top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Capitalism--not People's Park--killed Cody's Books (Part 1)

by Steve Ongerth
Since the announcement that the original Cody's Books in Berkeley is going out of business, local pundits, politicians, capitalists, and scissorbills have created a shit-storm. As happens so many times when influential businesses close, the capitalist class and its enablers have predictably placed the blame for this tragedy upon the shoulders of the usual suspects: the homeless, young punks, holdovers from the 1960s counterculture, and the city of Berkeley itself. As usual, the real truth goes unreported: Capitalism killed Cody's.

suits.jpgSince the announcement that the original Cody's Books in Berkeley is going out of business, local pundits, politicians, capitalists, and scissorbills have created a shit-storm. As happens so many times when influential businesses close, the capitalist class and its enablers have predictably placed the blame for this tragedy upon the shoulders of the usual suspects: the homeless, young punks, holdovers from the 1960s counterculture, and the city of Berkeley itself. As usual, the real truth goes unreported: Capitalism killed Cody's.

The original Cody's books is located on the Southwest corner of Telegraph Avenue and Haste Streets in Berkeley's "south-side" neighborhood, less than a half-mile from the University of California campus at Berkeley. Cody's Books is unionized and to many it represents the quintessential "independent" bookstore: Authors periodically give public readings of their books; Cody's carries a much wider selection of titles than their corporate competitors; shoppers are welcome (if not encouraged) to spend hours sitting, browsing, or reading from among the millions of books on their shelves; their magazine and periodical section surpasses even those of the local smokeshops (another Berkeley institution); creative graffiti is allowed to remain on the bathroom walls. I myself spent many an hour losing myself in a good book at Cody's only to find I lost track of entire afternoons.

Cody's is a neighborhood landmark in a neighborhood that is itself, a landmark. Berkeley's "Southside" is close to the famous "Sproul Plaza" site of the famous Free Speech Fights on the 1960s. Nearby, the late Mario Savio made his famous speech:

We have an autocracy which runs this university. It's managed. We asked the following: if President Kerr actually tried to get something more liberal out of the Regents in his telephone conversation, why didn't he make some public statement to that effect? And the answer we received -- from a well-meaning liberal -- was the following: He said, "Would you ever imagine the manager of a firm making a statement publicly in opposition to his board of directors?" That's the answer! Now, I ask you to consider: if this is a firm, and if the Board of Regents are the board of directors, and if President Kerr in fact is the manager, then I'll tell you something: the faculty are a bunch of employees, and we're the raw material! But we're a bunch of raw material[s] that don't mean to have any process upon us, don't mean to be made into any product, don't mean to end up being bought by some clients of the University, be they the government, be they industry, be they organized labor, be they anyone! We're human beings!

 [Wild applause.]

There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!

[Prolonged applause.]

Now, no more talking. We're going to march in singing "We Shall Overcome." Slowly; there are a lot of us. Up here to the left -- I didn't mean the pun.

Located nearby is Cody's counterpart, the almost as famous Moe's Books. Moe's is to used books as Cody's is to new ones. Moe's was featured briefly in "the Graduate". I have lost nearly as much time at Moe's as I have at Cody's.

Not more than half a block east of Cody's on Haste Street is the even more famous "People's Park". While many may be unfamiliar with Cody's, they're well aware of People's Park. People's Park has long been a source of contention (as well as a countercultural icon). As described by the City of Berkeley's official website:

The plot of land up Haste Street from Telegraph Avenue was once covered with community housing inhabited by political activists and members of the counterculture. In the late 1960s, the University of California purchased the land and tore down the houses with the plan of building athletic fields. In the face of protest, the university delayed building the fields and left the land vacant, angering community members even further.

 On April 18, 1969, the underground paper The Berkeley Barb ran an announcement calling for everyone interested to bring building materials to the lot on Haste and Telegraph to build a community park. People from all walks of life came to participate in the creation of “the People’s Park,” a huge group effort creating solidarity and community.

Eventually, the university decided to take their private property back. They bulldozed the garden, the pathways, and even the sandbox and put a fence around the lot, enraging community members who had put so much hard work into creating something positive. Thousands of protesters gathered to express their dismay. The protests got out of hand and turned into riots when some people used the chaos as an excuse to be destructive. Rocks and metal rods were thrown at the police. Eventually, the National Guard, in full battle gear, was ordered in by Governor Ronald Reagan to put down the protests. Many people were injured, one was blinded, and another (James Rector) was shot and killed. The streets of Berkeley were shrouded by a blanket of tear gas for days during the demonstrations. The National Guard occupied the City for weeks.

