top
California
California
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Elections Expert Sal Magallanez Speaks at Activist San Diego

by Mark Gabrish Conlan/Zenger's Newsmagazine
Elections expert Sal Magallanez spoke to Activist San Diego Monday, October 13 as part of a presentation that also included a documentary film, "Hacking Democracy," about Seattle activist Bev Harris and her exposés of the ease with which computer-counted elections can be rigged. Magallanez, an official elections observer for the Democratic Party, noted how the San Diego County Registrar of Voters — hired by an all-Republican County Board of Supervisors — has made suspicious policy decisions that may help Republicans in this year's and future elections.
640_magallanez.a.jpg
Elections Expert Sal Magallanez Speaks at Activist San Diego

Warns About How Easy It Is to Rig a Computer-Counted Election

by MARK GABRISH CONLAN

Copyright © 2008 by Mark Gabrish Conlan for Zenger’s Newsmagazine • All rights reserved

While the Right-wing media fuss about the voter-registration campaign of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and the forged registrations paid ACORN street employees allegedly turned in for Mickey Mouse and various football stars, progressives remain concerned about the real threat to election integrity: the use of computer voting systems running proprietary software and the ease with which they can be “hacked” to alter the outcome of an election. Activist San Diego featured this issue at their regular monthly meeting Monday, October 13 at the Joyce Beers Community Center in Hillcrest, presenting the film Hacking Democracy — a 2006 HBO documentary featuring Bev Harris and her fellow activists in the Black Box Voting group — and live speaker Sal Magallanez, a local election consultant for the Democratic Party.

Magallanez has quite a résumé on elections-related issues, having worked with or consulted for national organizations like Save Our Vote, Verified Voting Foundation and Help America Audit. He also joked that he spent 2 1/2 years in Berlin with the Royal Air Force and the Luftwaffe — “I call those my spy years,” he said — but his current affiliation is with the Election Integrity Institute, a local group that monitors San Diego elections and meets once a month with San Diego County Registrar of Voters Deborah Seiler. After a movie particularly exposing the flaws of Diebold Elections Systems hardware and software, Magallanez opened his presentation with an exposé of the connections Seiler and her chief deputy, Michael Vu, have with Diebold and the so-called “successor company” they spun off their elections division to in 2007, Premier Election Solutions.

“Deborah Seiler, our registrar of voters, was previously the salesperson who sold these machines on behalf of Diebold,” Magallanez explained. “Michael Vu, who was the registrar in Cuyahoga County, Ohio in 2004” — where, many progressives believe and the film Hacking Democracy strongly suggests, John Kerry was done out of the presidency by faulty and misallocated Diebold voting machines — “decided that no votes would be counted at individual precincts.” The reason that’s important, according to Magallanez, is that by eliminating the vote counts at individual precincts, Seiler and Vu deprived the system of an important check on the accuracy of the final count from the Registrar of Voters’ central computer.

Instead, he said, “you voted, and the only thing they reconciled at the precinct level was how many ballots they issued versus how many came back. They brought all the ballots to the Registrar of Voters and ran them on their scanners, recording the votes on memory cards which they took into a computer room where we are not allowed to enter. Then they announced what the votes were by precincts. We demand that the ballots be counted at the precincts first. That doesn’t happen.”

Magallanez listed other abuses in San Diego County under both Seiler and her predecessors, which he’s seen as an official observer for the Democratic Party. In 1996, he said, he saw the computer running GEMS— the proprietary software program at the heart of Diebold’s (now Premier’s) vote tabulation system — crash six times in half an hour. “The person in charge told everyone to take a lunch break while he fixed the computer,” Magallanez recalled. Later they found out that the reason the computer had crashed was that GEMS was simply overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of data coming in at once as the ballots were counted and the results sent from precincts to the GEMS computer.

Last February, he said, an even more serious potential breach of vote security occurred. The boxes containing the actual ballots are supposed to be sealed in at least three prominent places — not to keep anyone from breaking into the ballot boxes but at least to make it obvious if someone has tried. “In February 2008 I saw the ballot boxes coming in unsealed, and there were no signatures on them to tell which people had handled the boxes,” Magallanez explained. “There are 1,650 precincts in San Diego County and during the early returns, in which about 100 precincts came in, 24 boxes came in without signatures, seals or both. There’s no procedure to handle a box without a seal any differently from a box with a seal. We don’t know where the ballots inside those boxes came from.”

