top
South Bay
South Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

South Bay labor starts special election campaign

by PWW (reposted)
At least one northern California labor council has already started its special election campaign activity. On July 30, precinct walkers gathered at the South Bay Labor Council’s San Jose headquarters before fanning out to talk with union families about what’s at stake in the Nov. 8 special election called by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Precinct walking continues on weekends, and phone banking started Aug. 1.
“One reason we are starting early is that many activists are excited about getting out and starting to talk with people now,” SBLC Political Director Philip Bump said in a telephone interview. “The issues on the ballot are not ones that real people think of as reforms — real issues such as health care,” Bump said. “We are also emphasizing how unnecessary this election is, with its $50 million-plus cost, and people generally understand this.”

He highlighted two measures the labor movement considers especially harmful — Prop. 75, to force public workers’ unions to get written permission yearly from each member for their dues to be used for political activity, and Prop. 76, to let the governor cut the budget if spending exceeds revenue.

While Schwarzenegger has not yet publicly endorsed Prop. 75, his backers put it on the ballot. Bump pointed out that nurses, firefighters and teachers have “hounded” Schwarzenegger to protest the barrier the measure would pose to their political participation. He said the governor and his allies have met with “absolutely no success” in their efforts to create a phenomenon of anger against teachers and other public workers.

“We’re also very concerned about Prop. 76,” Bump said. “The governor has already reneged on his promise to fully fund education. Prop. 76 would result in unilateral cuts to both education and health.”

The 5-month-old STOP coalition — Standing Together to Protect our Families — is bringing community and labor forces together, he said.

In other news:

• Prop. 80, to reregulate the state’s electricity market, was restored to the ballot after its labor and community backers won their appeal.

• Schwarzenegger will return a $50,000 contribution from a partner in a tribal casino project, The Associated Press reported Aug. 4. The AP had questioned the donation because during the 2003 recall campaign, the governor promised not to accept campaign donations from groups negotiating directly with his office, including Indian tribal gaming interests.

• The nonpartisan California legislative counsel ruled Aug. 2 that Schwarzenegger can cancel the special election any time before voting begins. Assemblyman John Klehs said he will introduce legislation urging the governor to do just that.

• The labor-community Alliance for a Better California (ABC) said it is sponsoring an initiative for the June 2006 ballot that would require any corporation seeking to donate or spend money on political campaigns to list for its shareholders all political donations and spending for the previous year. New political budgets would require majority shareholder approval. Signature gathering is expected to start next month.
mbechtel [at] pww.org

http://pww.org/article/articleview/7507/1/281/
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by me
Imagine that! Having to actually get PERMISSION to spend someone's money. The horror! Your problem is you know damn well that at least half of them won't give permission and the Democrats will loose hundreds of millions of dollars in It's about goddam time.
by to "me"--get an education
How about we'll vote for this garbage prop. when the corporations have to get permission from their shareholders to spend their money politically?????? See, corporations out spend the unions about 20 to 1--this is another way to futher marginalize the voice of the average guy...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$180.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network