A Communique From the Organizers of the J25 Anti-War March
<b>Meet 7pm . Saturday . June 25</b><br>
Lytton Plaza in downtown Palo Alto<br>
University Ave. at Emerson<br>
<em>2 Blocks from Palo Alto Caltrain</em>
A Communique From the Organizers of the J25 Anti-War March www.anarchistaction.org Map Caltrain
On June 25th hundreds if not thousands of people will take to the streets of downtown Palo Alto to give voice to their collective outrage at the US occupation of Iraq. We will march against imperialist war, invasion, and occupation; against Bush and his corporate interests; against empire and against the systemic war machine. This is the new face of the anti-war movement. After a strong peak at the beginning of the invasion of Iraq and a two year ebb, the movement is again building momentum. But the movement is also growing louder, angrier, and more radical. As the occupation drags on with more and more casualties each day, popular outrage is growing, and with it popular support for the movement through which it is expressed. Emboldened, the movement is charting new territory; testing new tactics, abandoning its restrictive authoritarian leadership, and discovering the new directions in which it can grow.
All indications suggest that the movement now poses a substantial threat to those waging this war. Police from six different departments assemble a massive force to repress the upcoming demonstration. Undercover officers attempt to infiltrate a political group suspected solely of organizing a protest, and suspected organizers are followed, harassed, interrogated, and threatened. The corporate media - who hold a vested interest in the current system, war, empire, and all - print misinformation, distortions, and deliberate police misrepresentations. Despite these best efforts of those entrusted with protecting the system responsible for this war, an immense inertia is building behind this week's march, behind this movement.
There is a clear pattern of deliberate misrepresentation which can be traced throughout the six articles which have appeared in the local corporate media in the past week. The demonstration has been portrayed as a "second show of force" by "self-styled anarchists" "plotting to return to Palo Alto" and "expected to cause chaos and property damage." When applied to the anti-war protest planned for this Saturday, the image manufactured by the media is absurd. However, viewed in its appropriate social context, this distortion is perfectly understandable; the corporate media has its own interests which are directly contradictory to those of the anti-war movement, and of revolutionary anarchism in specific. Any movement which seeks to end war and empire must also oppose the corporate interests which creates them, including the corporate media. Beyond this, the media have received the vast majority of their information from the Palo Alto Police Department.
The Police Department has also consistently provided deliberate misinformation to the public, media, and city council as to the nature, scale, and organization of the protest. Police chief Lynne Johnson has repeatedly insisted, "It's our information that they are coming back to Palo Alto in far greater numbers to inflict more economic damage and incite confrontations with police." It is difficult to understand how we may be "coming back"; despite her hilariously misinformed assertion that "most" of the participants in the May 20th demonstration were from "outside the Bay Area", we all reside here and have never left. In fact a total of one affinity group (3-8 protesters) from outside of the Bay Area participated; perhaps this is deliberate misinformation, perhaps Lynne Johnson and her undercover detectives are complete idiots. Both appear to be true.
Either scenario would similarly account for her insistence that their "other intelligence" indicates that "800 to 1,000 anarchists" are "plotting" to attend the demonstration. While the protest's organizers would certainly be overjoyed by such a radical turnout, a much smaller number of "self-proclaimed anarchists" are likely to attend. The vast majority of the participants in Saturday's demonstration will hail from Palo Alto and the Mid-Peninsula, and the majority will not identify as anarchists. A more likely and historically accurate explanation for Johnson's "other intelligence" would be as follows: The number of police Johnson would like to occupy downtown streets on Saturday, 160-200, multiplied by five "expected anarchists", leaving a politically acceptable ratio of one officer per five anarchists and an impossibly inflated total 800-1,000 anarchists. We can always hope...
Apparently Johnson's omnipotent "other intelligence" also read the demonstration's call to action on the Anarchist Action website; she rightly states that protesters are planning to "inflict more economic damage." Unfortunately for her intelligence and reputation, "inflicting economic damage" can mean anything from a boycott to a civil suit, and the protest's organizers themselves have no plans to break corporate windows or engage in any other similar activities which seem to get her so excited. So now Police Chief Lynne Johnson has used our advocacy of legal activities which may hurt a corporation's ability to profit off of mass murder to send at least a half-dozen of her undercover officers to attempt to infiltrate Anarchist Action - Palo Alto, two of which she publicly admitted. As she said, "The threshold is when public safety is jeopardized." Apparently Johnson's notion of "public safety" is the economic prosperity of corporations whose practices the vast majority of Palo Alto's residents find abhorrible. Perhaps she should ask Albert Hopkins or any of the dozens of protesters injured by her officers on May 20th for a lesson on "public safety".
