UCSC Tree-sit Occupation Continues
To get emergency notifications about the UCSC tree-sit,
send a message from your cell phone or your computer to
lrr-add@riseup.net
Last month, a tree-sit was erected on campus by activists opposed to UC Santa Cruz's Long Range Development Plan. Just some of the reasons for opposition to the LRDP include:
- 120 acres of Upper Campus Forest slated for destruction
- Addition of 4500 new UCSC Students
- Uncontrolled UCSC development and expansion
- A planning process with insufficient student and city input
- Stress on city resources such as housing, traffic, and water
- Degradation of undergraduate education
- Creation of biotech facilities including live animal testing
- Increasing corporate funding of the UCs
These are just some of the reasons why the LRDP is opposed by an increasingly vocal coalition, including students, staff, faculty, and people in Santa Cruz.
During UCSC winter break, the campus will be subject to campus closure. However, the tree-sit and the autonomous zone beneath will continue. While students are gone during break, there is a strong chance of an attempt by campus administrators and police of a surprise attack to remove the tree-sitters and their ground support. In the event of an attack, they could use your support.
You can get emergency notification in case the tree-sit is attacked by sending an SMS email now to lrr-add@riseup.net
Historically, UCSC has a pattern of cutting trees during winter and summer breaks while students, staff, and faculty are absent. During winter break 1991, for instance, Elfland, a spectacular riparian redwood grove, was cut to make way for Colleges 9 and 10. More about elfland resistance: elfland history
For more about the UCSC tree-sit, read more about it on Indymedia at www.indybay.org/SantaCruz
To learn about the LRDP and judge for yourself, go to lrdpresistance.org
You can't resist a resistance, that's just not allowed. Anarchists only support the law when they think their rights are being violated.
but to most "progressives" and "radicals" the issue of animal testing seems not to be an issue (and you make the apparent)
No one's whining about fair or foul play or judging the tactic of surprise attacks except for a couple of wanking internet commentators. It's a war, anything goes...from both sides. The press release states that there is a threat to the tree-sit of such an attack, and asks people who care to respond in solidarity if such an attack occurs. Simple.
This is one of the most ignorant things I've ever read on this site. This is WAR? Give me a fucking break- war is what's going on in Baghdad, the Gaza Strip, Afghanistan, Darfur, the Congo, etc. Mindless intellectual masturbation and post-left philosophizing from a heated room in California isn't "war," it's pedantic. Ditto spending weeks in a tree when there's better ways to oppose the LRDP (which I agree is a totally worthless and destructive endeavor) that don't involve alienating the sizable majority of people who oppose it. To call this a "war" cheapens everything and anything that people risk torture and death for. At least have the intellectual honesty to admit that.
What? Won't sit down and talk like civilized people? OK, continue to marginalize your cause. Go ahead and sit (and sh!t) in the trees. Because THE CAUSE has been marginalized. Dumb-sh!t tactics have taken the attention away from the people that used to care (i.e., the populace) and have turned this into a circus.
The overwhelming consensus on campus and around town, is that the tree-sitters are not accomplishing anything. The entire police-baiting event was a losing proposition. You lost respect from virtually everyone that was on your side to begin with.
Nice job: stinky outcome.
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.