Over 100 UCSC Faculty Sign Letter Protesting Campus Judiciary Process
Dear Chancellor Blumenthal:
We write as faculty alarmed by the University’s disciplinary actions regarding the November 19-22 activities in and around Kerr Hall, and more specifically, the “Voluntary Resolution” agreements recently issued to students by Director of Student Judicial Affairs, Doug Zuidema. We worry that the implementation of the student judicial procedure in these cases violates constitutional due process and basic principles of fairness. These disciplinary actions also create a chilling effect on political dissent in the campus community.
Of particular concern are the following:
- The “Voluntary Resolution” agreements skirt due process procedures by asking students to incriminate themselves for “alleged violations” of University regulations committed in relation to activities in and around Kerr Hall without sufficient presentation of the evidence against them. According to the ACLU, the right to due process prior to the imposition of discipline is a fundamental constitutional protection, especially at institutions of higher learning (ACLU Letter to Chancellor Birgeneau, April 6, 2010, p.9, emphasis added). It is also a principle of basic fairness to allow the accused the opportunity to see the nature of evidence against him or her before deciding whether to enter into what amounts to a plea bargain.
- The “Voluntary Resolution” agreements hold individual students accountable for acts in which they may not have engaged. Addressed to individual students, these letters describe, in general terms, events and acts alleged to have occurred in and around Kerr Hall, including property damage, and then accuse the individual in question of violations of the Code of Student Conduct without indicating specific acts that s/he is alleged to have taken. It seems that Student Judicial Affairs is more intent on punishing students than determining the facts of the case.
- The situations of two students merit special mention in that they well illustrate Student Judicial Affairs’ disregard for determining the facts regarding each individual’s involvement in the Kerr Hall occupation: one student accused of violating the Code of Student Conduct is a student journalist who was covering the occupation for the Project Newspaper Collective; another is one of five students who entered into negotiations with representatives of the administration (the other four were either never summoned or held not responsible).
- The identities of the staff alleging that specific students engaged in specific violations remain anonymous. Again, fairness dictates that before entering a plea bargain, the accused should be allowed to see the evidence against him or her.
- These “Voluntary Resolution” agreements appear to be a form of coercion: students may either opt for self-incrimination (in the letters’ proposed resolutions) or risk more extensive, but unstated, punishment.
- Finally, aside from problems in due process, we also note that the disciplinary procedure has proceeded without consideration of students’ rights of free speech and assembly. The actions at Kerr Hall were collectively executed by a group of considerable size and diversity, in public expression of grievance against the University. The proposed resolution does not separate accusations of criminal behavior from protected speech acts; it implies that any form of participation in these actions is tantamount to vandalism. Such an equation will have a chilling effect on necessary speech and debate in the campus community. The “Voluntary Resolution” agreements present an implicitly constant threat of criminalization in cases where the University has a substantial stake in minimizing the effects of a coordinated protest action.
We request that due process and fair treatment be honored in this and future disciplinary actions not only because we wish to defend students’ right to assemble and protest, but also because we, as faculty, have a profound interest in the health of the University as a place of free exchange, inquiry, speech, and assembly. The University can rightly preside over disciplinary processes as part of its charge to educate students and to coordinate an academic community in accord with shared principles, but we fear that the University’s disciplinary process has gone awry in this instance.
Therefore we, the undersigned, request that no students be separated from their student status or be charged with restitution for participation in the events in and around Kerr Hall, or for other political actions past and future, unless legitimate material evidence links them to specific acts of property destruction. We also call for a suspension of the student disciplinary procedure in these and future cases involving political dissent until the problems we note have been addressed.
We note that section 104.20 in the Student Policies and Regulations Handbook states that “final authority for administration of student discipline rests with the chancellor.” We are optimistic that you, as a University administrator acting in the public trust and with an intrinsic interest in the protection of free speech, free inquiry, and open dialogue, will recognize the urgency of these procedural failures and take immediate steps to correct them.
