top
North Coast
North Coast
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

MLPA Initiative: Genocidal Attack on North Coast Tribal Culture and Sovereignty

by John Lewallen
It is unconscionable for true environmentalists to participate in the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative (MLPAI) process of cultural genocide. May we Californians put a stop to the genocidal MLPAI, support Tribal Sovereignty, and emulate the sense of personal and cultural sovereignty of the tribal peoples of Northern California.
Marine Life Protection Act Initiative: Genocidal Attack on North Coast Tribal Culture and Sovereignty

by John Lewallen, member, Public Ocean Access Network

The Marine Life Protection Act Initiative (MLPAI) is a genocidal attack on the tribal nations and native cultures who are surrounded, and sometimes overwhelmed by, the State of California.

Here in Mendocino County, California, are eight sovereign tribal nations. Many more federally-recognized tribal nations live in Sonoma, Humboldt and Del Norte counties. Their cultural survival is dependent on being part of the intertidal and ocean ecosystem in an annual migration to the coast to camp, talk to the spirits, play, and harvest essential food for human and cultural health.

“Cultural Genocide” is a crime under international law, and a morally reprehensible act when done with full knowledge. I am sure the genocidal MLPAI will stop as soon as most Californians see its true nature.

Northern California Tribes Demand Sovereign Negotiations

In October, 2009, the National Congress of American Indians passed a Resolution titled, “Supporting the Demand of the Tribes of Northern California that the State of California Enter into Government-to-Government Consultations with these Tribes in Order to Ensure the Protection of Tribal Subsistence, Ceremonial and Cultural rights in the Implementation of the State Marine Life Protection Act.”

“Our tribal members rely upon fishing and gathering seaweed to feed themselves and their families, and the continuance of these practices are essential to maintain our identities as tribal people,” the Resolution declared.

“There has been no formal recognition of tribal subsistence, ceremonial or cultural rights in the MLPA process."

In addition to demanding Sovereign negotiations, the Resolution demanded that “the State of California ensure the protection of tribal subsistence, ceremonial and cultural rights in the implementation of the Marine Life Protection Act. “

Del Norte County Backs Sovereignty of Smith River Rancheria

On December 28, 2009, Gerry Hemmingsen, Chair of the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors, sent a letter to Ken Wiseman, Director of the MLPAI.

“By way of this letter, the Board of Supervisors expresses its support of the Smith River Rancheria regarding the MLPA Initiative,” the official Del Norte County letter read, in part.

“This Board finds it important that you engage the Smith River Rancheria in discussions in order to address those issues that the Smith River Rancheria has outlined in the 11/19/09 letter asserting their status as a Sovereign Nation.”

A Truly Eloquent Tribal Letter to the MLPAI

The Nov. 19 letter endorsed in full by Del Norte County was fired off by Smith River Tribal Council leaders to MLPAI Director Wiseman the day after the Smith River Tribal Council leaders attended the MLPAI Blue Ribbon Task Force meeting in Eureka. This Letter Regarding the MLPA, signed by Kara Brundin Miller, Tribal Chair, was posted on the Smith River Rancheria website.

“Our first observation,” the letter opens, “was the very limited timeframe provided to tribes and tribal leaders, which was not reflective of their unique status as leaders of Sovereign Nations. It was stated numerous times during the meeting that Tribes have a unique connection with the ecosystem and have been practicing stewardship of the aquatic environment and lands since time immemorial. These inherent responsibilities to the marine resources by tribal peoples are not being validated or given their justified consideration.

“It is our strong held belief,” wrote Tribal Council Chair Miller, “that if true voluntary government-to-government consultation is to take place without other state agencies forced to the table, then just consideration and time for valid dialogue must be provided to tribal leaders and their representatives. Nowhere, should it be or the position taken that these two minutes of public comment is adequate or shows proper respect for tribal positions regarding a state mandate initiative on tribes. In addition, never should the Blue Ribbon Task Force continue to view tribal leaders as simply the ‘general public.’ The BRTF will find that North Coast Tribes are well organized and will stand together to protect our inalienable rights to gathering, subsistence, and ceremonal customary uses of offshore and near-shore marine resources.”

The letter closed by “requesting that each tribal government directly affected by these regulations in the North Coast District have a positon on the Regional Stakeholder Group. “

“We are acutely aware of this process,” declared the Smith River Nation, “and we will engage by any means available to us to ensure tribal rights are honored and protected.”

