generation with maybe the engine in your car, or a diesel powerplant. These things are silent; a few hisses and clunks, particularly when the sea is rough but this is lost in the sound of breaking waves. Wildlife is actually a big problem. Like all floating things, weed will grow on them, fish will school underneath them, seabirds perch on top of them. Because you cannot fish near them they act as natural schooling grounds for depleted fish stocks. Increasing the marine evosystem.
5. Bright orange and lit at night. You're right! They are; they are signal red, and carry _flashing_ lights. They are also 2m max above the sea. Unless you are a matter of meters away they are effectively below the horizon. They cannot be seen from the land. Unless you go up a really big hill close to the sea with a telescope. I'd think that a fair few tourists would be interested in doing this.
6. Breaking loose. Someone has probably already thought of this. Likewise retrieving them quickly.
7. Portugal problems. It's a new technology. I think even the Wright brothers had technical problems.
I believe that P1 was about 5 years ago. There's at least one new type of machine been working in the North Atlantic since then.
This type of energy is very different to the noisy, dirty, centralised industry that we are used to. This is small, low impact, low visibility, minimal. If we are to turn away from carbon pollution and reduce our impact on our world then we need, fundamentally, to spread the load; reduce the pressure. It's about working in sympathy with our world; gather wind where there's wind, solar where there's sun and wave where there's wave.
This machine is a way to celebrate the beauty and the power of the ocean.
Very objectionable.
I object to the semi-facts. If you are going to express an opinion then at least get it right.
1. Wave power may affect water circulation and currents. It's hard to see how a device working on the surface could affect currents. It's a _wave_ power device. It interacts with surface waves, not currents, or circulation.
2. They reduce wave action and sediment transport. They do take energy from the waves but the power produced by these devices compared to the power in the wavefront is infitesimal. Do the maths yourself, or think of the effect of a fleet of ships moored way offshore; imperceptible. As for sediment transport- this is not a breakwater!
3. Regarding cables and marine species; there's not a big problem with other offshore cables is there? Ships moorings, buoy lines?
4. As for noise; I think you are confusing this form of energy generation with maybe the engine in your car, or a diesel powerplant. These things are silent; a few hisses and clunks, particularly when the sea is rough but this is lost in the sound of breaking waves. Wildlife is actually a big problem. Like all floating things, weed will grow on them, fish will school underneath them, seabirds perch on top of them. Because you cannot fish near them they act as natural schooling grounds for depleted fish stocks. Increasing the marine evosystem.
5. Bright orange and lit at night. You're right! They are; they are signal red, and carry _flashing_ lights. They are also 2m max above the sea. Unless you are a matter of meters away they are effectively below the horizon. They cannot be seen from the land. Unless you go up a really big hill close to the sea with a telescope. I'd think that a fair few tourists would be interested in doing this.
6. Breaking loose. Someone has probably already thought of this. Likewise retrieving them quickly.
7. Portugal problems. It's a new technology. I think even the Wright brothers had technical problems.
I believe that P1 was about 5 years ago. There's at least one new type of machine been working in the North Atlantic since then.
This type of energy is very different to the noisy, dirty, centralised industry that we are used to. This is small, low impact, low visibility, minimal. If we are to turn away from carbon pollution and reduce our impact on our world then we need, fundamentally, to spread the load; reduce the pressure. It's about working in sympathy with our world; gather wind where there's wind, solar where there's sun and wave where there's wave.
This machine is a way to celebrate the beauty and the power of the ocean.
Sadly, these authors's point of view is ridiculous.
There may not be a larger untapped form of green energy on the face of the earth than the "motion of the oceans". Water is a thousand times more dense than air and the energy that pounds our shore is enough to power every single device on the planet hundreds of times over.
While, I remain skeptical of the Pelamis design, I am confident that in the future, wave energy will play a major role in the power grid.
As for Ms. Vidaver and Mr. Oberweiser's concerns. They are overblown and exaggerated. In fact, this is chicken little at it's worst. In fact, it is likely that wave power offers the smallest negative impact on our environment than any other form with perhaps solar energy.
Yes the oceans are stressed. But far more stress comes from the burning of fossil fuels, acid rain, global warming and the dumping of chemicals and untreated sewage into the oceans as well as garbage.
Thousands of buoys tether to the ocean floor that rise and fall with the waves would most likely have the effect of a microbe on the back of a gnat on the back of an elephant in comparison to the burning of fossil fuels or even the damming of our rivers.
Would these power plants have an effect on the oceans? I am sure they would. Just as a butterfly in Beijing would have an impact. Everything on this planet effects everything else, that doesn't mean that this would be a negative effect..
It is essential that we take care of our oceans, they are essential to humanity. But that does not mean that we should ignore the possibilities that they offer in creating an energy independent United States.
Although I remain skeptical of the Pelamis design and believe that it will prove not to be an effective design, I am confident that it's deployment will teach us a great deal that will allow the next generation of wave electricity generators to be successful.
There may not be a larger untapped form of green energy on the face of the earth than the "motion of the oceans". Water is a thousand times more dense than air and the energy that pounds our shore is enough to power every single device on the planet hundreds of times over.
While, I remain skeptical of the Pelamis design, I am confident that in the future, wave energy will play a major role in the power grid.
As for Ms. Vidaver and Mr. Oberweiser's concerns. They are overblown and exaggerated. In fact, this is chicken little at it's worst. In fact, it is likely that wave power offers the smallest negative impact on our environment than any other form with perhaps solar energy.
Yes the oceans are stressed. But far more stress comes from the burning of fossil fuels, acid rain, global warming and the dumping of chemicals and untreated sewage into the oceans as well as garbage.
Thousands of buoys tether to the ocean floor that rise and fall with the waves would most likely have the effect of a microbe on the back of a gnat on the back of an elephant in comparison to the burning of fossil fuels or even the damming of our rivers.
Would these power plants have an effect on the oceans? I am sure they would. Just as a butterfly in Beijing would have an impact. Everything on this planet effects everything else, that doesn't mean that this would be a negative effect..
It is essential that we take care of our oceans, they are essential to humanity. But that does not mean that we should ignore the possibilities that they offer in creating an energy independent United States.
Although I remain skeptical of the Pelamis design and believe that it will prove not to be an effective design, I am confident that it's deployment will teach us a great deal that will allow the next generation of wave electricity generators to be successful.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network