Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Santa Cruz Indymedia
Environment & Forest Defense
Government & Elections
Health, Housing & Public Services
Bikers in Santa Cruz Take the Lane for Safety and Awareness
On May 13th, 2008, a huge mob of cyclists rolled peacefully through the streets of Santa Cruz after a 6pm convergence at the Clock Tower. Bikers spanned city blocks in the right lane of Mission Street to raise awareness about California Vehicle Code Section 21202, cyclists may use the full right lane when the lane "is too narrow for a bicycle to safely ride to the side of a motor vehicle." Many people wore yellow shirts with a figure of a bike and the words "MAY USE FULL LANE cvc 21202" as they rode westbound on Mission, up Bay, east on King St. and down to the City Council meeting at 7pm.
City Hall was packed with bikers, many of whom spoke eloquently about their experiences on Mission St. and other dangerous routes, including Seabright Avenue. People Power, a local bicycle advocacy organization, declared their desire for City Council to request signs from CalTrans for Mission St. with a figure of a bike and the words "MAY USE FULL LANE." A discussion of proper signage went out for hours as experts and professionals testified about legal and safety concerns regarding the sharing of a "substandard lane" between motor vehicles and bicycles.
After hearing public testimonies and giving some of their own, councilmembers Mike Rotkin and Tony Madrigal strongly supported the installation of "(bike) MAY USE FULL LANE" signs, however they did not have enough votes from the rest of the councilmembers to pass the motion. The city of Santa Cruz website has the following record for the passing motion regarding Mission Street Signage:
The motion by Santa Cruz City Council to ask CalTrans for signs along Mission Street with a figure of a bike in the middle of the right lane and in front of a car was not the sign advocated by People Power, however director Micah Posner said after the meeting that he was pleased and that they will use the signs and point them out to people. Only Santa Cruz Police Spokesman Zack Friend and City Attorney John Barrisone spoke without intelligence about riding a bicycle and what CVC 21202 means when it reads that cyclists may use the full right lane under the condition that the lane "is too narrow for a bicycle to safely ride to the side of a motor vehicle."
After hearing public testimonies and giving some of their own, councilmembers Mike Rotkin and Tony Madrigal strongly supported the installation of "(bike) MAY USE FULL LANE" signs, however they did not have enough votes from the rest of the councilmembers to pass the motion. The city of Santa Cruz website has the following record for the passing motion regarding Mission Street Signage:
Motion carried to select and approve the signage “Bikes in Lane” (figure 3) pertaining to bicycle safety on Mission Street and direct staff to forward the signage to CalTrans, requesting that it be produced and installed as soon as possible, and to authorize the Mayor or designee to request information from CalTrans regarding the possibility of having large trucks use the inside lanes along the Mission Street/Highway 1 corridor; and to direct staff to develop signs that read: “Bikes May Use Sidewalk” and “Bikes Yield to Pedestrians.”There is no guarantee the signs will be approved by CalTrans, but there were assurances made during the meeting that CalTrans was supportive of some type of signage to improve safety and awareness for bikers and motorists. If the signs are approved, they will be installed "as soon as possible" which will likely translate to several months according to a CalTrans employee named Dario who spoke and answered questions on behalf of CalTrans. It should be noted that Dario rides he bike to work.
The motion by Santa Cruz City Council to ask CalTrans for signs along Mission Street with a figure of a bike in the middle of the right lane and in front of a car was not the sign advocated by People Power, however director Micah Posner said after the meeting that he was pleased and that they will use the signs and point them out to people. Only Santa Cruz Police Spokesman Zack Friend and City Attorney John Barrisone spoke without intelligence about riding a bicycle and what CVC 21202 means when it reads that cyclists may use the full right lane under the condition that the lane "is too narrow for a bicycle to safely ride to the side of a motor vehicle."
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
That's actually really interesting how you describe that they discussed a 'bikes may use sidewalk' sign.
In Washington State, bicycles may use the sidewalk, but they must reasonably yield like any jogger.
Any transportation planner or bicycle traffic expert will tell you that sidewalk driveway interactions actually do pose a much greater risk than riding in the street, in most situations, because vehicles often aren't looking out, or must pull all the way across the sidewalk when pulling out of a business so that they can see around bushes and parked cars to see if any motorized traffic is coming.
In California, while the sidewalk may feel safer, if a cyclist ran into one of these cars crossing the sidewalk at a driveway, they would legally be at fault. We won't even talk about cyclists who don't politely yield to pedestrians on the Mission sidewalk.
My question would be whether the council just decided that the signs would be a good idea, or whether they are actually changing the law for this stretch? If they have indeed changed the law, and there is an accident with a bicycle crashing into the side of a car as it crosses the sidewalk into Long's drugs or Safeway or the brazilian restaurant, or if a car hits a cyclist with their front grille, has the city adequately warned vehicle drivers that they face this extra liability and should use appropriate caution? If they didn't change the law, and this is just a casual warning about dangers on Mission street, could the city taxpayers face costs if someone gets hurt and they sue the city for advising that.
In Walnut Creek, there is definitely a long sidewalk next to a busy street where signs recommend the sidewalk, but there aren't many driveways. Maybe we should see how it legally works.
In Washington State, bicycles may use the sidewalk, but they must reasonably yield like any jogger.
Any transportation planner or bicycle traffic expert will tell you that sidewalk driveway interactions actually do pose a much greater risk than riding in the street, in most situations, because vehicles often aren't looking out, or must pull all the way across the sidewalk when pulling out of a business so that they can see around bushes and parked cars to see if any motorized traffic is coming.
In California, while the sidewalk may feel safer, if a cyclist ran into one of these cars crossing the sidewalk at a driveway, they would legally be at fault. We won't even talk about cyclists who don't politely yield to pedestrians on the Mission sidewalk.
My question would be whether the council just decided that the signs would be a good idea, or whether they are actually changing the law for this stretch? If they have indeed changed the law, and there is an accident with a bicycle crashing into the side of a car as it crosses the sidewalk into Long's drugs or Safeway or the brazilian restaurant, or if a car hits a cyclist with their front grille, has the city adequately warned vehicle drivers that they face this extra liability and should use appropriate caution? If they didn't change the law, and this is just a casual warning about dangers on Mission street, could the city taxpayers face costs if someone gets hurt and they sue the city for advising that.
In Walnut Creek, there is definitely a long sidewalk next to a busy street where signs recommend the sidewalk, but there aren't many driveways. Maybe we should see how it legally works.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$320.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network