top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

American Library Association leader: “This government stands completely exposed”

by wsws (reposted)
Interview with American Library Association leader: “This government stands completely exposed”
By Sandy English
12 October 2005
In July of this year, the governing council of the American Library Association passed a resolution calling for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Although there is widespread opposition to the war among cultural workers and academics in the Untied States, the ALA is one of the first professional organizations to publicly oppose the Iraq war.

In the past, the ALA has defended authors’ and readers’ rights to intellectual freedom. In 1988 it opposed the FBI’s Library Awareness program through which the Bureau attempted to coerce librarians into turning over lists of borrowers of material it deemed a threat to national security. The ALA has recently opposed section 215 of the Patriot Act, which criminalizes the free exchange of information.

Alfred Kagan is a member of the ALA’s Social Responsibility Roundtable and its representative to the ALA’s governing council. He is a bibliographer in the Africana Library in the Center for African Studies at the University of Illinois library at Urbana-Champaign, one of the largest collections of materials on Africa in the Unites States. He recently spoke to the World Socialist Web Site about the ALA’s antiwar resolution.

WSWS: Could you tell us about the history of the resolution itself?

Kagan: This is the second time we tried. It was proposed by our roundtable, which has been active since the 1960s. It seeks to promote a progressive direction in the ALA and there couldn’t be a more important issue than the Iraq war. We tried to introduce a resolution last year but didn’t get very far, although there was a fair amount of support. This year we won by a margin that surprised us.

WSWS: Why do you think that was?

Kagan: Partly because it has become clear that libraries are suffering because of budget cuts for the war. A lot of libraries around the country are facing closure, having their hours limited and staffs cut. There was an attempt to close the whole library system in Solinas, California. They kept them open because we made such a fuss. Public university libraries are feeling this as well.

Part of it is also that people have really woken up. I noticed that the front page of the New York Times is reporting that Bush has the lowest popularity ratings ever. There is unrest in the military. Lots of military families have maimed and dead. That goes through society. Something has to happen. The ALA is following public opinion. A majority of Americans don’t want this.

WSWS: What do you feel this war is about?

Kagan: It’s the neoconservative idea of taking over the Middle East for its natural resources.

WSWS: What do you know about the situation with Iraqi libraries?

Kagan: There was a lot of destruction and the military couldn’t have cared less. There is evidence of books being piled up and burnt. It was quite a big to-do in the ALA. We passed a resolution on artifacts and cultural resources.

Here you have an ancient civilization with an important intellectual history for the whole world. Iraq was a middle-income nation, fairly developed. That is just not good for American imperialism. They want to mold Iraq into another neo-colony. The want to change its culture in a way that is favorable for American culture.

WSWS: Could you tell us about the history of the ALA’s defense of civil liberties?

Kagan: One issue that is held dear to all librarians is the freedom to read. This goes through every unit of the ALA. It’s on issues of freedom of thought where the ALA has been the strongest. When the FBI was going around to libraries in the 1980s to see what people were reading, we felt that we had to do something.

WSWS: The ALA has opposed section 215 of the Patriot Act. How do you see the Patriot Act?

Kagan: Most of us see it as one more aspect of the war policy, as another way to control the population with fear. Let’s just say that the more people think, the less likely they will follow like sheep. Mass media is in the hands of a few big corporations who give carte blanche to the government.

Read More
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/oct2005/ala-o12.shtml
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Steve-portrait of a right-wing coward
Irrelevant as usual. Let us know when you obtain the intestinal fortitude to engage in adult-style discussion/debate/dialogue around issues instead of cowardly hit and run tactics where you simply spew AM nut radio snippets that you can't support.
Bye. You'll continue to be deleted and laughed at for the fraud that you are.
by Miguel
You neocon sheeps help sink USA economically, socially and morally, and all of you think you´ll be one of the few at the mast and water won´t touch you....
I live in Argentina, and when the things you americans are slowly about to experience happened to us, it happened to ALL OF US...except for very few elite families.
"Those who exchange liberty for safety, deserve neither"... concentration camps, thought persecution, meaningless wars (Malvinas-Falklands Islands), economic meltdown, famine...(yes, Argentina has 35 million habitants, produces food for 300 million people and children die every day for hunger..), 30.000 dissappeared between 1976-1983..
I care a lot about freedom of speech, you know? because freedom of speech helps ensure all the other freedoms.
I´m expecting your "spic-argie-sudaca" trash answer putting down the value of mi reply to your comment, but i don´t care, it´s now out there (so far)...
Think about latin america´s dictatorships in the 70´s as lab tests for america´s dictatorship to come.. if people stands still and does nothing it´ll most certainly happen.
by more Americans need to hear this
As people go around this site, this grotesque war-pig who calls himself "Steve" is the exception not the rule. I wish the same could be said of Americans as a whole