The Blue Ribbon Task Force directed MLPAI Director Wiseman to prepare a full briefing on impacted tribal interests and rights, and how these interests and rights can be addressed during the process. This briefing on tribal interests is due to be presented at the coming Blue Ribbon Task Force meeting on January 14 in Crescent City.

MLPAI Genocide on the North Central Coast

When my wife Barbara and I became aware in October, 2008, that the MLPAI was in process of closing public access to ocean food in the North Central Coast--from Pigeon Point to Alder Creek, just north of Point Arena--Barbara immediately asked Director Wiseman if tribal ocean food gathering was being considered. Director Wiseman replied that tribal representatives were not part of the MLPAI process, because they would not disclose the locations of their intertidal and ocean food-gathering.

Sonoma and Mendocino County tribal nations and people, in my experience, have a deep reluctance to disclose ocean food-gathering locations to the State of California. Certainly in justice and probably in law, these ancient locations essential to tribal survival are not ruled by state law over sovereign tribal rights. The state has no right to force tribal people to disclose their sacred ocean and intertidal harvest locations.

At the August 5, 2009 California Fish & Game Commission meeting, Lester Pinola, representing the Kashaya Nation, asked the Commission not to close Stewart’s Point to tribal harvest that had sustained the Kashaya and other tribes for centuries. Lester Pinola said that ocean and intertidal harvest is necessary for Kashaya cultural survival. “Our children are getting diabetes,” Pinola said. “We need food from the ocean. We wouldn’t take food out of your mouths. Don’t take food out of our mouths.”

The California Fish & Game Commission then enacted the North Central Coast Integrated Preferred Alternative, outlawing ancient tribal ocean harvesting relationships in places disclosed and undisclosed, seen and unseen. There was no mention of the presence, or even existence, of tribal representatives or interests. “I defy you,” Commissioner Richard Rogers taunted the crowd, in his closing remarks (dvd available from ).

Genocidal Words Make a Genocidal MLPAI Process

Words have always been the basic instrument of genocide against American Indians, and can be applied with similar effect on Californians in general.

The Marine Life Protection Act Initiative is focused on obscuring the fact that everyone being regulated is really an ocean food provider, a person exercising their sovereign right to sustainably take food from California ocean waters (to three miles out) and intertidal zone.

Until recent assertion of tribal rights, unique tribal ocean harveting rights and practices were not mentioned by the MLPAI. All ocean food providers were, and still are (see MLPAI North Coast Draft Profile), categorized as either “commercial” or “recreational” “extractors.”

Tribal people, as I know them, are personally sovereign and interdependent with the intertidal locations. Tribal people harvest for subsistence and much more than mere subsistence: to participate in world-creation as a beautiful and essential element of the ecosystem.

The basic act of MLPAI genocide, which I believe is a genocidal attack not only on North Coast tribal sovereignty, but also an attack on the food sovereignty of all Californians, is the newly-minted definition of “Ecosystem Management” which mandates that all human beings must be removed from the ecosystem. This genocidal theory, now enjoying marine biology orthodoxy among foundation-funded biologists, denies the fact that people have been part of the North Coast ocean ecosystem food chain since time immemorial.

The whole MLPAI concept of ocean and intertidal areas, free of human take, where the ocean can recover and be like it was, is a fallacy that may cause a lot of ecosystem and human damage before it is corrected. People are a necessary and legitimate part of the North Coast ocean ecosystem and intertidal zone.

Roberta Reyes Cordero and Tribal Marine Protected Areas

“Tribal Marine Protected Areas: Protecting Maritime Ways and Cultural Practices” (Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper, 2004), is a foundation-funded white paper that came out as the Central Coast MLPAI was starting up.

My blood froze when I read this conclusion in the Wishtoyo paper :

“Promotion of Sustainable Fishery Practices. Future tribal MPAs within the region should be designated as no-take reserves given the general decline in the health of the south coast marine ecosystems and the general decline in the health of south coast marine ecosystems and the general lack of resource use by Chumash people of marine resources.”

There are an estimated five thousand Chumash people in the Central Coast, and I do not believe they never go fishing in the ocean, or collecting mussels. The Wishtoyo paper advises the Chumash to participate by helping archaeologists study signs of ancient Chumash culture in these new no-take tribal marine reserves.

