top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

National "Support the Troops Day"

by MFSO
Congress has recently passed a resolution that calls
for a national moment of silence on Sunday March 26th, and declaring this day
"National Support the Troops Day." The resolution in part says: "All people in
the United States should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon the
service and sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces both home and abroad."

Dear Military Families:

Many of you may know that Congress has recently passed a resolution that calls
for a national moment of silence on Sunday March 26th, and declaring this day
"National Support the Troops Day." The resolution in part says: "All people in
the United States should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon the
service and sacrifice of members of the Armed Forces both home and abroad."



As military families we understand better than anyone how important supporting
our troops is -- and we think that everyone in this country should be thinking
about supporting our troops every day (not once a year). But we are also
outraged that elected officials who continue to support and fund the war in Iraq
are pretending that they are supporting the troops by calling for a moment of
silence instead of doing what they need to do: end the war (including cutting
off funding except for what is needed to bring our troops home quickly and
safely), bring our troops home now and take care of them when they get here!



Below are excerpts from a letter that a Military Families Speak Out member wrote
to her elected officials about this National Support the Troops day/moment of
silence. We are hoping that all of you can find a way to use this opportunity to
communicate with your elected officials, and to write letters to the editor of
your newspaper, saying "A moment of silence is not enough. The best way to honor
the losses and sacrifices of our loved ones and our families is to end this war
and Bring Our Troops Home NOW!"



Please send us copies of any letters you write to either elected officials or to
the newpapers. Please let us know if it is ok to post them and how you would
like to be identified.



In peace and solidarity

Charley Richardson and Nancy Lessin

for MFSO

http://www.mfso.org





I am writing in reference to the resolution passed by the House and Senate last week
supporting a "National Moment of Silence", which asks for a moment of silence to
honor the sacrifices of our troops.



As a member of a military family whose son has made this sacrifice you seek to
honor, I can not help but point out to you that our troops and their families have
already experienced three long years of silence with no honor from our
representatives in Congress.



Most members of Congress have remained silent about the horror of the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal... When only rank and file soldiers were accused of crimes at Abu
Ghraib, and none of the commanders and Pentagon officials, including Rumsfeld, who
oversaw and authorized the torture were accused, you remained silent.



When our sons and daughters, and husbands and wives went without life-saving
clothing and equipment in Iraq, most remained silent. When vehicles were not
armor-plated against IED's you remained silent. When even simple things like
batteries for night vision goggles and radios for communication were not provided,
except by terrified parents and friends, you kept silent.



The list of chilling and heartless silences can seem endless to angry and deeply
disappointed military families. There was no outraged response from Congress when
the commander-in-chief taunted and dared insurgents to "bring em on" to kill our
soldiers.... No concern when the Bush administration impugns military families'
patriotism when they dare to bring up uncomfortable basic facts about this war, no
concern that thousand upon thousand of innocent Iraqis have been killed, that
contractors continue to reap fortunes on the backs of the American people. Congress
remains almost completely silent regarding the destruction of Iraq, the lack after
three years of basic water and electricity, lack of oil for Iraqis' cars, no sewage,
few jobs.



May I make some suggestions for authentic ways of honoring the service of my
soldier-son? Instead of a moment of silence designed to make Congress feel better,
how about each and every member of Congress making regular visits to the wounded
soldiers you sent to war? How about assigning a specific staff member to help
soldiers in their districts with VA benefits and to monitor how they are doing with
employment opportunities when they get home? How about asking the soldiers who have
been to Iraq for their assessments of what we should be doing to get out, instead of
blindly following the arrogant and incompetent draft-avoiders who sent them there?



And finally, how about honoring our troops by taking positions and voting, not based
on your re-election chances, but based on conscience and decency and honor, those
values our thousands of troops have consistently displayed for three years and which
they see all too rarely from the Congress who sent them to Iraq.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Long live the resistance
Support the tropps-what crap.
by Ms. Mutiny
As long as any person continues to function as a "troop" of the United States Armed Forces, they should not be supported. They should be supported when they resist carrying out such functions, such as by desertion, sabotage or mutiny.

The U.S. soldier who most deserves our support is Army Sgt. Hasan Akbar, who is sitting on death row in Leavenworth for his preemptive strike against some tents full of high-ranking officers in Kuwait while those officers were waiting to join the just-begun U.S. invasion of Iraq in March of 2003. He killed two of them (including an Air Force Major) and put about ten more out of commision, at least for a while, perhaps thus saving an undetermined number of Iraqi lives.
by yep and nope
The Vietnamese wore the US down militarilly to the point where a victory was clearly impossible (since as with Iraq even in the areas controlled by the US opposition to the US being there was high). This made an eventual US withdrawl inevitable (no matter what military morale was like or even US public opinion was like Vietnam wasnt of enough strategic importance to US leaders to risk use of nukes or any more force due to fallout in other parts of the world). Low morale in the military may have helped to bring about a US withdrawl but that was both a result of the US losses and a result of the way the draft was carried out. Fragging essentially amounts to comitting suicide and taking others out with you so it really only can be expected in cases where people think they have a high likelyhood of dying anyways and where there is a clear difference as to why people are fighting based off position in the military hierarchy (a drafted troops vs a nondrafted officer). In the case of Iraq, one sees more suicide than fragging since the issue is more one of troops not knowing what they are fighting for and no clear end point than a real high number of US casualties. With disillusionment about the war occuring at all levels in the military hierarchy one really cant expect many cases of fragging since the blame for the war is with the civilian leadership in Washington not people's immediate superiors.
by main ingredient
When soldiers wont fight, war is impossible.
by TW
frag___em.jpg
Damn straight! But go for the Generals this time!
by Aaron Aarons
There were probably hundreds of incidents of fragging that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of officers and NCO's. Very few soldiers were prosecuted for these actions, and even fewer were convicted.

By "discouraging" officers from sending their men out on combat missions, fragging saved the lives of perhaps thousands of ordinary soldiers and tens of thousands of Vietnamese. From a "cost/benefit" point of view, it was rather economical.

In addition to the new film, "Sir! No Sir!", folks should check out the new edition of "Soldiers in Revolt" by David Cortright.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$180.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network