After the riots, the land was reclaimed by the community, which rebuilt the park. In the 1990s, the university attempted to reclaim the park for other uses, and once again met with community resistance and protests. For a period of time, the university and the City of Berkeley had an agreement for the City to run the park, but the agreement has expired and the park is currently both owned and managed by the university.

This is the so-called "objective" history. Pundits on the right often cite People's Park as the personification of the "People's Republic of Berkeley". Capitalists hate People's Park, because it represents a living example of public defiance against the iron laws of the "free market" and their near hysterical sacred cow of "private property". Since it so often goes unreported in proper context, I felt compelled to present this more partisan view of People's Park from its supporters:

Someday a petty official will appear with a piece of paper, called a land title, which states that the University of California owns the land of the People's Park. Where did that piece of paper come from? What is it worth?

 A long time ago the Costanoan Indians lived in the area now called Berkeley. They had no concept of land ownership. They believed that the land was under the care and guardianship of the people who used it and lived on it.

Catholic missionaries took the land away from the Indians. No agreements were made. No papers were signed. They ripped it off in the name of God.

The Mexican Government took the land away from the Church. The Mexican government had guns and an army. God's word was not as strong.

The Mexican Government wanted to pretend that it was not the army that guaranteed them the land. They drew up some papers which said they legally owned it. No Indians signed those papers.

The Americans were not fooled by the papers. They had a stronger army than the Mexicans. They beat them in a war and took the land. Then they wrote some papers of their own and forced the Mexicans to sign them.

The American Government sold the land to some white settlers. The Government gave the settlers a piece of paper called a land title in exchange for some money. All this time there were still some Indians around who claimed the land. The American army killed most of them.

The piece of paper saying who owned the land was passed around among rich white men.

Sometimes the white men were interested in taking care of the land. Usually they were just interested in making money. Finally some very rich men, who run the University of California, bought the land.

Immediately these men destroyed the houses that had been built on the land. The land went the way of so much other land in America -- it became a parking lot.

We are building a park on the land. We will take care of it and guard it, in the spirit of the Costanoan Indians. When the University comes with its land title we will tell them: "Your land title is covered with blood. We won't touch it. Your people ripped off the land from the Indians a long time ago. If you want it back now, you will have to fight for it again."

The Bay Area IWW's history is intertwined with The History of People's Park. Many of those who originally created People's Park were (at least partly) influenced by the history of the Wobblies of old. The riots that took place in the 1990s (caused at least as much by the University and dozens of police departments that invaded Berkeley at that time as Park supporters) brought SLAPP suits against four activists, one of whom (Bob Sparks) was a dues paying Wobbly. In 1995, the Bay Area IWW celebrated the 90th Anniversary of its founding convention in People's Park (during the People's Park's own anniversary celebration).

It would be quite correct to point out that People's Park and its ardent supporters (including the author) are not without fault or conceit. It would be accurate to state that People's Park has attracted more than its share of wingnuts, junkies, or even the occasional genuine scumbag (muggers, rapists, or petty thieves with no sense of class consciousness). It would be grossly inaccurate to blame their actions on the ideals of those who created People's Park and those who continue to support it. In any revolution, no matter ho noble in its intent, no matter how small in size, there can be miscreants who take advantage of the good work of others. The challenge for revolutionaries is overcome these weaknesses. It's safe to say that this hasn't happened with People's Park, but then, the experiment called "America" has its warts as well.

Despite all of this, People's Park has coexisted with Cody's Books now for well over four decades. Yet now that Cody's is closing and it's apparently People's Park's fault! At least, that's what some local pundits are saying. Witness for example, the comments of Moe's Book's current Manager, Gene Barone, from the Business section of the June 11 issue of the San Francisco Chronicle, People's Park cause of Telegraph's decay. (Funny, Moe's isn't going out of Business. Did People's Park activists deliberately target Cody's and ignore Moe's?).

Somebody should ask Gene Barone if he thinks that the solution to homelessness is to pave over all parks. Certainly, Golden Gate Park in San Francisco and Central Park in New York City have their share of problems. Perhaps we should just pave over the entire planet and make it into a giant parking lot! By his logic that would eliminate blight entirely. It boggles my mind that the manager of a bookstore that carries such incredible troves of knowledge could be so colossally stupid!

If that's not bad enough, examine this asinine screed by Chistopher Hitchens wannabe Chris Thompson of the East Bay Express, Leaders Fiddle While Berkeley Rots.

