Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Environmental Working Group Report on Cell Phones
Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) research team has assembled the most comprehensive online consumer guide ever to cell phone radiation, rating more than 1,000 cell phones marketed in the U.S.
http://www.ewg.org/project/2009cellphone/cellphoneradiation-fullreport.pdf
Lower Your Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation
Comprehensive Online Guide To Low-Radiation Wireless Devices
CONTACT: EWG Public Affairs, (202) 667-6982
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 9, 2009
WASHINGTON, D.C. –- Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) research team has assembled the most comprehensive online consumer guide ever to cell phone radiation, rating more than 1,000 cell phones marketed in the U.S.
With this free, user-friendly online tool, consumers can make informed decisions about which cell phones to buy. The EWG guide uses easy-to-read graphics to illustrate each phone’s radiofrequency emissions, enabling consumers to make quick comparisons of radiation output of various wireless devices. The url for the report: http://www.ewg.org/cellphone-radiation
“We would like to be able to say that cell phones are safe,” said Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., EWG Senior Scientist and lead author of the study. “But we can't. The most recent science, while not conclusive, raises serious issues about the cancer risk of cell phone use that must be addressed through further research. In the meantime, consumers can take steps to reduce exposure.”
EWG has compiled the guide, based on technical data provided by manufacturers, to fill the information gap left by the U.S. government’s failure to require cell phone makers and vendors to disclose emissions levels on labels or in-store advertising displays.
Better consumer information is vital. Recent scientific studies have produced evidence linking brain and salivary gland tumors to cell phone use. The state of the science, while far from definitive, is provocative and troubling and requires more research.
Public health officials’ concerns about the possible dangers of radiofrequency emissions are intensifying as wireless devices proliferate. According to the CTIA Wireless Association, an international industry group, U.S. wireless subscribers numbered 270.3 million -- 87 percent of Americans -- as of December 2008, a 30 percent jump in three years. Some 60 percent of the global population -- 4 billion people -- subscribe to wireless services, according to Cellular News, an online global industry news outlet.
Health agencies in six nations -- Switzerland, Germany, Israel, France, the United Kingdom, and Finland -- have issued warnings to limit cell phone use, particularly by children, whose softer, thinner skulls are less able to shield the brain from radiation. Scientists have found that children's brains absorb twice as much cell phone radiation as those of adults.
EWG’s analysis of possible public health risks of cell phone radiation culminates a 10-month investigation of more than 200 peer-reviewed studies, government advisories and industry documents.
Our conclusion: current U.S. cell phone radiation standards, set by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and based largely on 1992 cell phone industry recommendations, are outdated and allow 20 times more radiation to penetrate the head than the rest of the body.
EWG urges the FCC to upgrade its standards to take account of the newest scientific evidence and also increasing cell phone use by children.
“The first cell phones were marketed to adults,” Naidenko said. “But today, children are just as likely to own a cell phone as a video game, baseball or bicycle.”
According to the Pew Internet and American Life Project, which tracks cell phone use among U.S. children between 12 and 17 years old, last year (2008) 71 percent of tweens and teens owned cell phones. More than half use the device daily.
EWG urges concerned consumers to take action and tell the federal government that cell phone makers should be required to disclose each phone’s radiation output on the label.
The report also offers safety tips for reducing cell phone radiation exposure. Among them:
Use headsets and the speakerphone option if available.
Text more, talk less.
Stay off the phone when few bars indicate a weak signal.
EWG’s new interactive database, based on technical specifications of cell phones currently on the market and some popular older models, can be searched by model. A separate database details radiation levels of smart phones.
EWG’s top 10 phones, based on low emissions:
1. Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) [AT&T]
2. Motorola RAZR V8 [CellularONE]
3. Samsung SGH-t229 [T-Mobile]
4. Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) [AT&T]
5. Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) [AT&T]
6. Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) [CellularONE, T-Mobile]
7. T-Mobile Sidekick [T-Mobile]
8. LG Xenon (GR500) [AT&T]
9. Motorola Karma QA1 [AT&T]
10. Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]
EWG’s list of highest radiation phones:
1. Motorola MOTO VU204 [Verizon Wireless]
2. T-Mobile myTouch 3G [T-Mobile]
3. Kyocera Jax S1300 [Virgin Mobile]
4. Blackberry Curve 8330 [Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS]
5. Motorola W385 [U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless]
6. T-Mobile Shadow [T-Mobile]
7. Motorola C290 [Sprint, Kajeet]
8. Motorola i335 [Sprint]
9. Motorola MOTO VE240 [Cricket, MetroPCS]
10. Blackberry Bold 9000 [AT&T]
###
EWG is a nonprofit research organization headquartered in Washington, DC, with offices in Oakland, Ca. and Aimes, IA, that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment.
Lower Your Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation
Comprehensive Online Guide To Low-Radiation Wireless Devices
CONTACT: EWG Public Affairs, (202) 667-6982
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 9, 2009
WASHINGTON, D.C. –- Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) research team has assembled the most comprehensive online consumer guide ever to cell phone radiation, rating more than 1,000 cell phones marketed in the U.S.
With this free, user-friendly online tool, consumers can make informed decisions about which cell phones to buy. The EWG guide uses easy-to-read graphics to illustrate each phone’s radiofrequency emissions, enabling consumers to make quick comparisons of radiation output of various wireless devices. The url for the report: http://www.ewg.org/cellphone-radiation
“We would like to be able to say that cell phones are safe,” said Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., EWG Senior Scientist and lead author of the study. “But we can't. The most recent science, while not conclusive, raises serious issues about the cancer risk of cell phone use that must be addressed through further research. In the meantime, consumers can take steps to reduce exposure.”
