From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Rent is Theft, Housing is a Human Right
The housing situation in San Francisco is a prime example of the greatest evil of capitalism. Only those who
can afford it get to be housed. Everyone
else lives on the streets. They get trash
talked by neighbors and politicians alike
for the sin of being homeless. They are
arrested or cited with “quality of life” citations.
The situation couldn’t be worse—unless you throw into the mix the fact
that landlords in San Francisco have the
ultimate weapon against tenants they
want to get rid of: The Ellis Act. Even
with all of the tenant protections, renters have in a “progressive” enclave such
as San Francisco, one can be tossed out
into a housing market where rents are
astronomical, just because some speculator wants to turn a building into over-
priced tenancies-in-common (TICs,
pronounced like the bloodsucking critter).
Various solutions have been proposed
for the housing crisis in San Francisco.
Most of these options involve band-aiding a system that is problematic to
begin with. Real change will only come
by changing how we do housing in
America. That means housing can no
longer be a commodity. As long as it is,
there will be a basic inequity: those who
can afford to rent or buy versus those
who can’t. Housing is a basic human
need and should be guaranteed, just as
healthcare is in many countries.
In the meantime before we get to
that point, however, there are things
that affordable housing advocates in
San Francisco can fight for. They’re still
band-aids on a sick system, but they
will give working-class and poor people
more of a chance at affording to live
here. They include:
1) A moratorium on market-rate
housing. The last thing San Francisco
needs is more housing for the rich.
2) A moratorium on condo conversions. Every condo that is converted
from the rent-controlled stock is the loss
of a unit that’s price is controlled while
the tenant lives there—not to mention
displaces a person paying low rent.
3) Vacancy control, which puts price
restrictions on a unit after the tenant moves out. Under vacancy control,
a landlord can only jack up the rent a
small percentage for the next tenant.
Right now, it’s prohibited by state law
(Costa-Hawkins).
4) Community land trusts. The land
is purchased by a nonprofit entity and
taken off the market forever. The tenants who live there either rent or purchase at 30 percent of their income. It
is similar to a co-op, only there is no
equity in a land trust.
5) Squatter’s rights. If a building is
vacant, why can’t people make use of it?
A radical, southern Italian, working-class queer, Tommi Avicolli Mecca works
by day for the Housing Rights Committee
of SF, a tenant’s rights organization.
For more information:
http://indybay.org/faultlines
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
"Survival Without Rent"
http://squat.net/archiv/squatbook2/index.html
"NO TRESPASSING!"
http://squat.net/archiv/notrespassing/index.html
"Anarchist Squatting and Land Use in the West"
http://squat.net/archiv/anders/anarchist_squatting.html
"The Barcelona Mass Rent Strike of 1931"
http://www.workersolidarity.org/rentstrike1931.htm
http://squat.net/archiv/squatbook2/index.html
"NO TRESPASSING!"
http://squat.net/archiv/notrespassing/index.html
"Anarchist Squatting and Land Use in the West"
http://squat.net/archiv/anders/anarchist_squatting.html
"The Barcelona Mass Rent Strike of 1931"
http://www.workersolidarity.org/rentstrike1931.htm
"1) A moratorium on market-rate housing. The last thing San Francisco needs is more housing for the rich. "
Yes, since you own all property, you have the right to use force to stop people from building on your property.
"2) A moratorium on condo conversions. Every condo that is converted from the rent-controlled stock is the loss of a unit that’s price is controlled while the tenant lives there—not to mention displaces a person paying low rent."
Right. You own all property, so you have the right to use force to prevent people from deciding how to use your property.
"3) Vacancy control, which puts price restrictions on a unit after the tenant moves out. Under vacancy control, a landlord can only jack up the rent a small percentage for the next tenant. Right now, it’s prohibited by state law (Costa-Hawkins). "
Again, since you own all property you have the right to decide what the rents will be.
"4) Community land trusts. The land is purchased by a nonprofit entity and taken off the market forever. The tenants who live there either rent or purchase at 30 percent of their income. It is similar to a co-op, only there is no equity in a land trust. "
Fine.