Chris Thompson should ask himself whether or not he'd be happier at the National Review or Reason Magazine. His screed is not directed at People's Park in particular (he offers it as a tangential swipe), but rather neighborhood activists who dare to assume that new businesses that want to set up shop in an existing neighborhood (in this case, a satellite Berkeley Bowl in southwest Berkeley) should have some accountability to the people that actually live there! Nope. In Chris Thompson's view, capital should have near absolute power.

Local control versus market fundamentalism the real issue here.

Quite possibly, residents and local business owners agree that People's Park is more of a problem than a landmark. They may ultimately be right, but without conducting a very careful, scientific, and objective study--something I am certain has yet to be done--there is no factual basis upon which they can draw such a conclusion, only perceptions and prejudice.

Ever since that Cody's owner, Andy Ross, announced the store's closing, the capitalist press, local pundits, local business owners, and anti-"left" opinion holders have blamed homeless youth that hang out on Telegraph Avenue, "drugs", "permissive culture", and especially People's Park.

So far, virtually nobody across the political spectrum from far right to far left has raised so much as a peep in opposition.

For all of the howling done by the ideologues on the right (particularly Debra J Saunders, David Horowitz, and most of Fox News) about how Berkeley is an intolerant and totalitarian dictatorship of "political correctness" (read: any opinion that challenges Eurocentric, America-first, market fundamentalism), the silence is just deafening. The rhetoric being spouted about Cody's and People's Park is pure right wing dogma (who else but Christian Fundamentalists blame all of society's ills on "Permissive culture"?!?) Liberals and even some "leftists" are jumping on the Horowitz inspired bandwagon.

While it will no doubt win me no friends, I intend to break that silence and state, for the record, unabashedly, that Cody's is a casualty of a disease that affects not just Berkeley, but the whole of the world itself. That disease is not People's Park and those on the "left" who support it, but capitalism itself.

To be continued. . .

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by 2098430
So the Wobbly writes that "capitalism" is the eeeeeevil that is killing Cody's. Hardly. But then again, Peoples Park is not really the problem, but the CULTURE of Peoples Park IS a big part of the problem. For decades, Berkeley has hosted the losers of the world, and allowed them congregate along Telegraph where they have been free to bother everyone with impunity. Sorry, Mr Wobbly, but most of us have grown up and moved on. We no longer have any interest in being accosted by drunks, old hippies, churlish, overgrown high school dropouts who have nothing to do all day but panhandle us and call us filthy names when we ignore them. The issue with Cody's is that the company has two other locations which are doing fine and it can move its business out of Telegraph. The other stores like Moe's and UPB cannot...for now. Don't think Moe's won't end up on 4th St if the Avenue gets worse. The best thing that could happen now is for UC to announce they are building a couple of 15-story dorms on PP and be done with it. That would the best message Berkeley's taxpayers could here. Sorry, Mr Wobbly, but the sixties are dead, the hippies are tired and gray now, and most of us have moved on. Berkeley should, too.
by Steve Ongerth
Dear Not-thinking (or should I say, "non-tinker"?)

Rather than waste any time responding to your drivel, I invite you to read part two which blasts each of your stupid fallacies into dust: http://www.iww.org/en/node/2623
by Steve Ongerth
By your logic, Amoeba, Blondies, Rasputins, and Tower (all of which are now chains) should all have gone out of business. They haven't.

I happen to be 35 and work full-time and have so for several years now.

Do yourself a favor, know what the hell you're talking about before you spew forth your drivel.
by polls
U.S. Poll: Iraq Is More Unpopular Than Vietnam After Three Years
http://atlanticreview.org/archives/329-U.S.-Poll-Iraq-Is-More-Unpopular-Than-Vietnam-After-Three-Years.html

And that was while back. The 60s were way overrated. The youth culture then seemed so much more significant than now not because it was (although the draft in the early 70s did create a larger radical youth culture) but because those reporting the history were in their youth at the time and cant see the same culture today since they moved to the the suburbs (or hills). Conservatives were a larger percent of the population then than now.... but both conservatives and liberals who are middle aged want to believe in some mythical past even though it wasnt new and didnt disappear. You think the drug culture in the 1960s was crazy...compare it to SF in the 1860s
by Steve Ongerth
. . .and whether intended or not, it supports my argument, that thye capitalist class is using "the 60s" as a scapegoat for the damage caused by capitalism.