EWG has compiled the guide, based on technical data provided by manufacturers, to fill the information gap left by the U.S. government’s failure to require cell phone makers and vendors to disclose emissions levels on labels or in-store advertising displays.
Better consumer information is vital. Recent scientific studies have produced evidence linking brain and salivary gland tumors to cell phone use. The state of the science, while far from definitive, is provocative and troubling and requires more research.
Public health officials’ concerns about the possible dangers of radiofrequency emissions are intensifying as wireless devices proliferate. According to the CTIA Wireless Association, an international industry group, U.S. wireless subscribers numbered 270.3 million -- 87 percent of Americans -- as of December 2008, a 30 percent jump in three years. Some 60 percent of the global population -- 4 billion people -- subscribe to wireless services, according to Cellular News, an online global industry news outlet.
Health agencies in six nations -- Switzerland, Germany, Israel, France, the United Kingdom, and Finland -- have issued warnings to limit cell phone use, particularly by children, whose softer, thinner skulls are less able to shield the brain from radiation. Scientists have found that children's brains absorb twice as much cell phone radiation as those of adults.
EWG’s analysis of possible public health risks of cell phone radiation culminates a 10-month investigation of more than 200 peer-reviewed studies, government advisories and industry documents.
Our conclusion: current U.S. cell phone radiation standards, set by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and based largely on 1992 cell phone industry recommendations, are outdated and allow 20 times more radiation to penetrate the head than the rest of the body.
EWG urges the FCC to upgrade its standards to take account of the newest scientific evidence and also increasing cell phone use by children.
“The first cell phones were marketed to adults,” Naidenko said. “But today, children are just as likely to own a cell phone as a video game, baseball or bicycle.”
According to the Pew Internet and American Life Project, which tracks cell phone use among U.S. children between 12 and 17 years old, last year (2008) 71 percent of tweens and teens owned cell phones. More than half use the device daily.
EWG urges concerned consumers to take action and tell the federal government that cell phone makers should be required to disclose each phone’s radiation output on the label.
The report also offers safety tips for reducing cell phone radiation exposure. Among them:
Use headsets and the speakerphone option if available.
Text more, talk less.
Stay off the phone when few bars indicate a weak signal.
EWG’s new interactive database, based on technical specifications of cell phones currently on the market and some popular older models, can be searched by model. A separate database details radiation levels of smart phones.
EWG’s top 10 phones, based on low emissions:
1. Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) [AT&T]
2. Motorola RAZR V8 [CellularONE]
3. Samsung SGH-t229 [T-Mobile]
4. Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) [AT&T]
5. Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) [AT&T]
6. Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) [CellularONE, T-Mobile]
7. T-Mobile Sidekick [T-Mobile]
8. LG Xenon (GR500) [AT&T]
9. Motorola Karma QA1 [AT&T]
10. Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]
EWG’s list of highest radiation phones:
1. Motorola MOTO VU204 [Verizon Wireless]
2. T-Mobile myTouch 3G [T-Mobile]
3. Kyocera Jax S1300 [Virgin Mobile]
4. Blackberry Curve 8330 [Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS]
5. Motorola W385 [U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless]
6. T-Mobile Shadow [T-Mobile]
7. Motorola C290 [Sprint, Kajeet]
8. Motorola i335 [Sprint]
9. Motorola MOTO VE240 [Cricket, MetroPCS]
10. Blackberry Bold 9000 [AT&T]
###
EWG is a nonprofit research organization headquartered in Washington, DC, with offices in Oakland, Ca. and Aimes, IA, that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment.
For more information:
http://www.ewg.org/cellphone-radiation
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
I am convinced that this is a serious issue. I believe we just don't want to know about it.
This is one of the key reasons we have created Call Limiter - to limit cell phone exposure.
Let's face it, cell phones are here to stay and they perform a valuable role in our community. They allow simple and effective communication between people and make everyone more accessible (for better or worse) than we have ever been. But, this comes with a cost that we must acknowledge...and the early science on hands free kits isn't positive, in fact, the exposure to organs not protected by bone could mean they are (potentially) a worse option!
The one way to manage these effects is through careful management of exposure time. Call Limiter will do this. It is an incovenience? Perhaps. But consider the alternatives!
Take the time to think through the impact of cell phone use on your health and, more importantly, the health of your kids.
If the environmental damage is a legacy we don't want to leave, then imagine how much worse this legacy might be.
This is one of the key reasons we have created Call Limiter - to limit cell phone exposure.
Let's face it, cell phones are here to stay and they perform a valuable role in our community. They allow simple and effective communication between people and make everyone more accessible (for better or worse) than we have ever been. But, this comes with a cost that we must acknowledge...and the early science on hands free kits isn't positive, in fact, the exposure to organs not protected by bone could mean they are (potentially) a worse option!
The one way to manage these effects is through careful management of exposure time. Call Limiter will do this. It is an incovenience? Perhaps. But consider the alternatives!
Take the time to think through the impact of cell phone use on your health and, more importantly, the health of your kids.
If the environmental damage is a legacy we don't want to leave, then imagine how much worse this legacy might be.
For more information:
http://www.calllimiter.com
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$75.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network