top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

UCSC Students Occupy Dean's Office: Call to Revolt!

by Occupy California
The glass walls of passivity, separating us from one another, can only be shattered with revolt. We are occupying a second building on the Santa Cruz campus of the University of California because we have answered the call of the first to occupy everything. Tonight is a demonstration to students and workers everywhere that the division between taking what you want and planning for a movement to come only appears as a problem for abstract thought about taking action. We only catch sight of the fires of the insurrection to come on the morning after the unrest of the night before.

What is a crisis anyway? It is the exclusion from work and public services of those most precariously situated within this system. To a crisis which is generalized, it is pointless to respond with generic activism. Activists of more prosperous eras held demonstrations. Still, they were unable to secure any lasting position for those on whose behalf they took “action”. As the current crisis unfolds, it is necessary to elaborate innovative forms of escalation and revolt. Our crisis is as much the failure of these tired forms of mobilization as it is the collateral damage caused by a growing economic catastrophe.

We have lived through too many cycles of defeat and must try something else. We are compelled to negate the crisis itself with whatever capacity we have now. Tonight, we have taken the Humanities and Social Sciences building. As long as we occupy this space, Dean Sheldon Kamienecki will be deprived of his workplace. This empty figurehead, who last spring made decisions about what jobs get cut and which departments lose funding, will no longer have access to the means of his existence. While we hope this occupation quickens his pulse and that of administrators like him, we have not taken this building to send them a message. Although we hope that they fear for the integrity of their documents and office supplies, we do not occupy to demand the reinstatement of funding channels to what they were before the crisis exposed the fucked up priorities of this school. This occupation is a second call to everyone who has been targeted by this crisis. Which is to say: it is a call to everyone. We cannot wait for some movement to come that will stop the forces pushing ever more people out of this system. Our task is to disrupt the functioning of this system by appropriating what is ours for ourselves.

No amount of organizational meetings, phone calls or emails to legislators have the capacity to build a movement. Society cannot negotiate its way towards liberation. There is no need to raise consciousness. The crisis is already making people painfully aware of the situation. Peaceful marches, rallies and symbolic protests, attracting spectacular media attention, will never increase our ranks because this very process of mediation reduces us to passive observers of what is supposed to be our own activity. Organization for action has become an end in itself cut off from the reality of capitalism in decline. How many voices of outrage are required for a political rally to have a set demands met? We all know the answer to this question: no amount of voices will ever be enough. There is no power to which we can appeal except that which we find in one another. The organization of the movement occurs whenever a freshman or a service worker learns how to barricade doors, how to avoid arrest, how to pick locks. The movement has staying power when, for every one of us who grows tired, there are three who will take our place.

We have recently learned that the University of California does not use tuition money or student fees to fund research and education. On the contrary, they place one hundred percent of this money into an account with the Bank of New York Mellon Trust in order to protect their borrowing power in credit markets. They hold our tuition as collateral in order to finance the largest and most speculative construction projects in the state of California. UC pledged collateral rose by 60% with the last issue of bonds to $6.72B from $4.2B. The number of students taking out debt has risen 20% since 2000: 80-100% for students of color. Average debt levels for graduating seniors rose to $23,200 in 2008 alone, a 24% percent increase over 2004. We know very well what is going on: the University’s ability to finance bonds for new construction increases in direct proportion to their ability to slash spending on education, raise student fees indefinitely and ensure that students cannot disrupt the function of the University itself. This spectacular credit swap finances new construction on the backs of parents who increasingly risk foreclosure on their homes and students who will work the rest of their lives to pay off their debt. The University of California has already been securitized, ensuring that none of us have a future within this system.

We in the US have been too timid for far too long. We are afraid of the police. We are afraid of losing our jobs or getting expelled from school. We are afraid of people shouting in the streets. Security is the watchword of our era: no one wants to take risks. But this illusion of comfort — our separation from one another into perfectly compartmentalized lives, disconnected and self-amused — increasingly unravels with each person thrown out of work, every family evicted from their home and each student unable to afford unending tuition increases without bartering away her future on credit markets. It remains for those terminated by this system to use these failures as flash-points for generalizing the struggle. Perhaps, at last, we can understand one another, for we are all going bankrupt.