Roberta Reyes Cordero, JD, wrote a brilliant and sensitive study of aspects of Chumash traditional culture for “Tribal Marine Protected Areas.” Now Dr. Cordero is a member of the MLPAI Blue Ribbon Task Force for the North Coast, focused on bringing North Coast tribal members into the MLPAI process.

To me, nothing could be more genocidal than getting North Coast tribes to disclose their traditional ocean harvest locations so they can be closed as “Tribal Marine Reserves." “Tribal Marine Reserves” have no place on the North Coast.

Tribal Sovereignty and Californian Food Sovereignty

North Coast Tribal Nations are uniting and becoming stronger under this latest genocidal assault from the MLPAI. As wild seaweed harvesters, my wife Barbara and I are struggling in concert with the Tribal Nations to assert Californian food sovereignty, our legitimate and ancient right to be a harmonious part of the North Coast ocean food chain.

I felt sorry for us when the MLPAI closed our traditional sea palm trimming site at Point Arena. Depressed, I felt hopeless, defeated, and organically ripped away from a part of myself.

Now I see our tribal neighbors, who have lived through the most vicious genocide ever seen, extensively documented in “A Little Matter of Genocide” by Ward Churchill. The Northern California genocide has involved state-financed bounty hunting, thrill-killing, relocation marches driven by federal troops, and other genocidal atrocities. Few treaty settlements have been made.

More recently, “Termination” broke up all tribal holdings. Through legal action and raw persistence, North Coast tribal nations have been reassembled and federally recognized.

It is unconscionable for true environmentalists to participate in the MLPAI process of cultural genocide. May we Californians put a stop to the genocidal MLPAI, support Tribal Sovereignty, and emulate the sense of personal and cultural sovereignty of the tribal peoples of Northern California.

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by cp
I support your idea of having sovereign negotiations about this, but I think you're falsely characterizing the behavior of the Marine reserve commission.

First - 5 of 7 species of abalone in California are threatened or endangered. Do you have any sort of alternative plan which would be likely to result in recovery? Do you think this is acceptable? Clearly what has been done in the past few decades hasn't been working, and so it might make sense to discuss spatial forms of management - even though marine reserves should affect differently affect various types of fish and invertebrate species. http://search.ca.gov/search?q=cache:K-tUpbnDfdUJ:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/response/abalone.pdf&proxystylesheet=xfix&output=xml_no_dtd&client=xfix

Secondly - if you actually look at that MLPA plan (which another indybay writer linked to a couple of weeks ago), it has two pages about indigenous and traditional use of the shoreline.
Maybe you want to communicate that they are just disingenuous, and that there is really no substance or plan to really negotiate with tribes or take indigenous collection areas into account.
However, your title calling the marine reserve plan 'genocidal' comes across as hyperbole to me. There are plenty of blatantly immoral corporations out there which are causing poverty in the U.S. (including the north coast), and which trample over local populations, without even attempting to negotiate or recognize sovereignty. Most of the resource extraction multinationals fall in this category such as oil drilling in Nigeria, Burma, or gold/diamond/palladium/rare earth mining pretty much everywhere it occurs - are all famous for destroying tribes. Lots of americans get rich from commodities trading, but I haven't read much about such companies in California on Indybay - so I guess the marine reserves hierarchically rank much higher than any of the lumber companies etc. in terms of harming local cultures? By the way - the people in Denver do a pretty good job about raising awareness of Newmont, their local major mining company: http://www.stopnewmont.org/index.html

quote from North Coast MLPA regional profile document http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/regionalprofile_nc.asp

