top
California
California
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Should Progressives Support Proposition 88?

by Paul Hogarth, Beyond Chron (reposted)
As California continues to be the 43rd state in the nation in education spending (due to Prop 13 and Arnold Schwarzenegger), some education advocates have placed Proposition 88 on the November ballot to address this problem. Funded by Netflix founder Reed Hastings and venture capitalist John Doerr, the $50 parcel tax would raise $470 million a year to fund the state’s public schools. Locally, Prop 88 has the support of the San Francisco Bay Guardian – whose endorsement carries enormous weight among the city’s left-leaning voters, especially in down-ballot races with minimal media coverage. But not all progressives and public school advocates think it’s a good idea.
The California Democratic Party, the state PTA and the state Federation of Teachers are all against it, while the California Teachers Association remains neutral. This puts these groups in common cause with anti-tax zealots like the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers’ Association. In the Official Ballot Argument against Prop 88, right-wing opponents say that it undermines the “clear intent of Prop 13 to limit property taxes,” an argument not likely to convince many voters who care about education. But progressives have very different reasons for opposing Proposition 88.

“It’s a regressive tax that will unfairly burden low-income homeowners,” said School Board candidate Jane Kim. “We just don’t have the guts to tax wealthy individuals and businesses fairly, and we should be going after Prop 13.” Prop 88 would charge every parcel of real property in the state (regardless of size or value) a flat $50 fee. While elderly and disabled homeowners have an exemption, there is no equivalent break for low-income homeowners or parcels with low property values. “A $50 parcel tax is nothing for someone living in a $3 million house,” said Natasha Marsh of the League of Pissed Off Voters, but it’s another expense for working-class people struggling to get by.

But Tim Redmond, executive editor of the Bay Guardian, argues that this is not realistic. “In a perfect world and in a relatively sane world, property taxes in Marin would pay for schools in Bayview,” he explained. And while a parcel tax is more regressive than an income tax, it is far less regressive than a sales tax, which disproportionately hurts poor people the most. “Only those who own property will pay it -- not renters,” said Redmond. “And unlike bond measures, landlords in San Francisco can’t pass it on to their tenants. It’s hard for me to oppose anything that is remotely non-regressive and with the $50 parcel tax, the schools will be better off than they are now.”

Read More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3770#more
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Keith Richard Radford Jr.
Mon, Oct 30, 2006 2:17PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$180.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network