Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
A Report from the World Social Forum
The World Social Forum (WSF) is under way in Caracas Venezuela. This is an article from an Indymedia journalist who is at the forum. This article includes interviews with several participants, some analysis about the purpose and future of the WSF, and some pictures.
Another World is Possible
A Report from the World Social Forum
By Mike Rhodes
The sixth World Social Forum (WSF) is in full gear in Caracas Venezuela. With dozens of simultaneous events taking place all over town, most participants are limited to attending two or three activities a day.
The purpose of the WSF is to bring together activists from around the world under the theme that Another World is Possible. Although final numbers are not yet available it is expected that there are about 100,000 delegates at this years events.
Participants arriving by plane landed at the Caracas Airport, where many had a long wait to get into town. The regular road to the city was out and busloads of participants were sent on a long and winding detour over a mountain.
The WSF officially started on Tuesday, January 24 with a 60,000 person march through town. See the IMC story and photos about the march at: http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/01/1797969.php
The next day scheduled meetings, speeches, forums, and other events began. Many participants at this years WSF have complained of poorly organized events that have been cancelled without notice, the large distances between activities, and the lack of communications about events that happen with little or no notice. There is also a “Tower of Babel” phenomena with dozens of languages spoken and very few of the events being translated. Spanish is the primary language in use.
In spite of these criticisms the mood at the WSF is upbeat and optimistic. Paul LouLou Chery, Secretary General of the Confederation of Haitian Workers said the WSF was a great opportunity to meet others. Chery said “we are here to discuss our successes and failures...we are looking for a new path.” Chery said he was hopeful because so many people had come together to share their experiences and learn from each other. He concluded, “the decision to have this event in Venezuela was appropriate because this country is an inspiration to the world.” He was talking about President Hugo Chavez’s independent politics that are using Venezuela’s resources to benefit the people of this country and are sometimes confrontational with the United States.
Maria De La Villanueva, a community radio journalist from Venezuela, had another perspective on the WSF. Villanueva said “there are two views about the purpose of the WSF. The WSF brings together two different groups. It brings together grassroots activists from popular organizations around the world and workers with Non Governmental Organizations (NGO’s).” According to Villanueva these two groups have two significantly different perspectives. She said “the participants from the NGO’s largely look at how they can ‘help’ the poor. The grassroots activists are working for structural economic and social change” that will bring about a more just world. The WSF provides an opportunity for these groups to come together and discuss the issues surrounding these strategies for social change.
Villanueva says there is a discussion within the organizing body of the WSF to analyze the outcome of the events discussions. One view is that it is enough to bring everyone together for five days of discussions. Whatever comes out of those discussions and the networking that takes place during those days is the purpose of the WSF. The alternative to this approach is to have proposals and a process that would develop a political strategy.
At the workshops, participants are sharing an enormous amount of information. At a workshop held on Thursday (January 26) looking at the social movements in Latin America, participants heard first hand accounts from numerous countries. One panel member from Bolivia spoke about the recent electoral victory of Evo Morales. He described the building of the popular movement that included three sectors - unionized agricultural workers, the indigenous movement, and organizations working to stop privatization. Evo Morales was dependent on the grassroots movement for his election and will be held accountable to carry out their demands. This is in stark contrast to the situation in Venezuela where there is not a strong popular movement. While the left holds state power in Venezuela, they are in a precarious position to maintain and advance the revolution without a popular movement. That is the challenge in Venezuela - to build a popular movement that will defend the advances being made and hold elected leaders accountable.
There were also speakers at this workshop from Mexico, Ecuador, and Colombia. The speaker from Mexico was optimistic that the July 6, 2006 elections in that country will see a progressive candidate elected president. He said that the winds of change from South America will blow North to Mexico this year. With left, indigenous, or socialist leaders elected in Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Venezuela, Brazil, and Argentina there is a great deal of enthusiasm and hopefulness about this regions ability to determine its own destiny.
At an earlier workshop, held on Wednesday, Grace Loumo, executive director of Aware-Uganda spoke about women’s rights. Loumo said “women are still fighting for the right to own property in Uganda.” She said “women are themselves treated like property by their husbands. We do not even have the legal right to own an animal.” Conference participants pointed out that the new Venezuela constitution gives women many new rights including valuing the work they do within their homes. Loumo was excited to have the opportunity to meet with women from throughout the world to discuss strategy and compare notes.