I am not trying to defend "the 60s". Although I enjoy the music and some of the artwork inspired by the 60s, and I believe in freedom of choice, I myself find hippie culture to be at best annoying and at worst escapist. While I defend People's Park, I am not especially drawn to it. That's as much a result of my not living in that neighborhood anymore as anything, though.
I posted "60s are over" but not the first comment.

One thing I really do wonder is that while you are mentioning People's Park as if what one sees there has to do with 1960s "hippie" culture, is this really true?

If you look at the main grassy areas area near just about any college campus it has more kids with dreads, playing drums and smoking pot than in People's Park. People's Park has more a down and out city feel but that subculture has and will always exist and isnt tied much to the 1960s.

During times of war when the media can scare people into conformity there are downturns in idealistic youth culture (like the early 1980s, 2000s and 1950s), but I dont think the 1960s really stands out. The culture was unique in its way but didnt just grow out of the Beats and Bohemians but was a continuation of a type of youth culture that has and will always exist.

The rightwing in the US tried to take the red scare of the 1950s (and now an idealied version the 1980s Reagan years) as some sort of norm rather than an exception. Part of what the 1950s were was the disappearance of some of the power of middle class youth culture due to demographic trends elated to the end of WWII (those who came back were now parents and the kids were too young to be rebeliious) while the 1980s was the time period when the middle class baby boomers settled down ad had kids creating an uptick in middle class conservatism.
by Chris
People's Park is a dumping ground and a major failure. While some see a spirit of days gone by in the Park, the reality is different. It is really a dumping gournd for buisnesses on telegraph to push problems. As long as nothing bad happens, and it is out of sight, things are all right. Sadly, this is not the case. If you are not homeless, your presence in the park is limited to brief visits during special events. Rarely can you just go and not feel like the city's social problems are dumped in the park. Certainly, most people don't think of it as a place they can call their 'local park'. Perhaps the biggest contributor to this failure is the City of Berkely for not having the political will to take action and not make it a dumping ground. Now with most of the commerece of the Ave available elsewhere and the buisnesses that once offered a unique feeling are on thinner ice, People Park should be looked at as something that needs serious attention is the Avenue is to be anything more than a passing stop on the way to some other part of Berk or North Oak.
by ?
"Certainly, most people don't think of it as a place they can call their 'local park'."

Where do you live?

Most neighborhood parks are probably "less safe" than People's Park.
I would bet that of the hundreds of parks it's size in the E Bay People' Park has had fewer shootings, fewer ODs and less muggings than most.

Sure People's Park isnt like a park one would expect in a purely residential middle class neighborhood (like N Berkeley and the Hills) and its also a bit different than parks in the Tenderloin, E Oakland or Richmond but its about one one would expect for any park in a reasonably sized city near a college campus. People's Park really is no different than similar parks near campuses like in SF, Madison Wisconsin, Boston, Portland, Santa Monica, etc.... Both the good and bad aspects of it are not specific to Berkeley but just what one gets in parks near the main hangout streets of college campuses in middle sized cities.
by Steve Ongerth
Chris:

You obviously didn't pay close attention to what I wrote in Part I; you ignored my comments to the non-thinker; and you certainly didn't read Part II.

You say: "Now with most of the commerece of the Ave available elsewhere and the buisnesses that once offered a unique feeling are on thinner ice"

Did you even read what I wrote?

I will say it again: The argument that "the uniqueness of Telegraph no longer exists" is a red herring. There are Amoeba Records, Blondies, and Rasputins in many other locations, and there have been for several years, now. Tower Records has been a chain for over three decades. To my knowledge, NONE OF THESE STORES ON TELEGRAPH ARE CLOSING OR ARE THREATENING TO CLOSE. The argument just doesn't wash, pal. Why do you and others keep insiting on making it?!?

This whole thing a a scam from top to bottom. Andy Ross is a slimy bastard and he is using People's Park as a distraction to fool people into overlooking his real motivation, and that's greed.

I'd hoped that locals were a little smarter than this. Apparently, they're not.

For all of the accusations of "communism!", "crazy leftism", and "hostility to business!" that get levelled at the Bay Area, and Berkeley in PARTICULAR, the lack of anti-capitalist analysis with regard to state and local economies in California is simply baffling!

Just what sort of "political will" are you talking about Chris? The will to run roughshod over the civil liberties of those who hang out on Telegraph Avenue? The will to give capitalists a free pass when faced with zoning laws and accountability to the public (not to mention the well being of the Planet), just because the howl about "burdensome regulations"? The will to destory unique neighborhoods by letting cookie-cutter big-box chains engage in predatory capitalism? What, Chris?!?



by Steve Ongerth
I know you didn't post the initial comments. I apologize for not making that clear. You ask a good question. Honestly, I don't know exactly how each person perceives People's Park. That's not as relevant to me as how it's being used by Andy Ross, Gene Barone, Chris Thompson, or how it's been used in the past by the likes of Debra J. Saunders, David Horowitz, Ronald Reagan, et. al.

