From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
The Real "Operation" to Rescue Ingrid Betancourt and US Mercenaries
In order to understand the "rescue operation" of Ingrid Betancourt and the Northrop Grumman Corporation mercenaries who were released with her, it is necessary to piece together articles published in the media, filter the content and out of this is formed a true understanding of the facts of what happened here. A version in Portuguese is available here.
The Real Operation to "Rescue" Ingrid Betancourt and US Mercenaries
Author: Concerned citizens of irc.indymedia.orgIn order to understand the "rescue operation" of Ingrid Betancourt and the Northrop Grumman Corporation mercenaries who were released with her, it is necessary to piece together articles published in the media, filter the content and out of this is formed a true understanding of the facts of what happened here. A version in Portuguese is available here.
- On June 3rd, Colombian Senator Piedad Cordoba
revealed that she
possessed information that the government of Colombia was negotiating
a deal with
FARC to trade money for the release of Betancourt and the mercenaries.
The official policy of the United States
is that they don't
"negotiate with terrorists," even as many leaders of Latin American
countries accuse President Uribe of supporting the AUC paramilitary
death squads and accuse
the United States of providing safe harbor to known terrorists such
as Orlando Bosch
and Luis
Posada Carriles.
- Careful observers began to question the strange circumstances
under which the "dramatic rescue" of Ingrid Betancourt happened. Some
guys with Che Guevara
t-shirts simply showed up and redirected them into another helicopter?
If it were that easy, why didn't they do that years ago? The French
media also found strange the
fact that Betancourt
didn't resemble the gaunt and hungry images we
have been seeing in the media -- she seemed well-fed and healthy, as
if she were being prepared for release.
- More confusion came when the capitalist media seized this
opportunity to hack up Betancourt's press conference, keeping in the
parts that glorified Uribe and the United
States and excluding the parts that talked about Venezuela's Hugo
Chavez and Ecuador's Rafael Correa and
their important efforts in
finding a diplomatic, peaceful solution
to the crisis. The press conference was broadcast in its entirety on
the Latin American news network, Telesur, but only bit and pieces were
shown on CNN, Fox News and
other northern news channels. For instance, excluded from the edited
version is Betancourt's comments that she felt used by the whole
situation and that the operation put the
lives of the hostages at risk while a diplomatic solution, like the
one pursued by President Chavez, would ensure their safety.
- The capitalist media, without any shame, immediately began to use
the situation to promote their own political objectives: everywhere in
the corporate media,
Uribe was lauded as a hero,
FARC's days are numbered and
Chavez's successful and peaceful diplomacy that freed other
FARC-held prisoners was downplayed.
- However, on Friday, information began to be revealed that, in reality, the
government of Colombia
had secretly paid $20 million USD to FARC in exchange for the release of Betancourt and the US mercenaries, confirming what Senator Cordoba had
said a month before. This story was broken by
MediaPart in France
and
Radio Suisse Romande.
MediaPart also reported that France and Colombia guaranteed safe
asylum for some members of FARC as part of the deal.
- Dominique Moisi, one of France's most prominent foreign policy
experts, said that it was "probable" that FARC was given money in
exchange for the prisoners.
"They were bought in order to turn them around,
like Mafia chiefs," he said on French state television.
- In light of all these events, the government of
Ecuador has
suspended diplomatic relations with Colombia.
- The report of the $20 million pay-off is now
rapidly circulating
throughout the
corporate media as it
struggles with a way to
spin this news. The confusion caused
by this bizarre operation makes a lot more sense when viewed as a
pre-arranged, money-for-prisoners exchange. And, the true face of the
Latin American right-wing
is once again exposed.
- It is worth repeating that along with Betancourt, also released
were private military contractors from the United States who were
captured when their surveillance plane
went down in FARC-controlled territory during a Plan Colombia
operation.
Northrop Grumman, an aerospace and arms manufacturing firm,
was awarded a $60 million
contract to provide logistical support to the US and Colombian
military, on the ground in war zones there. Between 1990 and 2002,
Northrop Grumman contributed
$8.5 million to federal campaigns. Coincidentally, at least "seven
former officials, consultants or shareholders of Northrop Grumman"
have held posts in the Bush
administration, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz
and Lewis Libby (who was convicted on obstruction of justice, two
counts of perjury and making false
statements to federal investigators for his role in illegally "outing"
CIA agent Valerie Plame). In addition,
Plan Colombia has been repeatedly criticized by international
human rights organizations, including
Amnesty International and the
United Nations, for
maintaining close relationships with right-wing death squads,
providing direct assistance to illegal right-wing terrorist organizations as well as
directly and indirectly participating in massacres and atrocities.