If our opposition to corporations who pay to elect and lobby politicians who in turn wage wars to earn them billions of dollars in subsidies wasn't enough, Johnson insists that organizers are planning to "incite confrontations with police." This is coming from the Chief of Police is overseeing the assembly of a six-department tactical squad numbering in the hundreds, complete with a San Jose horse squad, and authorized to use tasers, batons, pepperspray, and teargas to prevent us from marching in the streets. Organizers have no plans to "incite confrontations with police", but make no mistake: Patriot Act, Lynne Johnson, tactical squad, or not, it is our human right and responsibility to protest this war and we will march this Saturday. It is our human right to defend ourselves from police attacks and regardless of whatever their pathetic "intelligence" may suggest, Lynne Johnson and the PAPD can expect fierce resistance of every form to police violence against the march.
It's up to us to resist war and empire; but for real change to be made we must also target every aspect of the war machine and the institutions which keep its gears turning. This means every corporation with a stock in this war, from Halliburton to Bechtel and Walmart to Starbucks. This means every corporate media outlet. This means every police department, whose legal responsibility it is to violently defend the corporations, government, and system responsible for this war. And this means the US government, the most violent institution on the face of the planet, built on a foundation of centuries of colonial genocide, imperialist war, political oppression, capitalist exploitation, oppression and starvation.
There's a war on - a war between the United States government and the vast majority of the world's population. This war has many faces - the struggles over globalization, corporate empire, and the invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan - but everywhere the same lines are drawn. Everywhere the US government is acting in the interests of corporations, and everywhere people are being slaughtered, are starving to death, and are watching their lives be torn apart and sold for profit.
This war has to stop. The occupation must end, neoliberalism must be buried, and any attempt to invade Iran must be prevented. The prediction that the US may not have the military or political capacity to wage another war must be fulfilled. Already well over five thousand soldiers have deserted and recruitment is falling far short of the military's goals. It's up to us to ensure that the US government does not maintain a political or social capacity to continue its war on the world's population.
What does this mean? This means we need to step up our resistance - and we need to do it now! The US can only continue its devastating economic pursuits if it can rely on our complacency and the safety of the corporations which it serves. If we act together to take back control out our own lives, environments, and relations, present a serious challenge to government power, and inflict serious economic damage upon the corporations responsible for this war, they won't be able to invade Iran or even continue the occupation of Iraq - and they'll be in a lot more trouble than that!
It is not enough to oppose one piece of this horrible puzzle - what we win one place will be taken away somewhere else. From war to globalization, occupation, and all other attacks on working and poor people around the world, to their architect, the G8 - it is the system itself which must be destroyed. As hundreds of thousands converge on Scotland to prevent the leaders of the world's 8 wealthiest countries from meeting to plan their next attack, we must mobilize here to resist it. Converge on downtown Palo Alto this June 25th - destroy the war machine - create the world you want to see!
But widows!?! Gimme a break. Windows are cheap.
Actually, places like Berkeley and S.F. are considered to have high demonstration participation due to their universities, but I find that most active people aren't students. So here, I know there are many leftist Stanford students, but I wouldn't expect much of a draw from that population compared to local residents who work or are still in high school.
nessie, you're always saying that this site isn't as well deleted as your site.
I met someone who spent 6 months in jail when he got carried away during the first Gulf War activity in San Francisco and pushed over a police motorcycle. He was a highly effective person in Seattle after that, but who knows if that was worth it. At least, when you are organizing things, most people should not allow their names and identities to be well known, and should not be retrievable by google in the future at minimum. People who do take spokesperson positions such as the student in the news article should almost be the safest nonparticipants later on.
Anyway, I think everyone needs to seriously check out a copy of books about the history of the FBI.
Do you see this AP story that came on the yahoo-crawl yesterday.
http://www.wboc.com/Global/story.asp?S=3499302
Even though there is billions lost in identity theft and organized crime for credit card fraud and other types of theft, and despite the war on terror activity, the FBI considers animal rights 'direct action' types to be their #1 priority, and can you trust them to distinguish between that and the Palo Alto stuff? If it were east Palo alto, maybe you could do what you want. Palo Alto itself has some very wealthy people who aren't going to freely let something happen in their community once it goes beyond their perception of teenager activity into actual political activity.
Did you know that under the Nixon administration, they had plans to identify each hippie and college protester and start files on *all* of them? Do you really think that people with the same attitudes aren't in government any longer, and everything has progressed so much, given what you know of their positions regarding imperialism, race, birth control and so forth? So take some precautions and don't blow your power in one demo when they bring in dozens of police.
