Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SF Library $115 Lost-book Fee Flyer
contact SF board of supes soon to prevent this $115 Lost-book Fee
SF Library $115 Lost-book Fee Flyer
Reply-To: libraryusers2004 at yahoo dot com
FYI again -- the Board of Supervisors votes July 15, and sooner is better than later for letters.
Text below -- somewhere it needs to have a stamp: "Supervisors to vote July 15"
Best -- Peter Warfield 415/7 5 3 - 2 1 8 0 libraryusers2004 at yahoo dot com
************************************************************************
Help Stop S.F. Public Library’s Unauthorized
$115
Lost-book Fee - Supervisors Vote 7/15/08
San Francisco Public Library has been charging more than a dozen fines and fees that were never authorized by the Supervisors, who must approve all City fines and fees.
In fact, the Library Commission itself never approved implementing these fees, either.
On May 1, 2008, the Library Commission voted to send legislation to the Board of Supervisors authorizing these fees retroactively. The proposed legislation creates barriers to access, and is
UNJUSTIFIABLE
UNNECESSARY
REGRESSIVE – hurts poorest people the most
The proposed legislation would authorize these fees:
$115 for a lost or damaged book, if it was obtained by the patron from another library using the library’s “LINK+” system.* In contrast, the Library’s long-time policy for its own lost books is to allow replacement, or payment of replacement cost plus a $5 processing fee. Policy for books lost from other library systems has been to follow the lending library’s policy – typically replacement cost plus a small processing fee.
$20 to scan a photograph. By comparison, the cost for a photograph of a photo remains $1. Note the fee is $15 for a previously-scanned photo.
Many new charges for use of equipment in a community meeting room, such as $30 per hour for a Powerpoint presentation, and $30 to use a microphone.
We have had a partial success so far, but we need public support to finish the job.
Library Users Association sounded alarms when the legislation was first proposed in December, 2007. Thanks to our efforts and others’, the proposed legislation was revised. It now allows patrons to pay a lower replacement fee, if -- that’s a big if -- the lending library authorizes it. But the $115 fee may still be collected at the lender’s option, even if replacement/repair actually costs much less. And a patron unable to pay would lose borrowing privileges under current library rules.
Additionally, The library administration dropped wording that would have allowed future changes without any action by the Board of Supervisors, just approval from the Controller and Commission.
Here’s What You Can Do:
1. Write to the Board of Supervisors (email: Board.of.Supervisors [at] sfgov.org).
1. Ask them to stop the Library charging and posting unauthorized fines and fees
2. Ask them not to sponsor, or support, the Library Commission’s proposed legislation authorizing these fines and fees.
2. Get more information by contacting Library Users Association:
Library Users Association, P.O.B 170544, San Francisco, CA 94117-0544
..… Libraryusers2004 [at] yahoo.com …...415/753-2180 ….
*LINK+ is an automated system to obtain books from 49 area libraries. By contrast, traditional inter-library loan can access thousands of libraries. LINK+ is found in the SFPL’s online catalog.
Reply-To: libraryusers2004 at yahoo dot com
FYI again -- the Board of Supervisors votes July 15, and sooner is better than later for letters.
Text below -- somewhere it needs to have a stamp: "Supervisors to vote July 15"
Best -- Peter Warfield 415/7 5 3 - 2 1 8 0 libraryusers2004 at yahoo dot com
************************************************************************
Help Stop S.F. Public Library’s Unauthorized
$115
Lost-book Fee - Supervisors Vote 7/15/08
San Francisco Public Library has been charging more than a dozen fines and fees that were never authorized by the Supervisors, who must approve all City fines and fees.
In fact, the Library Commission itself never approved implementing these fees, either.
On May 1, 2008, the Library Commission voted to send legislation to the Board of Supervisors authorizing these fees retroactively. The proposed legislation creates barriers to access, and is
UNJUSTIFIABLE
UNNECESSARY
REGRESSIVE – hurts poorest people the most
The proposed legislation would authorize these fees:
$115 for a lost or damaged book, if it was obtained by the patron from another library using the library’s “LINK+” system.* In contrast, the Library’s long-time policy for its own lost books is to allow replacement, or payment of replacement cost plus a $5 processing fee. Policy for books lost from other library systems has been to follow the lending library’s policy – typically replacement cost plus a small processing fee.
$20 to scan a photograph. By comparison, the cost for a photograph of a photo remains $1. Note the fee is $15 for a previously-scanned photo.
Many new charges for use of equipment in a community meeting room, such as $30 per hour for a Powerpoint presentation, and $30 to use a microphone.
We have had a partial success so far, but we need public support to finish the job.
Library Users Association sounded alarms when the legislation was first proposed in December, 2007. Thanks to our efforts and others’, the proposed legislation was revised. It now allows patrons to pay a lower replacement fee, if -- that’s a big if -- the lending library authorizes it. But the $115 fee may still be collected at the lender’s option, even if replacement/repair actually costs much less. And a patron unable to pay would lose borrowing privileges under current library rules.
Additionally, The library administration dropped wording that would have allowed future changes without any action by the Board of Supervisors, just approval from the Controller and Commission.
Here’s What You Can Do:
1. Write to the Board of Supervisors (email: Board.of.Supervisors [at] sfgov.org).
1. Ask them to stop the Library charging and posting unauthorized fines and fees
2. Ask them not to sponsor, or support, the Library Commission’s proposed legislation authorizing these fines and fees.
2. Get more information by contacting Library Users Association:
Library Users Association, P.O.B 170544, San Francisco, CA 94117-0544
..… Libraryusers2004 [at] yahoo.com …...415/753-2180 ….
*LINK+ is an automated system to obtain books from 49 area libraries. By contrast, traditional inter-library loan can access thousands of libraries. LINK+ is found in the SFPL’s online catalog.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Many poor kids will get a shock when they try to borrow books to write a paper for school, and mom and dad don't have money to pay this exhorbitant fee!
Another public service being shoveled off to the rich who couldn't care less!
Another public service being shoveled off to the rich who couldn't care less!
SFPL is only proposing to collect the amount required by the lending libraries to replace/repair a book--and is capping the fee at that! Indeed, the legislation forces the Library to forward the $ to the lending libraries from which the lost/damaged material was borrowed.
Why should other library users be penalized because a careless user loses/damages a book from another system? The more SFPL has to pay to repair or replace rare materials from other systems, the less money it will have to fund additions to its collections.
Besides, the library's pretty good about working out deals.
Why should other library users be penalized because a careless user loses/damages a book from another system? The more SFPL has to pay to repair or replace rare materials from other systems, the less money it will have to fund additions to its collections.
Besides, the library's pretty good about working out deals.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$75.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network