UCSC Students Occupy Dean's Office: Call to Revolt!
What is a crisis anyway? It is the exclusion from work and public services of those most precariously situated within this system. To a crisis which is generalized, it is pointless to respond with generic activism. Activists of more prosperous eras held demonstrations. Still, they were unable to secure any lasting position for those on whose behalf they took “action”. As the current crisis unfolds, it is necessary to elaborate innovative forms of escalation and revolt. Our crisis is as much the failure of these tired forms of mobilization as it is the collateral damage caused by a growing economic catastrophe.
We have lived through too many cycles of defeat and must try something else. We are compelled to negate the crisis itself with whatever capacity we have now. Tonight, we have taken the Humanities and Social Sciences building. As long as we occupy this space, Dean Sheldon Kamienecki will be deprived of his workplace. This empty figurehead, who last spring made decisions about what jobs get cut and which departments lose funding, will no longer have access to the means of his existence. While we hope this occupation quickens his pulse and that of administrators like him, we have not taken this building to send them a message. Although we hope that they fear for the integrity of their documents and office supplies, we do not occupy to demand the reinstatement of funding channels to what they were before the crisis exposed the fucked up priorities of this school. This occupation is a second call to everyone who has been targeted by this crisis. Which is to say: it is a call to everyone. We cannot wait for some movement to come that will stop the forces pushing ever more people out of this system. Our task is to disrupt the functioning of this system by appropriating what is ours for ourselves.
No amount of organizational meetings, phone calls or emails to legislators have the capacity to build a movement. Society cannot negotiate its way towards liberation. There is no need to raise consciousness. The crisis is already making people painfully aware of the situation. Peaceful marches, rallies and symbolic protests, attracting spectacular media attention, will never increase our ranks because this very process of mediation reduces us to passive observers of what is supposed to be our own activity. Organization for action has become an end in itself cut off from the reality of capitalism in decline. How many voices of outrage are required for a political rally to have a set demands met? We all know the answer to this question: no amount of voices will ever be enough. There is no power to which we can appeal except that which we find in one another. The organization of the movement occurs whenever a freshman or a service worker learns how to barricade doors, how to avoid arrest, how to pick locks. The movement has staying power when, for every one of us who grows tired, there are three who will take our place.
We have recently learned that the University of California does not use tuition money or student fees to fund research and education. On the contrary, they place one hundred percent of this money into an account with the Bank of New York Mellon Trust in order to protect their borrowing power in credit markets. They hold our tuition as collateral in order to finance the largest and most speculative construction projects in the state of California. UC pledged collateral rose by 60% with the last issue of bonds to $6.72B from $4.2B. The number of students taking out debt has risen 20% since 2000: 80-100% for students of color. Average debt levels for graduating seniors rose to $23,200 in 2008 alone, a 24% percent increase over 2004. We know very well what is going on: the University’s ability to finance bonds for new construction increases in direct proportion to their ability to slash spending on education, raise student fees indefinitely and ensure that students cannot disrupt the function of the University itself. This spectacular credit swap finances new construction on the backs of parents who increasingly risk foreclosure on their homes and students who will work the rest of their lives to pay off their debt. The University of California has already been securitized, ensuring that none of us have a future within this system.
We in the US have been too timid for far too long. We are afraid of the police. We are afraid of losing our jobs or getting expelled from school. We are afraid of people shouting in the streets. Security is the watchword of our era: no one wants to take risks. But this illusion of comfort — our separation from one another into perfectly compartmentalized lives, disconnected and self-amused — increasingly unravels with each person thrown out of work, every family evicted from their home and each student unable to afford unending tuition increases without bartering away her future on credit markets. It remains for those terminated by this system to use these failures as flash-points for generalizing the struggle. Perhaps, at last, we can understand one another, for we are all going bankrupt.
Press contact: (eight-three-one) 332-8916
website: http://occupyca.wordpress.com
The University of California is affiliated with Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos national laboratories, responsible for designing every nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal.
These weapons are all being reconfigured. What that means, essentially, is that the bombs that are already far too operational [for those of us who love our planet and want to see it safe from unnecessar and widespread destruction] are going to have parts replaced to make them MORE operational. This is an expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive process entirely unnecessary according to most experts in the field.
Yet it is being done with taxpayer money.
This is yet another instance where the money which ought to be going towards education is instead being funneled deliberately towards the most destructive projects imaginable.
Are we really going to stand for this?
How many more of us need get sick with radiation poisoning--also deemed "cancer"--before we fight back hard enough to win the battle against nuclear energy?
How many more employees are going to die of exposure while families in Livermore, CA are regularly exposed to extremely high levels of radiation with all of the related symptoms of exposure and disease...while we sit back and WATCH? How many more American Indian nations are going to be bombed? Is Hawai'i next?