I for one am extremely interested in what you have to say Miguel and would love to see you say more. Were you alive during the dark time under Videla, Galtieri, Massera, and the other US-supported monsters? I would love to see your stories about this

You should see this page Miguel:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB73/

I salute you and all Argentinians on recovering the TRUE spirit of democracy, even after such a horrible effort to purge it forever. Americans should long to be so great
by Miguel
Thank you very much.
Maybe i woke up today on some special kind of mood that made me write a reply to "Steve", because i don´t usually do this.
I frequently visit alternative news sites and try to educate myself, because the things happening in the world today since 9/11, or at least out in the open since then, everybody must be aware of, specially americans.
Millions of people alive today around the world, and millions more through history suffered and are suffering tyranny, and the sight of that coming onto one of the beacons of freedom that is (or used to be) the USA is very sad and frightening. PATRIOT ACT is the formal institution of that... if there was ever the need of laws ruling tyranny...What a joke, just because tyranny is written as law, people should abide by that and the people working for the system should enforce that??..Don´t you see it goes against your bill of rights and it´s unconstitutional?? That is the first thing americans should do, get your liberties back..

Personally, i was a child in the 70's and 80's and didn´t got hurt by, and wasn´t very of what dictatorship means. But my father had a cousin who got abducted by the military at that time, was "disappeared" for a couple of months, and reappeared by miracle. He just was friends with a so-called "insurgent", or maybe his phone number was in the "insurgent"´s phone book, i don´t remember now..(i regret to see the term "insurgent" revived in the media today..). He never talked about what happened to him there, or at least not to me, maybe because i was a kid.
I also have a close friend who is adopted, and he always had doubts about the circumstances of his adoption in the late 70´s...His adoptive father died years ago and his adoptive mother wouldn´t tell him how they adopted him, and would change the subject everytime he made a question. Only recently he found out that his parents paid 10,000 dollars for him and that his real parents were probably killed by the secret police.
If you want to learn about that era, there are lots of books about it. I recommend "Argentinos" (Vol 1 and 2. The 2 deals from 1930 to 2001) by Jorge Lanata. I don´t know if there´s an english version. Those books tell the story of Argentina. To know more about the specific 1976-1983 era, read "Nunca Más" ("Never again") a book from the "Comision Nacional de Desaparición de Personas" (national commission about persons disappearance).
Thanks for the link. I have something of a pesimistic attitude about those disclosures, though, like people today governing USA try to show that "that sort of thing´d happen outside america and would never happen there", or maybe they try do desentitize the people about that, like the media now, opening debates about whether torture is acceptable on some circunstancies or not...
Anyway, i´m very happy to se that there´re americans that are not going to take it and don´t believe anything the media tries to push down their throats..
Steve may be the exception, not the rule. But thought like that IS ruling america and that has to change soon before it´s too late. You americans have the vote, not we..
by grateful
Miguel: "i regret to see the term "insurgent" revived in the media today"

Yeah, I know. It's a classic Orwellian slur. Most of the people who've ever been called "insurgents" have just been ordinary citizens with enough awareness and courage to protect their communities from a government that's obviously criminally insane. "Guerrillas" is another such slur. The word sounds an awful lot like 'gorillas,' i.e. sub-human primates, does it not? William Randolph Hearst -- the original Orwellian word-twister -- came up with this one. Real tricky guy that Hearst. "Terrorist" is merely the latest and most dehumanizing of these Jedi word tricks.

So maybe we should just call these people what they really are: revolutionaries, insurrectos, resistance fighters

nah, too sympatico
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$180.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network