The new Venezuela constitution, adopted in 1999, says: The State guarantees equality and equity between men and women in the exercise of their right to work. The State recognizes work in the home as an economic activity that creates added value and produces social welfare and wealth. Housewives are entitled to social security.
At a workshop about developing a progressive world television network featuring a presentation by Gore Vidal, hundreds of participants waited for over an hour before someone took the microphone. The announcement was made that their was no sign of Vidal or the workshop organizers and that we should make the best use of the time. The speaker offered the microphone to whoever had something to say. Speakers immediately lined up and a translator (English/Spanish) was found. The first speaker, Anne Hess from Norway, implored the audience to think of the world as they would their home. Anne said “everyone needs enough to eat, they need a roof over their heads, and medicine when they are sick.” This simple story received loud applause from the audience.
In an attempt to clarify the purpose of the events at the WSF, the organizers issued the following statement:
The co-organized activities aim to give visibility to the methods of presenting the debate to the treatment of the themes that have arisen from the historical process of political accumulation of the World Social Forum. These themes are considered to be relevant for the consolidation of campaigns promoting some of the issues addressed in the co-organized activities. The co-organized activities should guarantee a plurality of political perspectives and give visibility to the positive dimensions in relation to the debate themes in question.
Considering that the WSF will be happening in Venezuela for the first time, it is important that the co-organized activities contain a dialog dimension between the WSF process and the Venezuelan organizations, facilitating the diffusion of issues and experiences addressed along the history of the Forum.
The co-organized activities should also contribute to get the Forum in Caracas closer to its polycentric dimension. Some of the panels will function as “windows” for the Forums in Bamako (Mali) and Karchi (Pakistan), as colleagues from Asia, Africa, and Europe participate as speakers on panels in Caracas. The composition of the panels must guarantee gender and regional balance and an equitable representation of networks and campaigns. As well, panels must be balanced between intellectuals and other people that may have important contributions on the political reflections and actions in the international movement of resistance to neoliberalism.
The World Social Forum, as a space for debate, articulation, interchange and convergence, intends to construct a critical vision and to develop alternatives. These alternatives are expressed in the development and practices of a popular movement that challenges neoliberal policies through mobilization, both from inside and outside the state apparatus (End of statement).
Additional reports and photos from this week’s events will be posted to this Indymedia site. For more information about the World Social Forum, see http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br
###
Additional Note:
There will be a National Solidarity Conference on Venezuela March 4-6 in Washington DC. For more information call 202 544-9355 or email nicanet [at] afgj.org
A Report from the World Social Forum
By Mike Rhodes
The sixth World Social Forum (WSF) is in full gear in Caracas Venezuela. With dozens of simultaneous events taking place all over town, most participants are limited to attending two or three activities a day.
The purpose of the WSF is to bring together activists from around the world under the theme that Another World is Possible. Although final numbers are not yet available it is expected that there are about 100,000 delegates at this years events.
Participants arriving by plane landed at the Caracas Airport, where many had a long wait to get into town. The regular road to the city was out and busloads of participants were sent on a long and winding detour over a mountain.
The WSF officially started on Tuesday, January 24 with a 60,000 person march through town. See the IMC story and photos about the march at: http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/01/1797969.php
The next day scheduled meetings, speeches, forums, and other events began. Many participants at this years WSF have complained of poorly organized events that have been cancelled without notice, the large distances between activities, and the lack of communications about events that happen with little or no notice. There is also a “Tower of Babel” phenomena with dozens of languages spoken and very few of the events being translated. Spanish is the primary language in use.
In spite of these criticisms the mood at the WSF is upbeat and optimistic. Paul LouLou Chery, Secretary General of the Confederation of Haitian Workers said the WSF was a great opportunity to meet others. Chery said “we are here to discuss our successes and failures...we are looking for a new path.” Chery said he was hopeful because so many people had come together to share their experiences and learn from each other. He concluded, “the decision to have this event in Venezuela was appropriate because this country is an inspiration to the world.” He was talking about President Hugo Chavez’s independent politics that are using Venezuela’s resources to benefit the people of this country and are sometimes confrontational with the United States.
Maria De La Villanueva, a community radio journalist from Venezuela, had another perspective on the WSF. Villanueva said “there are two views about the purpose of the WSF. The WSF brings together two different groups. It brings together grassroots activists from popular organizations around the world and workers with Non Governmental Organizations (NGO’s).” According to Villanueva these two groups have two significantly different perspectives. She said “the participants from the NGO’s largely look at how they can ‘help’ the poor. The grassroots activists are working for structural economic and social change” that will bring about a more just world. The WSF provides an opportunity for these groups to come together and discuss the issues surrounding these strategies for social change.