Press contact: (eight-three-one) 332-8916

website: http://occupyca.wordpress.com

§Update
by repost
"friday update

we’ll be back"
§You’ve got to be kidding us, Kliger
by Occupy California (repost)
Statements like, “these efforts [to clean up after the occupations] will run into tens of thousands of dollars” completely undermines any seemingly reasonable complaints that the university had to start with. The reality of the situation is that other than minor damages to benches or scratches here and there on furniture, nothing was destroyed. Individuals unrelated with the occupation spray painted all the messages you have seen. Although we don’t deny our sympathy with those statements, it is a complete and utter shameful tactic to attack these things as “vandalism” and ignore the elephant in the room. We can’t take this bullshit, these budget cuts, these cynical administrators any longer.

Tens of thousands of dollars in damage? Let’s talk real numbers: what about the $337 million that the UCOP caused to this university? What about the damage in excess of $813 million from the state? You’ve got to be kidding us.

There was an occupation last night. It ended. Mistakes were made, and lessons were learned. To err is to be human. However, as full of holes as any occupation is, including October 15th, we are not going to see a change in this system if we do not take our spaces back, if we don’t show the system that its ways cannot and will no longer be tolerated.

To clarify: the police came at some point during the dance party. The police shouting, “Hey folks, this is vandalism” is not a call for dispersal, it isn’t a warning that people will be maced. When Kliger writes that three people carrying a large table “cursed at an officer,” he isn’t lying. They were cursing at the police who were macing them. Are we surprised?

“The two ‘occupations’ of campus buildings since the beginning of fall quarter appear to be related to dissatisfaction with UC funding and related budget issues.” We pay this guy in excess of $250,000 a year for this? People occupying buildings, people protesting and demanding the layoff of Mark Yudof are not dissatisfied. No, we’re livid. No, we’re fucking pissed. And this means, “no more, Kliger.” It means we reject anyone handing out budget cuts. You aren’t being cut, we are. You are the representatives and defenders of an order that is gutting the university. Getting a education is becoming increasingly difficult, and it’s autocrats like Kliger and Yudof who are planning and enforcing it. The budget cuts are a ploy to increase bond ratings and promoting misleading construction projects.

The occupiers and their comrades are not asking you to agree with everything that they did. They aren’t asking you to not criticize these actions. They’re asking you to stop listening to the lies the UC administration is feeding you. Dividing us in this fight is what has let them run this university into the ground. Just remember, we are the university, and it’s within our power to establish.

[original article by Kliger can be found here]
§Response to Kliger
by Occupy California (repost)
Dear Students, Staff, and Faculty,

I would like to take the opportunity to clear up some the misconceptions surrounding last night’s demonstration at Cowell College and Humanities 2, misconceptions made worse by EVC David Kliger’s willfully alarmist letter to the campus community.

Last night a group of students held a potluck dinner and discussion session on the steps of the Cowell College courtyard. We were there to discuss what can be done to fight back against the cuts to our public education system and to think of ways to force the administration of UCSC and the larger UC system to recognize that we, as students, staff, and faculty, will not passively sit by as the administration attempts to deal with its budget crisis according to the same failed blueprint that it has used for the last decade. We have concluded that we should not accept more fee hikes, tuition increases, decreased course offerings, benefit cuts, and the like. We should not sit idly by as the UC administration continues to raise tuition and fees so it can keep on borrowing money for its crackpot development and construction projects.