However you slice it, People's Park is a symbol. For its detractors, it's a symbol of everything that's wrong with "the Berkeley left". Calls for its destruction are generally shorthand for "farting in the general direction" of the "Berkeley left". Both perceptions are vulgar and stupid.

Obviously, if People's Park didn't exist, it would be necessary for the Capitalist Class and the suckers on the right to invent one. It's a convenient scapegoat for the failings of capitalism. THAT is the point of my editorial.

I'm not some aging hippie waxing nostalgic about the Summer of Love. I am not and never have been in the inner circle of People's Park partisans (though some of my friends are or have been, and I would certainly stand in solidarity with them). Sometimes I even wonder if it's worth the effort to defend the Park. Certainly there are moochers who take advantage of it and give nothing to it in return (This includes homeless people and druggies as well as cops, and local capitalists).

People's Park has been a part of my life, whether I like it or not, but unlike some of these yahoos ready to bring down the guillotine upon its head, I happen to actually know what the hell I'm talking about.

I appreciate your comments, though. They are more intelligent than those who don't think.
by observer
is there actually a discussion going on here? amazing, i didn't know that happened anymore on indybay.

by yes.
It's amazing what sustained censorship can achieve.
by observer
yea, indybay has become a pretty silent place, almost as boring and stale as nessie's indymedia.
by .
Nessie is sort of quiet lately.

Many indymedias are more photo oriented than discourse focused.
by jessie cat
Yes, you are right, and I have been saying the same thing since I heard the "woes" of Cody's and the ensuing "crisis" of Telegraph. Capitalism is about technology, constantlly changing the built environment to suit the needs of business. Capitalism thrives on change, and Cody's moved to 4th Street and Montgomery Street to follow the market. I suspect business is quite good at those locations. Better than Telegraph, obviously.

I go to school at Berkeley, undergrad and now grad. When the Gap on Bancroft and Telegraph closed down I smirked. There is hope in the world, I thought. American Apparel sprung up across the street from the vacant Gap store. The market, again. Sweatshop-free clothes (or at least spin that claims as much) are popular, trendy, and they (apparently) sell. Maybe the Gap will catch on someday. There's a marketing campaign for you. But that's another story.

So why all the moaning and groaning about Telegraph? Have you been to Haight Street lately? That place is a living breathing paradox. It is a dump, and is retail heaven. It has gotten more and more yuppie as the years go by. Sometimes, on a Sunday, you may think it is Union Street! The street people don't seem to keep customers away there. Maybe Bates should meet with Newsom and ask what SF's strategy is!!! Oh, yeah, we already know that. Bus tickets.

God help us. They want to turn every last damn inch of space in the the Bay Area into a paved, polished promenade, with Main Street, U.S.A. style streetlights, a cop on every corner, and the smell of cinnabons wafting through the air. Churches of retail. Shop til you drop. Don't get mugged first. Bad for business.

Here's what the (real) left has to figure out: What to we want to create? And what do we want to save? Maybe we could all try a little harder with People's Park (myself included). Maybe we could try a little harder with the street people. There are lots of great organizations in Berkeley that help those folks out (Berkeley Food and Housing Project among myriad others). Maybe we can direct our time to such organizations.

Most Berkeley "liberals" want to buy their way to a better world. It's not going to happen. Unionized or not, Cody's was a capitalist enterprise. And it is going the way of all such endeavors. Street people aren't the problem. Capitalism is. Wanna save Cody's? Tell the owner to close his other two stores. Read some Marx. Bomb Amazon. But don't blame street people and hire more cops. That's called fascism.



by Steve Ongerth

Perhaps I should be clear what I mean by "capitalism". Capitalism is not the buying and selling of merchandise. Capitalism is predatory competition by businesses and merchants whose aim it is to dominate the market through their will to power. Capitalism is also the appropriation of the fruits of the labor of the producers by "owners" (sometimes directly, sometimes through the use of a managerial class). Capitalism is furthermore the ability by the owner to make unilateral decisions that are undemocratic and unaccountable to all individuals who regularly perform some sort of work in that organization. Capitalism is finally the division of labor bwteen owners, managers, and producers.

I hope that clarifies my position.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$55.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network