top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

"An Inconvenient Meal": Meat and Global Warming Connection Rarely Acknowledged

by karen dawn
DawnWatch: Glenn Beck and Atlantic Monthly cover meat and global warming 3/8/07
Late last year the UN released a report about the contribution of livestock to global warming. Whereas Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, didn't even acknowledge the impact of livestock, most press that does acknowledge it doesn't dare suggest that changing our eating habits would be a good way to affect global warning. The coverage in the March 2007 issue of the Atlantic Monthly magazine is fairy typical. The article reports:

"The Bovine Menace

"Forget SUVs and tractor-trailers—the world’s livestock play a larger role in global warming than all of our planes, trains, and automobiles combined, according to a report from the Livestock, Environment and Development Initiative (LEAD), an organization that promotes “ecologically sustainable livestock production systems.” Between the deforestation that’s necessary to create grazing lands, the fossil fuels required to manufacture fertilizer for the crops that feed the world’s growing livestock population, and the gases released by animal manure (and yes, animal flatulence as well), livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions worldwide. The good news: There are ways to reduce these emissions, including more efficient feed production, improved soil conservation, and a better diet for all those gassy cows. Given that the global production of meat and milk is on track to double by 2050, livestock’s current environmental impact would need to be cut
in half just to stay within the present level of damage to the global ecosystem.
—“Livestock’s Long Shadow,” Livestock, Environment and Development Initiative, H. Steinfeld et al."

The article is on line at http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200703/primarysources and the Atlantic Monthly takes letters at http://www.theatlantic.com/letters/edlet.htm
Always be sure not to use any comments or phrases from me or from any other alerts in your letters. Editors are looking for original responses from their readers.

On Thursday night, March 8, host Glenn Beck covered the issue on his show on CNN Headline News for his segment, "The Real Story." You can read his summary of the issue on his website at http://www.glennbeck.com/realstory/03-08-07.shtml

Beck makes it clear that he is not a PETA person, but that he doesn't like hypocrisy so is publicizing this issue. In his opening comments on the issue, reprinted on his website, he says:
"In a letter to Al Gore yesterday, PETA nicely explained to him that the single best way for an individual to fight global warming is to become a vegetarian. In fact, according to the United Nations -- an organization that Al Gore is usually quite fond of citing: raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world -- combined. That's not from PETA, that's from the U.N.! But it's not just them; university researchers have also determined that switching to a vegan diet has more of an impact on global warming than switching your car from a Camry to a Prius!

"Now, Al, I understand that you can't change your carbon footprint easily -- I mean, you have to travel around in a jet to all those panic speeches you give, but what about your meat footprint? If you honestly -- and that's really the key word here, 'honestly' -- believe that global warming is THE most important issue the world faces, bigger than terrorism or AIDS or hunger, then why haven't you started eating veggie burgers and drinking soy milk?"

On that page you can read further comments, and you can click on a link to read PETA's letter to Gore. You can also view a short video titled "An Inconvenient Meal," which has footage of global warming affected disasters, interspersed with shots of those politicians who champion the cause, chowing down on burgers.

You can also read the transcript of Thursday night's show on which PETA's Matt Prescott was interviewed. There is a glitch with that link -- it points to Wednesday's show. The correct URL is http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0703/08/gb.01.html

If Glenn Beck gets loads of positive feedback he is more likely to have animal friendly and veg-friendly guests on in the future. Please send a quick note of appreciation. Feedback matters.

Glenn Beck take comments at me [at] glennbeck.com and says that he reads all of them, though he cannot reply to each.

My thanks to Jackie Raven for letting us know about The Atlantic article and to Jane Velez Mitchell for calling our attention to Glenn Beck's coverage.


(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com. You may forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts if you do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this parenthesized tag line. If somebody forwards DawnWatch alerts to you, which you enjoy, please help the list grow by signing up. It is free.)
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by J
So, what exactly does becoming a vegetarian have to do with all this? Aren't we just talking about the livestock, farm animals, here? That means we should cut out the beef in our diets and start eating game in order to reduce the flatulent wild animal population, right?

By the way, the manure that the farm animals produce is used in farming, especially organic farming. Should that source for fertilizers cease to exist, a lot more chemicals would have to be used to grow vegetables to feed people with - unless we're willing to cut down some more forests in order to farm green manure.

We're always hearing about how many kilograms of cow feed is needed to produce one kilogram of meat, but I'd be very interested in hearing how many kilograms of green manure is needed to produce one kilogram of vegetables, and how many kilograms of vegetables does one have to eat to match the nutritional content of one kilogram of meat.

Besides, where I live, it's not possible to farm anything that we could eat ourselves, but cattle feed grows just fine. Should we just stop producing food, then? It's not exactly ecological to fly tomatos around, either. And I just know eskimos won't be happy to give up meat and switch to seaweed anytime soon.

I agree that people these days eat way too much meat, and meat of questionable quality and origin at that. Cutting the amounts down and carefully choosing the meat we eat, we can do just as much or more for the environment - and with the added health benefit that small amounts of meat and dairy products bring. So why not forget the vegan preaching and suggest gradually cutting down on meat instead and give some advice on how to choose that meat for dinner? So many people automatically stop listening when you say the word 'vegan', that you would certainly be doing more for the environment that way.
by John
The issue of bovine methane and the ruin brought by pastures is addressed up on 'The Inconvenient truth' DVD, in the extra features. There are various updates and other new information in this section.



by Ted
That's not to mention all the ENERGY used transporting all that livestock around

It is huge
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$155.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network