We should not accept tuition increases (tuition is now, for the first time in history, over $10,000 per year), that limit access to a university education, and which disproportionately affect poor and minority students whose parents don’t have the luxury of spending tens of thousands of dollars on our educations. Recently, the entire state of California has learned of the salaries that UC administrators give themselves. I believe that it is outrageous that EVC Kliger can claim to be so concerned about students’ and their families’ budgets given what he and his fellow administrators pay themselves for dismantling our system, and expelling teachers, students and staff from our community. If he really cared, he would help us try to restore UCSC’s commitment to diversity, justice, and equality by fostering a university environment. But we don’t actually think he does. The further up you go in this system, the more acceptable cutbacks and tuition and fee hikes seem to become.
As for Kliger’s astonishment that a peaceful protest would, as one of its tactics, limit access to a small part of campus for a short period of time -when no one was using it- I hardly know what to say. Even the most unsympathetic observer could not fail to place last night’s events in the context of a tradition of peaceful protest and demonstration. Yes, the occupiers attempted to limit access to a nominally public space (again, for a few hours- at night!) for the precise reason of demonstrating that the university is itself in the process of systematically limiting access to thousands of current and future Californians. Most American school children with even a cursory knowledge of the history of nonviolent protests from Gandhi to Dr. King, would not fail to recognize the true nature of last night’s events.

I will end by making two further points. First of all, as to EVC Kliger’s assertion that students were provoking police officers, this is simply untrue. He was not there, and has relied upon the accounts of the police officers who were. Perhaps he would be interested in hearing what others saw, but I doubt it. There are dozens of eyewitnesses who saw, as well as video footage showing, what actually happened. They testify to the fact that there was absolutely no call for baton-wielding police officers to use pepper spray on peacefully assembled, chanting students. I strongly believe that it is nothing short of reprehensible for EVC Kliger to endorse this sort of behavior from police without even asking anyone else what might have happened. Secondly, it simply beggars the imagination that last night’s party and brief occupation could have created ‘tens of thousands’ of dollars in damages. If EVC Kliger wants to talk of the ‘incongruous’ and ‘absurd,’ I suggest he start here. For him to suggest that it will cost that amount to clean a few carpets and wipe off some spray paint is simply ridiculous, and, quite frankly, offensive. It demonstrates a remoteness from the real costs of services and the wages paid to service workers that is simply astounding. It couldn’t conceivably cost more than a few hundred dollars to clean up the ‘damage’ done by the two occupations. For a small fraction of the ‘tens of thousands’ this will supposedly cost, I would be willing to do the job. Just ask me. In conclusion, let me suggest that it is this kind of casual approach to accounting that contributed to the problems we now all face.

Sincerely,
Patrick Madden
§UC Police Brutality
by Occupy California (repost)
Last night I was brutalized by the UC police. Without warning a UC police officer sprayed me with OC spray (similar to pepper spray) and then arrested me. I was not told to stop, was never told I was being put under arrest, and never read my rights. I stand in solidarity with the occupation of Humanities 2 and with Olivia Egan-Rudolph who was also the victim of police brutality last night. Fuck the police, fuck the systemic violence of capitalism, the movement will not stop here. The administration has been put on notice, we want everything and we will fucking get it.

Brian Glasscock
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Shekinah
I want to add to this article--the University is not only setting aside money for construction projects, including the controversial biomedical sciences facility on UCSC's campus.
The University of California is affiliated with Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos national laboratories, responsible for designing every nuclear weapon in the U.S. arsenal.

These weapons are all being reconfigured. What that means, essentially, is that the bombs that are already far too operational [for those of us who love our planet and want to see it safe from unnecessar and widespread destruction] are going to have parts replaced to make them MORE operational. This is an expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive process entirely unnecessary according to most experts in the field.
Yet it is being done with taxpayer money.
This is yet another instance where the money which ought to be going towards education is instead being funneled deliberately towards the most destructive projects imaginable.
Are we really going to stand for this?
How many more of us need get sick with radiation poisoning--also deemed "cancer"--before we fight back hard enough to win the battle against nuclear energy?
How many more employees are going to die of exposure while families in Livermore, CA are regularly exposed to extremely high levels of radiation with all of the related symptoms of exposure and disease...while we sit back and WATCH? How many more American Indian nations are going to be bombed? Is Hawai'i next?
How many more schools will tumble to the ground, a slower version of the falling of the Twin Towers so popularized through youtube videos, before we recognize that the construction projects being put forward to replace them are bombs designed to murder every human being within a large radius whenever the man in charge wishes it?
Who trusted Bush with such a project? Do we really trust any president backed by Wall St. not to push that button at any time?
Have a heart, y'all, and FIGHT BACK!
by Frank Snapp
I'm glad there are people out there in the U.S. who have appropriate torque required to revolt against the creeping crud of fascism that is now, by the richest at the top of our hierarchy of hoarding, moving to completely dismantle the tiny bits of accessible higher education available to the people of this planet. Currently less than one percent of the planet has access to college and access to higher-ed is definitely falling fast in the U.S., which is the nation with the greatest number of higher educational institutions despite our probable 50% functional illiteracy and 30% full illiteracy rates.

