From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
March 18, 07 escalation anniversary
Here are photos with some captions of a large fourth anniversary of the Iraq escalation march.
Towards the bottom, some film clips included of the antiauthoritarian gathering at the end of the main march. There was no breakaway march. I thought this situation was quite skillfully and creatively carried out
Towards the bottom, some film clips included of the antiauthoritarian gathering at the end of the main march. There was no breakaway march. I thought this situation was quite skillfully and creatively carried out
Shortly after this march, someone said that either the Chronicle's sfgate.com or the television said there were 3000 people. That is absolutely not true. This was very close to the average for the long list of San Francisco marches since 2002 - and probably had at least 40,000. Many people near me thought they were towards the end when they arrived at the Civic center for the ANSWER speeches, but it took nearly another hour for everyone to finish coming from Market street. The civic plaza was filled up.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Appears that the kids who "play" anarchist were intimidated by the show of force from the police.
Thats ok. The real anarchists were busy elsewhere. They recognized the futility of yet another mass rally
Thats ok. The real anarchists were busy elsewhere. They recognized the futility of yet another mass rally
In a sense, you're right to criticize the anarchists there. No one was prepared for anything major. Most of us just happened to be in town that day, and thought if there were to be some anarchist action in SF, we'd be glad to help out. We'd heard that there was an anonymous call for an anarchist breakaway march, so we made sure we could be there to add to the numbers if anything went down. But you're right; nobody there really had any experience (as far as I could tell), nobody knew why the call was made or what the purpose of being there was, so we sat down to have a lil' consensus meeting to decide where to go from there. And rather than A.) FSU with our small numbers and get arrested immediately, B.) Have another march, or C.) just go home, we decided to use it as an opportunity to set up a communication network so we can keep in touch and be more prepared for whatever we can help each other with in the future. Some of the folks there had pretty limited exposure to consensus, security culture, etc. so we got to cover those things a bit too. I was a little disappointed that we didn't take any "real" action, but at the same time I'm really glad to have met the folks I did, and I think we made the right decision given the circumstances. Oh, and at the end we sang 'Baby, I'm an Anarchist' to the police, to the delight of our surrounding audiences (excepting the police). I know, I know, we're not REAL ANARCHISTS, eh? Haha...
We didn't pass out lyric sheets, haha, the papers were for something else. Most of us just happened to know that song. We didn't even really plan to do the song... it just sort of happened.
I thought the whole thing was really well done - and at least as meaningful as anything happening across the street.
Did you see how the Chronicle is still almost delegitimizing the main march by continuing to argue that there were only 3000 people? I clearly remember that my high school had 1650 people. They would have sports assemblies and everyone would go into the gym during a 5 minute passing period through several sets of double doors. How could it take a couple hours for a crowd only twice that size to pass through a wide street into civic center?
Anyway, there were quite a few wise moves that the group did that we can list.
Clearly there is some coevolution occurring between the police and the affinity group that often forms a black bloc. The black bloc is a ritualistic activity which technically amounts to 'petitioning the government for redress of grievances', with a different style than the pacifist marchers. It is probably would less accurately be considered 'direct action', than a Food Not Bombs meal, in a sense. 'Insurrectionary' style stuff has its place when it is necessary to obstruct horrible current behavior by government and companies, however, the real hard work is to actually build a positive new society, rather than leaving a gaping hole after an older system is brought down.
It would be a bad move to repeat exactly the same protest format that has been done at least 10 times at the end of ANSWER marches and other large protests.
There have been several of these events where an unpermitted march didn't even do anything illegal at all, and the whole group was pre-emptively taken in. Given the statement on that call-out that it would be symbolically done for Josh Wolf, and given the large number of police, you could assume that the police would have tried to ticket people immediately for things like jaywalking. It could have become almost like the symbolic civil disobedience/voluntary arrest that the quakers do. There have been cases in the past where there also were 350 police following a group, and no one was arrested, so it is difficult to forecast what could have happened. Anyway, doing something creative, and meeting each other was probably far more productive a use of time. If anyone actually had a project, it would probably be wiser to just set a later date and reconvene.
Did you see how the Chronicle is still almost delegitimizing the main march by continuing to argue that there were only 3000 people? I clearly remember that my high school had 1650 people. They would have sports assemblies and everyone would go into the gym during a 5 minute passing period through several sets of double doors. How could it take a couple hours for a crowd only twice that size to pass through a wide street into civic center?
Anyway, there were quite a few wise moves that the group did that we can list.
Clearly there is some coevolution occurring between the police and the affinity group that often forms a black bloc. The black bloc is a ritualistic activity which technically amounts to 'petitioning the government for redress of grievances', with a different style than the pacifist marchers. It is probably would less accurately be considered 'direct action', than a Food Not Bombs meal, in a sense. 'Insurrectionary' style stuff has its place when it is necessary to obstruct horrible current behavior by government and companies, however, the real hard work is to actually build a positive new society, rather than leaving a gaping hole after an older system is brought down.
It would be a bad move to repeat exactly the same protest format that has been done at least 10 times at the end of ANSWER marches and other large protests.
There have been several of these events where an unpermitted march didn't even do anything illegal at all, and the whole group was pre-emptively taken in. Given the statement on that call-out that it would be symbolically done for Josh Wolf, and given the large number of police, you could assume that the police would have tried to ticket people immediately for things like jaywalking. It could have become almost like the symbolic civil disobedience/voluntary arrest that the quakers do. There have been cases in the past where there also were 350 police following a group, and no one was arrested, so it is difficult to forecast what could have happened. Anyway, doing something creative, and meeting each other was probably far more productive a use of time. If anyone actually had a project, it would probably be wiser to just set a later date and reconvene.
Did you see how the Chronicle is still almost delegitimizing the main march by continuing to argue that there were only 3000 people?
The mainstream media makes a 10 minute appearence, takes a few photos and records a few sound bites.
Its possible that when there were only 3,000 people when the Chron came. The rally organizers themselves lamented the fact they didn't have the numbers of the first anti-war rallies. With support for the war at its lowest point ever, the opposite should be true.
Part of the problem, of course, is ANSWER. People have begun to realize that ANSWER is not a legitimate peace group. Working Assets brought a sizeable contingent with them- and deliberately keep them apart from the main march. They even provided their own sound ssytem
The mainstream media makes a 10 minute appearence, takes a few photos and records a few sound bites.
Its possible that when there were only 3,000 people when the Chron came. The rally organizers themselves lamented the fact they didn't have the numbers of the first anti-war rallies. With support for the war at its lowest point ever, the opposite should be true.
Part of the problem, of course, is ANSWER. People have begun to realize that ANSWER is not a legitimate peace group. Working Assets brought a sizeable contingent with them- and deliberately keep them apart from the main march. They even provided their own sound ssytem
International A.N.S.W.E.R. is not the answer. That is the conclusion which has been reached by the majority of the American anti-war movement after two years of ANSWER's efforts to "lead" the American anti-war and peace movements. ANSWER bills itself as a coalition, but it is nothing of the sort. ANSWER is a front group organized by Stalinists associated with the Workers World Party. ANSWER has led the anti-war movement around in circles for two years, continuing its practice of organizing safe protests which promote the organization, but do nothing to slow down the war or even bring us one day closer to abolishing the U.S. war machine. What's more, scarce movement resources have been diverted into ANSWER's organization, which has only helped promote the authoritarian politics of the WWP. ANSWER has squandered movement resources on symbolic protests in Washington and San Francisco which every seasoned activist can tell you are a waste of time. ANSWER isn't interested in ending any war--they want to be in control of any new social change movements that grow in the United States.
For more information:
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/wwp.html
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network