From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Biojustice Diary: Oranized Opposition to the Biotech Industry's Annual Meeting in Boston
Chinatown - 5.03.07
Up a dusty flight of stairs in the heart of Boston’s Chinatown lies the arterial lining of the Boston anti-biotech movement. Banners for the US Social Forum line the walls, stacks of the Bioustice 2007 underground newspaper sit prepared for distribution, and various flyers await eager hands. Amidst these tools of resistance, there is a murmur of activity as a motley crew of committed individuals plot and laugh heartily. These are not your typical anti-authoritarians.
Up a dusty flight of stairs in the heart of Boston’s Chinatown lies the arterial lining of the Boston anti-biotech movement. Banners for the US Social Forum line the walls, stacks of the Bioustice 2007 underground newspaper sit prepared for distribution, and various flyers await eager hands. Amidst these tools of resistance, there is a murmur of activity as a motley crew of committed individuals plot and laugh heartily. These are not your typical anti-authoritarians.
Although over the course of the next
six days they will be met by armed oppressors, today the afternoon sun shines through
the 5th floor windows into a space ripe with
expectation. This is the BioJustice Convergence Center.
BioJustice 2007 is a direct challenge to
the annual B.I.O. (Biotechnology Industry
Organization) International Convention.
BioJustice participants celebrate sustainable
food and healthcare alternatives, and resist
the tools of corporate domination: geneti-
cally engineered foods, drug monopolies,
and biological weapons.
Downtown - 5.04.07
Across town at the Boston Conven-
tion and Exhibition Center, corporate sci-
entists conspire to engineer Genetically
Modified Organisms (GMOs), produce
medical drugs using means other than di-
rect extraction from native biological sources
(biopharmaceuticals), and build ‘biodefense’
weapons, pushing what Brian Tokar of the
Institute for Social Ecology calls a “corpo-
rate agenda of control over our food and
health.” This is not a new development.
Since the 1980s, food and drug corpora-
tions have experimented with genetic engi-
neering, the process of transferring genetic
material between living organisms. In 1982,
Genentech developed recombinant human
insulin (rHI), the first biopharm product. In
1987, the first Genetically Modified (GM)
crop of 2000 testers was planted outdoors
in Brentwood, California and subsequently
destroyed the next night by Earth First!ers.
In 1990, the first transgenic pig produced
human milk proteins via implanted DNA.
Corporate domination abounds in the world
of biotechnology.
Further, the profit-driven attempt to
use biological agents as weapons is key to the
BioJustice movement. Central to the cur-
rent struggle in Boston is the fight against
the “Biosafety Level 4” laboratory being
constructed in the South End by Boston
University. Twenty-five thousand people
live within one mile of this highly volatile lo-
cation, where research would be conducted
on the most deadly pathogens in the world.
Carmen Nazario of SafetyNet, a Roxbury
neighborhood action group, understands
that the powers that be want to study these
pathogens in case of emergency. Today at
the BioJustice Press Conference she objects,
clearly stating “a case of emergency will be
that they are causing one.”
Blackstone Park - 5.06.07
Upon arriving at Blackstone Park, located in Boston’s South End, I find a core group
of activists gathered around and inside the
park’s fountain, dramatically reworking the
“myths” of corporate biotechnological dominance through puppetry and theater. Food
Not Bombs is serving food and coffee, a DJ
emits blasts of funk and soul, and the ever
present Boston Police force circles nearby.
Though internet chatter will later criticize
the BioJustice event as a “bio-bust,” I find
a wonderful harmony present in the park.
The relatively small gathering of neighbors
and community members is peaceful, positive, and inclusive. As a young white male, I
find that a humble and respectful approach
is best suited to productivity. Instead of attempting to take over a neighborhood and
temporarily reclaim the streets, these activists networked with the local community
and the international BioJustice struggle,
and recognized the importance of permanently restoring community power.
The Common - 5.08.07
Boston Common is just that: a com-
mon space for community to come together.