See the movie, "The Take" from Argentina, which you may have seen already. You're going in the right direction. Thank you very much for what you're doing.

Spark revolution through doing! That's the way to be!

Sincerely,

Frank Snapp
North Oakland
Guerilla Gardener
SFSU Junior
by Your friend
Re: the mention of taxpayer dollars in the above post: the move by the uc and the state, with its tuition hikes and slashed public funding, is to the contrary one of privatization of that spending. Where even tax dollars might find their source across social strata, the raises in tuition target only one source: students. They are robbing us of our future to fund their failing system. The taxpayer argument has the dangerous ambiguity of who is supposedly being harmed unfairly, the wealthy who do and should pay more taxes or folks who, in the case of some tax funded programs, depend on their benefits? But this is another beast. It is a generation whose dereliction of social responsibility has found no place to turn to sustain it's flailing industry but to manufacture nails for the coffins of it's casualties, and charge them for it. Enough is enough. Occupy and resist!
by Dean Werdlinger
That'll show that crusty ol' dean!
by slingshot
Okay - this is some really exciting shit. Need more reporting on this asap though. ignore the online trash talkers, they be regurgitations of the same reactionary elements in our society circa 1968. they will always side w/ authority and the logic of private property - so fuck them, if they ever show up in person, put the fools on their backs.

How can we help w/ this occupation? that is question. sending much virtual love to everyone standing up and fighting back, keep escalating, and...fuck the pigs.

by i
Why did you leave???
by Occupy everything
part of the revolution must be the constant revolt against tedium. Anarchy is about desire, not sitting around in a bureaucratic building waiting for change.

So we left, thoroughly confusing the powers that be.
by boa
that's ridiculous.

what part of occupying a building is boring to you?

well, nvm. I can understand why you got bored. It's because it was a failed plan from the beginning. Where was the support, on the outside and inside? Or was it just a couple people getting boners about occupying shit and just did it without thinking, about EVERYTHING first.

There was the potential do to a lot with that building. Dance partys, FreeSkool could have had a new headquarters! Movie showings, lectures, anything was possible. But let me guess, you didn't have the keys to any of the class rooms and you were just sitting on the floor waiting for something exciting to happen.

This comment will probably get deleted, because i'm critiquing what happened. And Critiquing is BAD. If you don't say good things about stupid stuff then your voice will be silenced.

fascist much?

In the end, think about your plan before you just do it. Get support, a lot. And maybe, just maybe get the keys to the other rooms!


by reader
"This comment will probably get deleted, because i'm critiquing what happened."

Critique is welcome and encouraged. Thank You!

If critique turns into trolling and attempts to start flamewars, then a post might be hidden.
by Alls fair, right?
So the anarchists are unhappy with the status quo, feel its personified by the University, and as such are vandalizing the University and calling it justified actions.

Then it should stand true in turn that students who are unhappy with Anarchists and their trashing of UCSC should go and occupy/vandalize Sub-Rosa, to show their frustration?


Or am I misunderstanding the situation and this action is really only valid for anarchists?
by fid bellicose
slavoj zizek said something about critiquing resistance. that its our obligation to criticize the most successful of these...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GD69Cc20rw

worth watching...

anyways, yeah... there are different tactics of resistance (tip of the hat to de certeau). some like this are a blitz to confuse the fuck out of them all. however, these tactics run the risk of being written off as ill concieved. full blown occupation as well has its strengths and weaknesses. often those come to a head with escalated violence (which i'm fine with-did you bring the cocktails?).

regardless, the most important strategy once the tables turn is to have multiple attacks on all sides: blitzes, facutly sponsored walkouts, sit/teach-ins, burning structures, silent and direct actions of destruction and resistance.

the critique circulated that we have occupied destroyed what was already ours blows over that these things are all part of the structure that we are trying to tear down. we must make them affraid of our collective inacquiescense.