Many of the right-wing terrorists operating in Colombia are former members of the Colombian military, like paramilitary commander "Yair," who openly support Plan Colombia and publicly offer their support to Plan Colombia operations.
- Finally, it should be noted that the Colombian government under Uribe, who has enjoyed widespread celebration by the corporate press in the last few days, is routinely condemned as having one of the worst human rights records of any country in the world. More than 60 members of President Uribe's congressional coalition are under investigation for election fraud or collaborating with right-wing groups classified as "terrorist organizations" by the United States. Colombia is the most dangerous country in the world for labor union organizers, with the world's highest rate of assassinations and extra-judicial executions of trade unionists. Since Plan Colombia began, the United States has provided over $4.7 billion to the government of Colombia, described by Senator Cordoba as a "democracy that governs through fear and terror." Senator Cordoba, herself, was kidnapped by 12 heavily-armed government-affiliated terrorists. Senator Cordoba says that the operations of Plan Colombia are only partly used to fight the so-called "war on drugs": "It's also used to silence those of us who speak out against the government. They try to silence us by kidnapping, disappearing and even killing many of us." Unlike many other Latin American countries, who overthrew the brutal US-backed dictatorships which ruled the continent during much of the 20th century, Colombia is an active reminder of what life used to be like throughout all of South America -- fiercely repressive dictatorships which terrorize the population with money and weapons provided by the United States in exchange for support of U.S. policies. How can a government like this receive the kind of tributes and congratulations that have been showered on them by the capitalist press in the last few days since they traded $20 million for the release of Ingrid Betancourt and U.S. mercenaries? How can a supposedly free and democratic media uncritically praise a government like this?
Even now, the soldiers of Plan Colombia and their right-wing death squads continue murdering union leaders in cold blood, continue terrorizing the civilian population of Colombia, and continue protecting terrorists who hunt down and kill anyone seeking social justice in the region, a cause that threatens the profit and power of the dominant, ruling class.
Even when the United States and their Latin American allies attempt to create a spectacle of positive public relations for themselves, their hands are so bloody and their crimes are so deep that, in the end, their fabrications do little to change the reality on the ground. Like all dictatorships in human history, their lies are so transparent, their brutality is so brazen and their lifespan is so limited.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
this was the greatest article i've ever read on this or any other indymedia website. thank you so much for your fascinating work
why, thanks, erik! i used to do a lot of writing like this for indymedia but, unfortunately... well. you know. come visit us on irc!
There were quite a few things I didn't understand about this situation.
First, many would first ask what political perspective or agenda Betancourt had, especially given that she has already said that she's going to run for the national office. She looked in pretty good shape on television in clean clothes.
So, I read that she is from the 'center-left' party, and it even made it sound like she was someone who reformist liberals who support Obama or Edwards in the U.S. would support. But it was difficult to get the idea. What position might she be analogous to in the U.S., and moreover, what was the objective of the FARC in holding her captive for such a period.
Above, several very interesting points are made casting doubt on the official story, however, it's difficult to get informed to the situation, and understand the motivations of the various parties involved.
First, many would first ask what political perspective or agenda Betancourt had, especially given that she has already said that she's going to run for the national office. She looked in pretty good shape on television in clean clothes.
So, I read that she is from the 'center-left' party, and it even made it sound like she was someone who reformist liberals who support Obama or Edwards in the U.S. would support. But it was difficult to get the idea. What position might she be analogous to in the U.S., and moreover, what was the objective of the FARC in holding her captive for such a period.
Above, several very interesting points are made casting doubt on the official story, however, it's difficult to get informed to the situation, and understand the motivations of the various parties involved.
Wow, who is the Comment Nazi over there with nothing better to do? Is what I said REALLY that threatening to you?