Sincerely,
Jordi Aladro, Professor, Literature
Mark Anderson, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
Bettina Aptheker, Professor, Feminist Studies
Anjali Arondekar, Associate Professor, Feminist Studies
Gabriela F. Arredondo, Associate Professor, Latin American & Latino Studies; Director, CLRC
Noriko Aso, Assistant Professor, History
Gopal Balakrishnan, Associate Professor, History of Consciousness
Karen Barad, Professor, Feminist Studies
Karen Bassi, Professor and Chair, Literature
Dilip Basu, Associate Professor, History
Hunter Bivens, Assistant Professor, Literature
Robert Boltje, Professor, Mathematics
David Brundage, Professor, Community Studies
Edmund Burke, Professor, History
Sean Burns, Lecturer, Community Studies & American Studies
Brian Catlos, Associate Professor, History
Giulia Centineo, Lecturer, Languages
James Clifford, Professor, History of Consciousness
Christopher Connery, Professor, Literature
E.G. Crichton, Associate Professor, Art
Ben Crow, Professor, Sociology
Gina Dent, Professor and Chair, Feminist Studies
Maria Elena Diaz, Associate Professor, History
Nathaniel Deutsch, Professor, Literature and History
Tim Duane, Associate Professor, Environmental Studies
Barbara Epstein, Professor and Chair, History of Consciousness
Shelly Errington, Professor, Anthropology
Dion Farquhar, Lecturer, Literature and Crown College
Mayanthi Fernando, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
Kathy Foley, Professor and Editor of Asian Theater Journal, Theater Arts
Maria Frangos, Lecturer, Literature
Dana Frank, Professor, History
Carla Freccero, Professor, Literature
Rosa-Linda Fregoso, Professor, Latin American and Latino Studies
Hiroshi Fukurai, Professor, Sociology
Susan Gillman, Professor, Literature
Per Gjerde, Professor Emeritus, Psychology
Wlad Godzich, Distinguished Professor, Literature
W.L. Goldfrank, Professor Emeritus, Sociology & LALS
Jennifer Gonzalez, Professor and Chair, History of Art and Visual Culture
Deborah Gould, Assistant Professor, Sociology
Shelly Grabe, Assistant Professor, Psychology
Chris Hables Gray, Lecturer, Crown College
Miriam Greenberg, Assistant Professor, Sociology
Jody Greene, Associate Professor, Literature
Kirsten Silva Gruesz, Professor, Literature
Lisbeth Haas, Professor, History
Gildas Hamel, Senior Lecturer, History
Craig Haney, Professor, Psychology
Donna Haraway, Distinguished Professor, History of Consciousness
Gail Hershatter, Distinguished Professor, History
Christine Hong, Assistant Professor, Literature
Emily Honig, Professor, History
Minghui Hu, Assistant Professor, History
Catherine Jones, Assistant Professor, History
L.S. Kim, Associate Professor, Film and Digital Media
Sharon Kinoshita, Professor, Literature
Norma Klahn, Professor, Literature
Regina Day Langhout, Assistant Professor, Psychology
Kimberly Lau, Associate Professor, American Studies; Provost, Oakes College
H. Marshall Leicester, Professor, Literature
Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Professor, Politics
Leslie Lopez, Lecturer, UCSC
Andrew S. Mathews, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
Dean Mathiowetz, Assistant Professor, Politics
Robert Meister, Professor, Political and Social Thought
Helene Moglen, Professor Emerita, Literature
Megan Moodie, Assistant Professor, Anthropology
María Morris, Lecturer, Languages
Loisa Nygaard, Professor, Literature
Gregory O’Malley, Assistant Professor, History
Marcia Ochoa, Assistant Professor, Community Studies
Micah Perks, Associate Professor, Literature
Juan Poblete, Associate Professor, Literature; Provost, Kresge College
Cynthia Polecritti, Associate Professor, History
Mary Beth Pudup, Associate Professor, Community Studies
Catherine S. Ramírez, Associate Professor, American Studies
Renya Ramirez, Associate Professor, American Studies
Craig Reinarman, Professor, Sociology
B. Ruby Rich, Professor and Chair, Community Studies & Social Documentation
Lisa Rofel, Professor and Chair, Anthropology
Don Rothman, Senior Lecturer Emeritus, Writing
Danilyn Rutherford, Associate Professor, Anthropology
Zack Schlesinger, Professor, Physics
Roger Schoenman, Assistant Professor, Politics
Peter Scott, Professor Emeritus, Physics
Dan Selden, Professor, Literature
Warren Sack, Associate Professor, Film & Digital Media
Vanita Seth, Associate Professor, Politics
Carolyn Martin Shaw, Professor, Anthropology
Richard Terdiman, Professor, Literature
Megan Thomas, Assistant Professor, Politics
Avril Thorne, Professor and Chair, Psychology
Anna Tsing, Professor, Anthropology
Michael Urban, Professor, Politics
David Wellman, Research Professor, Community Studies
Rob Wilson, Professor, Literature & Creative Writing
Dan Wirls, Professor and Chair, Politics
Karen T. Yamashita, Professor, Literature
Pat Zavella, Professor and Chair, Latin American and Latino Studies
Eileen Zurbriggen, Associate Professor, Psychology
But at point 5, I dropped out when they say "we also note that the disciplinary procedure has proceeded without consideration of students’ rights of free speech and assembly."
When did vandalizing a building and trashing the heck out of it become defined as a student's right to free speech and assembly?
I invite any of the signing faculty to address this question, and provide their home address in doing so, so that myself and 100 of my friends might drop by and similarly express our same rights of free speech and assembly.
kEep oN tRollInG!
Mnah MuHmah!
The idea of academic discipline for non-academic charges is, itself, ludicrous. Who elected Zuidema anyways? Appointees appointing appointees who appoint another appointee to be the judge, jury and executioner. Where's the public in this whole process?
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.