In one sense, their organization so far has been very wise because it would be expensive to get such good advertising. Let it be a fun, political, and informational event a'la the bookfair, and more people will come on board. If a bad scene develops, however, it typically will take KPIX a very short time to find the least informed bystander and get an embarrassing quote from them about what 'anarchism' is (i.e. a youth rebellion phase, or random bombthrowing)
No Justice No Peace No Infiltrating Police hahaha!
We know that the first thing the KRON and KPIX are going to report at 10pm is that we failed to meet the projected numbers of 800 anarchists (which would be like an answer march contingent, which isn't going to happen on Saturday night, unless we invited the whole Peace and Justice community in - who would be far more than 800).
So, even if you are philosophically an insurrectionist, it doesn't make sense to take the tactic of the British army of the 1700s where they would dress in bright red and blue uniforms for visibility and line up the two armies in lines and shoot each other. Instead, react to the situation and have fun.
The opposition is engaging in heavy spin control. Bring camcorders. Record everything, especially cop behavior. Look for people who seem to be standing in the rear watching everything and talking on radios or cell phones for an extended period of time, and get good footage of them. Later, maybe they can be matched with photos of political operatives.
Upload your video. archive.org will take video and store it forever, for free.
First, the People's temple church run by Jim Jones had its massacre in Guyana, South America. The church had been a pioneer in racial integration, and had been forced to move from Indiana to San Francisco for this reason. They initially did good things and were attractive to many people in San Francisco, with a majority of african-american supporters, and had support of Jerry and Willie Brown. However, Jim Jones started using drugs and was probably schizophrenic or was the devil, and soon foster children they had were being sent out to collect money all day etc. and they had many conflicts with people who had left the church as it became a cult, so Jones took them to Guyana. It became like a slave camp out there where Jones was psychotic and everyone was forced to work long hours, with white people running things and passing down orders like zombies. Then Jones ordered a visiting congressman and Examiner reporter killed, after which he killed the members of his cult via gunshot, and many voluntarily drank poisoned cool-aid drink. They were communist, by the way.
People in the US, and San Francisco were pretty shocked, particularly because they hadn't realized how bad these people were who they had given shallow support to. In 1980, many people were disappointed with what the 1965 civil rights era had become, when so much violence had occurred during the vietnam war, and then after vietnam, the integration aspect of the movement died away. Cultural conservatives liked to associated feminism, racial integration, and the increasing number of drug addicts and property crimes (drug use peaked in 1982 for some reason, and went down to about 1/3 of this level by 1992) as all the same phenomenon. They labeled it the cultural war, and wanted to regress things back to the 1950s which they considered the ideal time, because they were thinking of their own euro-american, male perspective and didn't consider the suffering of women and other groups to be significant.
Dan White was one such individual. He was a moderate cultural conservative from the irish-american/catholic background that had previously had predominant political power in San Francisco who ran a baked potato restaurant on the wharf, and he was a city councilman. I believe he was either just really bad, or he suffered from depression, but he was pissed off at the hippie culture that has transformed the city. The summer of love/hippie culture had led to San Francisco becoming one of the top two locations for gay/transgender people trying to establish a safe neighborhood and also achieve political change. White was against this, along with other counterculture.
Police in the area were still from the old school ( refer to this article about the ex-police chief of Seattle talking about his earlier days of policing, and advocating reform, where he mentions infiltrating communists, choking hippies, and racism http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0522/050601_news_stamper_profile.php ). So police were still treating gay people pretty badly; I can still remember 1980 in my early memory, and it's hard to believe things have come so far. Often, being gay was actually illegal (and still is in texas??? ) and they would shut down gay bars and be able to assault gay people with impunity.
There was some aspect of the story like Dan White didn't like the political fraud that the People's temple had engaged in such as a reputed bus sent from precinct to precinct where cultists would vote multiple times, in favor of liberal Mayor Moscone, and so he decided to go to city hall and shoot first Harvey Milk, who was pretty much the first out gay politician, and the mayor.
Then, later at the trial, Dan White (who committed suicide later) was let go with minimal or no penalty due to the 'twinkie defense' that he had suffered hypoglycemia condition which made him go into a killing frenzy. Homosexuals (especially males) in the castro had really had enough, and many were angry about police attacking their meeting place called the Elephant or something like that, so they marched down Market street and threw stuff at city hall and police cars were set on fire. Then the police went down Market to the castro and started randomly beating people at the Elephant. And the city had to go to therapy after that.
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/24.html
I appload ever intelligent and mature decision made by these oh so learned protestors that gives the police an excuse to arrest them.
Nothing says responsible member of society like a little vandalism! /sarcasm
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.