Another abuse Magallanez reported is going on in San Diego County is “voter purging” or “caging.” “Caging,” Magallanez explained, is illegal if done by political parties but legal if done by elections officials. It means mailing out cards to the addresses of registered voters, with instructions to send them back either to confirm their registrations or to apply for vote-by-mail ballots. The trick behind it is that the cards are marked “Do Not Forward” — so if any of the cards are returned by the post office for any reason, the registrar assumes that the person no longer lives at that address and therefore can legally be dropped from the voter rolls.

“We’ve already had three rounds of voter purging,” Magallanez said. “They did a purge in September 2007 and another one in February 2008, and in February 2008 there were 15,000 fewer voters for the Democratic Party even though we’d been doing a major registration drive. They deleted 100,000 names before the February primary and another 35,000 before June. Postcards have just gone out, so expect to have another 30,000 people thrown off the rolls before November.”

According to Magallanez, many of the victims of caging and purging are college students, whose votes the Democrats are trying to protect. “The Registrar of Voters is setting it up so students who live in dorms have to re-register if they’re in a different dorm room this semester from last,” he explained. Another problem with student voters is that many are still registered in their parents’ home cities or counties rather than in San Diego. Magellanes’ recommendation to them is to get a vote-by-mail ballot from their home city or county, and to make sure they mail it before October 30 to ensure that it gets back by election day — as it must in order for it to count.

Magallanez criticized the San Diego County Registrar of Voters for encouraging students to vote on campus with so-called “provisional ballots.” Provisional ballots, a creation of the “Help America Vote Act” passed early in the Bush II administration after the fiasco of Florida, 2000, are given to people whose registrations are in question on the day of the election. People can vote these ballots and have them set aside to be counted if they meet the registration requirements after all — but Magellanez warned that 13 percent of all provisional ballots will never be counted. In Ohio in 2004, he explained, “180,000 provisional ballots were not counted. They said it didn’t matter whether they counted them or not because John Kerry still wouldn’t have won the state.”

The San Diego County Registrar of Voters is making some minor improvements in security for this November’s election, Magellanez said. “We’ve been told the poll workers will not be able to take the voting machines home overnight the day before the election,” he explained. “They’re locked in a security cabinet, but the ‘lock’ is just a piece of plastic. They’re putting chemical seals at all the most sensitive points that will void the machines if they are touched.” But Magellanez remains suspicious of the overall accuracy and reliability of the machines, as well as whether or not they’re part of a network.

The last point is important because registrars and other elections officials who use computerized systems say they can’t be hacked into because they’re not connected to the Internet. But, Magellanez said, “I asked all the elections officials what each cable at the end of the machine is connected to, and they wouldn’t explain where one cable — a USB cable — went.” What’s more, he added, “in 2004 we found in the logs of the GEMS computer the name ‘Everett’ and a phone number. Everett, Washington is the location of the headquarters of Microsoft. We said, ‘You guys said this wasn’t on a network, and this looks like a modem calling Microsoft.’ Deborah Seiler said, ‘That’s just the phone number of a guy named Everett who works in this office.’”

Another security issue Magellanez has raised with San Diego County’s elections office is the location of the “spoiled” check on the absentee ballot. Right now there’s a check box on the outside of the envelope that you can mark if you spoiled your ballot and want another one so you can fill it out correctly so you can still vote. Magellanez wants that box on the inside so that elections officials can’t just check the “spoiled” box themselves and have an excuse not to count ballots from a part of the county not likely to be for their favored candidates.

Former San Diego City Councilmember Floyd Morrow attended the meeting and said he’d lost a close election because the Registrar of Voters certified the result — i.e., declared it official — before the recount was finished. “That shifted the burden of proof on me to prove they were wroing, which would have been a $50,000-$80,000 lawsuit,” he said. “So I abandoned it, and then they sued me for the $28,000 they spent on the recount.” He won the suit but didn’t win the election, even though the recount showed that he should have. Morrow, who ran for Mayor of San Diego in the primary earlier this year, said that in that election “the Registrar of Voters sat on the same numbers most of the evening” and announced the winners in the city election when only one-third of the precincts in San Diego’s city limits had been counted.