"5) Squatter’s rights. If a building is vacant, why can’t people make use of it? "
Well, you own all property, so why not?
Yes, since you own all property, you have the right to use force to stop people from building on your property.
"2) A moratorium on condo conversions. Every condo that is converted from the rent-controlled stock is the loss of a unit that’s price is controlled while the tenant lives there—not to mention displaces a person paying low rent."
Right. You own all property, so you have the right to use force to prevent people from deciding how to use your property.
"3) Vacancy control, which puts price restrictions on a unit after the tenant moves out. Under vacancy control, a landlord can only jack up the rent a small percentage for the next tenant. Right now, it’s prohibited by state law (Costa-Hawkins). "
Again, since you own all property you have the right to decide what the rents will be.
"4) Community land trusts. The land is purchased by a nonprofit entity and taken off the market forever. The tenants who live there either rent or purchase at 30 percent of their income. It is similar to a co-op, only there is no equity in a land trust. "
Fine.
"5) Squatter’s rights. If a building is vacant, why can’t people make use of it? "
Well, you own all property, so why not?
Only those who can afford it? Actually, its really simple. If you get up and get a job, you will be able to afford a home. If you chose to sit around and wait for free handouts, dont expect much.
How is rent theft? If someone purchases a property, pays the mortgage on it, then rents it out, how is that theft? do you expect people to pay mortgages so that others can live freely?
Hi, Rent is theft because everyone should have housing. Living in a situation where you have to pay someone who bought "extra" housing so he could make a profit is torture for those of us who want to have a world that is based on equality, mutual aid, and respect.
I love the folks that believe so very hard in the American Dream. Just work hard and pull yourself up by your bootstraps and everything will be hunky dory peachy keen dandy fine. Right.
As an individual that worked three jobs (that's right, seven am to 11 pm 6-7 days a week) and still could barely make rent on the minuscule one bedroom apartment that sheltered other peoples discarded pets...let me tell you; BULLSH*T. There is nothing shameful about someone wanting to have a life and a place to live. Minimum wage is not a living wage, and a college degree doesn't instantly land you in a high paying job. Don't get me started on student loans. I know more single parents of various sexes and genders that work harder than the nuclear family, and take more flak about their 'shortcomings' than anyone would throw at a nuclear family that had the same difficulties. So the next time people feel like pinning everything on the 'slacker' walk a mile beside them first. You may just learn something.
As an individual that worked three jobs (that's right, seven am to 11 pm 6-7 days a week) and still could barely make rent on the minuscule one bedroom apartment that sheltered other peoples discarded pets...let me tell you; BULLSH*T. There is nothing shameful about someone wanting to have a life and a place to live. Minimum wage is not a living wage, and a college degree doesn't instantly land you in a high paying job. Don't get me started on student loans. I know more single parents of various sexes and genders that work harder than the nuclear family, and take more flak about their 'shortcomings' than anyone would throw at a nuclear family that had the same difficulties. So the next time people feel like pinning everything on the 'slacker' walk a mile beside them first. You may just learn something.
It's good there are people out there that get the point.
Let me guess. You are a neocon who has been given everything from birth by a wealthy family. You will go on to inherit their wealth and do everything you can to screw those who have nothing, because, after all, they "deserve" their poverty. [Because they are lazy; stupid, etc.]
There are as many reasons for poverty as there are for its victims. Only someone who has NOT gone hungry, feared homelessness or does not know the constant terror of what tomorrow will bring when one works several jobs paying slave wages and STILL has to make decisions about what bill to pay vs eating, has your callous, sociopathic attitude. I hope you are in this situation someday. At the very least, it may conjure some empathy from the bottom of that empty soul of yours toward others in situations which you cannot judge because you know not of what you speak.
There are as many reasons for poverty as there are for its victims. Only someone who has NOT gone hungry, feared homelessness or does not know the constant terror of what tomorrow will bring when one works several jobs paying slave wages and STILL has to make decisions about what bill to pay vs eating, has your callous, sociopathic attitude. I hope you are in this situation someday. At the very least, it may conjure some empathy from the bottom of that empty soul of yours toward others in situations which you cannot judge because you know not of what you speak.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network