Erik, I had replied thanking you for your compliments but it got hidden by the anarchopolitbureau. I used to write in-depth articles like this all the time for Indymedia except the 'anti-authoritarian' authoritarians decided to grab an opportunity to form a traditional political bloc and attack me personally until they destroyed one of the strongest and most innovative Indymedia's around at the time. The innovation was frozen in time and so years later, this site continues to be the same old blog and a BBS for an in-bred left/liberal scene while the attrition on the other side of how much work we do has prevented the realization of the full potential that was available to that Indymedia. Another unfortunate victim of personally-motivated anarchosectarianism.
Click on the IRC link and come by any time, we're always doing Indymedia work and all kinds of other exciting projects (over 8 years now!) with people from SF, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Europe, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, etc.
Erik, I had replied thanking you for your compliments but it got hidden by the anarchopolitbureau. I used to write in-depth articles like this all the time for Indymedia except the 'anti-authoritarian' authoritarians decided to grab an opportunity to form a traditional political bloc and attack me personally until they destroyed one of the strongest and most innovative Indymedia's around at the time. The innovation was frozen in time and so years later, this site continues to be the same old blog and a BBS for an in-bred left/liberal scene while the attrition on the other side of how much work we do has prevented the realization of the full potential that was available to that Indymedia. Another unfortunate victim of personally-motivated anarchosectarianism.
Click on the IRC link and come by any time, we're always doing Indymedia work and all kinds of other exciting projects (over 8 years now!) with people from SF, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Europe, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, etc.
Leni, your observations are correct and Betancourt was kidnapped in a demilitarized zone that was being used to hold on-again/off-again peace talks with FARC. Due to other events, the status of this DMZ "safety zone" was cancelled but many Colombian government officials continued to travel there as though the DMZ was still in effect.
Betancourt, and her campaign manager, Clara Rojas, decided to travel into the DMZ to meet with FARC, even though the Colombian government warned her against it and told her that they wouldn't provide for her safety. She and Clara went anyway and were kidnapped at a FARC checkpoint.
So, given these facts:
1- Betancourt was, politically, a left-winger and one of the founding members of the Partido Verde Oxígeno, similar to the Green Party in the US (although more to the left).
2- She bravely campaigned against the well-known corruption of the Colombian right and their ties to the Cali drug cartel.
3- Clara Rojas, who was kidnapped with her, gave birth to a baby boy while being held prisoner by FARC. It was rumored that she had a relationship with one of the FARC guerrillas. While this could be attributed to "stockholm syndrome," the fact that Betancourt and Rojas were FARC sympathizers before being kidnapped makes one wonder. The exact details of her relationship with the guerrilla and the birth of her son are not publicly known.
4- FARC wanted to trade Betancourt and Rojas for FARC guerrillas who had been kidnapped and held hostage by the government. However, Uribe refused to negotiate on these terms with FARC in regards to Betancourt. The family of Betancourt were -strongly- against any type of rescue operation attempt, for fear that someone could be hurt or killed during such an operation.
All these facts combined lead some to believe that Betancourt was a "voluntary kidnapee" -- that she pre-arranged a fake kidnapping with FARC to give them leverage in their negotiation with the government. While this is hardly ever publicly stated, it is whispered behind closed doors and can explain some of the abnormal behavior of the government's response to her kidnapping.
So, Leni, you are right to be confused about why FARC would kidnap someone sympathetic to them and other observers who have wondered this and investigated further have come to believe that Betancourt and Rojas were part of a fake kidnapping. Something to think about... obviously, there isn't much of any concrete proof that something like this happened.
Betancourt, and her campaign manager, Clara Rojas, decided to travel into the DMZ to meet with FARC, even though the Colombian government warned her against it and told her that they wouldn't provide for her safety. She and Clara went anyway and were kidnapped at a FARC checkpoint.
So, given these facts:
1- Betancourt was, politically, a left-winger and one of the founding members of the Partido Verde Oxígeno, similar to the Green Party in the US (although more to the left).
2- She bravely campaigned against the well-known corruption of the Colombian right and their ties to the Cali drug cartel.
3- Clara Rojas, who was kidnapped with her, gave birth to a baby boy while being held prisoner by FARC. It was rumored that she had a relationship with one of the FARC guerrillas. While this could be attributed to "stockholm syndrome," the fact that Betancourt and Rojas were FARC sympathizers before being kidnapped makes one wonder. The exact details of her relationship with the guerrilla and the birth of her son are not publicly known.