Villanueva says there is a discussion within the organizing body of the WSF to analyze the outcome of the events discussions. One view is that it is enough to bring everyone together for five days of discussions. Whatever comes out of those discussions and the networking that takes place during those days is the purpose of the WSF. The alternative to this approach is to have proposals and a process that would develop a political strategy.
At the workshops, participants are sharing an enormous amount of information. At a workshop held on Thursday (January 26) looking at the social movements in Latin America, participants heard first hand accounts from numerous countries. One panel member from Bolivia spoke about the recent electoral victory of Evo Morales. He described the building of the popular movement that included three sectors - unionized agricultural workers, the indigenous movement, and organizations working to stop privatization. Evo Morales was dependent on the grassroots movement for his election and will be held accountable to carry out their demands. This is in stark contrast to the situation in Venezuela where there is not a strong popular movement. While the left holds state power in Venezuela, they are in a precarious position to maintain and advance the revolution without a popular movement. That is the challenge in Venezuela - to build a popular movement that will defend the advances being made and hold elected leaders accountable.
There were also speakers at this workshop from Mexico, Ecuador, and Colombia. The speaker from Mexico was optimistic that the July 6, 2006 elections in that country will see a progressive candidate elected president. He said that the winds of change from South America will blow North to Mexico this year. With left, indigenous, or socialist leaders elected in Chile, Bolivia, Uruguay, Venezuela, Brazil, and Argentina there is a great deal of enthusiasm and hopefulness about this regions ability to determine its own destiny.
At an earlier workshop, held on Wednesday, Grace Loumo, executive director of Aware-Uganda spoke about women’s rights. Loumo said “women are still fighting for the right to own property in Uganda.” She said “women are themselves treated like property by their husbands. We do not even have the legal right to own an animal.” Conference participants pointed out that the new Venezuela constitution gives women many new rights including valuing the work they do within their homes. Loumo was excited to have the opportunity to meet with women from throughout the world to discuss strategy and compare notes.
The new Venezuela constitution, adopted in 1999, says: The State guarantees equality and equity between men and women in the exercise of their right to work. The State recognizes work in the home as an economic activity that creates added value and produces social welfare and wealth. Housewives are entitled to social security.
At a workshop about developing a progressive world television network featuring a presentation by Gore Vidal, hundreds of participants waited for over an hour before someone took the microphone. The announcement was made that their was no sign of Vidal or the workshop organizers and that we should make the best use of the time. The speaker offered the microphone to whoever had something to say. Speakers immediately lined up and a translator (English/Spanish) was found. The first speaker, Anne Hess from Norway, implored the audience to think of the world as they would their home. Anne said “everyone needs enough to eat, they need a roof over their heads, and medicine when they are sick.” This simple story received loud applause from the audience.
In an attempt to clarify the purpose of the events at the WSF, the organizers issued the following statement:
The co-organized activities aim to give visibility to the methods of presenting the debate to the treatment of the themes that have arisen from the historical process of political accumulation of the World Social Forum. These themes are considered to be relevant for the consolidation of campaigns promoting some of the issues addressed in the co-organized activities. The co-organized activities should guarantee a plurality of political perspectives and give visibility to the positive dimensions in relation to the debate themes in question.
Considering that the WSF will be happening in Venezuela for the first time, it is important that the co-organized activities contain a dialog dimension between the WSF process and the Venezuelan organizations, facilitating the diffusion of issues and experiences addressed along the history of the Forum.
The co-organized activities should also contribute to get the Forum in Caracas closer to its polycentric dimension. Some of the panels will function as “windows” for the Forums in Bamako (Mali) and Karchi (Pakistan), as colleagues from Asia, Africa, and Europe participate as speakers on panels in Caracas. The composition of the panels must guarantee gender and regional balance and an equitable representation of networks and campaigns. As well, panels must be balanced between intellectuals and other people that may have important contributions on the political reflections and actions in the international movement of resistance to neoliberalism.
The World Social Forum, as a space for debate, articulation, interchange and convergence, intends to construct a critical vision and to develop alternatives. These alternatives are expressed in the development and practices of a popular movement that challenges neoliberal policies through mobilization, both from inside and outside the state apparatus (End of statement).