HERE IS THE KICKER AND THE NEXT STRIKE!!! PAY BLOODY ATTENTION!

we must take this to the regents, they have homes, they have offices and lives outside of being a regent. they must feel the sting and embarrassment of our unwanted attention. bring it to their doorsteps. anyone know where yudof's appartment is?


by pre-occupied
maybe we could have a top 10 list of "where would be the greatest places to occupy?" and people could say. sure, there may be a few who would rain on the parade and ask us to occupy the bay tree men's room or such, but i'm sure there must be creative sparks sparkling all over the place and even with the recent rains, something is bound to catch fire, but just remember the Chumbawumba song about "nothing ever burns down by itself..give the anarchist a cigarette," etc...

i tried doing a similar top 10 after the Twin Towers got gotted Sept. 11, but for some reason the question "if you were a terrorist, what would you bomb?" question was questionably appropriate and not generally well received! DANCE DANCE REVOLUTION!...maybe some kind of a camp out on upper campus, like the Crown Meadow as an Occupation III? that too is contentious university land slated for development at some time...or, maybe have these rotating or simultaneous occupations to keep the po guessing, mobile, frustrated...hell, the situationists even used to have noon time flash mobbish demonstrations people could partake in on their lunch hours...

kudos to indymedia for allowing dissenting voices that are at least nominally respectful, thought out, etc, even if They are Wrong and We are Right...Bad them! Yeah we!...
by Nishan
not as much "support" this time, hey?
by 30 seconds
nishan, what kind of a response are you looking for? "that's what she said to you," har har? don't think longevity necessarily a measure of success. guerilla actions, in n out seem more prudent. now, as for the location of said action?? not quite sure how to defend that one...maybe the ucsc jail would be a great place to occupy next time?
by clau
If the goal is to occupy one building on one campus in one university system--for three or four hours in the middle of the night--then no, there is no need to raise consciousness or organize. What kind of sustained effort could destroy the university and the systems that produce it? What could even come close? It won't happen in one quarter, and it won't happen spontaneously. In critical solidarity, clau
by -
I think you guys are having too much fun and have no work ethic towards doing what would really be required to change the situation at UCSC. Either that, or the task is so daunting that you're not even trying - which is forgivable because the administration and leading professors have also failed to solve the budget problems.

Can you describe what power this dean even has?
by unsticky
i think you are talkin outta yer arse. there's hell of a lot of work going in to this from organizing to meeting to flyering, etc, while students are still students and maybe even working. all this in the face of people paid full time at the U to spin, secure, etc...
by anon
"On the contrary, they place one hundred percent of this money into an account with the Bank of New York Mellon Trust in order to protect their borrowing power in credit markets. They hold our tuition as collateral in order to finance the largest and most speculative construction projects in the state of California. UC pledged collateral rose by 60% with the last issue of bonds to $6.72B from $4.2B."

Interesting. I wonder if the same thing happened with UC Santa Cruz as happened with Harvard, i.e.:
"Harvard University’s failed bet that interest rates would rise cost the world’s richest school at least $500 million in payments to escape derivatives that backfired. Harvard paid $497.6 million to investment banks during the fiscal year ended June 30 to get out of $1.1 billion of interest-rate swaps intended to hedge variable-rate debt for capital projects... Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut; Georgetown University in Washington and Rockefeller University in New York have reported losses related to interest-rate swaps, in some cases prompting the schools to pay termination fees to end the contracts." (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHou7iMlBMN8)

If this is what happened at UC Santa Cruz, the admins will be dodging and weaving to save their own skins just as they're cutting every corner they can, and laying people off with great abandon. It might be a good idea to find out if this is what the real problem is - if so, UC Santa Cruz may be in *real* trouble.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$75.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network