top
International
International
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

U.S. Plans to Export LNG, Rivals Russian Markets, Raises U.S. Prices

by NY Gov. Cuomo Needs Facts on Fracking!
Some of the recent rushed developments of natural gas pipeline projects (ie., Ruby Pipeline, Pacific Connector, etc...) may be part of long term plans by natural gas corporations for exporting LNG across the oceans to European and Asian markets, bypassing U.S. consumers and raising prices for natural gas here stateside
"U.S. noses into Russia's gas domain"

Daniel Fineren and Edward McAllister

"The United States may play a role this winter in loosening Russia’s grip on the European market for natural gas by shipping liquefied natural gas across the Atlantic.

Awash with domestic shale gas and with little need to import extra fuel, the United States has started re-exporting LNG cargoes, which firms had previously imported under contract, to countries where gas prices are much higher.

Such shipments could contribute to a growing pool of cheaper LNG going to Russia’s biggest export market this winter. In the longer term, U.S. plans to build plants to liquefy shale gas could create another rival to Russian pipelines.

The first re-export cargo from the United States to Britain – a key access point for LNG into northern Europe via an Interconnector pipeline to Belgium – is set to sail over the weekend.

“It is a landmark shipment,” said Zach Allen at NATS LNG analysts in Raleigh North Carolina.

“LNG has, through the Interconnector, played a major role in reducing intake of Russian gas into western Europe.”

U.S. shale gas has already forced many LNG producers that had hoped to supply the North American market to find alternative buyers, with many cargoes ending up in Europe and driving spot gas prices below the price of oil-indexed Russian gas.

U.S. re-exports to Europe are the latest sign that increases in shale gas production have transformed the global gas market. The International Energy Agency said on Tuesday that a decade-long period of oversupply was likely to push oil-indexed gas sellers to accept lower prices.

In February, Russian gas export monopoly Gazprom postponed it’s Shtokman LNG project because the United States, its target market, did not need more imports.

Major European pipeline gas supplier Statoil has been forced to find alternative markets for LNG it had hoped to send to the United States, often selling it into Europe.

Qatar, the world’s largest producer and exporter of LNG, has also pushed into both Norwegian and Russian markets by making large deliveries of cheap LNG into Britain and Belgium.

U.S. LNG imports have fallen to contractual minimums as gas prices have sagged, forcing importers whose terminals are sitting idle to change strategy and re-export to make the most of higher prices overseas.

U.S. gas at $4.1 per million British thermal units (mmbtu) was about $3.3/mmbtu below U.K. prices on Tuesday and just under half the price of Russian gas in Europe in October, according to International Monetary Fund data.

About 20 billion cubic feet of gas has already been re-exported from the United States this year, with some sent to Asia, where buyers have paid nearly $10 per mmbtu, and some to Latin America and the Middle East.

More of those U.S. loaded cargoes could head to Britain over coming months, given that winter price increases are sharper in northern Europe than in the United States and that imports by South American and Middle Eastern buyers are usually confined to summer.

“U.S. exports to Europe will remain rather exotic, but they underline once again the big risks for Russia of focusing some of its future projects on U.S. markets,” said Valery Nesterov, energy analyst at Moscow-based Troika Dialog brokerage.

“The first U.S. LNG cargo for Europe is of course a symbolic event, but I would not overestimate it.”

The number of cargoes redirected from the United States to Europe this winter will be limited, because most shipments will probably head directly from producing countries, but the ongoing shale gas boom could lead to the export of American gas by tanker. Cheniere Energy, operator of the Sabine Pass import terminal in Louisiana, announced plans in June to build a liquefaction plant at the terminal. It said on Tuesday that U.S. bank Morgan Stanley hoped to secure some of its export capacity. Pending approval, the plant would export U.S.-produced shale gas to markets all over the globe from 2015.

It would be the first U.S. LNG export plant in 40 years – following the old Kenai facility which supplies Asia from Alaska – and would be well placed to supply Europe.

“LNG supplies from the United States can help lower gas prices in Europe and Asia and ultimately help lift prices in the States,” said Mikhail Korchemkin from Pennsylvania-based East European Gas Analysis."

article found here;
http://www.ctv.ca/generic/generated/static/business/article1791600.html




Meanwhile on the other side of the Mississippi, NY state Gov. Andrew Cuomo has expressed concerns about the risks of fracking (hydraulic fracturing) to groundwater, though apparently still needs some convincing. Please take a moment to sign the petition and urge Mr. Cuomo to take a more firm stance against the natural gas corporations intent on fracking with New York's watersheds.



"Today, Andrew Cuomo released his new Energy policy document, Power NY, the New NY Agenda.

The Agenda is a step in the right direction but stops short of calling for a permanent ban on fracking in our watersheds. The Agenda states that “existing watersheds are sacrosanct and Andrew Cuomo would not support any drilling that would threaten the State’s major sources of drinking water.” However, the Agenda does foresee Marcellus drilling in New York that is “highly sensitive to environmental concerns”; that obtaining gas should “not come at the expense of human health or have adverse environmental impacts”; that “it is critical that no drilling be conducted that might negatively affect any existing watershed”; and “any drilling in the Marcellus Shale must be environmentally sensitive and safe.”

Yesterday, responding to the New York State Senate passing a moratorium on issuance of gas drilling permits until May 15, 2011, Andrew Cuomo said that he doesn’t think the state should allow drilling until it “knows all the facts.”

While agreeing that a moratorium in general makes sense, Cuomo was flippant regarding the May date stating: “That’s why they call it May.”

Now is the time to let Andrew Cuomo know we need a clear and firm commitment from him banning fracking in our watersheds permanently.

Please urge everyone you know to SIGN THE PETITION and keep informed by joining the Frack campaign on Facebook."

article and petition here;
http://dontfrackwithny.com/cuomo-releases-policy-statement-on-marcellus/



Regional campaigns to stop Ruby Pipeline;
http://www.gbrw.org/

Regional campaigns to stop Pcific Connector Pipline;
http://kswild.org/programs/rogue-riverkeeper/no-lng-in-oregon
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$55.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network