-5.2 Native American Coastal Communities
Native American tribal people, also referred to as Indigenous Peoples, have inhabited the north
coast of California for over 12,000 years, and rely on the coast and ocean for a variety of important
uses, such as spiritual, ceremonial, cultural, training, travel, subsistence, harvesting, and gathering
(Rocha, pers. comm. 2009; Erlandson et al. 2007; Anderson 2006). As an intrinsic part of the
ecosystem, Indigenous Peoples strive to steward the environment in a sustainable manner based on
their traditional ecological and cultural knowledge (Anderson 2006; Eglash 2002; Heizer and
Elsasser 1980). In the north coast study region, there are a number of tribes located adjacent to the
coast. Tolowa, Yurok, Wiyot, Mattole, Sinkyone, Yuki and Pomo have ancestral territories directly
adjacent to the coast. Other tribal groups such as Hoopa and Karuk have coastal interests but not a
direct land link to the coast (NAHC 2009; Wiki, pers. comm. 2009).
At the time of the first European contacts in the north coast study region, Indigenous Peoples lived in
numerous and well-populated coastal and inland villages. These areas provided abundant food and
resources. The ocean and its many marine resources have always been an important part the
Native American way of life on the north coast. Despite historic events and policies that sought to
remove, colonize, or assimilate Indigenous Peoples, many of the Tribes of the north coast study
region continue to reside in or near their homelands, remain culturally intact, and continue many
aspects of the traditional lifeways (Rocha, pers. comm. 2009). This has led to culturally, politically
and socially strong Tribal organizations that are very much connected to place, although they vary in
capacity, membership, land status, government, and structure. Unlike other parts of the California
coastline, many tribes own land along the ocean.
5.2.1 Native American Resource Use
Some Native American people have indicated that they are an intrinsic part of the ecosystem, as
expressed in their interactions with the land, the ocean, and the various resources and animals
Socioeconomic Setting
69
(Eglash 2002). Traditional ecological knowledge has enabled Indigenous Peoples to live off the land
for thousands of years, with minimal environmental consequences (Anderson 2006; Heizer and
Elsasser 1980). There are many cultural uses of the coast and ocean waters by Indigenous Peoples
in California that can be consumptive and non-consumptive. Consumptive uses may be subsistence
or ceremonially based, for example. Non-consumptive examples may include use of the viewshed1
from a particular place for spiritual purposes, and resources needed in creating regalia used for
ceremony. Thus, these cultural uses are not recreational or commercial, although commercial fishing
does occur. Additionally, specific areas are identified for certain resources and/or uses by a given
family, Tribe or group of Tribes, and some maintain that they have aboriginal rights in these areas.
Therefore, some Native American people assert that restrictions for these uses cannot be
designated in those cultural use areas, often referred to as Traditional Cultural Properties (Rocha,
pers. comm. 2009).
Indigenous Peoples depend upon the rich diversity of marine and coastal plant resources as part of
their daily lives. Important marine resources include salmon, clams and abalone (as both food
sources and for the shells, which are used in ceremonial regalia), mussels, seaweed, eels, crab,
rockfish, steelhead, surf fish, candle fish (or eulachon) and sea salt (Young, pers. comm. 2009;
Hostler, pers. comm. 2009; Dowd and Dowd, pers. comm. 2009). Subsistence fishing for crab,
salmon, surf fish (smelt), mussels and clams occurs regularly from the rocky beaches. Non-plant or
animal materials with cultural significance found in the coastal zone include steatite and chert, which
are used to make items such as bowls and arrow points, respectively (Verwayen 2007) Historic
value is another important consideration. For example, certain areas along the coast are also highly
valued for their historic significance, such as submerged buried grounds (Erlandson et al. 2007).
These past and present uses are relevant in marine planning, as decisions may affect these
traditions.
by C-gull
Genocide does not necessarily occur quickly. The form of genocide I think the author is referring to, started with Columbus and continues to this day. If anyone needs a refresher course, I suggest reading "Where the Lightning Strikes" by Peter Nabokov. Remember the Tellico dam controversy and the Little Tennessee River. The Cherokee people called the Little Tennessee 'diga tale nohr'=this is where we began. The media told us that a little fish called the snail darter stood in the way of progress. The press did not tell us that the place that the Cherokee considered most sacred was in danger of being destroyed. It is well documented that ancient peoples live there for 10,000 years. The Cherokee lost in court because the judge separated sacred geography from culture and religion. Another definition from someone who probably had no idea what really is sacred. The red brothers and sisters I've talked to over the years are pretty damn tired of having their culture, lands and religion defined by some arrogant, self-serving human authority.
Clarification: In Mendocino County, there are more than 8 federally recognized tribes. They are:
Cahto Tribe - Laytonville
Coyote Valley - Redwood Valley
Guidiville - Talmage
Hopland - Hopland
Pinoleville - Ukiah
Point Arena/Manchester - Southern Mendocino County Coast
Redwood Valley - Redwood Valley
Round Valley - Covelo
Sherwood Valley - Willits

There are two additional State Recognized tribes which are:
Yokayo Rancheria - Talmage
Noyo - Ft. Bragg
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$55.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network