Originally owned by William Blaxton (often
pronounced “Blackstone,” as in Blackstone
Park), the Common was sold to the city and
over the years has evolved from a lynching
ground to battlefield to concert space to
platform for such notables as Martin Luther
King, Jr. and Pope John Paul II. Today, the
Common is transformed from a static space
to a neoliberal market in reverse, an antidote
to the mediocre and insincere. By offering
mutual exchange and providing an outlet of
sorts for self-sufficiency, the Really Really
Free Market acts as a medium of creativity
and a substitute for the mundane.
On the surface, sun shining and cool
breeze greeting us as we exit the Park subway
stop, the Common appears to be any ordi-
nary city park. Young people gather and play
games, small groups chatter idly, and couples
stroll complacent along concrete paths. Yet
there is an atmosphere of expectation, of
something waiting to happen.
As the cops patrol atop supersized
horses and V8 engines, we read poetry aloud
under a shade tree, collapse, and gather our-
selves again. The Market really was free
here, and the community was one.
It was only later that we learned that
innocent people had been detained for exit-
ing the park in a group. So what happened?
Why was the RRFM such a small, isolated
event? The Market happened later than we
expected, on a different day, so only those
who were “in” on the currents were able to be
there. Those from out of town or who were
not part of the organizing collective would
be ill-informed as to specifics, and only those
who took the time and energy to see what
this group of free-marketeers was all about
would be able to experience just how com-
munity-based, self-sufficient exchange really
works.
In my experience, I found that only
those who unsettled their comfort zone,
asked questions, and acknowledged one an-
other as fellow human beings were able to
fully participate in this idea so radical that
its physical presence had to be violated by
agents of the state.
5.09.07
As an “outsider” to the Boston anti-bio-
tech movement, I was surprised and relieved
to find a strong die-hard presence of com-
mitted folks. Although from the margins
Boston seemed to be inundated with cops
and appeared to have little to no strong mass
movement, there were a number of instances
in which I found comrades in arms in the
struggle against corporate biotechnological
dominance.
From Fault Lines #21
From Fault Lines #21
For more information:
http://indybay.org/faultlines
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
I would like to make a statement about this article.
Owing to a lack of information on the part of the author, it is the view of this unit of humanity that the truth needs to be told.
I belive that it is not the job of the individual to rise against the state, and to say what the state can and cannot do.
I have found that GM foodstuffs and products of same are not what could be considered dangerous.
They are not inimicable to human health, nor are they in any way toxic to the surrounding environs.
They are what is known as a support unit.
GM foodstuffs will supplement, not out-do organic food substances.
GM foodstuffs will be grown in poorer countries of the world, where conventional foodstuffs cannot be grown, assisting locals in the rise out of poverty
is it your place, individual, to tell them they can't because of your naiivety and superstition
I will also argue that Biological weapons are a prudent means of both attack and defence, and since they're going to build them anyway, like it or not, I belive that you should revel in your security that has entitled you to make such statements over an open network, and note that Biological weapons are what's bought you your freedom.
Because a soldier, made by man and woman, is a biological weapon because they are organic.
Are you trying to ban soldiers from the battlefield as well?
Yours Truly
Trinity One
Owing to a lack of information on the part of the author, it is the view of this unit of humanity that the truth needs to be told.
I belive that it is not the job of the individual to rise against the state, and to say what the state can and cannot do.
I have found that GM foodstuffs and products of same are not what could be considered dangerous.
They are not inimicable to human health, nor are they in any way toxic to the surrounding environs.
They are what is known as a support unit.
GM foodstuffs will supplement, not out-do organic food substances.
GM foodstuffs will be grown in poorer countries of the world, where conventional foodstuffs cannot be grown, assisting locals in the rise out of poverty
is it your place, individual, to tell them they can't because of your naiivety and superstition
I will also argue that Biological weapons are a prudent means of both attack and defence, and since they're going to build them anyway, like it or not, I belive that you should revel in your security that has entitled you to make such statements over an open network, and note that Biological weapons are what's bought you your freedom.
Because a soldier, made by man and woman, is a biological weapon because they are organic.
Are you trying to ban soldiers from the battlefield as well?
Yours Truly
Trinity One
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network