4- FARC wanted to trade Betancourt and Rojas for FARC guerrillas who had been kidnapped and held hostage by the government. However, Uribe refused to negotiate on these terms with FARC in regards to Betancourt. The family of Betancourt were -strongly- against any type of rescue operation attempt, for fear that someone could be hurt or killed during such an operation.
All these facts combined lead some to believe that Betancourt was a "voluntary kidnapee" -- that she pre-arranged a fake kidnapping with FARC to give them leverage in their negotiation with the government. While this is hardly ever publicly stated, it is whispered behind closed doors and can explain some of the abnormal behavior of the government's response to her kidnapping.
So, Leni, you are right to be confused about why FARC would kidnap someone sympathetic to them and other observers who have wondered this and investigated further have come to believe that Betancourt and Rojas were part of a fake kidnapping. Something to think about... obviously, there isn't much of any concrete proof that something like this happened.
This speculative polemic and articles and comments like it, come like the inevitable ants to a picnic. If the underlying motivation for such speculation is to discredit or call into question the motives of Alvaro Uribe and/or the USA, so be it and Amen. If the motivation be other than this, I can but wonder what it might be.
What is important is that 15 hostages are free and that Ingrid Betancourt can resume her campaign for a "New Colombia."
What is important is that 15 hostages are free and that Ingrid Betancourt can resume her campaign for a "New Colombia."
It looks like the int'l press is still discussing whether there was a ransom, pointing out that most kidnap releases actually involve that.
Probably I'd need an hourlong presentation to understand all the south american political parties, and their real versus official plans and loyalties.
My cousin who is a border patrol officer used to be a marine 'advisor' in Colombia, and his wife is panamanian. Right now he's a liaison with our embassy in Baghdad, helping teach Iraq forces to do security. But I can't really go ahead and ask more than superficial questions about what they were doing there. My perception both with him, and with my friend who actually attended Westpoint (where they are allowed more independent thought than recruits) is that even mid-level officers, much less regular soldiers, are not plugged in to understanding of the top-level planning and dynamics. For instance, someone might spend years in the country, but their specialty might be medical or infantry and that is all they experience. Maybe my cousin just gave people classes on how to use weapons and had no more insight into the presidential politics of Colombia than someone reading about it in magazines. My friend at Westpoint actually is some type of liberal (was permanently discharged early, the month before Iraq, for tendonitis), and so everyone would want to ask him what is really going on at the Pentagon. But it's frustrating. He'll see Fahrenheit 911, and the information is almost all new to him, and he finds it important, yet at the same time says that the public isn't aware of information that the military command is getting about risks from various countries and how dangerous everything is (but they can't release to the public). So maybe you'd have to go a few steps above him for someone to know how decisions are being made and who has all the power.
Probably I'd need an hourlong presentation to understand all the south american political parties, and their real versus official plans and loyalties.
My cousin who is a border patrol officer used to be a marine 'advisor' in Colombia, and his wife is panamanian. Right now he's a liaison with our embassy in Baghdad, helping teach Iraq forces to do security. But I can't really go ahead and ask more than superficial questions about what they were doing there. My perception both with him, and with my friend who actually attended Westpoint (where they are allowed more independent thought than recruits) is that even mid-level officers, much less regular soldiers, are not plugged in to understanding of the top-level planning and dynamics. For instance, someone might spend years in the country, but their specialty might be medical or infantry and that is all they experience. Maybe my cousin just gave people classes on how to use weapons and had no more insight into the presidential politics of Colombia than someone reading about it in magazines. My friend at Westpoint actually is some type of liberal (was permanently discharged early, the month before Iraq, for tendonitis), and so everyone would want to ask him what is really going on at the Pentagon. But it's frustrating. He'll see Fahrenheit 911, and the information is almost all new to him, and he finds it important, yet at the same time says that the public isn't aware of information that the military command is getting about risks from various countries and how dangerous everything is (but they can't release to the public). So maybe you'd have to go a few steps above him for someone to know how decisions are being made and who has all the power.
Yeah, Leni, the US Military scrutinizes and suspects their own troops more than, probably, your average peace protester. They are suspicious of active duty soldiers of theft, disobeying orders to save their own skin, leaking info to the press, selling info to whoever and, of course, they do routine psych exams to make sure that the soldiers don't frag an officer or go on an unordered killing spree in a combat zone or go on an unordered killing spree once they are back in the States. Your normal soldier doesn't know much.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network