How many more schools will tumble to the ground, a slower version of the falling of the Twin Towers so popularized through youtube videos, before we recognize that the construction projects being put forward to replace them are bombs designed to murder every human being within a large radius whenever the man in charge wishes it?
Who trusted Bush with such a project? Do we really trust any president backed by Wall St. not to push that button at any time?
Have a heart, y'all, and FIGHT BACK!
See the movie, "The Take" from Argentina, which you may have seen already. You're going in the right direction. Thank you very much for what you're doing.
Spark revolution through doing! That's the way to be!
Sincerely,
Frank Snapp
North Oakland
Guerilla Gardener
SFSU Junior
How can we help w/ this occupation? that is question. sending much virtual love to everyone standing up and fighting back, keep escalating, and...fuck the pigs.
So we left, thoroughly confusing the powers that be.
what part of occupying a building is boring to you?
well, nvm. I can understand why you got bored. It's because it was a failed plan from the beginning. Where was the support, on the outside and inside? Or was it just a couple people getting boners about occupying shit and just did it without thinking, about EVERYTHING first.
There was the potential do to a lot with that building. Dance partys, FreeSkool could have had a new headquarters! Movie showings, lectures, anything was possible. But let me guess, you didn't have the keys to any of the class rooms and you were just sitting on the floor waiting for something exciting to happen.
This comment will probably get deleted, because i'm critiquing what happened. And Critiquing is BAD. If you don't say good things about stupid stuff then your voice will be silenced.
fascist much?
In the end, think about your plan before you just do it. Get support, a lot. And maybe, just maybe get the keys to the other rooms!
Critique is welcome and encouraged. Thank You!
If critique turns into trolling and attempts to start flamewars, then a post might be hidden.
Then it should stand true in turn that students who are unhappy with Anarchists and their trashing of UCSC should go and occupy/vandalize Sub-Rosa, to show their frustration?
Or am I misunderstanding the situation and this action is really only valid for anarchists?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GD69Cc20rw
worth watching...
anyways, yeah... there are different tactics of resistance (tip of the hat to de certeau). some like this are a blitz to confuse the fuck out of them all. however, these tactics run the risk of being written off as ill concieved. full blown occupation as well has its strengths and weaknesses. often those come to a head with escalated violence (which i'm fine with-did you bring the cocktails?).
regardless, the most important strategy once the tables turn is to have multiple attacks on all sides: blitzes, facutly sponsored walkouts, sit/teach-ins, burning structures, silent and direct actions of destruction and resistance.
the critique circulated that we have occupied destroyed what was already ours blows over that these things are all part of the structure that we are trying to tear down. we must make them affraid of our collective inacquiescense.
HERE IS THE KICKER AND THE NEXT STRIKE!!! PAY BLOODY ATTENTION!
we must take this to the regents, they have homes, they have offices and lives outside of being a regent. they must feel the sting and embarrassment of our unwanted attention. bring it to their doorsteps. anyone know where yudof's appartment is?
i tried doing a similar top 10 after the Twin Towers got gotted Sept. 11, but for some reason the question "if you were a terrorist, what would you bomb?" question was questionably appropriate and not generally well received! DANCE DANCE REVOLUTION!...maybe some kind of a camp out on upper campus, like the Crown Meadow as an Occupation III? that too is contentious university land slated for development at some time...or, maybe have these rotating or simultaneous occupations to keep the po guessing, mobile, frustrated...hell, the situationists even used to have noon time flash mobbish demonstrations people could partake in on their lunch hours...
kudos to indymedia for allowing dissenting voices that are at least nominally respectful, thought out, etc, even if They are Wrong and We are Right...Bad them! Yeah we!...
Can you describe what power this dean even has?
Interesting. I wonder if the same thing happened with UC Santa Cruz as happened with Harvard, i.e.:
"Harvard University’s failed bet that interest rates would rise cost the world’s richest school at least $500 million in payments to escape derivatives that backfired. Harvard paid $497.6 million to investment banks during the fiscal year ended June 30 to get out of $1.1 billion of interest-rate swaps intended to hedge variable-rate debt for capital projects... Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut; Georgetown University in Washington and Rockefeller University in New York have reported losses related to interest-rate swaps, in some cases prompting the schools to pay termination fees to end the contracts." (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHou7iMlBMN8)
If this is what happened at UC Santa Cruz, the admins will be dodging and weaving to save their own skins just as they're cutting every corner they can, and laying people off with great abandon. It might be a good idea to find out if this is what the real problem is - if so, UC Santa Cruz may be in *real* trouble.
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.