Additional reports and photos from this week’s events will be posted to this Indymedia site. For more information about the World Social Forum, see http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br
###
Additional Note:
There will be a National Solidarity Conference on Venezuela March 4-6 in Washington DC. For more information call 202 544-9355 or email nicanet [at] afgj.org
For more information:
http://www.fresnoalliance.com/home
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
While funded by some of the most notorious agencies of US imperialism, the World Social Forums have not been so welcoming to those seen as potentially threatening the interests of imperialism. The statement in the WSF Charter of Principles that “neither party representatives nor military organizations shall participate in the Forum” has been used to exclude the Zapatistas as well as the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia). Even the Madres de Plaza de Mayo, an organisation of mothers of leftists who were “disappeared” during the 1976-1983 Argentinian military dictatorship, was excluded from the 2002 WSF. On the other hand, a warm welcome has been extended to various heads of capitalist governments—who preside over “special bodies of armed men” more commonly known as the capitalist state.
An insightful article titled “The Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum” in Aspects of India’s Economy (September 2003) by Rajani X Desai captured the purpose and nature of the Social Forums:
“While several political forces fighting for a change of the system [have] been excluded from the WSF meets, droves of political leaders of the imperialist countries have been attending. Not only does the WSF as a body receive funds from agencies which are tied to imperialist interests and operations, but innumerable bodies participating in the WSF too are dependent on such agencies. The implications of this can be seen from the history of one such agency, Ford Foundation, which has closely collaborated with the US Central Intelligence Agency internationally, and in India has helped to shape the government’s policies in favour of American interests.”
from http://www.icl-fi.org/english/wh/191/socialforum.html
and
Venezuela: Populist Nationalism vs. Proletarian Revolution
In contrast, the vast majority of self-described socialists and revolutionaries act as the “leftist” marketing department of Chávez’s “Bolivarian Revolution.” Foremost among these is Ted Grant’s British-based International Marxist Tendency (IMT), now led by Alan Woods, author of a paean titled The Venezuelan Revolution—A Marxist Perspective (2005). While other opportunists offer the occasional criticism of Chávez, Woods and his outfit actually boast of being “Trotskyist” advisers to the left-talking caudillo. In foisting Chávez off as a champion of the poor and oppressed, the IMT et al. help set workers up for slaughter. Tying the working class and its organizations to any bourgeois ruler only serves to impede independent working-class struggle. In opposition to groups like the IMT, Marxists seek to prepare the Venezuelan working class to effectively combat the murderous forces of bourgeois reaction, whether led by Chávez or his bourgeois opponents.
from http://www.icl-fi.org/english/wv/860/venezuela.html
An insightful article titled “The Economics and Politics of the World Social Forum” in Aspects of India’s Economy (September 2003) by Rajani X Desai captured the purpose and nature of the Social Forums:
“While several political forces fighting for a change of the system [have] been excluded from the WSF meets, droves of political leaders of the imperialist countries have been attending. Not only does the WSF as a body receive funds from agencies which are tied to imperialist interests and operations, but innumerable bodies participating in the WSF too are dependent on such agencies. The implications of this can be seen from the history of one such agency, Ford Foundation, which has closely collaborated with the US Central Intelligence Agency internationally, and in India has helped to shape the government’s policies in favour of American interests.”
from http://www.icl-fi.org/english/wh/191/socialforum.html
and
Venezuela: Populist Nationalism vs. Proletarian Revolution
In contrast, the vast majority of self-described socialists and revolutionaries act as the “leftist” marketing department of Chávez’s “Bolivarian Revolution.” Foremost among these is Ted Grant’s British-based International Marxist Tendency (IMT), now led by Alan Woods, author of a paean titled The Venezuelan Revolution—A Marxist Perspective (2005). While other opportunists offer the occasional criticism of Chávez, Woods and his outfit actually boast of being “Trotskyist” advisers to the left-talking caudillo. In foisting Chávez off as a champion of the poor and oppressed, the IMT et al. help set workers up for slaughter. Tying the working class and its organizations to any bourgeois ruler only serves to impede independent working-class struggle. In opposition to groups like the IMT, Marxists seek to prepare the Venezuelan working class to effectively combat the murderous forces of bourgeois reaction, whether led by Chávez or his bourgeois opponents.
from http://www.icl-fi.org/english/wv/860/venezuela.html
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$75.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network