Magellanez said that things like that happen because “the Registrar of Voters says their job is to please the media. The law says they have to certify the election within 28 days, but they say they need to certify the result the very next day for the convenience of the media. It’s our vote, not the media’s, and it’s our rights they should be protecting.” He closed by saying his presentation “was not designed to discourage people or make them feel demoralized,” and suggested that voters concerned about their registration status order ballots by mail, fill them out before the October 20 registration deadline and turn them in personally to the Registrar of Voters’ office, “so if there’s a problem with your registration, you find out about it before you can’t re-register.”
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by by Mark Gabrish Conlan/Zenger's Newsmagazine
By Sal Magallanez
Although the article is very accurate, I would just wanted to clarify some inaccuracies.
Describing about vote purging. In San Diego county, when a request to vote by mail post card is
returned, the voter is placed in the "INACTIVE" mode. This means that the voter name will still be
on the voter rolls, but the voter will not received any voter information like a sample ballot or info
on where the voters precinct is located. This is a big deal because a voter may show up to a
precinct assigned in a previous election, and not find the voters' name on the rolls. Thus given a
provisional ballot.

The article states that " ... February 2008 there were 15,000 fewer voters for the Democratic Party
even though we’d been doing a major registration drive. ..."
This is correct. But I'd like to mention that the Democratic Party in San Diego County did not make
an issue of this because after reviewing the list of all voters that were purged, the Democratic Party
determined that the percentage purged was just about equivalent to the numbers purged for the
Republican Party.

The article states about voting machines "They’re locked in a security cabinet, but the ‘lock’ is just a piece of plastic."
1 Diebold Touch screen voting machine is assigned to each precinct. These Touch Screen machines are placed in an
attaché case for delivery to the precinct. This lock, on the attaché case, is simply a plastic lock that is suppose to be
secure when it arrives at the precinct. The precinct captain then notes that the lock is still in place when receiving the
unit and cuts the plastic lock to remove the unit for use on election day.

Once last note: the article states "... the Registrar of Voters says their job is to please the media. The law says they
have to certify the election within 28 days, but they say they need to certify the result the very next day for the
convenience of the media."
The election is not certified the next day. But, the Election Integrity group feels that the ballots should be counted at
the precinct prior to being sent to the ROV to be run through the Diebold scanners. The ROV feels that counting at the
precinct takes too much time and that the media would not wait for election returns if handcounted at the precinct,
even if the scanned ballot results are unofficial.
Another concern; because the ROV receives ballot boxes unsealed, and unsigned, why is there a hurry to count these
unknown ballots? Why not spend time to investigate the ballots? Look at the ballot sequence numbers, and determine
if they match the sequence numbers issued at the precinct labeled on the ballot box. Don't just accept and count them
because they are now in the ROV facility.
by Christine (cma52572 [at] yahoo.com)
Sal,
This is great! I have been sounding alarms about this process ever since we hired Deborah Seiler and Michael Vu--How bout the fact that the 2 resigned in disgrace after the handling of the 2004 Ohio election---an election where voter fraud was proven and people are in jail. Why in the world did we hire these 2 and who (that we can trust) is keeping an eye on things?

I was suspicious after I received 2 letters from the registrar in the last 6 months (in addition to the regular voting lit. which already asks if you want to be absentee voter. She was urging me to be absentee. I wrote about it in this blog :
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/weblogs/ive-got-issues/2008/oct/17/walk-the-vote-a-pre-emptive-strike-on-voter-fraud-/

I am deeply concerned about this election after the lawsuit filed in the feb primary for the lack of seals. And also the huge anomoly in the city atty race where Goldsmith (the Republican golden boy received 12 points more than any poll had found (way outside the margin of error). Also we hadnt had this few people vote for mayor since the 80s.

Please read my blog--I list my concerns. Also are you aware that the scanner chips went missing when mailed from SOS office to SD in Feb Primary.

What about the last minute voter registrations--who is to stop the Repubs from filling out fake registrations for absentee ballots (especially w/ Seiler in charge). There is not enough time to verify them before the election--And they could file as democrats and then vote repub so as not to raise red flags. How do we know they didnt use ACORN for that purpose.

Sal what can we do. When I go to the polls I want to be on the look out--can I see if the ballot boxes are sealed. What should I look for?

Is anyone like you able to supervise the process? Seiler is still under a HUGE cloud of suspicion--why in the world would we trust her to verify voter reg and ballot scanning. This is frightening! Please help!!!

Christine
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$75.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network