top
International
International
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Sea Shepherd extends olive branch to Greenpeace to find Whalers

by Takver - Sydney Indymedia
Captain Paul Watson from the Sea Shepherd ship Steve Irwin has offered to co-operate with Greenpeace in searching for the Japanese whaling fleet, utilizing the Sea Shepherd helicopter, Kookaburra. Greenpeace ship Esperanza departed Auckland, New Zealand without their helicopter which had mechanical problems.
071219_captain_watson.jpg

The Steve Irwin has also had problems with a blown piston on one of its engines forcing it to return to Hobart arrival due on December 22 to pick up replacement parts and also taking the opportunity to refuel to extend its range.

It is believed the whaling fleet has started whaling to the south-west of Fremantle. The Australian Customs and Fisheries patrol vessel Oceanic Viking will depart Fremantle in the next few days to shadow the whaling fleet. The Australian Government has also committed the Australian Antarctic Division Airbus A-319 jet to seach for and do surveillance on the whaling fleet.

Paul Watson in his blog of December 19 describes the search task:

"Our actual task in searching for the Japanese fleet is awesome. We are looking for six ships in an area twice the size of Australia and we are working with limited resources without any governmental support against a wealthy industry with the most sophisticated equipment and the full backing both financially and with military surveillance and defense capabilities."

Once again Watson holds out an olive branch to Greenpeace in his blog:

"It would be nice if we could cooperate with the Greenpeace Foundation to track and oppose the whalers. After all we should be on the same page but Greenpeace refuses to respond to our repeated requests and refuses to provide coordinates for the Japanese fleet when they find them first. Sea Shepherd will nonetheless provide Greenpeace with the coordinates as we did earlier this year when we located the Japanese whaling fleet first."

Unfortunately Watson's pleas are highly likely to be rejected by the hierarchy within Greenpeace, as the organisation has built up too much of an international profile with its own strategy and tactics that has become pretty much ideological. Co-operation will be rejected by Greenpeace the organisation but I get the impression the differences are less pronounced between activists in both camps. Certainly crew members on the Esperanza and Steve Irwin will have a certain respect for their fellow activists in the harsh icy waters of the southern ocean.

The differences between Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd are based on history and personal conflicts (such as between Watson and ex-Greenpeace President and present apologist for the nuclear industry Patrick Moore) and to a certain extent on tactics. Paul Watson has not been afraid to step over the line of symbolic direct action which Greenpeace practices, to a direct action that is aimed at stopping or disabling his opponent without injury to people. The injuries Watson and the Sea Shepherd have inflicted have been to the instruments of whale slaughter and death - the equipment of the pirate whalers or long-line fishing pirates that have continued their trade despite widespread public condemnation.

Watson ends his blog entry with a very pluralist statement:

"If we are going to stop the ruthless Japanese whaling fleet we will need a cooperative effort not just with Greenpeace but also with the Humane Society, the Australian and New Zealand governments and any and all organizations and governments that want to end illegal whaling activities. We should all be on the same page if we are to turn the page on whaling to make it history."

Indeed. Paul Watson played an important role as a co-founder of Greenpeace, as a tactician in the original antiwhaling campaigns in 1975-76 when he and Bob Hunter pioneered placing themselves between the Russian harpoons and the whales. Japanese whaling will only be stopped with a diversity of tactics with many people willing to take some action whether it be signing a petition, protesting at a Japanese consulate or as a Sea Shepherd or Greenpeace crewmember or supporter.

Source:

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Rohilde
wow, I bet the Steve Irwin uses a lot of gas. They must be great at fundraising.
by Barak Goodman
It's nice that Watson want's to work with Greenpeace, but from my understanding the differences actually have very little to do with the personal differences and a LOT to do with his tactics.

Greenpeace have been pacifists from their founding days. Sea Shepherd say they won't hurt anyone, but in their own blogs from past hunts they boasted at using a giant "can opener" to try and puncture the hull of the Japanese ships and attempting to foul the Japanese ships propellers with rope. They know full well the dangers that an incapacitated ship faces in the Antarctic Sea, icebergs and all.

If Watson was genuine about JUST saving the whale he would have privately approached Greenpeace and agreed to play by their principles. But it strikes me that he just wants more publicity to fundraise for his organization which is really his private legacy and bread ticket. At this point he should just go and do what he can to save the whales, and Greenpeace will do what they can. All the noise he making is just distracting from the issue and encouraging the whalers.
by Vivienne
The Japanese government extrapolate a foolish IWC legal loop-hole that makes it quite "legal" and defensible in their eyes to kill over 1000 whales, including endangered species, and can't quite see why we are protesting! Diplomatic protests have just made their determination stronger. They increased their quota and included endangered humpback and fin whales!
Unless our government actually intercepts any vessels with harpoons and sends them home, the future or the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary is in jeopardy. The rumours of a new, "super" whale pulping machine, a 16,000-tonne factory ship, may become a reality! Any civilian protest group will be over-whelmed against these odds.
The final weapon against their butchery is trade sanctions. They won't get our wood chips, and we won't get their plasma screens and cars. We would be better off!
Greenpeace's current position towards Sea Shepherd is unfortunate and smacks of being a bit juvenile. Their reluctance (Greenpeace) to take direct action against the whalers is based on their fear of corporate responsibility for anything that effectively stops the whalers in situ, eg the Sea Shepherd approach, surely both organisations can work together on this issue.
by Marvelous Mike
First of all Greenpeace did NOT start out as pacifists. Paul Watson is one of the founding members. Also Paul was the one who started the intervention against whaling. He was the first to put himself between whalers and whales. Also to claim that he is using this as a form of publicity is very ignorant. By making it public instead of private it exposes Greenpeace for what they are; a group that likes to "bear witness" but in the end doesn't really accomplish all that much. (By pulling down their false banners of action perhaps they will be forced to really help. He has always helped them locate the Japanese whalers.) I know this because I was one of many to leave Greenpeace in the latter 70s because of this change in philosophy. Greenpeace will continue to "bear witness" until the last whale is slaughtered. Captain Watson actually stops these criminals and does so under international law. If someone is trying to hit you with a stick you can let them do it (Greenpeace's bearing witness program), you can hit them first with your own stick (this would be true eco-terrorism), or you can take their stick away from them (the Sea Shepherd way of action). The last method is the most effective way of stopping a wrong without causing any harm to anyone or anything.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$75.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network